You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by fu...@apache.org on 2009/07/01 18:10:56 UTC
svn commit: r790245 - /tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt
Author: funkman
Date: Wed Jul 1 16:10:56 2009
New Revision: 790245
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=790245&view=rev
Log:
vote
Modified:
tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt?rev=790245&r1=790244&r2=790245&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt (original)
+++ tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt Wed Jul 1 16:10:56 2009
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
updated from a previous proposal based on the comments of Konstantin.
mark and konstatin: please vote again.
+1: rjung, kkolinko, markt
+ -0: new Boolean bad, Boolean.valueOf() much better
-1:
* Make AccessLogValve thread safe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r790245 - /tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
funkman@apache.org wrote:
> Author: funkman
> Date: Wed Jul 1 16:10:56 2009
> New Revision: 790245
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=790245&view=rev
> Log:
> vote
>
> Modified:
> tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt
>
> Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt?rev=790245&r1=790244&r2=790245&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt (original)
> +++ tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt Wed Jul 1 16:10:56 2009
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
> updated from a previous proposal based on the comments of Konstantin.
> mark and konstatin: please vote again.
> +1: rjung, kkolinko, markt
> + -0: new Boolean bad, Boolean.valueOf() much better
Bad yes, but consistent with the current code ;)
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org