lost attachments (was RE: rolling and triggering policy)

[Mark Womack <mw...@bevocal.com>]

OK, so what is the jakarta/apache policy for attachments to mailing lists?
This has been going on for some time and fairly frustrating.  Should we send
an email to infrastructure?  I'll do it tonight if it is the right place to
start.

-Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ebersole, Steven [mailto:steven.ebersole@vignette.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 1:28 PM
> To: 'Log4J Developers List'
> Subject: RE: rolling and triggering policy
> 
> 
> Ok, supposedly these attachments will come through this time...
> 
> 
> 
>     |-----Original Message-----
>     |From: Ebersole, Steven [mailto:steven.ebersole@vignette.com]
>     |Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 2:04 PM
>     |To: 'Log4J Developers List'
>     |Subject: RE: rolling and triggering policy
>     |
>     |
>     |Well, as I haven't heard a reply attached are the classes 
>     |I have written and
>     |converted to the log4j1.3 interfaces.  Do with them as you wish.
>     |
>     |
>     |
>     |    |-----Original Message-----
>     |    |From: Ebersole, Steven [mailto:steven.ebersole@vignette.com]
>     |    |Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 5:22 PM
>     |    |To: 'Log4J Developers List'
>     |    |Subject: RE: rolling and triggering policy
>     |    |
>     |    |
>     |    |I finsihed converting all the ones I previously had over 
>     |    |to the seperated
>     |    |RollingPolicy and TriggeringPolicy interfaces.
>     |    |
>     |    |What I have so far:
>     |    |
>     |    |  triggering:
>     |    |    NeverTriggeringPolicy
>     |    |    DateTriggeringPolicy
>     |    |    SizeTriggeringPolicy
>     |    |
>     |    |  rolling:
>     |    |    TimestampRollingPolicy
>     |    |    IndexedRollingPolicy
>     |    |
>     |    |
>     |    |I had two other questions also.
>     |    |
>     |    |1) How are these to get configured and attached to 
>     |    |appenders?  For now, I
>     |    |just made all the above implement OptionHandler.
>     |    |
>     |    |2) Is the idea to eventually have a single version of 
>     |    |rollable appenders?
>     |    |For example, one version of FileAppender which would 
>     |    |accept rolling and
>     |    |triggering policies and coordinate rolling activities 
>     |    |based on those
>     |    |assigned policies?  If so, I would also like to propose a 
>     |    |marker interface
>     |    |for appenders which would be capable handling rolling.  It 
>     |    |would really just
>     |    |need some simple getters and setters for the 
>     |rolling-policy and
>     |    |triggering-policy.
>     |    |
>     |    |-----------------------------------------------------------
>     |    |----------
>     |    |To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
>     |log4j-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>     |    |For additional commands, e-mail: 
>     |log4j-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>     |    |
>     |
>     |
>     |
> 
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org