You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com> on 2015/02/11 18:53:30 UTC
query about 4.4 usage
H,
Today we had a talk at work (Schuberg Philis) about our CloudStack
strategy. We decided that we will keep at 4.4 until we have a good
test environment of our own and then skip to 4.6 or up, depending on
where we merge our redundant vpc work in. We don't have any time to
put energy in 4.5 and need some features that won't make it there. The
afore mentioned redundant vpcs, but also ipv6 for vpcs and ovm
support.
What I am wondering now is:
Who else is on 4.4 in production systems?
What versions do you run?
How did you test it before going to production?
What are your migration plans?
thanks,
--
Daan
Re: query about 4.4 usage
Posted by Nux! <nu...@li.nux.ro>.
Hi,
I'm with 4.4.1 in production on CentOS 6 HVs (should get it to 4.4.2 soon), Adv zone + SG.
I keep a separate, somehow similar setup where I test stuff before going to production - I don't always catch all the bugs.
Nothing fancy or automated like Jenkins etc, perhaps one day.
My migration plan are to follow 4.5, mainly as to not get left behind too much and wake up with a non-upgradable setup (however unlikely).
Looking forward to ipv6.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com>
> To: "dev" <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>, users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 11 February, 2015 17:53:30
> Subject: query about 4.4 usage
> H,
>
> Today we had a talk at work (Schuberg Philis) about our CloudStack
> strategy. We decided that we will keep at 4.4 until we have a good
> test environment of our own and then skip to 4.6 or up, depending on
> where we merge our redundant vpc work in. We don't have any time to
> put energy in 4.5 and need some features that won't make it there. The
> afore mentioned redundant vpcs, but also ipv6 for vpcs and ovm
> support.
>
> What I am wondering now is:
> Who else is on 4.4 in production systems?
> What versions do you run?
> How did you test it before going to production?
> What are your migration plans?
>
> thanks,
> --
> Daan
Re: query about 4.4 usage
Posted by Erik Weber <te...@gmail.com>.
We (EVRY) have 4.3.2 deployed, and plan on upgrading to 4.5 after it
reaches a certain maturity.
--
Erik
Den onsdag 11. februar 2015 skrev Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
følgende:
> H,
>
> Today we had a talk at work (Schuberg Philis) about our CloudStack
> strategy. We decided that we will keep at 4.4 until we have a good
> test environment of our own and then skip to 4.6 or up, depending on
> where we merge our redundant vpc work in. We don't have any time to
> put energy in 4.5 and need some features that won't make it there. The
> afore mentioned redundant vpcs, but also ipv6 for vpcs and ovm
> support.
>
> What I am wondering now is:
> Who else is on 4.4 in production systems?
> What versions do you run?
> How did you test it before going to production?
> What are your migration plans?
>
> thanks,
> --
> Daan
>
Re: query about 4.4 usage
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Loic, give me a ping for the review
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:04 PM, loic.lambiel@exoscale.ch
<lo...@exoscale.ch> wrote:
> Hi Daan,
>
> Yes we generally submit our patches upstream when we are sure that the
> change will not break other environments that we cannot / have time to test.
> We run basic zone and KVM with local storage, so it’s not the most common
> Cloudstack setup.
>
> Our latest patches for 4.4 will be submitted within a few days.
>
> Regards,
>
> Loic
>
>
>
>
>
> On 15 Feb 2015, at 12:46, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Antoine, Loic,
>
> would be good to share fixes. We had some problems with 4.4 ourselves
> so probably there is some doubles here. If you could, please do a
> merge and a pull request against apache/4.4...?
>
> thanks
>
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Antoine Coetsier
> <an...@exoscale.ch> wrote:
>
> Hello Daan,
>
> Our work is public and published here:
> https://github.com/exoscale/cloudstack
>
> I do not think this is worthwhile, but this is out of my league. I am
> Ccing Loic here, he will answer better than I can.
>
> Regards.
