You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com> on 2014/02/13 08:00:20 UTC

[VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating

This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.

A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes (6 binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes.

Release Vote:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c44C5BAAD-0FD8-454C-84D7-C8DA924420D7@gmail.com%3e

Release Vote Result:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3A207F1C-3B07-4029-93D4-87ABEB412D36@gmail.com%3e


The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.1-incubating:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=tree;h=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c;hb=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c

The specific source archive being voted upon can be found here:

http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating-src.tar.gz

Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:

http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3

The release artifacts are signed with the key available here:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd

The staging repository for this release can be found here:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1002/

The generated reports and documentation for this release can be found here:

http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-report-rc3

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating.

This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating
[ ]  0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because …

Thanks,
Apache Storm Team

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating

Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)




On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Joseph Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>wrote:

> I would say that is the right approach, and
> that this vote should continue on.
>
> On Feb 15, 2014, at 2:34 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Joseph,
> >
> > Thank you very much for the clarification.
> >
> > After checking the history of the NOTICE file [1], it turns out that
> those entries were made by Nathan and a Yahoo! employee.
> >
> > (I thought I had added Nathan to the file, but after checking the
> history, realized I didn’t, so there is a commit rollback in the history).
> >
> > I have reached out to both of them with a request to remove those
> entries.
> >
> > I’m assuming we can continue with the vote without having to start over
> at this point?
> >
> > Thanks again for your input.
> >
> > - Taylor
> >
> > On Feb 15, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Joseph Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> It means that unless Nathan Marz and an Yahoo! employee
> >> added those items to the NOTICE, you can remove them.  But
> >> if they did, than either Nathan Marz or a Y! employee should
> >> be asked to.
> >>
> >> In terms of being a release blocker, I’d say not.  If you fix
> >> this in HEAD that should be sufficient to continue.
> >>
> >> On Feb 15, 2014, at 1:02 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> With the exception of some JavaScript code [1], all source code files
> use the Apache v2 license.
> >>>
> >>> Prior to entering the incubator, the project used the Eclipse Public
> License. In the incubator, all source files that did not have a license
> header already (the JavaScript files mentioned above), were updated with
> the Apache v2 license header.
> >>>
> >>> So from a LICENSE/NOTICE file perspective, where does that put us?
> >>>
> >>> -Taylor
> >>>
> >>>> On Feb 15, 2014, at 12:10 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 15 February 2014 16:44, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>> Hi sebb,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What specifically needs to be done to correct the NOTICE file?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Should the references to Nathan Marz and Yahoo! be removed?
> >>>>
> >>>> As I already wrote, this depends on the exact license(s) of the
> >>>> file(s) involved.
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Taylor
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Feb 14, 2014, at 12:44 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If the code has not changed substantially in 2014 then the date can
> >>>>>> stay as 2013.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> As to the attribution, that depends on the _exact text_ of the
> license
> >>>>>> provided with the files.
> >>>>>> The license(s) should also be included in the LICENSE file.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Note that attributions in the NOTICE file must be passed to
> downstream
> >>>>>> consumers so it is important not to include anything that is not
> >>>>>> required.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 14 February 2014 17:31, Suresh Srinivas <su...@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>> +1 (binding) from me.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sebb, can you please answer the question related to the NOTICE
> file. I
> >>>>>>> think while it may not be necessary to call out individual or
> companies
> >>>>>>> contributing large portions of the code, it should not block this
> release
> >>>>>>> and can be addressed later.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:49 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <
> ptgoetz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks for the input!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The majority of the codebase was originally developed by Nathan
> Marz, and
> >>>>>>>> it includes significant contributions from Yahoo!.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The project was originally licensed under the Eclipse Public
> License, but
> >>>>>>>> has not transitioned to the Apache v2 license.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If putting those attributions in the NOTICE file is not the
> correct thing
> >>>>>>>> to do, please let me know the right way to handle it.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It was still 2013 when I last updated the NOTICE file. I'm not
> sure if
> >>>>>>>> that is a blocker for release or not.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> - Taylor
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Feb 13, 2014, at 5:59 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 13 February 2014 07:00, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating)
> version
> >>>>>>>> 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9
> +1 votes
> >>>>>>>> (6
> >>>>>>>> binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Release Vote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c44C5BAAD-0FD8-454C-84D7-C8DA924420D7@gmail.com%3e
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Release Vote Result:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3A207F1C-3B07-4029-93D4-87ABEB412D36@gmail.com%3e
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.1-incubating:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=tree;h=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c;hb=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> NOTICE file still refers to 2013.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The NOTICE file also references software from
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Nathan Marz and Yahoo!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> However there are no corresponding licenses in the LICENSE file.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Does the source *contain* software from either of the above?
> >>>>>>>> If so, where are the license files?
> >>>>>>>> If not, why are the attributions present in the NOTICE file?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Remember that N&L file entries are only for bits that are actually
> >>>>>>>> included in the distributiion.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The specific source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key available here:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found here:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1002/
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The generated reports and documentation for this release can be
> found here:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-report-rc3
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm
> 0.9.1-incubating.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating
> >>>>>>>> [ ]  0 No opinion
> >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>> Apache Storm Team
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> http://hortonworks.com/download/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> >>>>>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> entity to
> >>>>>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> confidential,
> >>>>>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader
> >>>>>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that
> >>>>>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> >>>>>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
> have
> >>>>>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> >>>>>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating

