You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Viraj Jasani (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/04/23 06:53:00 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (HADOOP-17409) Remove S3Guard - no longer
needed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17330029#comment-17330029 ]
Viraj Jasani edited comment on HADOOP-17409 at 4/23/21, 6:52 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[~stevel@apache.org] Is your proposal to remove S3Guard applicable to 3.4.0 onwards or is it for next major release (4.0.0) onwards?
Thanks
was (Author: vjasani):
[~stevel@apache.org] Is your intention to remove S3Guard applicable to 3.4.0 onwards or is it for next major release (4.0.0) onwards?
> Remove S3Guard - no longer needed
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-17409
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17409
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: fs/s3
> Affects Versions: 3.3.0
> Reporter: Steve Loughran
> Priority: Major
>
> With Consistent S3, S3Guard is superfluous.
> stop developing it and wean people off it as soon as they can.
> Then we can worry about what to do in the code. It has gradually insinuated its way through the layers, especially things like multi-object delete handling (see HADOOP-17244). Things would be a lot simpler without it
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org