You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@airflow.apache.org by "Shreyas Joshi (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/01/05 22:45:01 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (AIRFLOW-736) Sub dag status still "running" even if all task instances are complete

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Shreyas Joshi updated AIRFLOW-736:
----------------------------------
    Summary: Sub dag status still "running" even if all task instances are complete  (was: sub dag status still "running" even if all task instances are complete)

> Sub dag status still "running" even if all task instances are complete
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AIRFLOW-736
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-736
>             Project: Apache Airflow
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: scheduler
>    Affects Versions: Airflow 1.7.1.3
>            Reporter: Shreyas Joshi
>
> Sometimes, a sub dag is still running, even though all the task instances in it are successful. The log is an endless list of waiting for all the tasks to finish like:
> {noformat}
> [2017-01-05 00:46:26,031] {jobs.py:997} INFO - [backfill progress] | waiting: 1 | succeeded: 6 | kicked_off: 7 | failed: 0 | skipped: 4 | deadlocked: 0
> [2017-01-05 00:46:31,033] {jobs.py:997} INFO - [backfill progress] | waiting: 1 | succeeded: 6 | kicked_off: 7 | failed: 0 | skipped: 4 | deadlocked: 0
> {noformat}
> with this line hidden in there:
> {noformat}
> 2017-01-05 00:10:21,037] {jobs.py:965} ERROR - The airflow run command failed at reporting an error. This should not occur in normal circumstances. Task state is 'running',reported state is 'success'. TI is <TaskInstance: something.something_child 2017-01-03 23:00:00 [running]>
> {noformat}
> There are no dependencies on past runs. We are using the CeleryExecutor with three worker nodes. AIRFLOW-396 seems very similar to this.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)