You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@activemq.apache.org by "ASF subversion and git services (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/12/17 05:46:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (ARTEMIS-3707) ResourceAdapter improvements

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17648859#comment-17648859 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on ARTEMIS-3707:
----------------------------------------------------------

Commit 59a7257ce5e9b5fbf9742a919db2b58668d60ec8 in activemq-artemis's branch refs/heads/main from waldi5001
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git;h=59a7257ce5 ]

ARTEMIS-3707 remove use of TransactionManager

The TransactionManager interface defines the methods that allow an
*application server* to manage transaction boundaries. However, the
TransactionSynchronizationRegistry is intended for use by system level
application server components such as persistence managers, *resource
adapters*, as well as EJB and Web application components.


> ResourceAdapter improvements
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-3707
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3707
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Waldi
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 9h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Hi Everybody,
> I've tried to install the resourceAdapter in openliberty/WLP by myself. I've got in some troubles and fixed it by myself. Now, I would like to provide the modifications and a small piece of documentation of the resourceAdapter, if interested.
>  * Sample config / project for openliberty/WLP
>  * remove usage of the transactionManager in the resource adapter
>  * fix the jakarta ra.xml namespaces and classnames
>  * create a maven build for a rar archive with fewer dependencies and therefore a smaller footprint.
> I took notice of ARTEMIS-1487 and ARTEMIS-1614. In my opinion, with my contributions, we can close these issues. Can you tell me your thoughts and give me feedback?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)