You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Mike Tutkowski <mi...@solidfire.com> on 2013/12/18 21:55:46 UTC

XenServer SR Question

Hi,

I just noticed a problem today while creating SRs in XenServer. Perhaps
someone with related experience could point me in the right direction.

Let's say my SAN's management IP address is X.

I can have XenServer create a shared SR using IP address X with CHAP
credentials Y.

If I try to have XenServer create another shared SR using IP address X that
uses different CHAP credentials (ex. CHAP credentials Z), XenServer returns
a discovery failure.

It's like XenServer is expecting all iSCSI targets at the same IP address
to have the same CHAP credentials.

Does anyone know if I am mistaken here? This seems like a critical defect
if this is true.

Thanks!

-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*

Re: XenServer SR Question

Posted by Mike Tutkowski <mi...@solidfire.com>.
Just as an FYI to those it may concern:

The way I got around this issue with XenServer is to use a SolidFire
feature we refer to as Volume Access Groups (VAGs).

A VAG is essentially a way to map a host IQN to the volumes it can access
on the SAN without using CHAP.

For the sake of consistency (and because VAGs are actually more powerful
than CHAP), I went ahead and updated the SolidFire plug-in to use VAGs for
all of the hypervisor types it currently supports (XenServer, VMware, and
KVM).

Technically the SolidFire plug-in has no knowledge of the hypervisor in
question, so my updates also required that I continue with work Edison Su
had started in 4.2 to notify storage plug-ins when a host needs access to a
volume and when a host's access to a volume should be revoked. At these
notifications points is when VAGs are leveraged.


On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:

> One alternative I have is to abandon using SolidFire's multi-tenancy
> ability (separating volumes by accounts for reporting purposes). If I only
> used one uber account, then I'd only be using one set of credentials.
>
> Another is more work and would have to wait until 4.4: Add logic to the
> storage plug-in framework to notify storage plug-ins when a host needs
> access to a given volume that's supplied by that plug-in's storage. In this
> model, the plug-in could choose to not use CHAP and instead tell the
> storage system that host x is OKed for accessing volume y.
>
> We already have the ability to listen for host-connect-to-storage events,
> but that is not granular enough for my purposes (as my storage is zone wide
> and can be used by tons of hosts at the same time, so I wouldn't want to
> give them all access to all of the volumes of the SAN).
>
> Does anyone know if this is just a XenServer problem?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
>
>> Good points, Tim.
>>
>> Do you know if this is an issue the XenServer group plans to address
>> anytime soon?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Tim Mackey <tm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The problem with doing that is during host reboot. Then only one of the
>>> credential sets will be used to do the discovery, and on each reboot a
>>> discovery will occur. It'll also have issues with multipath.
>>>
>>> There will also be an issue during pool join, and there could be
>>> replication issues in xenstore.
>>>
>>> Net is that you can make things work by doing that, but error recovery
>>> paths and reboots break.
>>> On Dec 18, 2013 6:07 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <mi...@solidfire.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > We have noticed if I ssh into XenServer and delete the file /etc/iscsi/
>>> > 10.10.8.108,3260 (where 10.10.8.108 is our storage's IP address and
>>> 3260 is
>>> > the port) that I can create SRs using different CHAP credentials.
>>> >
>>> > Can anyone think of a "got-cha" here?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks!
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Tim Mackey <tm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Mike,
>>> > >
>>> > > I'm referring to the open-iscsi code used by XAPI.  XAPI has a
>>> storage
>>> > > manager API which deals with all the SR management.  It's also where
>>> the
>>> > > issue you're running into exists.
>>> > >
>>> > > In terms of clearing the connections and credentials, the easiest
>>> way is
>>> > > via a reboot.  Since your using multiple CHAP credentials, only one
>>> set
>>> > > will be used and any SRs which use a different CHAP secret will fail
>>> to
>>> > > have their targets discovered during the pdb-plug phase of storage
>>> > > initialization.  You can then destroy the SRs which failed to come
>>> up and
>>> > > move forward.
>>> > >
>>> > > -tim
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>> > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hey Tim,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > When you refer to modifying the storage manager, are you referring
>>> to
>>> > > > CloudStack?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Perhaps you are referring to CitrixResourceBase, which is where we
>>> > > discover
>>> > > > and log in to iSCSI targets.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Do you know of a way to delete those cached CHAP credentials via
>>> XAPI
>>> > so
>>> > > > when new ones are used for discovery they can work?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Thanks!
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Tim Mackey <tm...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Unfortunately what you're experiencing is how it works.  While
>>> > > XenServer
>>> > > > > does support different CHAP credentials by SR, it only supports a
>>> > > single
>>> > > > > CHAP credential for discovery.  It can be made to work, but you'd
>>> > need
>>> > > to
>>> > > > > either modify how the storage manager works to pull it off, or
>>> > rewrite
>>> > > > some
>>> > > > > of the init scripts to cache the discovery data.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>> > > > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > Hi,
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > I just noticed a problem today while creating SRs in XenServer.
>>> > > Perhaps
>>> > > > > > someone with related experience could point me in the right
>>> > > direction.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > Let's say my SAN's management IP address is X.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > I can have XenServer create a shared SR using IP address X with
>>> > CHAP
>>> > > > > > credentials Y.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > If I try to have XenServer create another shared SR using IP
>>> > address
>>> > > X
>>> > > > > that
>>> > > > > > uses different CHAP credentials (ex. CHAP credentials Z),
>>> XenServer
>>> > > > > returns
>>> > > > > > a discovery failure.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > It's like XenServer is expecting all iSCSI targets at the same
>>> IP
>>> > > > address
>>> > > > > > to have the same CHAP credentials.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > Does anyone know if I am mistaken here? This seems like a
>>> critical
>>> > > > defect
>>> > > > > > if this is true.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > Thanks!
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > --
>>> > > > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
>>> > > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>> > > > > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
>>> > > > > > o: 303.746.7302
>>> > > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
>>> > > > > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>> > > > > > *™*
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
>>> > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>> > > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
>>> > > > o: 303.746.7302
>>> > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
>>> > > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>> > > > *™*
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > *Mike Tutkowski*
>>> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
>>> > o: 303.746.7302
>>> > Advancing the way the world uses the
>>> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>> > *™*
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
>> o: 303.746.7302
>> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>> *™*
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *™*
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*

Re: XenServer SR Question

Posted by Mike Tutkowski <mi...@solidfire.com>.
One alternative I have is to abandon using SolidFire's multi-tenancy
ability (separating volumes by accounts for reporting purposes). If I only
used one uber account, then I'd only be using one set of credentials.

Another is more work and would have to wait until 4.4: Add logic to the
storage plug-in framework to notify storage plug-ins when a host needs
access to a given volume that's supplied by that plug-in's storage. In this
model, the plug-in could choose to not use CHAP and instead tell the
storage system that host x is OKed for accessing volume y.

We already have the ability to listen for host-connect-to-storage events,
but that is not granular enough for my purposes (as my storage is zone wide
and can be used by tons of hosts at the same time, so I wouldn't want to
give them all access to all of the volumes of the SAN).

Does anyone know if this is just a XenServer problem?

Thanks


On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:

> Good points, Tim.
>
> Do you know if this is an issue the XenServer group plans to address
> anytime soon?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Tim Mackey <tm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The problem with doing that is during host reboot. Then only one of the
>> credential sets will be used to do the discovery, and on each reboot a
>> discovery will occur. It'll also have issues with multipath.
>>
>> There will also be an issue during pool join, and there could be
>> replication issues in xenstore.
>>
>> Net is that you can make things work by doing that, but error recovery
>> paths and reboots break.
>> On Dec 18, 2013 6:07 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <mi...@solidfire.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > We have noticed if I ssh into XenServer and delete the file /etc/iscsi/
>> > 10.10.8.108,3260 (where 10.10.8.108 is our storage's IP address and
>> 3260 is
>> > the port) that I can create SRs using different CHAP credentials.
>> >
>> > Can anyone think of a "got-cha" here?
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Tim Mackey <tm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Mike,
>> > >
>> > > I'm referring to the open-iscsi code used by XAPI.  XAPI has a storage
>> > > manager API which deals with all the SR management.  It's also where
>> the
>> > > issue you're running into exists.
>> > >
>> > > In terms of clearing the connections and credentials, the easiest way
>> is
>> > > via a reboot.  Since your using multiple CHAP credentials, only one
>> set
>> > > will be used and any SRs which use a different CHAP secret will fail
>> to
>> > > have their targets discovered during the pdb-plug phase of storage
>> > > initialization.  You can then destroy the SRs which failed to come up
>> and
>> > > move forward.
>> > >
>> > > -tim
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>> > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hey Tim,
>> > > >
>> > > > When you refer to modifying the storage manager, are you referring
>> to
>> > > > CloudStack?
>> > > >
>> > > > Perhaps you are referring to CitrixResourceBase, which is where we
>> > > discover
>> > > > and log in to iSCSI targets.
>> > > >
>> > > > Do you know of a way to delete those cached CHAP credentials via
>> XAPI
>> > so
>> > > > when new ones are used for discovery they can work?
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks!
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Tim Mackey <tm...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Unfortunately what you're experiencing is how it works.  While
>> > > XenServer
>> > > > > does support different CHAP credentials by SR, it only supports a
>> > > single
>> > > > > CHAP credential for discovery.  It can be made to work, but you'd
>> > need
>> > > to
>> > > > > either modify how the storage manager works to pull it off, or
>> > rewrite
>> > > > some
>> > > > > of the init scripts to cache the discovery data.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>> > > > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I just noticed a problem today while creating SRs in XenServer.
>> > > Perhaps
>> > > > > > someone with related experience could point me in the right
>> > > direction.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Let's say my SAN's management IP address is X.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I can have XenServer create a shared SR using IP address X with
>> > CHAP
>> > > > > > credentials Y.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > If I try to have XenServer create another shared SR using IP
>> > address
>> > > X
>> > > > > that
>> > > > > > uses different CHAP credentials (ex. CHAP credentials Z),
>> XenServer
>> > > > > returns
>> > > > > > a discovery failure.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > It's like XenServer is expecting all iSCSI targets at the same
>> IP
>> > > > address
>> > > > > > to have the same CHAP credentials.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Does anyone know if I am mistaken here? This seems like a
>> critical
>> > > > defect
>> > > > > > if this is true.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Thanks!
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
>> > > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>> > > > > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
>> > > > > > o: 303.746.7302
>> > > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
>> > > > > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>> > > > > > *™*
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
>> > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>> > > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
>> > > > o: 303.746.7302
>> > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
>> > > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>> > > > *™*
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > *Mike Tutkowski*
>> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
>> > o: 303.746.7302
>> > Advancing the way the world uses the
>> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>> > *™*
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *™*
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*

Re: XenServer SR Question

Posted by Mike Tutkowski <mi...@solidfire.com>.
Good points, Tim.

Do you know if this is an issue the XenServer group plans to address
anytime soon?

