You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@guacamole.apache.org by Henri Alves de Godoy <he...@fca.unicamp.br.INVALID> on 2020/08/03 14:52:06 UTC
Re:
Hi all,
Just returning the tests.
Setting the value of 0 to the connection limit, the message stopped
appearing.
Thank you
Att
Henri.
Em sex., 31 de jul. de 2020 às 08:51, Henri Alves de Godoy <
henri.godoy@fca.unicamp.br> escreveu:
> Hi Mike, thanks for the great explanation and also for making me feel more
> relaxed.
>
> In the next few days we will place 2 computer labs of 60 students each for
> remote access.
>
> I will do this test by placing the value 0 at the connection limit.
>
> I will give a feedback to say if it worked.
>
> Thanks
> Henri.
>
> Em qui., 30 de jul. de 2020 às 22:31, Mike Jumper <mj...@apache.org>
> escreveu:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 6:06 PM Henri Alves de Godoy
>> <he...@fca.unicamp.br.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Nick, thanks for reply.
>>>
>>> I have no configuration that limits my connection or group.
>>>
>>
>> Based on similar reports at my day job, I think recent changes may have
>> inadvertently changed the default concurrency limits for connections to 1.
>>
>> Have you tried specifying 0 (the representation for no limit) for the
>> concurrency limits in the connection?
>>
>> I'm not using load balancing either.
>>>
>>
>> Concurrent usage limits are not specific to balancing. They can be
>> applied to connections. This is mainly of use for remote desktop servers
>> that will otherwise kick off the current user of a connection if another
>> user attempts to connect (Windows RDP), or remote desktop servers that
>> should only accept a limited number of connections due to limited resources.
>>
>> There is no error or information in the log files.
>>>
>>
>> There might be an informational message in the logs noting that a
>> connection attempt was denied.
>>
>> After the message appears, I choose Reconnect for about 3 times and then
>>> I will connect it again.
>>>
>>> My fear is that when I start using with more people > 60, this problem
>>> will become more serious and start to interfere.
>>>
>>
>> There is no need to fear concurrency limits, and there is nothing here
>> that can become more serious or interfere. Concurrency limits limit
>> concurrent usage of a connection. All such limits would prevent is multiple
>> users accessing the exact same connection at the exact same time, or in
>> this case prevent a single user from accessing the same connection multiple
>> times. You can specify any limits you like, including no limits. This is
>> naturally independent of any limits that the remote desktop being accessed
>> might enforce.
>>
>> - Mike
>>
>>
>
> --
> --
> Henri Alves Godoy
> Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação
> Faculdade de Ciências Aplicadas - FCA
> Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP
> Fone: (19) 3701-6682
>
--
--
Henri Alves Godoy
Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação
Faculdade de Ciências Aplicadas - FCA
Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP
Fone: (19) 3701-6682