>
> Le 13.02.15 12:57, « Daan Hoogland » <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> Antoine,
> Did you feed your patches back to the 4.4 branch and should we release
> another 4.4 in your opinion?
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Antoine Coetsier
> <an...@exoscale.ch> wrote:
>
> Hello Daan and users,
>
> We at Exoscale are now using in Production a 4.4 CloudStack base + our
> patches after an extensive preproduction run with this version.
> Next migration is unlikely to be 4.5. Please, let¹s adopt all proper
> rebasing from one version to another in order not to have bugs fixed in
> smaller versions being shipped in higher ones.
>
> Antoine
>
>
> Le 11.02.15 18:53, « Daan Hoogland » <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> H,
>
> Today we had a talk at work (Schuberg Philis) about our CloudStack
> strategy. We decided that we will keep at 4.4 until we have a good
> test environment of our own and then skip to 4.6 or up, depending on
> where we merge our redundant vpc work in. We don't have any time to
> put energy in 4.5 and need some features that won't make it there. The
> afore mentioned redundant vpcs, but also ipv6 for vpcs and ovm
> support.
>
> What I am wondering now is:
> Who else is on 4.4 in production systems?
> What versions do you run?
> How did you test it before going to production?
> What are your migration plans?
>
> thanks,
> --
> Daan
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>
>
--
Daan
Re: query about 4.4 usage
Posted by "loic.lambiel@exoscale.ch" <lo...@exoscale.ch>.
Hi Daan,
Yes we generally submit our patches upstream when we are sure that the change will not break other environments that we cannot / have time to test. We run basic zone and KVM with local storage, so it’s not the most common Cloudstack setup.
Our latest patches for 4.4 will be submitted within a few days.
Regards,
Loic
> On 15 Feb 2015, at 12:46, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Antoine, Loic,
>
> would be good to share fixes. We had some problems with 4.4 ourselves
> so probably there is some doubles here. If you could, please do a
> merge and a pull request against apache/4.4...?
>
> thanks
>
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Antoine Coetsier
> <an...@exoscale.ch> wrote:
>> Hello Daan,
>>
>> Our work is public and published here:
>> https://github.com/exoscale/cloudstack
>>
>> I do not think this is worthwhile, but this is out of my league. I am
>> Ccing Loic here, he will answer better than I can.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> Le 13.02.15 12:57, « Daan Hoogland » <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>>> Antoine,
>>> Did you feed your patches back to the 4.4 branch and should we release
>>> another 4.4 in your opinion?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Antoine Coetsier
>>> <an...@exoscale.ch> wrote:
>>>> Hello Daan and users,
>>>>
>>>> We at Exoscale are now using in Production a 4.4 CloudStack base + our
>>>> patches after an extensive preproduction run with this version.
>>>> Next migration is unlikely to be 4.5. Please, let¹s adopt all proper
>>>> rebasing from one version to another in order not to have bugs fixed in
>>>> smaller versions being shipped in higher ones.
>>>>
>>>> Antoine
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 11.02.15 18:53, « Daan Hoogland » <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> H,
>>>>>
>>>>> Today we had a talk at work (Schuberg Philis) about our CloudStack
>>>>> strategy. We decided that we will keep at 4.4 until we have a good
>>>>> test environment of our own and then skip to 4.6 or up, depending on
>>>>> where we merge our redundant vpc work in. We don't have any time to
>>>>> put energy in 4.5 and need some features that won't make it there. The
>>>>> afore mentioned redundant vpcs, but also ipv6 for vpcs and ovm
>>>>> support.
>>>>>
>>>>> What I am wondering now is:
>>>>> Who else is on 4.4 in production systems?
>>>>> What versions do you run?
>>>>> How did you test it before going to production?
>>>>> What are your migration plans?