Thanks


On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Tim Mackey <tm...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The problem with doing that is during host reboot. Then only one of the
> credential sets will be used to do the discovery, and on each reboot a
> discovery will occur. It'll also have issues with multipath.
>
> There will also be an issue during pool join, and there could be
> replication issues in xenstore.
>
> Net is that you can make things work by doing that, but error recovery
> paths and reboots break.
> On Dec 18, 2013 6:07 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <mi...@solidfire.com>
> wrote:
>
> > We have noticed if I ssh into XenServer and delete the file /etc/iscsi/
> > 10.10.8.108,3260 (where 10.10.8.108 is our storage's IP address and 3260
> is
> > the port) that I can create SRs using different CHAP credentials.
> >
> > Can anyone think of a "got-cha" here?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Tim Mackey <tm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Mike,
> > >
> > > I'm referring to the open-iscsi code used by XAPI.  XAPI has a storage
> > > manager API which deals with all the SR management.  It's also where
> the
> > > issue you're running into exists.
> > >
> > > In terms of clearing the connections and credentials, the easiest way
> is
> > > via a reboot.  Since your using multiple CHAP credentials, only one set
> > > will be used and any SRs which use a different CHAP secret will fail to
> > > have their targets discovered during the pdb-plug phase of storage
> > > initialization.  You can then destroy the SRs which failed to come up
> and
> > > move forward.
> > >
> > > -tim
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey Tim,
> > > >
> > > > When you refer to modifying the storage manager, are you referring to
> > > > CloudStack?
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps you are referring to CitrixResourceBase, which is where we
> > > discover
> > > > and log in to iSCSI targets.
> > > >
> > > > Do you know of a way to delete those cached CHAP credentials via XAPI
> > so
> > > > when new ones are used for discovery they can work?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Tim Mackey <tm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Unfortunately what you're experiencing is how it works.  While
> > > XenServer
> > > > > does support different CHAP credentials by SR, it only supports a
> > > single
> > > > > CHAP credential for discovery.  It can be made to work, but you'd
> > need
> > > to
> > > > > either modify how the storage manager works to pull it off, or
> > rewrite
> > > > some
> > > > > of the init scripts to cache the discovery data.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I just noticed a problem today while creating SRs in XenServer.
> > > Perhaps
> > > > > > someone with related experience could point me in the right
> > > direction.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Let's say my SAN's management IP address is X.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I can have XenServer create a shared SR using IP address X with
> > CHAP
> > > > > > credentials Y.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If I try to have XenServer create another shared SR using IP
> > address
> > > X
> > > > > that
> > > > > > uses different CHAP credentials (ex. CHAP credentials Z),
> XenServer
> > > > > returns
> > > > > > a discovery failure.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's like XenServer is expecting all iSCSI targets at the same IP
> > > > address
> > > > > > to have the same CHAP credentials.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does anyone know if I am mistaken here? This seems like a
> critical
> > > > defect
> > > > > > if this is true.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > > > > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > > > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > > > > *™*
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > > *™*
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > *™*
> >
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*

Re: XenServer SR Question

Posted by Tim Mackey <tm...@gmail.com>.
The problem with doing that is during host reboot. Then only one of the
credential sets will be used to do the discovery, and on each reboot a
discovery will occur. It'll also have issues with multipath.

There will also be an issue during pool join, and there could be
replication issues in xenstore.

Net is that you can make things work by doing that, but error recovery
paths and reboots break.
On Dec 18, 2013 6:07 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <mi...@solidfire.com>
wrote:

> We have noticed if I ssh into XenServer and delete the file /etc/iscsi/
> 10.10.8.108,3260 (where 10.10.8.108 is our storage's IP address and 3260 is
> the port) that I can create SRs using different CHAP credentials.
>
> Can anyone think of a "got-cha" here?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Tim Mackey <tm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Mike,
> >
> > I'm referring to the open-iscsi code used by XAPI.  XAPI has a storage
> > manager API which deals with all the SR management.  It's also where the
> > issue you're running into exists.
> >
> > In terms of clearing the connections and credentials, the easiest way is
> > via a reboot.  Since your using multiple CHAP credentials, only one set
> > will be used and any SRs which use a different CHAP secret will fail to
> > have their targets discovered during the pdb-plug phase of storage
> > initialization.  You can then destroy the SRs which failed to come up and
> > move forward.
> >
> > -tim
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey Tim,
> > >
> > > When you refer to modifying the storage manager, are you referring to
> > > CloudStack?
> > >
> > > Perhaps you are referring to CitrixResourceBase, which is where we
> > discover
> > > and log in to iSCSI targets.
> > >
> > > Do you know of a way to delete those cached CHAP credentials via XAPI
> so
> > > when new ones are used for discovery they can work?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Tim Mackey <tm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Unfortunately what you're experiencing is how it works.  While
> > XenServer
> > > > does support different CHAP credentials by SR, it only supports a
> > single
> > > > CHAP credential for discovery.  It can be made to work, but you'd
> need
> > to
> > > > either modify how the storage manager works to pull it off, or
> rewrite
> > > some
> > > > of the init scripts to cache the discovery data.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I just noticed a problem today while creating SRs in XenServer.
> > Perhaps
> > > > > someone with related experience could point me in the right
> > direction.
> > > > >
> > > > > Let's say my SAN's management IP address is X.
> > > > >
> > > > > I can have XenServer create a shared SR using IP address X with
> CHAP
> > > > > credentials Y.
> > > > >
> > > > > If I try to have XenServer create another shared SR using IP
> address
> > X
> > > > that
> > > > > uses different CHAP credentials (ex. CHAP credentials Z), XenServer
> > > > returns
> > > > > a discovery failure.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's like XenServer is expecting all iSCSI targets at the same IP
> > > address
> > > > > to have the same CHAP credentials.
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anyone know if I am mistaken here? This seems like a critical
> > > defect
> > > > > if this is true.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > > > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > > > *™*
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > *™*
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *™*
>

