You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Allan Yang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/11/05 12:13:01 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21395) Abort split/merge procedure if there is a table procedure of the same table going on

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Allan Yang updated HBASE-21395:
-------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed
        Status: Resolved  (was: Patch Available)

> Abort split/merge procedure if there is a table procedure of the same table going on
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-21395
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21395
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.0, 2.0.2
>            Reporter: Allan Yang
>            Assignee: Allan Yang
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.0.3, 2.1.2
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-21395.branch-2.0.001.patch, HBASE-21395.branch-2.0.002.patch, HBASE-21395.branch-2.0.003.patch, HBASE-21395.branch-2.0.004.patch
>
>
> In my ITBLL, I often see that if split/merge procedure and table procedure(like ModifyTableProcedure) happen at the same time, and since there some race conditions between these two kind of procedures,  causing some serious problems. e.g. the split/merged parent is bought on line by the table procedure or the split merged region making the whole table procedure rollback.
> Talked with [~Apache9] offline today, this kind of problem was solved in branch-2+ since There is a fence that only one RTSP can agianst a single region at the same time.
> To keep out of the mess in branch-2.0 and branch-2.1, I added a simple safe fence in the split/merge procedure: If there is a table procedure going on against the same table, then abort the split/merge procedure. Aborting the split/merge procedure at the beginning of the execution is no big deal, compared with the mess it will cause...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)