Posted by Joseph Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
I would say that is the right approach, and
that this vote should continue on.

On Feb 15, 2014, at 2:34 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Joseph,
> 
> Thank you very much for the clarification.
> 
> After checking the history of the NOTICE file [1], it turns out that those entries were made by Nathan and a Yahoo! employee.
> 
> (I thought I had added Nathan to the file, but after checking the history, realized I didn’t, so there is a commit rollback in the history).
> 
> I have reached out to both of them with a request to remove those entries.
> 
> I’m assuming we can continue with the vote without having to start over at this point?
> 
> Thanks again for your input.
> 
> - Taylor
> 
> On Feb 15, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Joseph Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>> It means that unless Nathan Marz and an Yahoo! employee
>> added those items to the NOTICE, you can remove them.  But
>> if they did, than either Nathan Marz or a Y! employee should
>> be asked to.
>> 
>> In terms of being a release blocker, I’d say not.  If you fix
>> this in HEAD that should be sufficient to continue.
>> 
>> On Feb 15, 2014, at 1:02 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> With the exception of some JavaScript code [1], all source code files use the Apache v2 license.
>>> 
>>> Prior to entering the incubator, the project used the Eclipse Public License. In the incubator, all source files that did not have a license header already (the JavaScript files mentioned above), were updated with the Apache v2 license header.
>>> 
>>> So from a LICENSE/NOTICE file perspective, where does that put us?
>>> 
>>> -Taylor
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 15, 2014, at 12:10 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 15 February 2014 16:44, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi sebb,
>>>>> 
>>>>> What specifically needs to be done to correct the NOTICE file?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Should the references to Nathan Marz and Yahoo! be removed?
>>>> 
>>>> As I already wrote, this depends on the exact license(s) of the
>>>> file(s) involved.
>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Taylor
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Feb 14, 2014, at 12:44 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If the code has not changed substantially in 2014 then the date can
>>>>>> stay as 2013.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> As to the attribution, that depends on the _exact text_ of the license
>>>>>> provided with the files.
>>>>>> The license(s) should also be included in the LICENSE file.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Note that attributions in the NOTICE file must be passed to downstream
>>>>>> consumers so it is important not to include anything that is not
>>>>>> required.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 14 February 2014 17:31, Suresh Srinivas <su...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> +1 (binding) from me.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sebb, can you please answer the question related to the NOTICE file. I
>>>>>>> think while it may not be necessary to call out individual or companies
>>>>>>> contributing large portions of the code, it should not block this release
>>>>>>> and can be addressed later.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:49 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks for the input!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The majority of the codebase was originally developed by Nathan Marz, and
>>>>>>>> it includes significant contributions from Yahoo!.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The project was originally licensed under the Eclipse Public License, but
>>>>>>>> has not transitioned to the Apache v2 license.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> If putting those attributions in the NOTICE file is not the correct thing
>>>>>>>> to do, please let me know the right way to handle it.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> It was still 2013 when I last updated the NOTICE file. I'm not sure if
>>>>>>>> that is a blocker for release or not.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> - Taylor
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Feb 13, 2014, at 5:59 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 13 February 2014 07:00, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version
>>>>>>>> 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes
>>>>>>>> (6
>>>>>>>> binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Release Vote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c44C5BAAD-0FD8-454C-84D7-C8DA924420D7@gmail.com%3e
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Release Vote Result:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3A207F1C-3B07-4029-93D4-87ABEB412D36@gmail.com%3e
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.1-incubating:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=tree;h=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c;hb=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> NOTICE file still refers to 2013.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The NOTICE file also references software from
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Nathan Marz and Yahoo!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> However there are no corresponding licenses in the LICENSE file.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Does the source *contain* software from either of the above?
>>>>>>>> If so, where are the license files?
>>>>>>>> If not, why are the attributions present in the NOTICE file?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Remember that N&L file entries are only for bits that are actually
>>>>>>>> included in the distributiion.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The specific source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key available here:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found here:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1002/
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The generated reports and documentation for this release can be found here:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-report-rc3
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating
>>>>>>>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Apache Storm Team
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> http://hortonworks.com/download/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>>>>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
>>>>>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>>>>>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>>>>>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
>>>>>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>>>>>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>>>>>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
>>>>>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating

Posted by "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com>.
Hi Joseph,

Thank you very much for the clarification.

