You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@chemistry.apache.org by "Florian Müller (Assigned JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/03/31 15:44:24 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (CMIS-518) Interoperability issues with deserialization of attributes in Extension Elements

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CMIS-518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Florian Müller reassigned CMIS-518:
-----------------------------------

    Assignee: Florian Müller
    
> Interoperability issues with deserialization of attributes in Extension Elements
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CMIS-518
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CMIS-518
>             Project: Chemistry
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: opencmis-commons
>    Affects Versions: OpenCMIS 0.7.0
>            Reporter: David Ward
>            Assignee: Florian Müller
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: ALF13088.diff
>
>
> We came across this issue in https://issues.alfresco.com/jira/browse/ALF-13088 . This is affecting Alfresco OpenCMIS Extensions.
> It would seem that the presence or absence of xalan.jar on the sending side can affect the receiver's ability to lookup attributes on an extension element.
> The two examples given at
> http://groups.google.com/group/alfresco-opencmis-extension/browse_thread/thread/f9d9152691e5a04f
> are equivalent. They just use different ways of serializing the same namespaced XML.
> I think the problem lies in the way that OpenCMIS deserializes extension elements. It strips the namespace from all attributes, loading their local name into a single map. That means xmlns:propertyDefinitionId and propertyDefinitionId:propertyDefinitionId may be considered to be the same attribute so one can overwrite the other.
> The attached patch to org.apache.chemistry.opencmis.commons.impl.Converter.convertDomToCmisExtensionElement() fixed the issue for us, making it only pay attention to attributes in the element's namespace. What do you think?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira