You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com> on 2014/05/29 20:07:17 UTC
Re: [Installer][FlexJS] Changes to installer
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> I just checked in changes to the FlexJS install script to perform
> checksums on the downloads. You will need a nightly build of the
> installer to run it, or just use Ant.
>
Where do I get a nightly build of the Installer? Or do you mean build from
Installer source?
>
> The Installer has been upgraded to report more information on each
> failure. I'm not quite sure we have the right information in all cases,
> but hopefully we'll get a better clue as to why we're seeing so many
> failures after we roll out this installer.
>
Are you reporting this to Google Analytics? I can start monitoring it and
let you know if the information you are looking for is coming through.
>
> Note that the new checkums result in a major increase in the total time to
> install an SDK. The ActionScript MD5 code is significantly slower than
> the Java version in Ant. This could become our new barrier to entry. I
> will look into optimizing it, but other folks are welcome to take a shot
> at it too.
>
This is what Installer 2.7 used, right? In that case, I dont think this is
a major problem at this point. Folks are used to long MD5 checks in our
current installers.
Thanks,
Om
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
>
Re: [Installer][FlexJS] Changes to installer
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
The adt.jar fix goes in the SDK's installer.xml and should already be
there.
On 5/29/14 11:41 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Is there a fix in for the missing adt.exe file? I saw a couple of emails
>about it where you had mentioned that there was fix coming imminently.
>
>Thanks,
>Om
>
>
>On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> We build a Windows version on the CI server.
>> http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080
>>
>> On 5/29/14 11:07 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I just checked in changes to the FlexJS install script to perform
>> >> checksums on the downloads. You will need a nightly build of the
>> >> installer to run it, or just use Ant.
>> >>
>> >
>> >Where do I get a nightly build of the Installer? Or do you mean build
>> >from
>> >Installer source?
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> The Installer has been upgraded to report more information on each
>> >> failure. I'm not quite sure we have the right information in all
>>cases,
>> >> but hopefully we'll get a better clue as to why we're seeing so many
>> >> failures after we roll out this installer.
>> >>
>> >
>> >Are you reporting this to Google Analytics? I can start monitoring it
>>and
>> >let you know if the information you are looking for is coming through.
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Note that the new checkums result in a major increase in the total
>>time
>> >>to
>> >> install an SDK. The ActionScript MD5 code is significantly slower
>>than
>> >> the Java version in Ant. This could become our new barrier to
>>entry. I
>> >> will look into optimizing it, but other folks are welcome to take a
>>shot
>> >> at it too.
>> >>
>> >
>> >This is what Installer 2.7 used, right? In that case, I dont think
>>this
>> >is
>> >a major problem at this point. Folks are used to long MD5 checks in
>>our
>> >current installers.
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Om
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
Re: [Installer][FlexJS] Changes to installer
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
Is there a fix in for the missing adt.exe file? I saw a couple of emails
about it where you had mentioned that there was fix coming imminently.
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> We build a Windows version on the CI server.
> http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080
>
> On 5/29/14 11:07 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I just checked in changes to the FlexJS install script to perform
> >> checksums on the downloads. You will need a nightly build of the
> >> installer to run it, or just use Ant.
> >>
> >
> >Where do I get a nightly build of the Installer? Or do you mean build
> >from
> >Installer source?
> >
> >
> >>
> >> The Installer has been upgraded to report more information on each
> >> failure. I'm not quite sure we have the right information in all cases,
> >> but hopefully we'll get a better clue as to why we're seeing so many
> >> failures after we roll out this installer.
> >>
> >
> >Are you reporting this to Google Analytics? I can start monitoring it and
> >let you know if the information you are looking for is coming through.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Note that the new checkums result in a major increase in the total time
> >>to
> >> install an SDK. The ActionScript MD5 code is significantly slower than
> >> the Java version in Ant. This could become our new barrier to entry. I
> >> will look into optimizing it, but other folks are welcome to take a shot
> >> at it too.
> >>
> >
> >This is what Installer 2.7 used, right? In that case, I dont think this
> >is
> >a major problem at this point. Folks are used to long MD5 checks in our
> >current installers.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Om
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: [Installer][FlexJS] Changes to installer
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
We build a Windows version on the CI server.
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080
On 5/29/14 11:07 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> I just checked in changes to the FlexJS install script to perform
>> checksums on the downloads. You will need a nightly build of the
>> installer to run it, or just use Ant.
>>
>
>Where do I get a nightly build of the Installer? Or do you mean build
>from
>Installer source?
>
>
>>
>> The Installer has been upgraded to report more information on each
>> failure. I'm not quite sure we have the right information in all cases,
>> but hopefully we'll get a better clue as to why we're seeing so many
>> failures after we roll out this installer.
>>
>
>Are you reporting this to Google Analytics? I can start monitoring it and
>let you know if the information you are looking for is coming through.
>
>
>>
>> Note that the new checkums result in a major increase in the total time
>>to
>> install an SDK. The ActionScript MD5 code is significantly slower than
>> the Java version in Ant. This could become our new barrier to entry. I
>> will look into optimizing it, but other folks are welcome to take a shot
>> at it too.
>>
>
>This is what Installer 2.7 used, right? In that case, I dont think this
>is
>a major problem at this point. Folks are used to long MD5 checks in our
>current installers.
>
>Thanks,
>Om
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>>
>>