After checking the history of the NOTICE file [1], it turns out that those entries were made by Nathan and a Yahoo! employee.

(I thought I had added Nathan to the file, but after checking the history, realized I didn’t, so there is a commit rollback in the history).

I have reached out to both of them with a request to remove those entries.

I’m assuming we can continue with the vote without having to start over at this point?

Thanks again for your input.

- Taylor

On Feb 15, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Joseph Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> It means that unless Nathan Marz and an Yahoo! employee
> added those items to the NOTICE, you can remove them.  But
> if they did, than either Nathan Marz or a Y! employee should
> be asked to.
> 
> In terms of being a release blocker, I’d say not.  If you fix
> this in HEAD that should be sufficient to continue.
> 
> On Feb 15, 2014, at 1:02 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> With the exception of some JavaScript code [1], all source code files use the Apache v2 license.
>> 
>> Prior to entering the incubator, the project used the Eclipse Public License. In the incubator, all source files that did not have a license header already (the JavaScript files mentioned above), were updated with the Apache v2 license header.
>> 
>> So from a LICENSE/NOTICE file perspective, where does that put us?
>> 
>> -Taylor
>> 
>>> On Feb 15, 2014, at 12:10 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 15 February 2014 16:44, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi sebb,
>>>> 
>>>> What specifically needs to be done to correct the NOTICE file?
>>>> 
>>>> Should the references to Nathan Marz and Yahoo! be removed?
>>> 
>>> As I already wrote, this depends on the exact license(s) of the
>>> file(s) involved.
>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> Taylor
>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 14, 2014, at 12:44 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> If the code has not changed substantially in 2014 then the date can
>>>>> stay as 2013.
>>>>> 
>>>>> As to the attribution, that depends on the _exact text_ of the license
>>>>> provided with the files.
>>>>> The license(s) should also be included in the LICENSE file.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Note that attributions in the NOTICE file must be passed to downstream
>>>>> consumers so it is important not to include anything that is not
>>>>> required.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 14 February 2014 17:31, Suresh Srinivas <su...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>> +1 (binding) from me.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sebb, can you please answer the question related to the NOTICE file. I
>>>>>> think while it may not be necessary to call out individual or companies
>>>>>> contributing large portions of the code, it should not block this release
>>>>>> and can be addressed later.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:49 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks for the input!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The majority of the codebase was originally developed by Nathan Marz, and
>>>>>>> it includes significant contributions from Yahoo!.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The project was originally licensed under the Eclipse Public License, but
>>>>>>> has not transitioned to the Apache v2 license.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If putting those attributions in the NOTICE file is not the correct thing
>>>>>>> to do, please let me know the right way to handle it.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> It was still 2013 when I last updated the NOTICE file. I'm not sure if
>>>>>>> that is a blocker for release or not.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - Taylor
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Feb 13, 2014, at 5:59 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 13 February 2014 07:00, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version
>>>>>>> 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes
>>>>>>> (6
>>>>>>> binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Release Vote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c44C5BAAD-0FD8-454C-84D7-C8DA924420D7@gmail.com%3e
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Release Vote Result:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3A207F1C-3B07-4029-93D4-87ABEB412D36@gmail.com%3e
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.1-incubating:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=tree;h=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c;hb=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> NOTICE file still refers to 2013.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The NOTICE file also references software from
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Nathan Marz and Yahoo!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> However there are no corresponding licenses in the LICENSE file.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Does the source *contain* software from either of the above?
>>>>>>> If so, where are the license files?
>>>>>>> If not, why are the attributions present in the NOTICE file?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Remember that N&L file entries are only for bits that are actually
>>>>>>> included in the distributiion.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The specific source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key available here:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found here:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1002/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The generated reports and documentation for this release can be found here:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-report-rc3
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating
>>>>>>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Apache Storm Team
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> http://hortonworks.com/download/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>>>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
>>>>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>>>>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>>>>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
>>>>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>>>>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>>>>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
>>>>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating

Posted by Joseph Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
It means that unless Nathan Marz and an Yahoo! employee
added those items to the NOTICE, you can remove them.  But
if they did, than either Nathan Marz or a Y! employee should
be asked to.

In terms of being a release blocker, I’d say not.  If you fix
this in HEAD that should be sufficient to continue.

