You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Costin Leau (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/01/19 11:50:44 UTC
[jira] Updated: (JCR-306) repositoryConfig should use setter for
its internal components
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-306?page=all ]
Costin Leau updated JCR-306:
----------------------------
Attachment: RepositoryConfig.patch
should be tested.
> repositoryConfig should use setter for its internal components
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-306
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-306
> Project: Jackrabbit
> Type: Improvement
> Components: config
> Versions: 0.9
> Reporter: Costin Leau
> Attachments: RepositoryConfig.patch
>
> From the mailing list (not archived at the moment):
> --- Jukka's reply ---
> I refactored the config classes last year but didn't change the way
> the config instances are being used by Jackrabbit. In general I think
> that a IoC approach (use setters to configure the Jackrabbit
> components) would be better than passing config objects around and
> letting the components to instantiate any subcomponents based on the
> configuration. This is why I didn't really want to make the config
> constructors public, otherwise we'd easily up with backwards
> compatibility issues if we were to change the way configuration is
> handled.
> ---
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira