[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-10783) Allow literal value as parameter of UDF & UDA

["Benjamin Lerer (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Benjamin Lerer updated CASSANDRA-10783:
---------------------------------------
    Status: Ready to Commit  (was: Patch Available)

> Allow literal value as parameter of UDF & UDA
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-10783
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10783
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: CQL
>            Reporter: DOAN DuyHai
>            Assignee: Robert Stupp
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: CQL3, UDF, client-impacting, doc-impacting
>             Fix For: 3.x
>
>
> I have defined the following UDF
> {code:sql}
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION  maxOf(current int, testValue int) RETURNS NULL ON NULL INPUT 
> RETURNS int 
> LANGUAGE java 
> AS  'return Math.max(current,testValue);'
> CREATE TABLE maxValue(id int primary key, val int);
> INSERT INTO maxValue(id, val) VALUES(1, 100);
> SELECT maxOf(val, 101) FROM maxValue WHERE id=1;
> {code}
> I got the following error message:
> {code}
> SyntaxException: <ErrorMessage code=2000 [Syntax error in CQL query] message="line 1:19 no viable alternative at input '101' (SELECT maxOf(val1, [101]...)">
> {code}
>  It would be nice to allow literal value as parameter of UDF and UDA too.
>  I was thinking about an use-case for an UDA groupBy() function where the end user can *inject* at runtime a literal value to select which aggregation he want to display, something similar to GROUP BY ... HAVING <filter clause>



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)