On Feb 15, 2014, at 1:02 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:

> With the exception of some JavaScript code [1], all source code files use the Apache v2 license.
> 
> Prior to entering the incubator, the project used the Eclipse Public License. In the incubator, all source files that did not have a license header already (the JavaScript files mentioned above), were updated with the Apache v2 license header.
> 
> So from a LICENSE/NOTICE file perspective, where does that put us?
> 
> -Taylor
> 
>> On Feb 15, 2014, at 12:10 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 15 February 2014 16:44, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi sebb,
>>> 
>>> What specifically needs to be done to correct the NOTICE file?
>>> 
>>> Should the references to Nathan Marz and Yahoo! be removed?
>> 
>> As I already wrote, this depends on the exact license(s) of the
>> file(s) involved.
>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Taylor
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 14, 2014, at 12:44 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> If the code has not changed substantially in 2014 then the date can
>>>> stay as 2013.
>>>> 
>>>> As to the attribution, that depends on the _exact text_ of the license
>>>> provided with the files.
>>>> The license(s) should also be included in the LICENSE file.
>>>> 
>>>> Note that attributions in the NOTICE file must be passed to downstream
>>>> consumers so it is important not to include anything that is not
>>>> required.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 14 February 2014 17:31, Suresh Srinivas <su...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>> +1 (binding) from me.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sebb, can you please answer the question related to the NOTICE file. I
>>>>> think while it may not be necessary to call out individual or companies
>>>>> contributing large portions of the code, it should not block this release
>>>>> and can be addressed later.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:49 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks for the input!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The majority of the codebase was originally developed by Nathan Marz, and
>>>>>> it includes significant contributions from Yahoo!.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The project was originally licensed under the Eclipse Public License, but
>>>>>> has not transitioned to the Apache v2 license.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If putting those attributions in the NOTICE file is not the correct thing
>>>>>> to do, please let me know the right way to handle it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It was still 2013 when I last updated the NOTICE file. I'm not sure if
>>>>>> that is a blocker for release or not.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - Taylor
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Feb 13, 2014, at 5:59 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 13 February 2014 07:00, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version
>>>>>> 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes
>>>>>> (6
>>>>>> binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Release Vote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c44C5BAAD-0FD8-454C-84D7-C8DA924420D7@gmail.com%3e
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Release Vote Result:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3A207F1C-3B07-4029-93D4-87ABEB412D36@gmail.com%3e
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.1-incubating:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=tree;h=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c;hb=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> NOTICE file still refers to 2013.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The NOTICE file also references software from
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Nathan Marz and Yahoo!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> However there are no corresponding licenses in the LICENSE file.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Does the source *contain* software from either of the above?
>>>>>> If so, where are the license files?
>>>>>> If not, why are the attributions present in the NOTICE file?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Remember that N&L file entries are only for bits that are actually
>>>>>> included in the distributiion.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The specific source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key available here:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found here:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1002/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The generated reports and documentation for this release can be found here:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-report-rc3
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating
>>>>>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Apache Storm Team
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> http://hortonworks.com/download/
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
>>>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>>>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>>>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
>>>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>>>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>>>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
>>>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating

Posted by "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com>.
With the exception of some JavaScript code [1], all source code files use the Apache v2 license.

Prior to entering the incubator, the project used the Eclipse Public License. In the incubator, all source files that did not have a license header already (the JavaScript files mentioned above), were updated with the Apache v2 license header.

So from a LICENSE/NOTICE file perspective, where does that put us?

