You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Marc Slemko <ma...@worldgate.com> on 1997/09/23 17:15:51 UTC
Apache for NT (fwd)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Path: scanner.worldgate.com!nac!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!152.163.199.19!portc03.blue.aol.com!audrey01.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
>From: ivanlan@aol.com (Ivanlan)
>Newsgroups: comp.infosystems.www.servers.ms-windows
>Subject: Re: Apache for NT
>Date: 23 Sep 1997 14:59:19 GMT
>Lines: 15
>Message-ID: <19...@ladder02.news.aol.com>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder02.news.aol.com
>X-Admin: news@aol.com
>References: <5r...@scanner.worldgate.com>
>Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
>X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader
>Xref: scanner.worldgate.com comp.infosystems.www.servers.ms-windows:21037
The 1.3a1 NT source does not compile as packaged under MS VC++ 5.0.
The .DSW file and the .DSP files have no source files in them; they are
pretty worthless. The makefiles do not work. If you want experienced C
programmers to compile Apache for NT, then I suggest strongly that you
make at least a feeble attempt to help us figure out what's wrong.
----------------------------------------------
Ivan Van Laningham
CallWare Technologies, Inc.
ivanlan@callware.com
http://tzuk-te.callware.com (See Mayan glyphs here!)
http://huch-pib.callware.com (Currently off the net.)
----------------------------------------------
Re: Apache for NT (fwd)
Posted by Ben Laurie <be...@algroup.co.uk>.
Paul Sutton wrote:
>
> > The 1.3a1 NT source does not compile as packaged under MS VC++ 5.0.
> >
> > The .DSW file and the .DSP files have no source files in them; they are
> > pretty worthless. The makefiles do not work. If you want experienced C
> > programmers to compile Apache for NT, then I suggest strongly that you
> > make at least a feeble attempt to help us figure out what's wrong.
>
> Has anyone replied to this, erm, polite enquiry? I was going to reply on
> News but I don't have access from here. I'll send email if no-one else has
> responded (via email or news).
I replied to something rather similar privately sent to me and Alexei,
but I'm not completely sure it was the same guy.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
Ben Laurie |Phone: +44 (181) 994 6435|Apache Group member
Freelance Consultant |Fax: +44 (181) 994 6472|http://www.apache.org
and Technical Director|Email: ben@algroup.co.uk |Apache-SSL author
A.L. Digital Ltd, |http://www.algroup.co.uk/Apache-SSL
London, England. |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache
Re: Apache for NT (fwd)
Posted by Paul Sutton <pc...@hyperreal.org>.
On Wed, 24 Sep 1997, Marc Slemko wrote:
> Nope, I haven't responded and haven't noticed any responses either. I was
> tempted to say "you are a bloody idiot" but figure that wouldn't be fair
> without me looking at the NT stuff. <g>
That is an appropriate answer, but not as diplomatic as perhaps it could
be! He shouldn't be having a problem if he's a MS developer - he can
either run nmake at the command line (I guess _real_ MS developers never
use the command line, cough). Or load each of the projects in turn and
compile. It isn't exactly plug-n-play, but what does he expect for an
alpha source-only release?
But he's doing something strange if he thinks our .dsw files are empty -
since we don't even ship anything called *.dsw. Umm.
> If getting access to a news server is a problem for you and you want it,
> let me know and we could probably work something out.
Actually Dean's already offered a server which is local to apache.org so
this is sorted. Thanks for the offer.
Paul
Re: Apache for NT (fwd)
Posted by Marc Slemko <ma...@worldgate.com>.
On Wed, 24 Sep 1997, Paul Sutton wrote:
> > The 1.3a1 NT source does not compile as packaged under MS VC++ 5.0.
> >
> > The .DSW file and the .DSP files have no source files in them; they are
> > pretty worthless. The makefiles do not work. If you want experienced C
> > programmers to compile Apache for NT, then I suggest strongly that you
> > make at least a feeble attempt to help us figure out what's wrong.
>
> Has anyone replied to this, erm, polite enquiry? I was going to reply on
> News but I don't have access from here. I'll send email if no-one else has
> responded (via email or news).
Nope, I haven't responded and haven't noticed any responses either. I was
tempted to say "you are a bloody idiot" but figure that wouldn't be fair
without me looking at the NT stuff. <g>
If getting access to a news server is a problem for you and you want it,
let me know and we could probably work something out.
>
> //pcs
>
>
Re: Apache for NT (fwd)
Posted by Paul Sutton <pc...@hyperreal.org>.
> The 1.3a1 NT source does not compile as packaged under MS VC++ 5.0.
>
> The .DSW file and the .DSP files have no source files in them; they are
> pretty worthless. The makefiles do not work. If you want experienced C
> programmers to compile Apache for NT, then I suggest strongly that you
> make at least a feeble attempt to help us figure out what's wrong.
Has anyone replied to this, erm, polite enquiry? I was going to reply on
News but I don't have access from here. I'll send email if no-one else has
responded (via email or news).
//pcs