You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jira@arrow.apache.org by "Joris Van den Bossche (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/07/16 08:35:00 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (ARROW-13328) [C++][Dataset] Use an
ExecPlan for synchronous scans or drop synchronous scans
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-13328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17381890#comment-17381890 ]
Joris Van den Bossche edited comment on ARROW-13328 at 7/16/21, 8:34 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Which raises the question of course: should we maybe switch the default for pyarrow 5.0.0? (EDIT, ah I see that's ARROW-13338 linked by Ben above)
was (Author: jorisvandenbossche):
Which raises the question of course: should we maybe switch the default for pyarrow 5.0.0?
> [C++][Dataset] Use an ExecPlan for synchronous scans or drop synchronous scans
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-13328
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-13328
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: C++
> Reporter: Ben Kietzman
> Priority: Major
> Labels: dataset
> Fix For: 6.0.0
>
>
> ARROW-13238 ensured that asynchronous dataset scans are internally backed by ExecPlans, allowing easier integration with new ExecNode sinks.
> However synchronous scans are still backed by {{FilterAndProjectScanTask}} and are not consumable using ExecNodes. Ideally, we should route synchronous scans through an ExecPlan as well.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)