-Taylor

> On Feb 15, 2014, at 12:10 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 15 February 2014 16:44, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi sebb,
>> 
>> What specifically needs to be done to correct the NOTICE file?
>> 
>> Should the references to Nathan Marz and Yahoo! be removed?
> 
> As I already wrote, this depends on the exact license(s) of the
> file(s) involved.
> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Taylor
>> 
>>> On Feb 14, 2014, at 12:44 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> If the code has not changed substantially in 2014 then the date can
>>> stay as 2013.
>>> 
>>> As to the attribution, that depends on the _exact text_ of the license
>>> provided with the files.
>>> The license(s) should also be included in the LICENSE file.
>>> 
>>> Note that attributions in the NOTICE file must be passed to downstream
>>> consumers so it is important not to include anything that is not
>>> required.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 14 February 2014 17:31, Suresh Srinivas <su...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>> +1 (binding) from me.
>>>> 
>>>> Sebb, can you please answer the question related to the NOTICE file. I
>>>> think while it may not be necessary to call out individual or companies
>>>> contributing large portions of the code, it should not block this release
>>>> and can be addressed later.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:49 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks for the input!
>>>>> 
>>>>> The majority of the codebase was originally developed by Nathan Marz, and
>>>>> it includes significant contributions from Yahoo!.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The project was originally licensed under the Eclipse Public License, but
>>>>> has not transitioned to the Apache v2 license.
>>>>> 
>>>>> If putting those attributions in the NOTICE file is not the correct thing
>>>>> to do, please let me know the right way to handle it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> It was still 2013 when I last updated the NOTICE file. I'm not sure if
>>>>> that is a blocker for release or not.
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Taylor
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 13, 2014, at 5:59 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 13 February 2014 07:00, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version
>>>>> 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
>>>>> 
>>>>> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes
>>>>> (6
>>>>> binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Release Vote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c44C5BAAD-0FD8-454C-84D7-C8DA924420D7@gmail.com%3e
>>>>> 
>>>>> Release Vote Result:
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3A207F1C-3B07-4029-93D4-87ABEB412D36@gmail.com%3e
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.1-incubating:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=tree;h=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c;hb=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> NOTICE file still refers to 2013.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The NOTICE file also references software from
>>>>> 
>>>>> Nathan Marz and Yahoo!
>>>>> 
>>>>> However there are no corresponding licenses in the LICENSE file.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Does the source *contain* software from either of the above?
>>>>> If so, where are the license files?
>>>>> If not, why are the attributions present in the NOTICE file?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Remember that N&L file entries are only for bits that are actually
>>>>> included in the distributiion.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The specific source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
>>>>> 
>>>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3
>>>>> 
>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key available here:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>>>>> 
>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found here:
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1002/
>>>>> 
>>>>> The generated reports and documentation for this release can be found here:
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-report-rc3
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>> 
>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating
>>>>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Apache Storm Team
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> http://hortonworks.com/download/
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
>>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
>>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
>>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating

Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 15 February 2014 16:44, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi sebb,
>
> What specifically needs to be done to correct the NOTICE file?
>
> Should the references to Nathan Marz and Yahoo! be removed?

As I already wrote, this depends on the exact license(s) of the
file(s) involved.

> Thanks,
>
> Taylor
>
>> On Feb 14, 2014, at 12:44 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> If the code has not changed substantially in 2014 then the date can
>> stay as 2013.
>>
>> As to the attribution, that depends on the _exact text_ of the license
>> provided with the files.
>> The license(s) should also be included in the LICENSE file.
>>
>> Note that attributions in the NOTICE file must be passed to downstream
>> consumers so it is important not to include anything that is not
>> required.
>>
>>
>>> On 14 February 2014 17:31, Suresh Srinivas <su...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>> +1 (binding) from me.
>>>
>>> Sebb, can you please answer the question related to the NOTICE file. I
>>> think while it may not be necessary to call out individual or companies
>>> contributing large portions of the code, it should not block this release
>>> and can be addressed later.
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:49 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the input!
>>>>
>>>> The majority of the codebase was originally developed by Nathan Marz, and
>>>> it includes significant contributions from Yahoo!.
>>>>
>>>> The project was originally licensed under the Eclipse Public License, but
>>>> has not transitioned to the Apache v2 license.
>>>>
>>>> If putting those attributions in the NOTICE file is not the correct thing
>>>> to do, please let me know the right way to handle it.
>>>>
>>>> It was still 2013 when I last updated the NOTICE file. I'm not sure if
>>>> that is a blocker for release or not.
>>>>
>>>> - Taylor
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 13, 2014, at 5:59 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 13 February 2014 07:00, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version
>>>> 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
>>>>
>>>> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes
>>>> (6
>>>> binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes.
>>>>
>>>> Release Vote:
>>>>
>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c44C5BAAD-0FD8-454C-84D7-C8DA924420D7@gmail.com%3e
>>>>
>>>> Release Vote Result:
>>>>
>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3A207F1C-3B07-4029-93D4-87ABEB412D36@gmail.com%3e
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.1-incubating:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=tree;h=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c;hb=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> NOTICE file still refers to 2013.
>>>>
>>>> The NOTICE file also references software from
>>>>
>>>> Nathan Marz and Yahoo!
>>>>
>>>> However there are no corresponding licenses in the LICENSE file.
>>>>
>>>> Does the source *contain* software from either of the above?
>>>> If so, where are the license files?
>>>> If not, why are the attributions present in the NOTICE file?
>>>>
>>>> Remember that N&L file entries are only for bits that are actually
>>>> included in the distributiion.
>>>>
>>>> The specific source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
>>>>
>>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3
>>>>
>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key available here:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>>>>
>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found here:
>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1002/
>>>>
>>>> The generated reports and documentation for this release can be found here:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-report-rc3
>>>>
>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating.
>>>>
>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating
>>>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Apache Storm Team
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://hortonworks.com/download/
>>>
>>> --
>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating

Posted by "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com>.
Hi sebb,

What specifically needs to be done to correct the NOTICE file?

Should the references to Nathan Marz and Yahoo! be removed?