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>> --
>>>>> Daan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daan
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>
Re: query about 4.4 usage
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Antoine, Loic,
would be good to share fixes. We had some problems with 4.4 ourselves
so probably there is some doubles here. If you could, please do a
merge and a pull request against apache/4.4...?
thanks
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Antoine Coetsier
<an...@exoscale.ch> wrote:
> Hello Daan,
>
> Our work is public and published here:
> https://github.com/exoscale/cloudstack
>
> I do not think this is worthwhile, but this is out of my league. I am
> Ccing Loic here, he will answer better than I can.
>
> Regards.
>
> Le 13.02.15 12:57, « Daan Hoogland » <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>>Antoine,
>>Did you feed your patches back to the 4.4 branch and should we release
>>another 4.4 in your opinion?
>>
>>On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Antoine Coetsier
>><an...@exoscale.ch> wrote:
>>> Hello Daan and users,
>>>
>>> We at Exoscale are now using in Production a 4.4 CloudStack base + our
>>> patches after an extensive preproduction run with this version.
>>> Next migration is unlikely to be 4.5. Please, let¹s adopt all proper
>>> rebasing from one version to another in order not to have bugs fixed in
>>> smaller versions being shipped in higher ones.
>>>
>>> Antoine
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 11.02.15 18:53, « Daan Hoogland » <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>>>H,
>>>>
>>>>Today we had a talk at work (Schuberg Philis) about our CloudStack
>>>>strategy. We decided that we will keep at 4.4 until we have a good
>>>>test environment of our own and then skip to 4.6 or up, depending on
>>>>where we merge our redundant vpc work in. We don't have any time to
>>>>put energy in 4.5 and need some features that won't make it there. The
>>>>afore mentioned redundant vpcs, but also ipv6 for vpcs and ovm
>>>>support.
>>>>
>>>>What I am wondering now is:
>>>>Who else is on 4.4 in production systems?
>>>>What versions do you run?
>>>>How did you test it before going to production?
>>>>What are your migration plans?
>>>>
>>>>thanks,
>>>>--
>>>>Daan
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Daan
>>
>
>
--
Daan
Re: query about 4.4 usage
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Antoine, Loic,
would be good to share fixes. We had some problems with 4.4 ourselves
so probably there is some doubles here. If you could, please do a
merge and a pull request against apache/4.4...?
thanks
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Antoine Coetsier
<an...@exoscale.ch> wrote:
> Hello Daan,
>
> Our work is public and published here:
> https://github.com/exoscale/cloudstack
>
> I do not think this is worthwhile, but this is out of my league. I am
> Ccing Loic here, he will answer better than I can.
>
> Regards.
>
> Le 13.02.15 12:57, « Daan Hoogland » <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>>Antoine,
>>Did you feed your patches back to the 4.4 branch and should we release
>>another 4.4 in your opinion?
>>
>>On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Antoine Coetsier
>><an...@exoscale.ch> wrote:
>>> Hello Daan and users,
>>>
>>> We at Exoscale are now using in Production a 4.4 CloudStack base + our
>>> patches after an extensive preproduction run with this version.
>>> Next migration is unlikely to be 4.5. Please, let¹s adopt all proper
>>> rebasing from one version to another in order not to have bugs fixed in
>>> smaller versions being shipped in higher ones.
>>>
>>> Antoine
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 11.02.15 18:53, « Daan Hoogland » <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>>>H,
>>>>
>>>>Today we had a talk at work (Schuberg Philis) about our CloudStack
>>>>strategy. We decided that we will keep at 4.4 until we have a good
>>>>test environment of our own and then skip to 4.6 or up, depending on
>>>>where we merge our redundant vpc work in. We don't have any time to
>>>>put energy in 4.5 and need some features that won't make it there. The
>>>>afore mentioned redundant vpcs, but also ipv6 for vpcs and ovm
>>>>support.
>>>>
>>>>What I am wondering now is:
>>>>Who else is on 4.4 in production systems?
>>>>What versions do you run?
>>>>How did you test it before going to production?
