You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cayenne.apache.org by Bill Dudney <bd...@apache.org> on 2006/08/07 06:41:34 UTC
headers discussion
HI All,
One last thread tonight...
I wanted to give everyone a heads up to something I just noticed [1].
It is a new policy for the license comments in src files.
The discussion is happening on the leagal-discuss [2] lists now as to
what time frame this will be required in. I've read Sep 1st and that
it might be postponed but either way I think we will have to conform
before the 3.0 release is ready to go.
Anyone have any bandwidth to tackle this change?
TTFN,
-bd-
[1]http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
[2]http://tinyurl.com/m6x3u
Re: headers discussion
Posted by Bill Dudney <bd...@apache.org>.
That would be great if its already done (and it probably is from the
sound of it). I just saw the chatter on the Geronimo list and figured
I'd better get the word out here because I had not seen it here.
But I guess I was heads down on day job when the discussion was
happening.
TTFN,
-bd-
On Aug 7, 2006, at 7:26 AM, Gentry, Michael (Contractor) wrote:
> Unless I'm missing a subtle difference, these are the changes we did a
> few weeks back immediately after 1.2 was released. I even used
> mogrify
> to add a "See http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 for license
> information." comment to the images. There wasn't enough room to
> store
> the entire license as a comment, so I improvised a bit (there was no
> direction on how to handle this in the FAQ/etc).
>
> Thanks,
>
> /dev/mrg
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Dudney [mailto:bdudney@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 12:42 AM
> To: cayenne-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: headers discussion
>
>
> HI All,
>
> One last thread tonight...
>
> I wanted to give everyone a heads up to something I just noticed [1].
> It is a new policy for the license comments in src files.
>
> The discussion is happening on the leagal-discuss [2] lists now as to
> what time frame this will be required in. I've read Sep 1st and that
> it might be postponed but either way I think we will have to conform
> before the 3.0 release is ready to go.
>
> Anyone have any bandwidth to tackle this change?
>
> TTFN,
>
> -bd-
>
> [1]http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
> [2]http://tinyurl.com/m6x3u
Re: headers discussion
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
On Aug 7, 2006, at 10:11 AM, Gentry, Michael ((Contractor)) wrote:
> I have no idea how to do it. (I'm assuming you mean right-clicking on
> the Windows .exe and choosing Properties and then the Summary tab?)
probably. The policy regarding the .exe licensing is unclear to me.
> I could probably find it with Google if you think we really need it.
Yeah, I guess some research is due. I may look in the sources of the
NSIS Maven plugin - they have some license-related parameters, but
that may be related to building the *installer*, not the actual
launcher. Confusing...
Andrus
Re: headers discussion
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Rereading the policy I think it doesn't require to do anything with
the .exe that is not an *installer* itself. I posted a note to legal-
discuss to confirm that.
Andrus
On Aug 7, 2006, at 10:11 AM, Gentry, Michael ((Contractor)) wrote:
> I have no idea how to do it. (I'm assuming you mean right-clicking on
> the Windows .exe and choosing Properties and then the Summary tab?)
>
> I could probably find it with Google if you think we really need it.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andrus@objectstyle.org]
> Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 9:54 AM
> To: cayenne-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: headers discussion
>
>
>
> On Aug 7, 2006, at 9:26 AM, Gentry, Michael ((Contractor)) wrote:
>
>> Unless I'm missing a subtle difference, these are the changes we
>> did a
>> few weeks back immediately after 1.2 was released.
>
> Yes, AFAIK we should be all set on that.
>
>> I even used mogrify to add a "See http://www.apache.org/licenses/
>> LICENSE-2.0 for license
>> information." comment to the images.
>
> Michael (or anybody else) - any insights how to do the same for the
> new NSIS CayenneModeler.exe launcher? The sample project that
> generates the launcher is available here:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cayenne/sandbox/nsis-test/
>
> To try it, you will need a Windows machine with NSIS installed:
>
> http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Main_Page
>
> Andrus
>
RE: headers discussion
Posted by "Gentry, Michael (Contractor)" <mi...@fanniemae.com>.
I have no idea how to do it. (I'm assuming you mean right-clicking on
the Windows .exe and choosing Properties and then the Summary tab?)
I could probably find it with Google if you think we really need it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andrus@objectstyle.org]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 9:54 AM
To: cayenne-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: headers discussion
On Aug 7, 2006, at 9:26 AM, Gentry, Michael ((Contractor)) wrote:
> Unless I'm missing a subtle difference, these are the changes we did a
> few weeks back immediately after 1.2 was released.
Yes, AFAIK we should be all set on that.
> I even used mogrify to add a "See http://www.apache.org/licenses/
> LICENSE-2.0 for license
> information." comment to the images.
Michael (or anybody else) - any insights how to do the same for the
new NSIS CayenneModeler.exe launcher? The sample project that
generates the launcher is available here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cayenne/sandbox/nsis-test/
To try it, you will need a Windows machine with NSIS installed:
http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Main_Page
Andrus
Re: headers discussion
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
On Aug 7, 2006, at 9:26 AM, Gentry, Michael ((Contractor)) wrote:
> Unless I'm missing a subtle difference, these are the changes we did a
> few weeks back immediately after 1.2 was released.
Yes, AFAIK we should be all set on that.
> I even used mogrify to add a "See http://www.apache.org/licenses/
> LICENSE-2.0 for license
> information." comment to the images.
Michael (or anybody else) - any insights how to do the same for the
new NSIS CayenneModeler.exe launcher? The sample project that
generates the launcher is available here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cayenne/sandbox/nsis-test/
To try it, you will need a Windows machine with NSIS installed:
http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Main_Page
Andrus
RE: headers discussion
Posted by "Gentry, Michael (Contractor)" <mi...@fanniemae.com>.
Unless I'm missing a subtle difference, these are the changes we did a
few weeks back immediately after 1.2 was released. I even used mogrify
to add a "See http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 for license
information." comment to the images. There wasn't enough room to store
the entire license as a comment, so I improvised a bit (there was no
direction on how to handle this in the FAQ/etc).
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Dudney [mailto:bdudney@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 12:42 AM
To: cayenne-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: headers discussion
HI All,
One last thread tonight...
I wanted to give everyone a heads up to something I just noticed [1].
It is a new policy for the license comments in src files.
The discussion is happening on the leagal-discuss [2] lists now as to
what time frame this will be required in. I've read Sep 1st and that
it might be postponed but either way I think we will have to conform
before the 3.0 release is ready to go.
Anyone have any bandwidth to tackle this change?
TTFN,
-bd-
[1]http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
[2]http://tinyurl.com/m6x3u