Thanks,

Taylor

> On Feb 14, 2014, at 12:44 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> If the code has not changed substantially in 2014 then the date can
> stay as 2013.
> 
> As to the attribution, that depends on the _exact text_ of the license
> provided with the files.
> The license(s) should also be included in the LICENSE file.
> 
> Note that attributions in the NOTICE file must be passed to downstream
> consumers so it is important not to include anything that is not
> required.
> 
> 
>> On 14 February 2014 17:31, Suresh Srinivas <su...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> +1 (binding) from me.
>> 
>> Sebb, can you please answer the question related to the NOTICE file. I
>> think while it may not be necessary to call out individual or companies
>> contributing large portions of the code, it should not block this release
>> and can be addressed later.
>> 
>> 
>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:49 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the input!
>>> 
>>> The majority of the codebase was originally developed by Nathan Marz, and
>>> it includes significant contributions from Yahoo!.
>>> 
>>> The project was originally licensed under the Eclipse Public License, but
>>> has not transitioned to the Apache v2 license.
>>> 
>>> If putting those attributions in the NOTICE file is not the correct thing
>>> to do, please let me know the right way to handle it.
>>> 
>>> It was still 2013 when I last updated the NOTICE file. I'm not sure if
>>> that is a blocker for release or not.
>>> 
>>> - Taylor
>>> 
>>> On Feb 13, 2014, at 5:59 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 13 February 2014 07:00, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version
>>> 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
>>> 
>>> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes
>>> (6
>>> binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes.
>>> 
>>> Release Vote:
>>> 
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c44C5BAAD-0FD8-454C-84D7-C8DA924420D7@gmail.com%3e
>>> 
>>> Release Vote Result:
>>> 
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3A207F1C-3B07-4029-93D4-87ABEB412D36@gmail.com%3e
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.1-incubating:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=tree;h=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c;hb=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c
>>> 
>>> 
>>> NOTICE file still refers to 2013.
>>> 
>>> The NOTICE file also references software from
>>> 
>>> Nathan Marz and Yahoo!
>>> 
>>> However there are no corresponding licenses in the LICENSE file.
>>> 
>>> Does the source *contain* software from either of the above?
>>> If so, where are the license files?
>>> If not, why are the attributions present in the NOTICE file?
>>> 
>>> Remember that N&L file entries are only for bits that are actually
>>> included in the distributiion.
>>> 
>>> The specific source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
>>> 
>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>>> 
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3
>>> 
>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key available here:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>>> 
>>> The staging repository for this release can be found here:
>>> 
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1002/
>>> 
>>> The generated reports and documentation for this release can be found here:
>>> 
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-report-rc3
>>> 
>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating.
>>> 
>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating
>>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Apache Storm Team
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> http://hortonworks.com/download/
>> 
>> --
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating

Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
If the code has not changed substantially in 2014 then the date can
stay as 2013.

As to the attribution, that depends on the _exact text_ of the license
provided with the files.
The license(s) should also be included in the LICENSE file.

Note that attributions in the NOTICE file must be passed to downstream
consumers so it is important not to include anything that is not
required.


On 14 February 2014 17:31, Suresh Srinivas <su...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding) from me.
>
> Sebb, can you please answer the question related to the NOTICE file. I
> think while it may not be necessary to call out individual or companies
> contributing large portions of the code, it should not block this release
> and can be addressed later.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:49 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the input!
>>
>> The majority of the codebase was originally developed by Nathan Marz, and
>> it includes significant contributions from Yahoo!.
>>
>> The project was originally licensed under the Eclipse Public License, but
>> has not transitioned to the Apache v2 license.
>>
>> If putting those attributions in the NOTICE file is not the correct thing
>> to do, please let me know the right way to handle it.
>>
>> It was still 2013 when I last updated the NOTICE file. I'm not sure if
>> that is a blocker for release or not.
>>
>> - Taylor
>>
>> On Feb 13, 2014, at 5:59 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 13 February 2014 07:00, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version
>> 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
>>
>> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes
>> (6
>> binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes.
>>
>> Release Vote:
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c44C5BAAD-0FD8-454C-84D7-C8DA924420D7@gmail.com%3e
>>
>> Release Vote Result:
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3A207F1C-3B07-4029-93D4-87ABEB412D36@gmail.com%3e
>>
>>
>> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.1-incubating:
>>
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=tree;h=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c;hb=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c
>>
>>
>> NOTICE file still refers to 2013.
>>
>> The NOTICE file also references software from
>>
>> Nathan Marz and Yahoo!
>>
>> However there are no corresponding licenses in the LICENSE file.
>>
>> Does the source *contain* software from either of the above?
>> If so, where are the license files?
>> If not, why are the attributions present in the NOTICE file?
>>
>> Remember that N&L file entries are only for bits that are actually
>> included in the distributiion.
>>
>> The specific source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>>
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
>>
>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3
>>
>> The release artifacts are signed with the key available here:
>>
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>>
>> The staging repository for this release can be found here:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1002/
>>
>> The generated reports and documentation for this release can be found here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-report-rc3
>>
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating.
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating
>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Apache Storm Team
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> http://hortonworks.com/download/
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating

Posted by Suresh Srinivas <su...@hortonworks.com>.
+1 (binding) from me.