>>>>What are your migration plans?
>>>>
>>>>thanks,
>>>>--
>>>>Daan
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Daan
>>
>
>
--
Daan
Re: query about 4.4 usage
Posted by Antoine Coetsier <an...@exoscale.ch>.
Hello Daan,
Our work is public and published here:
https://github.com/exoscale/cloudstack
I do not think this is worthwhile, but this is out of my league. I am
Ccing Loic here, he will answer better than I can.
Regards.
Le 13.02.15 12:57, « Daan Hoogland » <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>Antoine,
>Did you feed your patches back to the 4.4 branch and should we release
>another 4.4 in your opinion?
>
>On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Antoine Coetsier
><an...@exoscale.ch> wrote:
>> Hello Daan and users,
>>
>> We at Exoscale are now using in Production a 4.4 CloudStack base + our
>> patches after an extensive preproduction run with this version.
>> Next migration is unlikely to be 4.5. Please, let¹s adopt all proper
>> rebasing from one version to another in order not to have bugs fixed in
>> smaller versions being shipped in higher ones.
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>>
>> Le 11.02.15 18:53, « Daan Hoogland » <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>>>H,
>>>
>>>Today we had a talk at work (Schuberg Philis) about our CloudStack
>>>strategy. We decided that we will keep at 4.4 until we have a good
>>>test environment of our own and then skip to 4.6 or up, depending on
>>>where we merge our redundant vpc work in. We don't have any time to
>>>put energy in 4.5 and need some features that won't make it there. The
>>>afore mentioned redundant vpcs, but also ipv6 for vpcs and ovm
>>>support.
>>>
>>>What I am wondering now is:
>>>Who else is on 4.4 in production systems?
>>>What versions do you run?
>>>How did you test it before going to production?
>>>What are your migration plans?
>>>
>>>thanks,
>>>--
>>>Daan
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Daan
>
Re: query about 4.4 usage
Posted by Antoine Coetsier <an...@exoscale.ch>.
Hello Daan,
Our work is public and published here:
https://github.com/exoscale/cloudstack
I do not think this is worthwhile, but this is out of my league. I am
Ccing Loic here, he will answer better than I can.
Regards.
Le 13.02.15 12:57, « Daan Hoogland » <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>Antoine,
>Did you feed your patches back to the 4.4 branch and should we release
>another 4.4 in your opinion?
>
>On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Antoine Coetsier
><an...@exoscale.ch> wrote:
>> Hello Daan and users,
>>
>> We at Exoscale are now using in Production a 4.4 CloudStack base + our
>> patches after an extensive preproduction run with this version.
>> Next migration is unlikely to be 4.5. Please, let¹s adopt all proper
>> rebasing from one version to another in order not to have bugs fixed in
>> smaller versions being shipped in higher ones.
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>>
>> Le 11.02.15 18:53, « Daan Hoogland » <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>>>H,
>>>
>>>Today we had a talk at work (Schuberg Philis) about our CloudStack
>>>strategy. We decided that we will keep at 4.4 until we have a good
>>>test environment of our own and then skip to 4.6 or up, depending on
>>>where we merge our redundant vpc work in. We don't have any time to
>>>put energy in 4.5 and need some features that won't make it there. The
>>>afore mentioned redundant vpcs, but also ipv6 for vpcs and ovm
>>>support.
>>>
>>>What I am wondering now is:
>>>Who else is on 4.4 in production systems?
>>>What versions do you run?
>>>How did you test it before going to production?
>>>What are your migration plans?
>>>
>>>thanks,
>>>--
>>>Daan
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Daan
>
Re: query about 4.4 usage
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
Antoine,
Did you feed your patches back to the 4.4 branch and should we release
another 4.4 in your opinion?
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Antoine Coetsier
<an...@exoscale.ch> wrote:
> Hello Daan and users,
>
> We at Exoscale are now using in Production a 4.4 CloudStack base + our
> patches after an extensive preproduction run with this version.
