You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com> on 2014/09/24 14:43:55 UTC
Mustella slave offline [attn: Alex]
I've been meaning to ask this for a while, but on the 'Apache Flex
Build' Jenkins, one of the build slaves is off line and has been for a
while.
Should we just delete this node, or is it expected to come back ?
I think that's Alex's box, right ?
--
extravision Signature
*Tom Chiverton* | Lead Developer | Extravision
*T:* 0161 817 2922 | *W:* www.extravision.com
<http://www.extravision.com> | *T:* twitter.com/extravision
<http://twitter.com/extravision> | *E:* tchiverton@extravision.com
<ma...@extravision.com>
.
.
A fresh approach to email marketing
.
Registered in the UK at : 107 Timber Wharf, 33 Worsley Street,
Manchester, M15 4LD. Registration number: 05017214 VAT: GB 824 5386 19
Disclaimer: This e-mail is intended solely for the person to whom it is
addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
have received it in error please notify us immediately and destroy this
e-mail and any attachments. In addition, you must not disclose, copy,
distribute or take any action in reliance on this e-mail or any
attachments. Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely
of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Extravision Ltd.
E-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception, unauthorised
amendment, viruses and delays or the consequences thereof. Accordingly,
this e-mail and any attachments are opened at your own risk.
Re: Mustella slave offline [attn: Alex]
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
On 24/09/14 16:04, Alex Harui wrote:
> Do we have any reason to have two slaves?
Not that I can see.
Tom
Re: Mustella slave offline [attn: Alex]
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Sep 24, 2014 9:06 AM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> And something like this perhaps should of been a LAZY to give people in
> different time zones to respond
Justin, this is routine maintenance. It would be impossible to get a
consensus (lazy or otherwise) on every such activity.
Moreover, it is a matter of minutes to create a new slave, especially one
that is running on the same machine.
Let's not unnecessarily complicate things.
Thanks,
Om
Re: Mustella slave offline [attn: Alex]
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
And something like this perhaps should of been a LAZY to give people in
different time zones to respond
Re: Mustella slave offline [attn: Alex]
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
Nice try starting another discussion about procedure, Justin, but alas: too
little, too late ;-)
EdB
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
> IMO Just leave it offline rather than deleting we way get it working
> someday
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: Mustella slave offline [attn: Alex]
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
IMO Just leave it offline rather than deleting we way get it working someday
Re: Mustella slave offline [attn: Alex]
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
[ducks and covers]
…
;-)
EdB
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
> On 24/09/14 16:44, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
>
>> Nope. Executive decision
>>
> Extreme prejudice invoked :-)
>
> Tom
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: Mustella slave offline [attn: Alex]
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
On 24/09/14 16:44, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
> Nope. Executive decision
Extreme prejudice invoked :-)
Tom
Re: Mustella slave offline [attn: Alex]
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Sep 24, 2014 8:36 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>
> Do we have to vote before I can press the delete button ?
Nope. Executive decision :-)
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 24/09/14 16:08, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, I wouldn’t mess with two active slaves, I think we tried that way
>> back when we were still on builds@apache and the only thing it gave us
was
>> a sure way to mess up two builds at same time, every time ;-)
>>
>> EdB
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> That slave broke during a jenkins upgrade. I was never able to fix
it. I
>>> think we can take it down.
>>>
>>> Do we have any reason to have two slaves? Because most jobs use
>>> FlashPlayer, we can't run the risk of two jobs hitting their testing
phase
>>> at the same time. I'm not sure if we have builds that don't use FP,
maybe
>>> just MD5Checker.
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>> On 9/24/14 5:43 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've been meaning to ask this for a while, but on the 'Apache Flex
>>>> Build' Jenkins, one of the build slaves is off line and has been for a
>>>> while.
>>>> Should we just delete this node, or is it expected to come back ?
>>>> I think that's Alex's box, right ?
>>>> --
>>>> extravision Signature
>>>> *Tom Chiverton* | Lead Developer | Extravision
>>>> *T:* 0161 817 2922 | *W:* www.extravision.com
>>>> <http://www.extravision.com> | *T:* twitter.com/extravision
>>>> <http://twitter.com/extravision> | *E:* tchiverton@extravision.com
>>>> <ma...@extravision.com>
>>>> .
>>>> .
>>>> A fresh approach to email marketing
>>>>
>>>> .
>>>> Registered in the UK at : 107 Timber Wharf, 33 Worsley Street,
>>>> Manchester, M15 4LD. Registration number: 05017214 VAT: GB 824 5386 19
>>>>
>>>> Disclaimer: This e-mail is intended solely for the person to whom it is
>>>> addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you
>>>> have received it in error please notify us immediately and destroy this
>>>> e-mail and any attachments. In addition, you must not disclose, copy,
>>>> distribute or take any action in reliance on this e-mail or any
>>>> attachments. Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely
>>>> of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Extravision
Ltd.
>>>> E-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception,
unauthorised
>>>> amendment, viruses and delays or the consequences thereof. Accordingly,
>>>> this e-mail and any attachments are opened at your own risk.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Mustella slave offline [attn: Alex]
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
Nah. Votes are mostly for stuff we release or receive, or procedural issues
related to releases/donations. This is “just” a utility thing, and it will
not (negatively) impact the day to day workings of the project.
So: kill it!
EdB
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
> Do we have to vote before I can press the delete button ?
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 24/09/14 16:08, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I wouldn’t mess with two active slaves, I think we tried that way
>> back when we were still on builds@apache and the only thing it gave us
>> was
>> a sure way to mess up two builds at same time, every time ;-)
>>
>> EdB
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>> That slave broke during a jenkins upgrade. I was never able to fix it.
>>> I
>>> think we can take it down.
>>>
>>> Do we have any reason to have two slaves? Because most jobs use
>>> FlashPlayer, we can't run the risk of two jobs hitting their testing
>>> phase
>>> at the same time. I'm not sure if we have builds that don't use FP,
>>> maybe
>>> just MD5Checker.
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>> On 9/24/14 5:43 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I've been meaning to ask this for a while, but on the 'Apache Flex
>>>> Build' Jenkins, one of the build slaves is off line and has been for a
>>>> while.
>>>> Should we just delete this node, or is it expected to come back ?
>>>> I think that's Alex's box, right ?
>>>> --
>>>> extravision Signature
>>>> *Tom Chiverton* | Lead Developer | Extravision
>>>> *T:* 0161 817 2922 | *W:* www.extravision.com
>>>> <http://www.extravision.com> | *T:* twitter.com/extravision
>>>> <http://twitter.com/extravision> | *E:* tchiverton@extravision.com
>>>> <ma...@extravision.com>
>>>> .
>>>> .
>>>> A fresh approach to email marketing
>>>>
>>>> .
>>>> Registered in the UK at : 107 Timber Wharf, 33 Worsley Street,
>>>> Manchester, M15 4LD. Registration number: 05017214 VAT: GB 824 5386 19
>>>>
>>>> Disclaimer: This e-mail is intended solely for the person to whom it is
>>>> addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
>>>> have received it in error please notify us immediately and destroy this
>>>> e-mail and any attachments. In addition, you must not disclose, copy,
>>>> distribute or take any action in reliance on this e-mail or any
>>>> attachments. Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely
>>>> of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Extravision Ltd.
>>>> E-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception, unauthorised
>>>> amendment, viruses and delays or the consequences thereof. Accordingly,
>>>> this e-mail and any attachments are opened at your own risk.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: Mustella slave offline [attn: Alex]
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
Do we have to vote before I can press the delete button ?
Tom
On 24/09/14 16:08, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Yeah, I wouldn’t mess with two active slaves, I think we tried that way
> back when we were still on builds@apache and the only thing it gave us was
> a sure way to mess up two builds at same time, every time ;-)
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> That slave broke during a jenkins upgrade. I was never able to fix it. I
>> think we can take it down.
>>
>> Do we have any reason to have two slaves? Because most jobs use
>> FlashPlayer, we can't run the risk of two jobs hitting their testing phase
>> at the same time. I'm not sure if we have builds that don't use FP, maybe
>> just MD5Checker.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 9/24/14 5:43 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I've been meaning to ask this for a while, but on the 'Apache Flex
>>> Build' Jenkins, one of the build slaves is off line and has been for a
>>> while.
>>> Should we just delete this node, or is it expected to come back ?
>>> I think that's Alex's box, right ?
>>> --
>>> extravision Signature
>>> *Tom Chiverton* | Lead Developer | Extravision
>>> *T:* 0161 817 2922 | *W:* www.extravision.com
>>> <http://www.extravision.com> | *T:* twitter.com/extravision
>>> <http://twitter.com/extravision> | *E:* tchiverton@extravision.com
>>> <ma...@extravision.com>
>>> .
>>> .
>>> A fresh approach to email marketing
>>>
>>> .
>>> Registered in the UK at : 107 Timber Wharf, 33 Worsley Street,
>>> Manchester, M15 4LD. Registration number: 05017214 VAT: GB 824 5386 19
>>>
>>> Disclaimer: This e-mail is intended solely for the person to whom it is
>>> addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
>>> have received it in error please notify us immediately and destroy this
>>> e-mail and any attachments. In addition, you must not disclose, copy,
>>> distribute or take any action in reliance on this e-mail or any
>>> attachments. Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely
>>> of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Extravision Ltd.
>>> E-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception, unauthorised
>>> amendment, viruses and delays or the consequences thereof. Accordingly,
>>> this e-mail and any attachments are opened at your own risk.
>>>
>>
>
Re: Mustella slave offline [attn: Alex]
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
Yeah, I wouldn’t mess with two active slaves, I think we tried that way
back when we were still on builds@apache and the only thing it gave us was
a sure way to mess up two builds at same time, every time ;-)
EdB
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> That slave broke during a jenkins upgrade. I was never able to fix it. I
> think we can take it down.
>
> Do we have any reason to have two slaves? Because most jobs use
> FlashPlayer, we can't run the risk of two jobs hitting their testing phase
> at the same time. I'm not sure if we have builds that don't use FP, maybe
> just MD5Checker.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/24/14 5:43 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>
> >I've been meaning to ask this for a while, but on the 'Apache Flex
> >Build' Jenkins, one of the build slaves is off line and has been for a
> >while.