Sebb, can you please answer the question related to the NOTICE file. I
think while it may not be necessary to call out individual or companies
contributing large portions of the code, it should not block this release
and can be addressed later.


On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:49 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the input!
>
> The majority of the codebase was originally developed by Nathan Marz, and
> it includes significant contributions from Yahoo!.
>
> The project was originally licensed under the Eclipse Public License, but
> has not transitioned to the Apache v2 license.
>
> If putting those attributions in the NOTICE file is not the correct thing
> to do, please let me know the right way to handle it.
>
> It was still 2013 when I last updated the NOTICE file. I'm not sure if
> that is a blocker for release or not.
>
> - Taylor
>
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 5:59 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 13 February 2014 07:00, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version
> 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
>
> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes
> (6
> binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes.
>
> Release Vote:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c44C5BAAD-0FD8-454C-84D7-C8DA924420D7@gmail.com%3e
>
> Release Vote Result:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3A207F1C-3B07-4029-93D4-87ABEB412D36@gmail.com%3e
>
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.1-incubating:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=tree;h=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c;hb=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c
>
>
> NOTICE file still refers to 2013.
>
> The NOTICE file also references software from
>
> Nathan Marz and Yahoo!
>
> However there are no corresponding licenses in the LICENSE file.
>
> Does the source *contain* software from either of the above?
> If so, where are the license files?
> If not, why are the attributions present in the NOTICE file?
>
> Remember that N&L file entries are only for bits that are actually
> included in the distributiion.
>
> The specific source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
>
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3
>
> The release artifacts are signed with the key available here:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>
> The staging repository for this release can be found here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1002/
>
> The generated reports and documentation for this release can be found here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-report-rc3
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> Thanks,
> Apache Storm Team
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>


-- 
http://hortonworks.com/download/

-- 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, 
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader 
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or 
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately 
and delete it from your system. Thank You.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating

Posted by "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com>.
Correction: “has not transitioned to the Apache v2 license” should  read “has now transitioned to the Apache v2 license”.

On Feb 13, 2014, at 10:49 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the input!
> 
> The majority of the codebase was originally developed by Nathan Marz, and it includes significant contributions from Yahoo!.
> 
> The project was originally licensed under the Eclipse Public License, but has not transitioned to the Apache v2 license.
> 
> If putting those attributions in the NOTICE file is not the correct thing to do, please let me know the right way to handle it.
> 
> It was still 2013 when I last updated the NOTICE file. I’m not sure if that is a blocker for release or not.
> 
> - Taylor
> 
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 5:59 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 13 February 2014 07:00, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version
>>> 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
>>> 
>>> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes (6
>>> binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes.
>>> 
>>> Release Vote:
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c44C5BAAD-0FD8-454C-84D7-C8DA924420D7@gmail.com%3e
>>> 
>>> Release Vote Result:
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3A207F1C-3B07-4029-93D4-87ABEB412D36@gmail.com%3e
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.1-incubating:
>>> 
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=tree;h=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c;hb=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c
>> 
>> NOTICE file still refers to 2013.
>> 
>> The NOTICE file also references software from
>> 
>> Nathan Marz and Yahoo!
>> 
>> However there are no corresponding licenses in the LICENSE file.
>> 
>> Does the source *contain* software from either of the above?
>> If so, where are the license files?
>> If not, why are the attributions present in the NOTICE file?
>> 
>> Remember that N&L file entries are only for bits that are actually
>> included in the distributiion.
>> 
>>> The specific source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>>> 
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
>>> 
>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>>> 
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3
>>> 
>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key available here:
>>> 
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>>> 
>>> The staging repository for this release can be found here:
>>> 
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1002/
>>> 
>>> The generated reports and documentation for this release can be found here:
>>> 
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-report-rc3
>>> 
>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating.
>>> 
>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating
>>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Apache Storm Team
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating

Posted by "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the input!

The majority of the codebase was originally developed by Nathan Marz, and it includes significant contributions from Yahoo!.

The project was originally licensed under the Eclipse Public License, but has not transitioned to the Apache v2 license.

If putting those attributions in the NOTICE file is not the correct thing to do, please let me know the right way to handle it.

It was still 2013 when I last updated the NOTICE file. I’m not sure if that is a blocker for release or not.

