You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openwhisk.apache.org by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org> on 2018/12/06 16:45:23 UTC
Staging environment servers
Hi OpenWhisk PPMC,
This month's report [1] says
> ...It seems that Apache Infra. will not provide us servers to host a staging environment that would
> help us perform needed staging testing on Pull Requests...
Can someone clarify what's missing for this to happen?
Or point me to prior discussions or tickets if I missed them - I'm
willing to dig deeper and see what can be done as it's not an unusual
requirement.
-Bertrand
Re: Staging environment servers
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:05 PM David P Grove <gr...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> ...maybe the comment for the report is just that it took 5 months from the
> time Adobe made the financial donation to the ASF to the time that the
> machines were actually made available to us....
Ok, thanks for clarifying.
I think the more specific we can be about asking for improvements the
better - if someone could briefly describe what can help OpenWhisk in
the future for similar cases (assuming more infrastructure is useful
at this) that would be great and hopefully benefit other projects.
-Bertrand
Re: Staging environment servers
Posted by David P Grove <gr...@us.ibm.com>.
Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org> wrote on 12/06/2018 01:32:26
PM:
> From: Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>
> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> Date: 12/06/2018 01:33 PM
> Subject: Re: Staging environment servers
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:05 PM David P Grove <gr...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > ...maybe the comment for the report is just that it took 5 months from
the
> > time Adobe made the financial donation to the ASF to the time that the
> > machines were actually made available to us...
>
> That's not what the report says IMO, but I'm aware of that. And yes
> that's disappointing.
>
> -Bertrand
>
I edited the point to say the following:
4. The project is still working on establishing an open staging
environment to enable proper testing without depending on closed testing
infrastructure at involved companies. Unfortunately, even after finally
arranging a corporate donation to the ASF in June to support this need, it
took until late October for Apache Infra to finish provisioning the
machines.
--dave
Re: Staging environment servers
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:05 PM David P Grove <gr...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> ...maybe the comment for the report is just that it took 5 months from the
> time Adobe made the financial donation to the ASF to the time that the
> machines were actually made available to us...
That's not what the report says IMO, but I'm aware of that. And yes
that's disappointing.
-Bertrand
Re: Staging environment servers
Posted by David P Grove <gr...@us.ibm.com>.
maybe the comment for the report is just that it took 5 months from the
time Adobe made the financial donation to the ASF to the time that the
machines were actually made available to us.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16668 for the gory details.
--dave
Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com> wrote on 12/06/2018 11:51:35 AM:
>
> Is that outdated? Per [1] Adobe Inc. contributed a donation toward
> infrastructure and now Vincent and others are working on enabling
> Jenkins on those machines.
> Do we need more machines?
>
> -r
>
> [1] INVALID URI REMOVED
>
u=https-3A__lists.apache.org_thread.html_762fbb5965e74b22bcabc9d46a400e537dad60206f32d444fdc24d3e-40-253Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org-253E&d=DwIFAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> siA1ZOg&r=Fe4FicGBU_20P2yihxV-
> apaNSFb6BSj6AlkptSF2gMk&m=Be_rZI9zYla1k-
>
ly15B5Oxd7NoHEcHcMMWr92yVc4Ls&s=1Ywg1iDzk5AWX-ipKSrWyeCMBfbKUvxxby9dTv4uV64&e=
> <INVALID URI REMOVED
>
u=https-3A__lists.apache.org_thread.html_762fbb5965e74b22bcabc9d46a400e537dad60206f32d444fdc24d3e-40-253Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org-253E&d=DwIFAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> siA1ZOg&r=Fe4FicGBU_20P2yihxV-
> apaNSFb6BSj6AlkptSF2gMk&m=Be_rZI9zYla1k-
>
ly15B5Oxd7NoHEcHcMMWr92yVc4Ls&s=1Ywg1iDzk5AWX-ipKSrWyeCMBfbKUvxxby9dTv4uV64&e=
> >
>
>
>
> > On Dec 6, 2018, at 11:45 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> <bd...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi OpenWhisk PPMC,
> >
> > This month's report [1] says
> >
> >> ...It seems that Apache Infra. will not provide us servers to
> host a staging environment that would
> >> help us perform needed staging testing on Pull Requests...
> >
> > Can someone clarify what's missing for this to happen?
> >
> > Or point me to prior discussions or tickets if I missed them - I'm
> > willing to dig deeper and see what can be done as it's not an unusual
> > requirement.
> >
> > -Bertrand
>
Re: Staging environment servers
Posted by Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com>.
Is that outdated? Per [1] Adobe Inc. contributed a donation toward infrastructure and now Vincent and others are working on enabling Jenkins on those machines.
Do we need more machines?
-r
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/762fbb5965e74b22bcabc9d46a400e537dad60206f32d444fdc24d3e@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/762fbb5965e74b22bcabc9d46a400e537dad60206f32d444fdc24d3e@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E>
> On Dec 6, 2018, at 11:45 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi OpenWhisk PPMC,
>
> This month's report [1] says
>
>> ...It seems that Apache Infra. will not provide us servers to host a staging environment that would
>> help us perform needed staging testing on Pull Requests...
>
> Can someone clarify what's missing for this to happen?
>
> Or point me to prior discussions or tickets if I missed them - I'm
> willing to dig deeper and see what can be done as it's not an unusual
> requirement.
>
> -Bertrand