> >Should we just delete this node, or is it expected to come back ?
> >I think that's Alex's box, right ?
> >--
> >extravision Signature
> >*Tom Chiverton* | Lead Developer | Extravision
> >*T:* 0161 817 2922 | *W:* www.extravision.com
> ><http://www.extravision.com> | *T:* twitter.com/extravision
> ><http://twitter.com/extravision> | *E:* tchiverton@extravision.com
> ><ma...@extravision.com>
> >.
> >.
> > A fresh approach to email marketing
> >
> >.
> >Registered in the UK at : 107 Timber Wharf, 33 Worsley Street,
> >Manchester, M15 4LD. Registration number: 05017214 VAT: GB 824 5386 19
> >
> >Disclaimer: This e-mail is intended solely for the person to whom it is
> >addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
> >have received it in error please notify us immediately and destroy this
> >e-mail and any attachments. In addition, you must not disclose, copy,
> >distribute or take any action in reliance on this e-mail or any
> >attachments. Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely
> >of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Extravision Ltd.
> >E-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception, unauthorised
> >amendment, viruses and delays or the consequences thereof. Accordingly,
> >this e-mail and any attachments are opened at your own risk.
> >
>
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: Mustella slave offline [attn: Alex]
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
That slave broke during a jenkins upgrade. I was never able to fix it. I
think we can take it down.
Do we have any reason to have two slaves? Because most jobs use
FlashPlayer, we can't run the risk of two jobs hitting their testing phase
at the same time. I'm not sure if we have builds that don't use FP, maybe
just MD5Checker.
-Alex
On 9/24/14 5:43 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>I've been meaning to ask this for a while, but on the 'Apache Flex
>Build' Jenkins, one of the build slaves is off line and has been for a
>while.
>Should we just delete this node, or is it expected to come back ?
>I think that's Alex's box, right ?
>--
>extravision Signature
>*Tom Chiverton* | Lead Developer | Extravision
>*T:* 0161 817 2922 | *W:* www.extravision.com
><http://www.extravision.com> | *T:* twitter.com/extravision
><http://twitter.com/extravision> | *E:* tchiverton@extravision.com
><ma...@extravision.com>
>.
>.
> A fresh approach to email marketing
>
>.
>Registered in the UK at : 107 Timber Wharf, 33 Worsley Street,
>Manchester, M15 4LD. Registration number: 05017214 VAT: GB 824 5386 19
>
>Disclaimer: This e-mail is intended solely for the person to whom it is
>addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
>have received it in error please notify us immediately and destroy this
>e-mail and any attachments. In addition, you must not disclose, copy,
>distribute or take any action in reliance on this e-mail or any
>attachments. Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely
>of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Extravision Ltd.
>E-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception, unauthorised
>amendment, viruses and delays or the consequences thereof. Accordingly,
>this e-mail and any attachments are opened at your own risk.
>
Re: Mustella slave offline [attn: Alex]
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
Better than the original ending of the quote, anyway :-P
EdB
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
> Today is a good day to be the Jenkins wiki page :-)
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 24/09/14 13:47, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>
>> Yes, that one is Alex’s: but it’s referred to as “builds”, not “Mustella”
>> (which is “mine”):-)
>>
>
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: Mustella slave offline [attn: Alex]
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
Today is a good day to be the Jenkins wiki page :-)
Tom
On 24/09/14 13:47, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Yes, that one is Alex’s: but it’s referred to as “builds”, not “Mustella”
> (which is “mine”):-)
Re: Mustella slave offline [attn: Alex]
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
Yes, that one is Alex’s: but it’s referred to as “builds”, not “Mustella”
(which is “mine”) :-)
EdB
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
> I've been meaning to ask this for a while, but on the 'Apache Flex Build'
> Jenkins, one of the build slaves is off line and has been for a while.
> Should we just delete this node, or is it expected to come back ?
> I think that's Alex's box, right ?
> --
> extravision Signature
> *Tom Chiverton* | Lead Developer | Extravision
> *T:* 0161 817 2922 | *W:* www.extravision.com <http://www.extravision.com>
> | *T:* twitter.com/extravision <http://twitter.com/extravision> | *E:*
> tchiverton@extravision.com <ma...@extravision.com>
> .
> .
> A fresh approach to email marketing
>
> .
> Registered in the UK at : 107 Timber Wharf, 33 Worsley Street, Manchester,
> M15 4LD. Registration number: 05017214 VAT: GB 824 5386 19
>
> Disclaimer: This e-mail is intended solely for the person to whom it is
> addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
> have received it in error please notify us immediately and destroy this
> e-mail and any attachments. In addition, you must not disclose, copy,
> distribute or take any action in reliance on this e-mail or any
> attachments. Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely of
> the author and do not necessarily represent those of Extravision Ltd.
> E-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception, unauthorised
> amendment, viruses and delays or the consequences thereof. Accordingly,
> this e-mail and any attachments are opened at your own risk.
>
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl