You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to repository@apache.org by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> on 2006/12/22 17:04:22 UTC

Problems with Maven 1 to Maven 2 conversion should be solved now

Please check that the missing artifacts you complained for being
missing are under http://repo1.maven.org/maven2

Relevant issue is http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-261

-- 
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
                             -- The Princess Bride

Re: Problems with Maven 1 to Maven 2 conversion should be solved now

Posted by Guillaume Laforge <gl...@gmail.com>.

Ah a different pom for groovy and groovy-all... hmmm ok.
But groovy-all does make sense, since it's easier to use it for
embedding Groovy within an application which already uses Antlr and
ASM.
Anyway, we're soon going to be re-working our build system, and I'll
poke Arnaud for the gory details ;-)
Thanks a lot for your help and answers.

On 12/31/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> it can be m1 or m2
>
> in this case that pom is for groovy or groovy-all?
> note that they need to be different and I don't think it makes much
> sense to have the groovy-all artifact that will be problematic for
> dependencies.
>
>
> On 12/30/06, Arnaud HERITIER <ah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > If yours jars are deployed on a m1 repository I think that you have to
> > deploy also a pom in the m1 format (or the conversion will fail). Carlos ?
> >
> > Arnaud
> >
> >
> > On 12/30/06, Guillaume Laforge <gl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > What about this one?
> > >
> > http://svn.groovy.codehaus.org/browse/groovy/trunk/groovy/groovy-core/pom.xml?r=4310
> > >
> > > We're not using it for our build, we're still on M1, but some
> > > developers had a try at switching our build to M2. But it should be
> > > valid dependency-wise.
> > >
> > > Guillaume
> > >
> > > On 12/30/06, Arnaud HERITIER < aheritier@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > ok, I thought it was automatically done.
> > > > I'll say it to the groovy team that they have to add it themselves.
> > > >
> > > > Thx
> > > >
> > > > Arnaud
> > > >
> > > > On 12/30/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > no, poms have not been autogenerated for a year so good poms can be
> > > > > provided by users
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12/29/06, Arnaud HERITIER <ah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > There wasn't a default pom created by default during the conversion
> > ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Arnaud
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 12/29/06, Carlos Sanchez < carlos@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > groovy-all artifacts don't have poms in the m1 repo
> > > > > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven/groovy/poms/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 12/28/06, Arnaud HERITIER < aheritier@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I also noticed that there's no pom for groovy artifacts.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/groovy/groovy-all/1.0-RC-01/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/groovy/groovy-all/1.0-RC-02/
> > > > > > > > Is it possible ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Arnaud
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 12/23/06, Arnaud HERITIER < aheritier@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Carlos,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >   Do you think that the one I described in the release process
> > for
> > > > m1
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > > can be used ?
> > > > > > > > >   You can adapt it to remove the pgp part and the control of
> > the
> > > > > > current
> > > > > > > > user (-and -user $USER)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >   Arnaud
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/developers/making-releases.html
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 12/23/06, Carlos Sanchez < carlos@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Yes, seems that the converter doesn't generate checksums,
> > I'll
> > > > take
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > look
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-scxml/commons-scxml/0.6/
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > If anyone can in the meantime do a shell script that checks
> > for
> > > > > > > > > > missing checksums in poms and jars and generates them it'd
> > be
> > > > > > helpful.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 12/22/06, Rahul Akolkar < rahul.akolkar@gmail.com >
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On 12/22/06, Carlos Sanchez < carlos@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Please check that the missing artifacts you complained
> > for
> > > > being
> > > > > > > > > > > > missing are under http://repo1.maven.org/maven2
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > <snip/>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your time, I checked
> > commons-scxml:commons-scxml:
> > > > 0.6
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > the artifacts (jar, pom) are downloaded, but the checksums
> > > > error
> > > > > > out.
> > > > > > > > > > > Probably related to the similar thread from a couple of
> > weeks
> > > > ago.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > -Rahul
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Relevant issue is
> > > > > > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-261
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > > > > > > > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > > > > > > > > >                              -- The
> > > > Princess
> > > > > > Bride
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > > > > > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > > > > > > >                              -- The
> > Princess
> > > > Bride
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > > > >                              -- The Princess
> > Bride
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > >                              -- The Princess Bride
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Guillaume Laforge
> > > Groovy Project Manager
> > > http://glaforge.free.fr/blog/groovy
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
>                              -- The Princess Bride
>


-- 
Guillaume Laforge
Groovy Project Manager
http://glaforge.free.fr/blog/groovy