You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> on 2015/12/03 03:34:10 UTC
Re: A 5.4 release?
Hi,
I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and running
tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
> pointing at the 5.4 branch.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> > thx :-)
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch creation
> > > mail
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one
> already
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson <
> erickerickson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US, lots
> of
> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised if
> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter <
> thelabdude@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Upayavira
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101
> into
> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if there
> are
> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Tim
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
> wrote:
> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this
> moment, the feature
> > > >>>>> > freeze starts.
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix
> version 5.4. I
> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I
> expect that the
> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham,
> Noble) blocker
> > > >>>>> > "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
> authorization causes
> > > >>>>> > issue with replication"
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before
> the release?
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik)
> critical
> > > >>>>> > "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik)
> critical
> > > >>>>> > "Add tests for bin/post"
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of
> holding back a
> > > >>>>> > release
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe)
> critical
> > > >>>>> > "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java
> 9 (b71)"
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin,
> others), blocker
> > > >>>>> > "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I
> will not
> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > - o -
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of
> attention. Anyone
> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > Upayavira
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > > > Noble Paul
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > > Noble Paul
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
--
Anshum Gupta
Re: A 5.4 release?
Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.
I've just generated the first RC, but haven't posted it. How long do you
expect it to take to get this bug resolved? It does seem worth doing.
Upayavira
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015, at 09:51 AM, Varun Thacker wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I think we should try to fix SOLR-8363�before the RC?
>
> Seems like this problem has been there for a while since the
> luceneMatchVersion hasn't updated in a while. So if others feel this
> isn't worth the delay then I'll remove it from being a blocker.
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Adrien Grand
> <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been
>> committed to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find
>> problems before Upayavira cuts a release candidate.
>>
>> Le�jeu. 3 d�c. 2015 �03:34, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a
>> �crit�:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and
>>> running tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
>>>>
pointing at the 5.4 branch.
>>>>
>>>>
Upayavira
>>>>
>>>>
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>>>>
> thx :-)
>>>>
>
>>>>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
>>>>
> > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch
> > creation
>>>>
> > mail
>>>>
> >
>>>>
> >
>>>>
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>>>>
> > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one
> > > already
>>>>
> > >
>>>>
> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson
> > > <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
> > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US,
> > >> lots of
>>>>
> > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be
> > >> surprised if
>>>>
> > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
>>>>
> > >>
>>>>
> > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter
> > >> <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
> > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
>>>>
> > >>>
>>>>
> > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
> > >>> wrote:
>>>>
> > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
>>>>
> > >>>>
>>>>
> > >>>> Upayavira
>>>>
> > >>>>
>>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
>>>>
> > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101
> > >>>>> into
>>>>
> > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if
> > >>>>> there are
>>>>
> > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
>>>>
> > >>>>>
>>>>
> > >>>>> Tim
>>>>
> > >>>>>
>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
> > >>>>> wrote:
>>>>
> > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this
> > >>>>> > moment, the feature
>>>>
> > >>>>> > freeze starts.
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix
> > >>>>> > version 5.4. I
>>>>
> > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I
> > >>>>> > expect that the
>>>>
> > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five
> > >>>>> > tickets:
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham,
> > >>>>> > Noble) blocker
>>>>
> > >>>>> >"Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
> > >>>>> >authorization causes
>>>>
> > >>>>> > issue with replication"
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> >Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before
> > >>>>> >the release?
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik)
> > >>>>> > critical
>>>>
> > >>>>> >"Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> >This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik)
> > >>>>> > critical
>>>>
> > >>>>> >"Add tests for bin/post"
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> >Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of
> > >>>>> >holding back a
>>>>
> > >>>>> > release
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe)
> > >>>>> > critical
>>>>
> > >>>>> >"Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java
> > >>>>> >9 (b71)"
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> >Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin,
> > >>>>> > others), blocker
>>>>
> > >>>>> >"Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> >Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I
> > >>>>> >will not
>>>>
> > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> >- o -
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of
> > >>>>> > attention. Anyone
>>>>
> > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > Upayavira
>>>>
> > >>>>>
>>>>
> > >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> -------
>>>>
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >>>>>
>>>>
> > >>>>
>>>>
> > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> ------
>>>>
> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >>>>
>>>>
> > >>>
>>>>
> > >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> -----
>>>>
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >>>
>>>>
> > >>
>>>>
> > >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> ----
>>>>
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >>
>>>>
> > >
>>>>
> > >
>>>>
> > >
>>>>
> > > --
>>>>
> > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>>>
> > > Noble Paul
>>>>
> >
>>>>
> >
>>>>
> >
>>>>
> > --
>>>>
> > -----------------------------------------------------
>>>>
> > Noble Paul
>>>>
> >
>>>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------
>>>>
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> >
>>>>
>
>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>
>>>>
>>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Anshum Gupta
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Regards, Varun Thacker
Re: A 5.4 release?