- Taylor

On Feb 13, 2014, at 5:59 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 13 February 2014 07:00, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version
>> 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
>> 
>> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes (6
>> binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes.
>> 
>> Release Vote:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c44C5BAAD-0FD8-454C-84D7-C8DA924420D7@gmail.com%3e
>> 
>> Release Vote Result:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3A207F1C-3B07-4029-93D4-87ABEB412D36@gmail.com%3e
>> 
>> 
>> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.1-incubating:
>> 
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=tree;h=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c;hb=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c
> 
> NOTICE file still refers to 2013.
> 
> The NOTICE file also references software from
> 
> Nathan Marz and Yahoo!
> 
> However there are no corresponding licenses in the LICENSE file.
> 
> Does the source *contain* software from either of the above?
> If so, where are the license files?
> If not, why are the attributions present in the NOTICE file?
> 
> Remember that N&L file entries are only for bits that are actually
> included in the distributiion.
> 
>> The specific source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>> 
>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
>> 
>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>> 
>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3
>> 
>> The release artifacts are signed with the key available here:
>> 
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>> 
>> The staging repository for this release can be found here:
>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1002/
>> 
>> The generated reports and documentation for this release can be found here:
>> 
>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-report-rc3
>> 
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating.
>> 
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> 
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating
>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Apache Storm Team
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating

Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 13 February 2014 07:00, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version
> 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
>
> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes (6
> binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes.
>
> Release Vote:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c44C5BAAD-0FD8-454C-84D7-C8DA924420D7@gmail.com%3e
>
> Release Vote Result:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3A207F1C-3B07-4029-93D4-87ABEB412D36@gmail.com%3e
>
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.1-incubating:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=tree;h=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c;hb=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c

NOTICE file still refers to 2013.

The NOTICE file also references software from

Nathan Marz and Yahoo!

However there are no corresponding licenses in the LICENSE file.

Does the source *contain* software from either of the above?
If so, where are the license files?
If not, why are the attributions present in the NOTICE file?

Remember that N&L file entries are only for bits that are actually
included in the distributiion.

> The specific source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
>
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3
>
> The release artifacts are signed with the key available here:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>
> The staging repository for this release can be found here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1002/
>
> The generated reports and documentation for this release can be found here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-report-rc3
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> Thanks,
> Apache Storm Team

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating

Posted by "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com>.
+1 

-Taylor

On Feb 13, 2014, at 2:00 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
> 
> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes (6 binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes.
> 
> Release Vote:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c44C5BAAD-0FD8-454C-84D7-C8DA924420D7@gmail.com%3e
> 
> Release Vote Result:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3A207F1C-3B07-4029-93D4-87ABEB412D36@gmail.com%3e
> 
> 
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.1-incubating:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=tree;h=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c;hb=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c
> 
> The specific source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
> 
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3
> 
> The release artifacts are signed with the key available here:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> 
> The staging repository for this release can be found here:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1002/
> 
> The generated reports and documentation for this release can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-report-rc3
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating.
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because …
> 
> Thanks,
> Apache Storm Team

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating

Posted by "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com>.
Voting is now closed. Thank you to everyone who voted.

This vote passes with 3 binding +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Totals:

+1:
Ted Dunning*
Matt Franklin*
Suresh Srivinas*

0:

-1:

(* indicates a binding vote)

- Taylor

On Feb 13, 2014, at 2:00 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
> 
> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes (6 binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes.
> 
> Release Vote:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c44C5BAAD-0FD8-454C-84D7-C8DA924420D7@gmail.com%3e
> 
> Release Vote Result:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3A207F1C-3B07-4029-93D4-87ABEB412D36@gmail.com%3e
> 
> 
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.1-incubating:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=tree;h=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c;hb=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c
> 
> The specific source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
> 
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3
> 
> The release artifacts are signed with the key available here:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> 
> The staging repository for this release can be found here:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1002/
> 
> The generated reports and documentation for this release can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-report-rc3
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating.
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because …
> 
> Thanks,
> Apache Storm Team

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating

Posted by Matt Franklin <m....@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)

> On Feb 13, 2014, at 2:00, "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
> 
> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes (6 binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes.
> 
> Release Vote:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c44C5BAAD-0FD8-454C-84D7-C8DA924420D7@gmail.com%3e
> 
> Release Vote Result:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3A207F1C-3B07-4029-93D4-87ABEB412D36@gmail.com%3e
> 
> 
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.1-incubating:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=tree;h=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c;hb=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c
> 
> The specific source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
> 
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3
> 
> The release artifacts are signed with the key available here:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> 
> The staging repository for this release can be found here:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1002/
> 
> The generated reports and documentation for this release can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-report-rc3
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating.
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because …
> 
> Thanks,
> Apache Storm Team