You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Wenchen Fan (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/02/09 13:55:00 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (SPARK-37652) Support optimize skewed join through union
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-37652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Wenchen Fan resolved SPARK-37652.
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.3.0
Resolution: Fixed
Issue resolved by pull request 34908
[https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34908]
> Support optimize skewed join through union
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-37652
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-37652
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: SQL
> Affects Versions: 3.2.0
> Reporter: mcdull_zhang
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
>
> `OptimizeSkewedJoin` rule will take effect only when the plan has two ShuffleQueryStageExec。
> With `Union`, it might break the assumption. For example, the following plans
> *scenes 1*
> {noformat}
> Union
> SMJ
> ShuffleQueryStage
> ShuffleQueryStage
> SMJ
> ShuffleQueryStage
> ShuffleQueryStage
> {noformat}
> *scenes 2*
> {noformat}
> Union
> SMJ
> ShuffleQueryStage
> ShuffleQueryStage
> HashAggregate
> {noformat}
> when one or more of the SMJ data in the above plan is skewed, it cannot be processed at present.
> It's better to support partial optimize with Union.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org