Re: XenServer SR Question

Posted by Mike Tutkowski <mi...@solidfire.com>.
We have noticed if I ssh into XenServer and delete the file /etc/iscsi/
10.10.8.108,3260 (where 10.10.8.108 is our storage's IP address and 3260 is
the port) that I can create SRs using different CHAP credentials.

Can anyone think of a "got-cha" here?

Thanks!


On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Tim Mackey <tm...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Mike,
>
> I'm referring to the open-iscsi code used by XAPI.  XAPI has a storage
> manager API which deals with all the SR management.  It's also where the
> issue you're running into exists.
>
> In terms of clearing the connections and credentials, the easiest way is
> via a reboot.  Since your using multiple CHAP credentials, only one set
> will be used and any SRs which use a different CHAP secret will fail to
> have their targets discovered during the pdb-plug phase of storage
> initialization.  You can then destroy the SRs which failed to come up and
> move forward.
>
> -tim
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey Tim,
> >
> > When you refer to modifying the storage manager, are you referring to
> > CloudStack?
> >
> > Perhaps you are referring to CitrixResourceBase, which is where we
> discover
> > and log in to iSCSI targets.
> >
> > Do you know of a way to delete those cached CHAP credentials via XAPI so
> > when new ones are used for discovery they can work?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Tim Mackey <tm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Unfortunately what you're experiencing is how it works.  While
> XenServer
> > > does support different CHAP credentials by SR, it only supports a
> single
> > > CHAP credential for discovery.  It can be made to work, but you'd need
> to
> > > either modify how the storage manager works to pull it off, or rewrite
> > some
> > > of the init scripts to cache the discovery data.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I just noticed a problem today while creating SRs in XenServer.
> Perhaps
> > > > someone with related experience could point me in the right
> direction.
> > > >
> > > > Let's say my SAN's management IP address is X.
> > > >
> > > > I can have XenServer create a shared SR using IP address X with CHAP
> > > > credentials Y.
> > > >
> > > > If I try to have XenServer create another shared SR using IP address
> X
> > > that
> > > > uses different CHAP credentials (ex. CHAP credentials Z), XenServer
> > > returns
> > > > a discovery failure.
> > > >
> > > > It's like XenServer is expecting all iSCSI targets at the same IP
> > address
> > > > to have the same CHAP credentials.
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone know if I am mistaken here? This seems like a critical
> > defect
> > > > if this is true.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > > *™*
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > *™*
> >
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*

Re: XenServer SR Question

Posted by Tim Mackey <tm...@gmail.com>.
Mike,

I'm referring to the open-iscsi code used by XAPI.  XAPI has a storage
manager API which deals with all the SR management.  It's also where the
issue you're running into exists.

In terms of clearing the connections and credentials, the easiest way is
via a reboot.  Since your using multiple CHAP credentials, only one set
will be used and any SRs which use a different CHAP secret will fail to
have their targets discovered during the pdb-plug phase of storage
initialization.  You can then destroy the SRs which failed to come up and
move forward.

-tim


On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:

> Hey Tim,
>
> When you refer to modifying the storage manager, are you referring to
> CloudStack?
>
> Perhaps you are referring to CitrixResourceBase, which is where we discover
> and log in to iSCSI targets.
>
> Do you know of a way to delete those cached CHAP credentials via XAPI so
> when new ones are used for discovery they can work?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Tim Mackey <tm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately what you're experiencing is how it works.  While XenServer
> > does support different CHAP credentials by SR, it only supports a single
> > CHAP credential for discovery.  It can be made to work, but you'd need to
> > either modify how the storage manager works to pull it off, or rewrite
> some
> > of the init scripts to cache the discovery data.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I just noticed a problem today while creating SRs in XenServer. Perhaps
> > > someone with related experience could point me in the right direction.
> > >
> > > Let's say my SAN's management IP address is X.
> > >
> > > I can have XenServer create a shared SR using IP address X with CHAP
> > > credentials Y.
> > >
> > > If I try to have XenServer create another shared SR using IP address X
> > that
> > > uses different CHAP credentials (ex. CHAP credentials Z), XenServer
> > returns
> > > a discovery failure.
> > >
> > > It's like XenServer is expecting all iSCSI targets at the same IP
> address
> > > to have the same CHAP credentials.
> > >
> > > Does anyone know if I am mistaken here? This seems like a critical
> defect
> > > if this is true.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > *™*
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *™*
>

