You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@esme.apache.org by Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com> on 2011/04/03 11:33:03 UTC
Branch cleanup
Hi all,
I'd like to delete the following branches:
lift-2.0/
lift-2.2/
metadata/
pubsubhubbub/
pubsubhubbub-2/
update_box_redesign/
Does anyone know of a reason not to delete one of these?
In the future, I'd like to suggest including the name of a central
Jira ticket in the name of the branch, so that we can tell if work on
the branch is complete without consulting the list. Sound good?
Thanks,
Ethan
Re: Branch cleanup
Posted by Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>.
Thanks
D.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, I'll delete them all except for the comet rewrite branch when I
> have the chance.
>
> Cheers,
> Ethan
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> <yo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am not working in any of the branches..
>>
>> /Anne
>>
>> On 3 April 2011 13:58, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I did practically nothing on that branch before I had questions about how
>>> prevalent and therefore how necessary pubsubhubub was for ESME particularly
>>> after the originator Ethan said, that he kind of started it a 'science
>>> project' for himself, in one of his replies.
>>>
>>> We should just go ahead and delete that branch. We can always create an
>>> upto-date one in the future, if I or someone else decides to resume work on
>>> the feature.
>>>
>>> Imtiaz
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <hi...@gmail.com>
>>> To: <de...@esme.apache.org>
>>> Cc: "Ethan Jewett" <es...@gmail.com>
>>> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 5:01 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Branch cleanup
>>>
>>>
>>>> what about the pubsubhubbub branches? can we use any of code from
>>>> these branches?
>>>>
>>>> I don't know how far Imtiaz got or whether we should even support it
>>>> anymore.....
>>>>
>>>> I'm fine with deleting the other ones.
>>>>
>>>> D.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> .0/
>>>>> lift-2.2/
>>>>> metadata/
>>>>> pubsubhubbub/
>>>>> pubsubhubbub-2/
>>>>> update_box_redesign/
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Branch cleanup
Posted by Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>.
Ok, I'll delete them all except for the comet rewrite branch when I
have the chance.
Cheers,
Ethan
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
<yo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am not working in any of the branches..
>
> /Anne
>
> On 3 April 2011 13:58, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I did practically nothing on that branch before I had questions about how
>> prevalent and therefore how necessary pubsubhubub was for ESME particularly
>> after the originator Ethan said, that he kind of started it a 'science
>> project' for himself, in one of his replies.
>>
>> We should just go ahead and delete that branch. We can always create an
>> upto-date one in the future, if I or someone else decides to resume work on
>> the feature.
>>
>> Imtiaz
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <hi...@gmail.com>
>> To: <de...@esme.apache.org>
>> Cc: "Ethan Jewett" <es...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 5:01 PM
>> Subject: Re: Branch cleanup
>>
>>
>>> what about the pubsubhubbub branches? can we use any of code from
>>> these branches?
>>>
>>> I don't know how far Imtiaz got or whether we should even support it
>>> anymore.....
>>>
>>> I'm fine with deleting the other ones.
>>>
>>> D.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> .0/
>>>> lift-2.2/
>>>> metadata/
>>>> pubsubhubbub/
>>>> pubsubhubbub-2/
>>>> update_box_redesign/
>>
>>
>
Re: Branch cleanup
Posted by Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>.
I am not working in any of the branches..
/Anne
On 3 April 2011 13:58, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I did practically nothing on that branch before I had questions about how
> prevalent and therefore how necessary pubsubhubub was for ESME particularly
> after the originator Ethan said, that he kind of started it a 'science
> project' for himself, in one of his replies.
>
> We should just go ahead and delete that branch. We can always create an
> upto-date one in the future, if I or someone else decides to resume work on
> the feature.
>
> Imtiaz
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <hi...@gmail.com>
> To: <de...@esme.apache.org>
> Cc: "Ethan Jewett" <es...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 5:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Branch cleanup
>
>
>> what about the pubsubhubbub branches? can we use any of code from
>> these branches?
>>
>> I don't know how far Imtiaz got or whether we should even support it
>> anymore.....
>>
>> I'm fine with deleting the other ones.
>>
>> D.
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> .0/
>>> lift-2.2/
>>> metadata/
>>> pubsubhubbub/
>>> pubsubhubbub-2/
>>> update_box_redesign/
>
>
Re: Branch cleanup
Posted by Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com>.
I did practically nothing on that branch before I had questions about how
prevalent and therefore how necessary pubsubhubub was for ESME particularly
after the originator Ethan said, that he kind of started it a 'science
project' for himself, in one of his replies.
We should just go ahead and delete that branch. We can always create an
upto-date one in the future, if I or someone else decides to resume work on
the feature.
Imtiaz
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Hirsch" <hi...@gmail.com>
To: <de...@esme.apache.org>
Cc: "Ethan Jewett" <es...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: Branch cleanup
> what about the pubsubhubbub branches? can we use any of code from
> these branches?
>
> I don't know how far Imtiaz got or whether we should even support it
> anymore.....
>
> I'm fine with deleting the other ones.
>
> D.
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> .0/
>> lift-2.2/
>> metadata/
>> pubsubhubbub/
>> pubsubhubbub-2/
>> update_box_redesign/
Re: Branch cleanup
Posted by Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>.
what about the pubsubhubbub branches? can we use any of code from
these branches?
I don't know how far Imtiaz got or whether we should even support it
anymore.....
I'm fine with deleting the other ones.
D.
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com> wrote:
> .0/
> lift-2.2/
> metadata/
> pubsubhubbub/
> pubsubhubbub-2/
> update_box_redesign/