> Next migration is unlikely to be 4.5. Please, let¹s adopt all proper
> rebasing from one version to another in order not to have bugs fixed in
> smaller versions being shipped in higher ones.
>
> Antoine
>
>
> Le 11.02.15 18:53, « Daan Hoogland » <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>>H,
>>
>>Today we had a talk at work (Schuberg Philis) about our CloudStack
>>strategy. We decided that we will keep at 4.4 until we have a good
>>test environment of our own and then skip to 4.6 or up, depending on
>>where we merge our redundant vpc work in. We don't have any time to
>>put energy in 4.5 and need some features that won't make it there. The
>>afore mentioned redundant vpcs, but also ipv6 for vpcs and ovm
>>support.
>>
>>What I am wondering now is:
>>Who else is on 4.4 in production systems?
>>What versions do you run?
>>How did you test it before going to production?
>>What are your migration plans?
>>
>>thanks,
>>--
>>Daan
>
>
--
Daan
Re: query about 4.4 usage
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
Antoine,
Did you feed your patches back to the 4.4 branch and should we release
another 4.4 in your opinion?
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Antoine Coetsier
<an...@exoscale.ch> wrote:
> Hello Daan and users,
>
> We at Exoscale are now using in Production a 4.4 CloudStack base + our
> patches after an extensive preproduction run with this version.
> Next migration is unlikely to be 4.5. Please, let¹s adopt all proper
> rebasing from one version to another in order not to have bugs fixed in
> smaller versions being shipped in higher ones.
>
> Antoine
>
>
> Le 11.02.15 18:53, « Daan Hoogland » <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>>H,
>>
>>Today we had a talk at work (Schuberg Philis) about our CloudStack
>>strategy. We decided that we will keep at 4.4 until we have a good
>>test environment of our own and then skip to 4.6 or up, depending on
>>where we merge our redundant vpc work in. We don't have any time to
>>put energy in 4.5 and need some features that won't make it there. The
>>afore mentioned redundant vpcs, but also ipv6 for vpcs and ovm
>>support.
>>
>>What I am wondering now is:
>>Who else is on 4.4 in production systems?
>>What versions do you run?
>>How did you test it before going to production?
>>What are your migration plans?
>>
>>thanks,
>>--
>>Daan
>
>
--
Daan
Re: query about 4.4 usage
Posted by Antoine Coetsier <an...@exoscale.ch>.
Hello Daan and users,
We at Exoscale are now using in Production a 4.4 CloudStack base + our
patches after an extensive preproduction run with this version.
Next migration is unlikely to be 4.5. Please, let¹s adopt all proper
rebasing from one version to another in order not to have bugs fixed in
smaller versions being shipped in higher ones.
Antoine
Le 11.02.15 18:53, « Daan Hoogland » <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>H,
>
>Today we had a talk at work (Schuberg Philis) about our CloudStack
>strategy. We decided that we will keep at 4.4 until we have a good
>test environment of our own and then skip to 4.6 or up, depending on
>where we merge our redundant vpc work in. We don't have any time to
>put energy in 4.5 and need some features that won't make it there. The
>afore mentioned redundant vpcs, but also ipv6 for vpcs and ovm
>support.
>
>What I am wondering now is:
>Who else is on 4.4 in production systems?
>What versions do you run?
>How did you test it before going to production?
>What are your migration plans?
>
>thanks,
>--
>Daan
Re: query about 4.4 usage
Posted by Nux! <nu...@li.nux.ro>.
Hi,
I'm with 4.4.1 in production on CentOS 6 HVs (should get it to 4.4.2 soon), Adv zone + SG.
I keep a separate, somehow similar setup where I test stuff before going to production - I don't always catch all the bugs.
Nothing fancy or automated like Jenkins etc, perhaps one day.
My migration plan are to follow 4.5, mainly as to not get left behind too much and wake up with a non-upgradable setup (however unlikely).