Re: XenServer SR Question

Posted by Mike Tutkowski <mi...@solidfire.com>.
Hey Tim,

When you refer to modifying the storage manager, are you referring to
CloudStack?

Perhaps you are referring to CitrixResourceBase, which is where we discover
and log in to iSCSI targets.

Do you know of a way to delete those cached CHAP credentials via XAPI so
when new ones are used for discovery they can work?

Thanks!


On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Tim Mackey <tm...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Unfortunately what you're experiencing is how it works.  While XenServer
> does support different CHAP credentials by SR, it only supports a single
> CHAP credential for discovery.  It can be made to work, but you'd need to
> either modify how the storage manager works to pull it off, or rewrite some
> of the init scripts to cache the discovery data.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just noticed a problem today while creating SRs in XenServer. Perhaps
> > someone with related experience could point me in the right direction.
> >
> > Let's say my SAN's management IP address is X.
> >
> > I can have XenServer create a shared SR using IP address X with CHAP
> > credentials Y.
> >
> > If I try to have XenServer create another shared SR using IP address X
> that
> > uses different CHAP credentials (ex. CHAP credentials Z), XenServer
> returns
> > a discovery failure.
> >
> > It's like XenServer is expecting all iSCSI targets at the same IP address
> > to have the same CHAP credentials.
> >
> > Does anyone know if I am mistaken here? This seems like a critical defect
> > if this is true.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > *™*
> >
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*

Re: XenServer SR Question

Posted by Mike Tutkowski <mi...@solidfire.com>.
Thanks, Tim!

I am working with someone at SolidFire now who has experience with this
issue and might have a workaround.


On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Tim Mackey <tm...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Unfortunately what you're experiencing is how it works.  While XenServer
> does support different CHAP credentials by SR, it only supports a single
> CHAP credential for discovery.  It can be made to work, but you'd need to
> either modify how the storage manager works to pull it off, or rewrite some
> of the init scripts to cache the discovery data.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just noticed a problem today while creating SRs in XenServer. Perhaps
> > someone with related experience could point me in the right direction.
> >
> > Let's say my SAN's management IP address is X.
> >
> > I can have XenServer create a shared SR using IP address X with CHAP
> > credentials Y.
> >
> > If I try to have XenServer create another shared SR using IP address X
> that
> > uses different CHAP credentials (ex. CHAP credentials Z), XenServer
> returns
> > a discovery failure.
> >
> > It's like XenServer is expecting all iSCSI targets at the same IP address
> > to have the same CHAP credentials.
> >
> > Does anyone know if I am mistaken here? This seems like a critical defect
> > if this is true.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > *™*
> >
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*

Re: XenServer SR Question

Posted by Tim Mackey <tm...@gmail.com>.
Unfortunately what you're experiencing is how it works.  While XenServer
does support different CHAP credentials by SR, it only supports a single
CHAP credential for discovery.  It can be made to work, but you'd need to
either modify how the storage manager works to pull it off, or rewrite some
of the init scripts to cache the discovery data.


On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I just noticed a problem today while creating SRs in XenServer. Perhaps
> someone with related experience could point me in the right direction.
>
> Let's say my SAN's management IP address is X.
>
> I can have XenServer create a shared SR using IP address X with CHAP
> credentials Y.
>
> If I try to have XenServer create another shared SR using IP address X that
> uses different CHAP credentials (ex. CHAP credentials Z), XenServer returns
> a discovery failure.
>
> It's like XenServer is expecting all iSCSI targets at the same IP address
> to have the same CHAP credentials.
>
> Does anyone know if I am mistaken here? This seems like a critical defect
> if this is true.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *™*
>