You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org by Geoffrey Young <ge...@modperlcookbook.org> on 2004/03/02 01:49:54 UTC
[Fwd: Apache-Cookie]
it's things like this that make me wonder if libapreq shouldn't issue a call
to ap_add_version_component(). does that sound like a decent idea for
apache 2.0?
--Geoff
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Apache-Cookie
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 16:38:37 -0800
From: Carl Holm <vp...@earthlink.net>
To: modperl@perl.apache.org
Hello,
With the following server environment: SERVER_SOFTWARE = "Apache/2.0.47
(Win32) mod_perl/1.99_10-dev Perl/v5.8.0 PHP/4.3.2",
and libapreq2 installed via PPM, I am not able to load Apache::Cookie.
I would appreciate hearing about any success with this configuration.
Thanks,
Carl Holm
vpulse@earthlink.net
--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
Re: [Fwd: Apache-Cookie]
Posted by Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org>.
Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Geoffrey Young <ge...@modperlcookbook.org> writes:
>
>
>>>but if we are going to put anything there, I'd expect it
>>>to be the version number of mod_apreq, not libapreq2.
>>
>>yeah, that's kinda what I meant - sorry I'm not more hip to
>>the modern nomenclature ;)
>
>
> I was just thinking out loud, that's all. I'm just
> wondering what other folks think about your idea.
>
> It certainly will help in tracking down inevitable
> problems if/when users start getting mod_apreq and
> libapreq2 out-of-sync (from different releases of libapreq2).
> On *nix, the library version is easy to get from the .so file
> name, but mod_apreq's version is only available in the
> source code. Putting the version number on the Server
> line might be a big help going forward, so I'm leaning
> towards +1.
Hey, and then Netcraft and Security Space will count mod_apreq usage!!!
And you probably also want to generated and customize mod_perl/Apache-Test's
t/REPORT and/or bin/apreq2bug (similar to bin/mp2bug and start advertising it
in the docs / test failure banner so that people send in proper bug reports
and you don't have to ask for the data again and again.
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
Re: [Fwd: Apache-Cookie]
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@sunstarsys.com>.
Geoffrey Young <ge...@modperlcookbook.org> writes:
> > but if we are going to put anything there, I'd expect it
> > to be the version number of mod_apreq, not libapreq2.
>
> yeah, that's kinda what I meant - sorry I'm not more hip to
> the modern nomenclature ;)
I was just thinking out loud, that's all. I'm just
wondering what other folks think about your idea.
It certainly will help in tracking down inevitable
problems if/when users start getting mod_apreq and
libapreq2 out-of-sync (from different releases of libapreq2).
On *nix, the library version is easy to get from the .so file
name, but mod_apreq's version is only available in the
source code. Putting the version number on the Server
line might be a big help going forward, so I'm leaning
towards +1.
--
Joe Schaefer
Re: [Fwd: Apache-Cookie]
Posted by Geoffrey Young <ge...@modperlcookbook.org>.
Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Geoffrey Young <ge...@modperlcookbook.org> writes:
>
>
>>it's things like this that make me wonder if libapreq shouldn't issue
>>a call to ap_add_version_component(). does that sound like a decent
>>idea for apache 2.0?
>
>
> I think I know what you're getting at (does the guy have mod_apreq
> loaded?),
something like that. it might not have mattered in this case, but it's
something else to narrow things down.
> but if we are going to put anything there, I'd expect it
> to be the version number of mod_apreq, not libapreq2.
yeah, that's kinda what I meant - sorry I'm not more hip to the modern
nomenclature ;)
--Geoff
Re: [Fwd: Apache-Cookie]
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@sunstarsys.com>.
Geoffrey Young <ge...@modperlcookbook.org> writes:
> it's things like this that make me wonder if libapreq shouldn't issue
> a call to ap_add_version_component(). does that sound like a decent
> idea for apache 2.0?
I think I know what you're getting at (does the guy have mod_apreq
loaded?), but if we are going to put anything there, I'd expect it
to be the version number of mod_apreq, not libapreq2.
--
Joe Schaefer