Looking forward to ipv6.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com>
> To: "dev" <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>, users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 11 February, 2015 17:53:30
> Subject: query about 4.4 usage
> H,
>
> Today we had a talk at work (Schuberg Philis) about our CloudStack
> strategy. We decided that we will keep at 4.4 until we have a good
> test environment of our own and then skip to 4.6 or up, depending on
> where we merge our redundant vpc work in. We don't have any time to
> put energy in 4.5 and need some features that won't make it there. The
> afore mentioned redundant vpcs, but also ipv6 for vpcs and ovm
> support.
>
> What I am wondering now is:
> Who else is on 4.4 in production systems?
> What versions do you run?
> How did you test it before going to production?
> What are your migration plans?
>
> thanks,
> --
> Daan
Re: query about 4.4 usage
Posted by Antoine Coetsier <an...@exoscale.ch>.
Hello Daan and users,
We at Exoscale are now using in Production a 4.4 CloudStack base + our
patches after an extensive preproduction run with this version.
Next migration is unlikely to be 4.5. Please, let¹s adopt all proper
rebasing from one version to another in order not to have bugs fixed in
smaller versions being shipped in higher ones.
Antoine
Le 11.02.15 18:53, « Daan Hoogland » <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>H,
>
>Today we had a talk at work (Schuberg Philis) about our CloudStack
>strategy. We decided that we will keep at 4.4 until we have a good
>test environment of our own and then skip to 4.6 or up, depending on
>where we merge our redundant vpc work in. We don't have any time to
>put energy in 4.5 and need some features that won't make it there. The
>afore mentioned redundant vpcs, but also ipv6 for vpcs and ovm
>support.
>
>What I am wondering now is:
>Who else is on 4.4 in production systems?
>What versions do you run?
>How did you test it before going to production?
>What are your migration plans?
>
>thanks,
>--
>Daan
Re: query about 4.4 usage
Posted by Steve Wilson <st...@citrix.com>.
Just as a data point, at Citrix we actually decided to skip 4.4 and didn¹t
put out a commercial distribution based on it. We put all our energy into
fixing bugs that went into 4.5. We¹re now bringing up large customers on
4.5, but too early to publish results. Overall, though, I feel good about
4.5 quality.
On 2/11/15, 9:53 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>H,
>
>Today we had a talk at work (Schuberg Philis) about our CloudStack
>strategy. We decided that we will keep at 4.4 until we have a good
>test environment of our own and then skip to 4.6 or up, depending on
>where we merge our redundant vpc work in. We don't have any time to
>put energy in 4.5 and need some features that won't make it there. The
>afore mentioned redundant vpcs, but also ipv6 for vpcs and ovm
>support.
>
>What I am wondering now is:
>Who else is on 4.4 in production systems?
>What versions do you run?
>How did you test it before going to production?
>What are your migration plans?
>
>thanks,
>--
>Daan
Re: query about 4.4 usage
Posted by Steve Wilson <st...@citrix.com>.
Just as a data point, at Citrix we actually decided to skip 4.4 and didn¹t
put out a commercial distribution based on it. We put all our energy into
fixing bugs that went into 4.5. We¹re now bringing up large customers on
4.5, but too early to publish results. Overall, though, I feel good about
4.5 quality.
On 2/11/15, 9:53 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>H,
>
>Today we had a talk at work (Schuberg Philis) about our CloudStack
>strategy. We decided that we will keep at 4.4 until we have a good
>test environment of our own and then skip to 4.6 or up, depending on
>where we merge our redundant vpc work in. We don't have any time to
>put energy in 4.5 and need some features that won't make it there. The
>afore mentioned redundant vpcs, but also ipv6 for vpcs and ovm
>support.
>
>What I am wondering now is:
>Who else is on 4.4 in production systems?
>What versions do you run?
>How did you test it before going to production?
>What are your migration plans?
>
>thanks,
>--
>Daan