You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com> on 2014/01/21 18:08:05 UTC
[VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 1.0.0 RC8
Hi,
the eight release candidate of the sandbox project Apache UIMA DUCC v1.0.0
is ready for voting.
Issues fixed in RC8:
1) Fixed NOTICE and License files
2) Fixed location of java api in INSTALL
3) Fixed location of descriptors in README
4) Fixed Copyright year in javadoc pages
DUCC stands for Distributed UIMA Cluster Computing. DUCC is a cluster
management system providing tooling, management, and scheduling facilities
to automate the scale-out of applications written to the UIMA framework.
Core UIMA provides a generalized framework for applications that process
unstructured information such as human language, but does not provide a
scale-out mechanism. UIMA-AS provides a scale-out mechanism to distribute
UIMA pipelines over a cluster of computing resources, but does not provide
job or cluster management of the resources. DUCC defines a formal job model
that closely maps to a standard UIMA pipeline. Around this job model DUCC
provides cluster management services to automate the scale-out of UIMA
pipelines over computing clusters.
The Maven artifacts are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1003/org/apache/uima/<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1002/org/apache/uima/>
The source and binary zip/tars are here:
http://people.apache.org/~cwiklik/releases/uima-ducc/1.0.0/RC8/<http://people.apache.org/~cwiklik/releases/uima-ducc/1.0.0/RC7/>
The SVN Tag Checkout:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/uima-ducc/tags/uima-ducc-1.0.0/
See: http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for instructions how to
test release candidate.
Please vote on release:
[ ] +1 OK to release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 1.0.0 RC8
Posted by Lou DeGenaro <lo...@gmail.com>.
I have DUCC RC5 running in 2 places both Linux following (my own)
instructions on the wiki, one from source (Quick Start) and the other from
binary (Install WebServer Demo). See
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/UIMA/DUCC. None of the
post-RC5 changes would affect my success.
Lou.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Download binary, verified md5sum, followed INSTALL instructions to create a
> multi-user installation on our small test cluster, verified 1.job worked.
> Now running more complex set of real jobs (try3).
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
> > downloaded sources and bin distribution, checked out tag.
> >
> > Signatures OK on sources and bin distr (didn't check the maven ones).
> >
> > tag compare to source.zip - OK
> >
> > build from source (on windows, full build with -Papache-release) - OK -
> > but I
> > note there's this persistent warning about "Multiply defined labels":
> > LaTeX Warning: Label `overflow' multiply defined.
> >
> > Checked the license and notice files in the source and binary
> distribution
> > -
> > look OK.
> >
> > The Notice files in the Jars have the wrong copyright date - need to set
> > <inceptionYear> (which is not a property, but a top level Maven element -
> > see
> > full discussion about this in other thread).
> >
> > It would be good if someone can do a quick-start verification test on a
> > linux
> > platform. I'll see what I can do on Windows (I know it's not supported
> on
> > that
> > platform, but perhaps I won't find any issues :-) )
> >
> > -Marshall
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 1.0.0 RC8
Posted by Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com>.
Download binary, verified md5sum, followed INSTALL instructions to create a
multi-user installation on our small test cluster, verified 1.job worked.
Now running more complex set of real jobs (try3).
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> downloaded sources and bin distribution, checked out tag.
>
> Signatures OK on sources and bin distr (didn't check the maven ones).
>
> tag compare to source.zip - OK
>
> build from source (on windows, full build with -Papache-release) - OK -
> but I
> note there's this persistent warning about "Multiply defined labels":
> LaTeX Warning: Label `overflow' multiply defined.
>
> Checked the license and notice files in the source and binary distribution
> -
> look OK.
>
> The Notice files in the Jars have the wrong copyright date - need to set
> <inceptionYear> (which is not a property, but a top level Maven element -
> see
> full discussion about this in other thread).
>
> It would be good if someone can do a quick-start verification test on a
> linux
> platform. I'll see what I can do on Windows (I know it's not supported on
> that
> platform, but perhaps I won't find any issues :-) )
>
> -Marshall
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 1.0.0 RC8
Posted by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>.
OK, I will cancel and redo RC with the corrected Copyright date both in
javadocs and the NOTICE file in jars.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> I haven't found any other issues so I would be inclined to vote to release.
> However, because of the now known copyright issue, even though I think
> it's a
> relatively trivial issue, given that we strive to make legally correct
> releases
> as one of the important goals of Apache projects, I'd like to see one more
> release candidate with this corrected.
>
> -Marshall
>
> On 1/21/2014 4:46 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> > downloaded sources and bin distribution, checked out tag.
> >
> > Signatures OK on sources and bin distr (didn't check the maven ones).
> >
> > tag compare to source.zip - OK
> >
> > build from source (on windows, full build with -Papache-release) - OK -
> but I
> > note there's this persistent warning about "Multiply defined labels":
> > LaTeX Warning: Label `overflow' multiply defined.
> >
> > Checked the license and notice files in the source and binary
> distribution -
> > look OK.
> >
> > The Notice files in the Jars have the wrong copyright date - need to set
> > <inceptionYear> (which is not a property, but a top level Maven element
> - see
> > full discussion about this in other thread).
> >
> > It would be good if someone can do a quick-start verification test on a
> linux
> > platform. I'll see what I can do on Windows (I know it's not supported
> on that
> > platform, but perhaps I won't find any issues :-) )
> >
> > -Marshall
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 1.0.0 RC8
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
I haven't found any other issues so I would be inclined to vote to release.
However, because of the now known copyright issue, even though I think it's a
relatively trivial issue, given that we strive to make legally correct releases
as one of the important goals of Apache projects, I'd like to see one more
release candidate with this corrected.
-Marshall
On 1/21/2014 4:46 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> downloaded sources and bin distribution, checked out tag.
>
> Signatures OK on sources and bin distr (didn't check the maven ones).
>
> tag compare to source.zip - OK
>
> build from source (on windows, full build with -Papache-release) - OK - but I
> note there's this persistent warning about "Multiply defined labels":
> LaTeX Warning: Label `overflow' multiply defined.
>
> Checked the license and notice files in the source and binary distribution -
> look OK.
>
> The Notice files in the Jars have the wrong copyright date - need to set
> <inceptionYear> (which is not a property, but a top level Maven element - see
> full discussion about this in other thread).
>
> It would be good if someone can do a quick-start verification test on a linux
> platform. I'll see what I can do on Windows (I know it's not supported on that
> platform, but perhaps I won't find any issues :-) )
>
> -Marshall
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 1.0.0 RC8
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
downloaded sources and bin distribution, checked out tag.
Signatures OK on sources and bin distr (didn't check the maven ones).
tag compare to source.zip - OK
build from source (on windows, full build with -Papache-release) - OK - but I
note there's this persistent warning about "Multiply defined labels":
LaTeX Warning: Label `overflow' multiply defined.
Checked the license and notice files in the source and binary distribution -
look OK.
The Notice files in the Jars have the wrong copyright date - need to set
<inceptionYear> (which is not a property, but a top level Maven element - see
full discussion about this in other thread).
It would be good if someone can do a quick-start verification test on a linux
platform. I'll see what I can do on Windows (I know it's not supported on that
platform, but perhaps I won't find any issues :-) )
-Marshall