You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@solr.apache.org by "David Eric Pugh (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/09/09 20:30:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6910) deleteById without _route_ param for
implicit router could be broadcast
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17412823#comment-17412823 ]
David Eric Pugh commented on SOLR-6910:
---------------------------------------
[~ichattopadhyaya] do you think you could review the PR that was submitted? It seems pretty reasonable to me, but would love another set of eyes who have more experience in the distributed query paths review!
> deleteById without _route_ param for implicit router could be broadcast
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-6910
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6910
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 1h 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> A deleteById request without __route__ param for implicit router could be sent to all shard leaders (Shalin). Alternatively, a new router (or a strict mode for implicit router) that requires _route_ to be set for all adds/deletes (Yonik).
> Some discussion here in SOLR-5890:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5890?focusedCommentId=14236722&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14236722
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5890?focusedCommentId=14264525&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14264525
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@solr.apache.org