You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "A B (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/04/05 20:43:32 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (DERBY-2500) Assertion failure preparing query with AND and OR in where clause

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

A B resolved DERBY-2500.
------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 10.3.0.0
       Derby Info:   (was: [Patch Available])

> Assertion failure preparing query with AND and OR in where clause
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-2500
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2500
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 10.3.0.0
>            Reporter: Andrew McIntyre
>         Assigned To: A B
>             Fix For: 10.3.0.0
>
>         Attachments: d2500_v1.patch, d2500_v1.stat, d2500_v2.patch, d2500_v3.patch
>
>
> See commented out test in DistinctTest, DistinctTest.testResultSetInOrderWhenUsingIndex.
> The actual assert is:
> ASSERT FAILED Found IN-list probing (NLR.LUSERNAME = <expr>) while generating HASH join, which should not happen.
> I was able to simplify the query a little:
> SELECT DISTINCT nb.name AS name, nb.summary AS summary FROM netbutton1 nb, netbuttonlibraryrole1 nlr, library_netbutton ln WHERE nlr.netbuttonlibrary_id = ln.netbuttonlibrary_id AND (nlr.lusername = ? OR nlr.lusername =?)
> Removing nlr.netbuttonlibrary_id = ln.netbuttonlibrary_id clause but leaving the 'nb.lname = ln.lname' in front of the AND did not reproduce the problem.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.