You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cocoon.apache.org by "Treiner, Joerg" <tr...@sony.de> on 2001/05/07 11:36:04 UTC

XSP & Performance

Hi,

i have massive performance problems with XSPs. The "recompilation"  of a
xsp-page (e.g. the "test.xml" from the examples dir) takes nearly one minute
(!) - is this a normal behaviour ?



> **************************************
> Joerg Treiner
> 
> Sony International(Europe)GmbH 
> Advanced Technology Center Stuttgart 
> 
> Telecommunication Research & Development
> Application & Service Group 
> 
> Hedelfinger Str. 61, 
> 70327 Stuttgart (Wangen), Germany
> 
> E-mail: treiner@sony.de  
> **************************************
> 
> 
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>

To unsubscribe, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>


Re: XSP & Performance

Posted by Donald Ball <ba...@webslingerZ.com>.
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Frans Thamura wrote:

> This is my opinion.
>
> XSP performance is quiet good, but it is still not as fast as PHP.
>
> I have experience, if we create multiple XSP that generate XML..
>
> If we create more than one branch like this scenario.the performance will be
> drop..esp. if we used multiple XSL.
>
> XML (XSP) + XSL (XSP) --> XML(XSP) + XSL (XSP) -> HTML
>                                             --> XML(XSP) + XSL2 (XSP) -->
> HTML

if you want speed, especially if you want to apply multiple xslt
stylesheets, you want to try c2.

- donald


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>

To unsubscribe, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>


Re: XSP & Performance

Posted by Frans Thamura <ft...@yahoo.com>.
This is my opinion.

XSP performance is quiet good, but it is still not as fast as PHP.

I have experience, if we create multiple XSP that generate XML..

If we create more than one branch like this scenario.the performance will be
drop..esp. if we used multiple XSL.

XML (XSP) + XSL (XSP) --> XML(XSP) + XSL (XSP) -> HTML
                                            --> XML(XSP) + XSL2 (XSP) -->
HTML

----- Original Message -----
From: "Donald Ball" <ba...@webslingerZ.com>
To: <co...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 11:35 PM
Subject: Re: XSP & Performance


> On Mon, 7 May 2001, Treiner, Joerg wrote:
>
> > i have massive performance problems with XSPs. The "recompilation"  of a
> > xsp-page (e.g. the "test.xml" from the examples dir) takes nearly one
minute
> > (!) - is this a normal behaviour ?
>
> no, that's rather slow. the compilation takes a few seconds on most of my
> boxes (lightly loaded linux-2.2.x with jdk-1.3.0fcs), and execution takes
> mere milliseconds.
>
> - donald
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
> FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>

To unsubscribe, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>


Re: XSP & Performance

Posted by Donald Ball <ba...@webslingerZ.com>.
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Treiner, Joerg wrote:

> i have massive performance problems with XSPs. The "recompilation"  of a
> xsp-page (e.g. the "test.xml" from the examples dir) takes nearly one minute
> (!) - is this a normal behaviour ?

no, that's rather slow. the compilation takes a few seconds on most of my
boxes (lightly loaded linux-2.2.x with jdk-1.3.0fcs), and execution takes
mere milliseconds.

- donald


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>

To unsubscribe, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>