Posted by Varun Thacker <va...@gmail.com>.
Hi Everyone,
I think we should try to fix SOLR-8363 before the RC?
Seems like this problem has been there for a while since the
luceneMatchVersion hasn't updated in a while. So if others feel this isn't
worth the delay then I'll remove it from being a blocker.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been committed
> to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems before
> Upayavira cuts a release candidate.
>
> Le jeu. 3 déc. 2015 à 03:34, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and running
>> tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
>>> pointing at the 5.4 branch.
>>>
>>> Upayavira
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>>> > thx :-)
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
>>> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch creation
>>> > > mail
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one
>>> already
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson <
>>> erickerickson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US,
>>> lots of
>>> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised
>>> if
>>> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter <
>>> thelabdude@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
>>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >>>> Upayavira
>>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
>>> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101
>>> into
>>> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if
>>> there are
>>> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>> Tim
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this
>>> moment, the feature
>>> > > >>>>> > freeze starts.
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix
>>> version 5.4. I
>>> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I
>>> expect that the
>>> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham,
>>> Noble) blocker
>>> > > >>>>> > "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
>>> authorization causes
>>> > > >>>>> > issue with replication"
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before
>>> the release?
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik)
>>> critical
>>> > > >>>>> > "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik)
>>> critical
>>> > > >>>>> > "Add tests for bin/post"
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of
>>> holding back a
>>> > > >>>>> > release
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe)
>>> critical
>>> > > >>>>> > "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and
>>> java 9 (b71)"
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a
>>> blocker?
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin,
>>> others), blocker
>>> > > >>>>> > "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so
>>> I will not
>>> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > - o -
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of
>>> attention. Anyone
>>> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > Upayavira
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>> > > > Noble Paul
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>> > > Noble Paul
>>> > >
>>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> >
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>
--
Regards,
Varun Thacker
RE: A 5.4 release?
Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.
Hi,
I agree: it brings no new functionality. On the other hand it is unlikely to break, so if Jenkins passes one time it will pass everytime (unless there is a still broken test that parses log output in a random way).!
So I would leave it open to release manager to merge it and press the “commit” button.
Uwe
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
<http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
From: Adrien Grand [mailto:jpountz@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 10:37 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: A 5.4 release?
SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been committed to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems before Upayavira cuts a release candidate.
Le jeu. 3 déc. 2015 à 03:34, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net <ma...@anshumgupta.net> > a écrit :
Hi,
I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and running tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk <ma...@odoko.co.uk> > wrote:
Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
pointing at the 5.4 branch.
Upayavira
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> thx :-)
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
> > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch creation
> > mail
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <noble.paul@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one already
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US, lots of
> > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised if
> > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter <thelabdude@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk <ma...@odoko.co.uk> > wrote:
> > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Upayavira
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
> > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101 into
> > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if there are
> > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Tim
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk <ma...@odoko.co.uk> > wrote:
> > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature
> > >>>>> > freeze starts.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I
> > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the
> > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
> > >>>>> > "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
> > >>>>> > issue with replication"
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release?
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
> > >>>>> > "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
> > >>>>> > "Add tests for bin/post"
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a
> > >>>>> > release
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
> > >>>>> > "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker
> > >>>>> > "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
> > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > - o -
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone
> > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > Upayavira
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > > Noble Paul
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > Noble Paul
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
--
Anshum Gupta
Re: A 5.4 release?
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
Sure.
The last message on the thread was from about 8 days ago so I wasn't sure
if it would be a while before the RC was cut giving this enough time on the
branch. In any case, I agree with not shoving things in last moment.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> Agreed. Waiting on SOLR-8363 right now.
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015, at 02:14 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
> > Agreed, what's done is done but in future, let's avoid shoving
> > anything other than critical bug fixes into release branches.
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > A really strong reason would be to not shove last minute changes right
> > > before releases.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
> > >> I'll admit I committed it thinking it was safe and didn't bring any
> > >> flakiness into the system but it's not something critical. I'll let
> the
> > >> release manager decide if it's fine being released with 5.4. If he
> thinks
> > >> otherwise (or someone else has a really strong reason) we can roll
> this
> > >> back, though I don't really see a reason unless we see broken builds
> due to
> > >> this commit.
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been
> committed
> > >>> to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems
> before
> > >>> Upayavira cuts a release candidate.
> > >>>
> > >>> Le jeu. 3 déc. 2015 à 03:34, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> a écrit
> > >>> :
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and
> running
> > >>>> tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
> > >>>>> pointing at the 5.4 branch.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Upayavira
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> > >>>>> > thx :-)
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
> > >>>>> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch
> > >>>>> > > creation
> > >>>>> > > mail
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <
> noble.paul@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> > > wrote:
> > >>>>> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see
> one
> > >>>>> > > > already
> > >>>>> > > >
> > >>>>> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson
> > >>>>> > > > <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the
> US,
> > >>>>> > > >> lots of
> > >>>>> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be
> surprised
> > >>>>> > > >> if
> > >>>>> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
> > >>>>> > > >>
> > >>>>> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter
> > >>>>> > > >> <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
> > >>>>> > > >>>
> > >>>>> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk
> >
> > >>>>> > > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>> Upayavira
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and
> SOLR-8101
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> into
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> there are
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> Tim
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <
> uv@odoko.co.uk>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From
> this
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > moment, the feature
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > freeze starts.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned
> to fix
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > version 5.4. I
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so
> I
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > expect that the
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > tickets:
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326
> (Anusham,
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Noble) blocker
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > authorization causes
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > issue with replication"
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this
> before
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > the release?
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik)
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik)
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > "Add tests for bin/post"
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy
> of
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > holding back a
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > release
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723
> (Uwe)
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler
> and
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > java 9 (b71)"
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > blocker?
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722
> (Shalin,
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > others), blocker
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > branch_5x"
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus
> here, so
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > I will not
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > - o -
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones
> worthy of
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > attention. Anyone
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Upayavira
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>>
> > >>>>> > > >>
> > >>>>> > > >>
> > >>>>> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>
> > >>>>> > > >
> > >>>>> > > >
> > >>>>> > > >
> > >>>>> > > > --
> > >>>>> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > > Noble Paul
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > > --
> > >>>>> > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > Noble Paul
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Anshum Gupta
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Anshum Gupta
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
--
Anshum Gupta
Re: A 5.4 release?
Posted by Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>.
nice upayavira. Every new RM adds value to the release todo. Enjoy the ride
👍
On Dec 5, 2015 2:55 PM, "Upayavira" <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> * Make sure you don't have another Solr instance running on port 8983
> whilst running the smoke test (even a Vagrant instance sharing the port
> without Solr running) as the smoke test will fail.
>
> Yes, I'm planning to "soften" the release notes to make them less dense
> and more accessible.
>
> Upayavira
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015, at 03:44 AM, Anshum Gupta wrote:
>
> This is good ! :)
>
> just so that you know, make sure that your key is up on id.apache.org
> too! I struggled with that for almost a day during my first release (I
> believe I added that to the wiki too).
>
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015, at 06:10 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > As a first time Release Manager
> >
> > Thanks Upayavira!
> >
> > But please, please, please take advantage of your newness to this, to
> > edit https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo when things are
> > confusing/missing/etc.!
> >
> > Being new to something is unfortunately rare and we all quickly become
> > "release blind" after doing a couple releases.
>
> Okay - will do.
>
> 1. Make sure your key is up on the pgp.mit.edu before running the build.
> 2. Make sure you are using ant 1.8, not ant 1.9.
> 3. To be found out shortly... :-)
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>
>
>
Re: A 5.4 release?
Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.
* Make sure you don't have another Solr instance running on port 8983
whilst running the smoke test (even a Vagrant instance sharing the port
without Solr running) as the smoke test will fail.
Yes, I'm planning to "soften" the release notes to make them less dense
and more accessible.
Upayavira
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015, at 03:44 AM, Anshum Gupta wrote:
> This is good ! :)
>
> just so that you know, make sure that your key is up on id.apache.org
> too! I struggled with that for almost a day during my first release (I
> believe I added that to the wiki too).
>
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015, at 06:10 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>
>>
> > As a first time Release Manager
>>
>
>>
> Thanks Upayavira!
>>
>
>>
> But please, please, please take advantage of your newness to this, to
>>
> edit https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo when things are
>>
> confusing/missing/etc.!
>>
>
>>
> Being new to something is unfortunately rare and we all quickly become
>>
> "release blind" after doing a couple releases.
>>
>> Okay - will do.
>>
>>
1. Make sure your key is up on the pgp.mit.edu before running the build.
>>
2. Make sure you are using ant 1.8, not ant 1.9.
>>
3. To be found out shortly... :-)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
Re: A 5.4 release?
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
This is good ! :)
just so that you know, make sure that your key is up on id.apache.org too!
I struggled with that for almost a day during my first release (I believe I
added that to the wiki too).
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015, at 06:10 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > As a first time Release Manager
> >
> > Thanks Upayavira!
> >
> > But please, please, please take advantage of your newness to this, to
> > edit https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo when things are
> > confusing/missing/etc.!
> >
> > Being new to something is unfortunately rare and we all quickly become
> > "release blind" after doing a couple releases.
>
> Okay - will do.
>
> 1. Make sure your key is up on the pgp.mit.edu before running the build.
> 2. Make sure you are using ant 1.8, not ant 1.9.
> 3. To be found out shortly... :-)
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
--
Anshum Gupta
Re: A 5.4 release?
Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015, at 08:59 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015, at 06:10 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >> > As a first time Release Manager
> >>
> >> Thanks Upayavira!
> >>
> >> But please, please, please take advantage of your newness to this, to
> >> edit https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo when things are
> >> confusing/missing/etc.!
> >>
> >> Being new to something is unfortunately rare and we all quickly become
> >> "release blind" after doing a couple releases.
> >
> > Okay - will do.
> >
> > 1. Make sure your key is up on the pgp.mit.edu before running the build.
> > 2. Make sure you are using ant 1.8, not ant 1.9.
> > 3. To be found out shortly... :-)
>
> Thanks Upayavira: your newness is paying off already! Just be sure to
> edit the wiki accordingly :)
I certainly will. I'll add some context setting at the top too, as it
does dive into the weeds pretty much from the get go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: A 5.4 release?
Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015, at 06:10 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> > As a first time Release Manager
>>
>> Thanks Upayavira!
>>
>> But please, please, please take advantage of your newness to this, to
>> edit https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo when things are
>> confusing/missing/etc.!
>>
>> Being new to something is unfortunately rare and we all quickly become
>> "release blind" after doing a couple releases.
>
> Okay - will do.
>
> 1. Make sure your key is up on the pgp.mit.edu before running the build.
> 2. Make sure you are using ant 1.8, not ant 1.9.
> 3. To be found out shortly... :-)
Thanks Upayavira: your newness is paying off already! Just be sure to
edit the wiki accordingly :)
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: A 5.4 release?
Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015, at 06:10 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > As a first time Release Manager
>
> Thanks Upayavira!
>
> But please, please, please take advantage of your newness to this, to
> edit https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo when things are
> confusing/missing/etc.!
>
> Being new to something is unfortunately rare and we all quickly become
> "release blind" after doing a couple releases.
Okay - will do.
1. Make sure your key is up on the pgp.mit.edu before running the build.
2. Make sure you are using ant 1.8, not ant 1.9.
3. To be found out shortly... :-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: A 5.4 release?
Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> As a first time Release Manager
Thanks Upayavira!
But please, please, please take advantage of your newness to this, to
edit https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo when things are
confusing/missing/etc.!
Being new to something is unfortunately rare and we all quickly become
"release blind" after doing a couple releases.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: A 5.4 release?
Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.
Thanks Varun.
As a first time Release Manager, I'm currently working through the steps
needed to build a release. I'll call a vote as soon as I have uploaded
artifacts that are passing smoke tests.
Upayavira
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015, at 07:16 AM, Varun Thacker wrote:
> Hi�Upayavira,
>
> I have committed a fix for�SOLR-8363 . You should be good to go.
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>> Agreed. Waiting on SOLR-8363 right now.
>>
>>
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015, at 02:14 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>>
> Agreed, what's done is done but in future, let's avoid shoving
>>
> anything other than critical bug fixes into release branches.
>>
>
>>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
> > A really strong reason would be to not shove last minute
> > changes right
>>
> > before releases.
>>
> >
>>
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Anshum Gupta
> > <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
>>
> >> I'll admit I committed it thinking it was safe and didn't bring any
>>
> >> flakiness into the system but it's not something critical. I'll
> >> let the
>>
> >> release manager decide if it's fine being released with 5.4. If he
> >> thinks
>>
> >> otherwise (or someone else has a really strong reason) we can
> >> roll this
>>
> >> back, though I don't really see a reason unless we see broken
> >> builds due to
>>
> >> this commit.
>>
> >>
>>
> >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
>>
> >>>
>>
> >>> SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been
> >>> committed
>>
> >>> to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems
> >>> before
>>
> >>> Upayavira cuts a release candidate.
>>
> >>>
>>
> >>> Le jeu. 3 d�c. 2015 � 03:34, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> >>> a �crit
>>
> >>> :
>>
> >>>>
>>
> >>>> Hi,
>>
> >>>>
>>
> >>>> I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and
> >>>> running
>>
> >>>> tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
>>
> >>>>
>>
> >>>>
>>
> >>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
> >>>> wrote:
>>
> >>>>>
>>
> >>>>> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman
> >>>>> Jenkins
>>
> >>>>> pointing at the 5.4 branch.
>>
> >>>>>
>>
> >>>>> Upayavira
>>
> >>>>>
>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>>
> >>>>> > thx :-)
>>
> >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
>>
> >>>>> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch
>>
> >>>>> > > creation
>>
> >>>>> > > mail
>>
> >>>>> > >
>>
> >>>>> > >
>>
> >>>>> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul
> >>>>> > > <no...@gmail.com>
>>
> >>>>> > > wrote:
>>
> >>>>> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I
> >>>>> > > > see one
>>
> >>>>> > > > already
>>
> >>>>> > > >
>>
> >>>>> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson
>>
> >>>>> > > > <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
> >>>>> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the
> >>>>> > > >> US,
>>
> >>>>> > > >> lots of
>>
> >>>>> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be
> >>>>> > > >> surprised
>>
> >>>>> > > >> if
>>
> >>>>> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
>>
> >>>>> > > >>
>>
> >>>>> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter
>>
> >>>>> > > >> <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
> >>>>> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira
> >>>>> > > >>> <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>> wrote:
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>> Upayavira
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter
> >>>>> > > >>>> wrote:
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and
> >>>>> > > >>>>> SOLR-8101
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> into
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know
> >>>>> > > >>>>> if
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> there are
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> Tim
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira
> >>>>> > > >>>>> <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> wrote:
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > this
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > moment, the feature
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > freeze starts.
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > to fix
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > version 5.4. I
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week,
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > so I
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > expect that the
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > tickets:
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > (Anusham,
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > Noble) blocker
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >"Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > authorization causes
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > issue with replication"
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >before
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > the release?
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > (Erik)
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >"Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > (Erik)
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >"Add tests for bin/post"
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >of
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > holding back a
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > release
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > (Uwe)
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >"Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >and
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > java 9 (b71)"
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > blocker?
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > (Shalin,
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > others), blocker
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >"Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > branch_5x"
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >here, so
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > I will not
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >- o -
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > worthy of
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > attention. Anyone
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > Upayavira
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > >>>>> ---------------
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
> >>>>> > > >>>>> unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-
> >>>>> > > >>>>> help@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > >>>> --------------
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
> >>>>> > > >>>> unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-
> >>>>> > > >>>> help@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>> --------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > >>> -------------
>>
> >>>>> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
> >>>>> > > >>> unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-
> >>>>> > > >>> help@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>
>>
> >>>>> > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > >> ------------
>>
> >>>>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-
> >>>>> > > >> help@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> > > >>
>>
> >>>>> > > >
>>
> >>>>> > > >
>>
> >>>>> > > >
>>
> >>>>> > > > --
>>
> >>>>> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>
> >>>>> > > > Noble Paul
>>
> >>>>> > >
>>
> >>>>> > >
>>
> >>>>> > >
>>
> >>>>> > > --
>>
> >>>>> > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>
> >>>>> > > Noble Paul
>>
> >>>>> > >
>>
> >>>>> > >
>>
> >>>>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > ---------
>>
> >>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> > >
>>
> >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > -------
>>
> >>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>>
>>
> >>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> -----
>>
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>>
>>
> >>>>
>>
> >>>>
>>
> >>>>
>>
> >>>> --
>>
> >>>> Anshum Gupta
>>
> >>
>>
> >>
>>
> >>
>>
> >>
>>
> >> --
>>
> >> Anshum Gupta
>>
> >
>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------
>>
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
> --
>>
> Regards,
>>
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
>>
>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Regards, Varun Thacker
Re: A 5.4 release?
Posted by Varun Thacker <va...@gmail.com>.
Hi Upayavira,
I have committed a fix for SOLR-8363 . You should be good to go.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> Agreed. Waiting on SOLR-8363 right now.
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015, at 02:14 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
> > Agreed, what's done is done but in future, let's avoid shoving
> > anything other than critical bug fixes into release branches.
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > A really strong reason would be to not shove last minute changes right
> > > before releases.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
> > >> I'll admit I committed it thinking it was safe and didn't bring any
> > >> flakiness into the system but it's not something critical. I'll let
> the
> > >> release manager decide if it's fine being released with 5.4. If he
> thinks
> > >> otherwise (or someone else has a really strong reason) we can roll
> this
> > >> back, though I don't really see a reason unless we see broken builds
> due to
> > >> this commit.
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been
> committed
> > >>> to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems
> before
> > >>> Upayavira cuts a release candidate.
> > >>>
> > >>> Le jeu. 3 déc. 2015 à 03:34, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> a écrit
> > >>> :
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and
> running
> > >>>> tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
> > >>>>> pointing at the 5.4 branch.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Upayavira
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> > >>>>> > thx :-)
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
> > >>>>> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch
> > >>>>> > > creation
> > >>>>> > > mail
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <
> noble.paul@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> > > wrote:
> > >>>>> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see
> one
> > >>>>> > > > already
> > >>>>> > > >
> > >>>>> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson
> > >>>>> > > > <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the
> US,
> > >>>>> > > >> lots of
> > >>>>> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be
> surprised
> > >>>>> > > >> if
> > >>>>> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
> > >>>>> > > >>
> > >>>>> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter
> > >>>>> > > >> <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
> > >>>>> > > >>>
> > >>>>> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk
> >
> > >>>>> > > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>> Upayavira
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and
> SOLR-8101
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> into
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> there are
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> Tim
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <
> uv@odoko.co.uk>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From
> this
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > moment, the feature
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > freeze starts.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned
> to fix
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > version 5.4. I
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so
> I
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > expect that the
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > tickets:
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326
> (Anusham,
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Noble) blocker
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > authorization causes
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > issue with replication"
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this
> before
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > the release?
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik)
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik)
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > "Add tests for bin/post"
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy
> of
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > holding back a
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > release
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723
> (Uwe)
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler
> and
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > java 9 (b71)"
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > blocker?
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722
> (Shalin,
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > others), blocker
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > branch_5x"
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus
> here, so
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > I will not
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > - o -
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones
> worthy of
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > attention. Anyone
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Upayavira
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>>
> > >>>>> > > >>
> > >>>>> > > >>
> > >>>>> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>
> > >>>>> > > >
> > >>>>> > > >
> > >>>>> > > >
> > >>>>> > > > --
> > >>>>> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > > Noble Paul
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > > --
> > >>>>> > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > Noble Paul
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Anshum Gupta
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Anshum Gupta
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
--
Regards,
Varun Thacker
Re: A 5.4 release?
Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.
Agreed. Waiting on SOLR-8363 right now.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015, at 02:14 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
> Agreed, what's done is done but in future, let's avoid shoving
> anything other than critical bug fixes into release branches.
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > A really strong reason would be to not shove last minute changes right
> > before releases.
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> >> I'll admit I committed it thinking it was safe and didn't bring any
> >> flakiness into the system but it's not something critical. I'll let the
> >> release manager decide if it's fine being released with 5.4. If he thinks
> >> otherwise (or someone else has a really strong reason) we can roll this
> >> back, though I don't really see a reason unless we see broken builds due to
> >> this commit.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been committed
> >>> to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems before
> >>> Upayavira cuts a release candidate.
> >>>
> >>> Le jeu. 3 déc. 2015 à 03:34, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a écrit
> >>> :
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and running
> >>>> tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
> >>>>> pointing at the 5.4 branch.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Upayavira
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> >>>>> > thx :-)
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
> >>>>> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch
> >>>>> > > creation
> >>>>> > > mail
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> > > wrote:
> >>>>> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one
> >>>>> > > > already
> >>>>> > > >
> >>>>> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson
> >>>>> > > > <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US,
> >>>>> > > >> lots of
> >>>>> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised
> >>>>> > > >> if
> >>>>> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
> >>>>> > > >>
> >>>>> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter
> >>>>> > > >> <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
> >>>>> > > >>>
> >>>>> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
> >>>>> > > >>> wrote:
> >>>>> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
> >>>>> > > >>>>
> >>>>> > > >>>> Upayavira
> >>>>> > > >>>>
> >>>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
> >>>>> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101
> >>>>> > > >>>>> into
> >>>>> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if
> >>>>> > > >>>>> there are
> >>>>> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
> >>>>> > > >>>>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> Tim
> >>>>> > > >>>>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > moment, the feature
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > freeze starts.
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > version 5.4. I
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > expect that the
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > tickets:
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham,
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > Noble) blocker
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > authorization causes
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > issue with replication"
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > the release?
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik)
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik)
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > "Add tests for bin/post"
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > holding back a
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > release
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe)
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > java 9 (b71)"
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > blocker?
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin,
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > others), blocker
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > branch_5x"
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > I will not
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > - o -
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > attention. Anyone
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > Upayavira
> >>>>> > > >>>>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> > > >>>>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>
> >>>>> > > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> > > >>>>
> >>>>> > > >>>
> >>>>> > > >>>
> >>>>> > > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> > > >>>
> >>>>> > > >>
> >>>>> > > >>
> >>>>> > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> > > >>
> >>>>> > > >
> >>>>> > > >
> >>>>> > > >
> >>>>> > > > --
> >>>>> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > > Noble Paul
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > > --
> >>>>> > > -----------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > Noble Paul
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Anshum Gupta
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Anshum Gupta
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: A 5.4 release?
Posted by Shalin Shekhar Mangar <sh...@gmail.com>.
Agreed, what's done is done but in future, let's avoid shoving
anything other than critical bug fixes into release branches.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A really strong reason would be to not shove last minute changes right
> before releases.
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
>> I'll admit I committed it thinking it was safe and didn't bring any
>> flakiness into the system but it's not something critical. I'll let the
>> release manager decide if it's fine being released with 5.4. If he thinks
>> otherwise (or someone else has a really strong reason) we can roll this
>> back, though I don't really see a reason unless we see broken builds due to
>> this commit.
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been committed
>>> to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems before
>>> Upayavira cuts a release candidate.
>>>
>>> Le jeu. 3 déc. 2015 à 03:34, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a écrit
>>> :
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and running
>>>> tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
>>>>> pointing at the 5.4 branch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Upayavira
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>>>>> > thx :-)
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
>>>>> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch
>>>>> > > creation
>>>>> > > mail
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one
>>>>> > > > already
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson
>>>>> > > > <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US,
>>>>> > > >> lots of
>>>>> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised
>>>>> > > >> if
>>>>> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
>>>>> > > >>
>>>>> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter
>>>>> > > >> <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>>>>> > > >>> wrote:
>>>>> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
>>>>> > > >>>>
>>>>> > > >>>> Upayavira
>>>>> > > >>>>
>>>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
>>>>> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101
>>>>> > > >>>>> into
>>>>> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if
>>>>> > > >>>>> there are
>>>>> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
>>>>> > > >>>>>
>>>>> > > >>>>> Tim
>>>>> > > >>>>>
>>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>>>>> > > >>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this
>>>>> > > >>>>> > moment, the feature
>>>>> > > >>>>> > freeze starts.
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix
>>>>> > > >>>>> > version 5.4. I
>>>>> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I
>>>>> > > >>>>> > expect that the
>>>>> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five
>>>>> > > >>>>> > tickets:
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham,
>>>>> > > >>>>> > Noble) blocker
>>>>> > > >>>>> > "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
>>>>> > > >>>>> > authorization causes
>>>>> > > >>>>> > issue with replication"
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before
>>>>> > > >>>>> > the release?
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik)
>>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
>>>>> > > >>>>> > "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik)
>>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
>>>>> > > >>>>> > "Add tests for bin/post"
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of
>>>>> > > >>>>> > holding back a
>>>>> > > >>>>> > release
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe)
>>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
>>>>> > > >>>>> > "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and
>>>>> > > >>>>> > java 9 (b71)"
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a
>>>>> > > >>>>> > blocker?
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin,
>>>>> > > >>>>> > others), blocker
>>>>> > > >>>>> > "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for
>>>>> > > >>>>> > branch_5x"
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so
>>>>> > > >>>>> > I will not
>>>>> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > - o -
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of
>>>>> > > >>>>> > attention. Anyone
>>>>> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > Upayavira
>>>>> > > >>>>>
>>>>> > > >>>>>
>>>>> > > >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > > >>>>>
>>>>> > > >>>>
>>>>> > > >>>>
>>>>> > > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > > >>>>
>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>> > > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>> > > >>
>>>>> > > >>
>>>>> > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > > >>
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > --
>>>>> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > > > Noble Paul
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > --
>>>>> > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > > Noble Paul
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: A 5.4 release?
Posted by Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com>.
A really strong reason would be to not shove last minute changes right
before releases.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> I'll admit I committed it thinking it was safe and didn't bring any
> flakiness into the system but it's not something critical. I'll let the
> release manager decide if it's fine being released with 5.4. If he thinks
> otherwise (or someone else has a really strong reason) we can roll this
> back, though I don't really see a reason unless we see broken builds due to
> this commit.
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been committed
>> to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems before
>> Upayavira cuts a release candidate.
>>
>> Le jeu. 3 déc. 2015 à 03:34, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a écrit
>> :
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and running
>>> tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
>>>> pointing at the 5.4 branch.
>>>>
>>>> Upayavira
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>>>> > thx :-)
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
>>>> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch
>>>> > > creation
>>>> > > mail
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one
>>>> > > > already
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson
>>>> > > > <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US,
>>>> > > >> lots of
>>>> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised
>>>> > > >> if
>>>> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter
>>>> > > >> <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
>>>> > > >>>
>>>> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>>>> > > >>> wrote:
>>>> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
>>>> > > >>>>
>>>> > > >>>> Upayavira
>>>> > > >>>>
>>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
>>>> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101
>>>> > > >>>>> into
>>>> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if
>>>> > > >>>>> there are
>>>> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
>>>> > > >>>>>
>>>> > > >>>>> Tim
>>>> > > >>>>>
>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>>>> > > >>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this
>>>> > > >>>>> > moment, the feature
>>>> > > >>>>> > freeze starts.
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix
>>>> > > >>>>> > version 5.4. I
>>>> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I
>>>> > > >>>>> > expect that the
>>>> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five
>>>> > > >>>>> > tickets:
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham,
>>>> > > >>>>> > Noble) blocker
>>>> > > >>>>> > "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
>>>> > > >>>>> > authorization causes
>>>> > > >>>>> > issue with replication"
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before
>>>> > > >>>>> > the release?
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik)
>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
>>>> > > >>>>> > "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik)
>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
>>>> > > >>>>> > "Add tests for bin/post"
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of
>>>> > > >>>>> > holding back a
>>>> > > >>>>> > release
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe)
>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
>>>> > > >>>>> > "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and
>>>> > > >>>>> > java 9 (b71)"
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a
>>>> > > >>>>> > blocker?
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin,
>>>> > > >>>>> > others), blocker
>>>> > > >>>>> > "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for
>>>> > > >>>>> > branch_5x"
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so
>>>> > > >>>>> > I will not
>>>> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > - o -
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of
>>>> > > >>>>> > attention. Anyone
>>>> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > Upayavira
>>>> > > >>>>>
>>>> > > >>>>>
>>>> > > >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > > >>>>>
>>>> > > >>>>
>>>> > > >>>>
>>>> > > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > > >>>>
>>>> > > >>>
>>>> > > >>>
>>>> > > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > > >>>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > --
>>>> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>>> > > > Noble Paul
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > --
>>>> > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>>> > > Noble Paul
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Anshum Gupta
>
>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: A 5.4 release?
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
I'll admit I committed it thinking it was safe and didn't bring any
flakiness into the system but it's not something critical. I'll let the
release manager decide if it's fine being released with 5.4. If he thinks
otherwise (or someone else has a really strong reason) we can roll this
back, though I don't really see a reason unless we see broken builds due to
this commit.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been committed
> to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems before
> Upayavira cuts a release candidate.
>
> Le jeu. 3 déc. 2015 à 03:34, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and running
>> tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
>>> pointing at the 5.4 branch.
>>>
>>> Upayavira
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>>> > thx :-)
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
>>> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch creation
>>> > > mail
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one
>>> already
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson <
>>> erickerickson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US,
>>> lots of
>>> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised
>>> if
>>> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter <
>>> thelabdude@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
>>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >>>> Upayavira
>>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
>>> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101
>>> into
>>> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if
>>> there are
>>> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>> Tim
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this
>>> moment, the feature
>>> > > >>>>> > freeze starts.
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix
>>> version 5.4. I
>>> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I
>>> expect that the
>>> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham,
>>> Noble) blocker
>>> > > >>>>> > "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
>>> authorization causes
>>> > > >>>>> > issue with replication"
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before
>>> the release?
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik)
>>> critical
>>> > > >>>>> > "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik)
>>> critical
>>> > > >>>>> > "Add tests for bin/post"
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of
>>> holding back a
>>> > > >>>>> > release
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe)
>>> critical
>>> > > >>>>> > "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and
>>> java 9 (b71)"
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a
>>> blocker?
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin,
>>> others), blocker
>>> > > >>>>> > "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so
>>> I will not
>>> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > - o -
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of
>>> attention. Anyone
>>> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > Upayavira
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>> > > > Noble Paul
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>> > > Noble Paul
>>> > >
>>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> >
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>
--
Anshum Gupta
Re: A 5.4 release?
Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.
SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been committed to
the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems before
Upayavira cuts a release candidate.
Le jeu. 3 déc. 2015 à 03:34, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and running
> tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
>> pointing at the 5.4 branch.
>>
>> Upayavira
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>> > thx :-)
>> >
>> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
>> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch creation
>> > > mail
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one
>> already
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson <
>> erickerickson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US, lots
>> of
>> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised if
>> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter <
>> thelabdude@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Upayavira
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
>> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101
>> into
>> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if there
>> are
>> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> Tim
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this
>> moment, the feature
>> > > >>>>> > freeze starts.
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix
>> version 5.4. I
>> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I
>> expect that the
>> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham,
>> Noble) blocker
>> > > >>>>> > "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
>> authorization causes
>> > > >>>>> > issue with replication"
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before
>> the release?
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik)
>> critical
>> > > >>>>> > "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik)
>> critical
>> > > >>>>> > "Add tests for bin/post"
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of
>> holding back a
>> > > >>>>> > release
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe)
>> critical
>> > > >>>>> > "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and
>> java 9 (b71)"
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a
>> blocker?
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin,
>> others), blocker
>> > > >>>>> > "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so
>> I will not
>> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > - o -
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of
>> attention. Anyone
>> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > Upayavira
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
>> > > > Noble Paul
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > -----------------------------------------------------
>> > > Noble Paul
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> > >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>