You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@trafficserver.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/11/21 10:39:59 UTC

[jira] [Work logged] (TS-5061) TS use ats_malloc instead of malloc in log module

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-5061?focusedWorklogId=32235&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-32235 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on TS-5061:
--------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 21/Nov/16 10:39
            Start Date: 21/Nov/16 10:39
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: GitHub user scw00 opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1229

    TS-5061 TS use ats_malloc instead of malloc in log module

    It should be abort immediately while malloc failed . So why do not use ats_malloc instead of malloc?

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/scw00/trafficserver 7.0.x

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1229.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #1229
    
----
commit 86eef601b984953f2e3d2b5c964367204f8afa6d
Author: scw00 <61...@qq.com>
Date:   2016-11-21T10:29:08Z

    Update LogFile.cc

----


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

            Worklog Id:     (was: 32235)
            Time Spent: 10m
    Remaining Estimate: 0h

> TS use ats_malloc instead of malloc in log module
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TS-5061
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-5061
>             Project: Traffic Server
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Song CW
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> It should be abort immediately while malloc failed . So why do not use ats_malloc instead of malloc?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)