You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@royale.apache.org by Hugo Ferreira <hf...@gmail.com> on 2020/10/20 23:20:19 UTC
Clarify the different component sets
Hi,
For a while that I have a question to make about current components set :)
If search for TextInput.as, I found the following projects:
- HTML5
- Basic: I know that this is the smallest and 100% PAYG core components
from the framework
- Express
- Jewel: I know that this extends from Basic and it's focus of design with
TDJ samples (excelent choice for new project and Flex remake projects)
- MXRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for MX components (excelent
choice to port from Flex with less time and no focus on design)
- SparkRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for Spark components
(excelent choice to port from Flex with less time and no focus on design)
I don't know what the purpose of Express components set and HTML5
Thank you,
Hugo.
Re: Clarify the different component sets
Posted by Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>.
More than that, I think each directory should have a README file that
explains the goal or intended use of that component set.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 10:46 AM Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we should list the component sets that are not complete in a
> separate list below the mention of Basic and Jewel...and MDL?
>
> I can get to that later today.
>
> Andrew
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 5:57 AM Hugo Ferreira <hf...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you again.
>> It is all clear for me now :)
>>
>> Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> escreveu no dia quarta,
>> 21/10/2020
>> à(s) 09:54:
>>
>> > I think Express was a good idea some years ago, but was not developed,
>> so
>> > maybe the problem is that it didn't go so far, but maybe others want to
>> > develop that one.
>> > In the other hand we have other UI sets that was just experiments like
>> > CreateJS or Flat, I think those could be removed or something (at least
>> > from the SDK or from building) since don't think will go further
>> >
>> > El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 10:25, Hugo Ferreira (<
>> hferreira.80@gmail.com
>> > >)
>> > escribió:
>> >
>> > > I may be wrong but:
>> > > Express appears before Jewel ?
>> > > Seems natural to me to pick up Express if I want to started and we
>> would
>> > > not have any other option but this is not the case today and with
>> Jewel
>> > > that evolved a lot, seems that Express end up alone.
>> > > However if for some reason, someone want to create is own set perhaps
>> > it's
>> > > a good choice (at least and option).
>> > >
>> > > Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> escreveu no dia quarta,
>> > 21/10/2020
>> > > à(s) 09:19:
>> > >
>> > > > Hope Andrew can add the missing description with a better
>> explanation
>> > and
>> > > > wording than me
>> > > > thanks
>> > > >
>> > > > El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 10:05, Hugo Ferreira (<
>> > > hferreira.80@gmail.com
>> > > > >)
>> > > > escribió:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thank you Carlos.
>> > > > > In fact in saw the referenced page and asked because was missing
>> > this 2
>> > > > > options as you said.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> escreveu no dia quarta,
>> > > > 21/10/2020
>> > > > > à(s) 08:56:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > we need to update that page since it doesn't give info about the
>> > sets
>> > > > > Hugo
>> > > > > > is asking for:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > - HTML and HTML5: Are the components that use Basic underneath
>> but
>> > > > > provide
>> > > > > > basic HTML(or HTML5) component tags. For example, if you want
>> div,
>> > > > > header,
>> > > > > > section, button tags from HTML you must use this. This could be
>> > mixed
>> > > > > with
>> > > > > > other sets like Basic or Jewel. In fact you can see TodoMVC is
>> > using
>> > > > HTML
>> > > > > > components along Jewel components to mimic the interface in the
>> > > > original
>> > > > > > app.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > - Express: Is Basic with beads applied. While Basic is all about
>> > PAYG
>> > > > and
>> > > > > > the foundation of other sets, Express uses to configure the most
>> > > needed
>> > > > > > beads so is not PAYG. For example if enabling/disable a
>> component
>> > is
>> > > > > > something we think it could be very needed, the components in
>> > Express
>> > > > > have
>> > > > > > the Disabled bead attached by default while in Basic you need to
>> > add
>> > > > it.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 2:43, Andrew Wetmore (<
>> > > cottage14@gmail.com
>> > > > >)
>> > > > > > escribió:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hi:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Brief descriptions of the component set are here:
>> > > > > > > https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/component-sets
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Andrew
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:20 PM Hugo Ferreira <
>> > > > hferreira.80@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Hi,
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > For a while that I have a question to make about current
>> > > components
>> > > > > set
>> > > > > > > :)
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > If search for TextInput.as, I found the following projects:
>> > > > > > > > - HTML5
>> > > > > > > > - Basic: I know that this is the smallest and 100% PAYG core
>> > > > > components
>> > > > > > > > from the framework
>> > > > > > > > - Express
>> > > > > > > > - Jewel: I know that this extends from Basic and it's focus
>> of
>> > > > design
>> > > > > > > with
>> > > > > > > > TDJ samples (excelent choice for new project and Flex remake
>> > > > > projects)
>> > > > > > > > - MXRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for MX
>> components
>> > > > > > (excelent
>> > > > > > > > choice to port from Flex with less time and no focus on
>> design)
>> > > > > > > > - SparkRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for Spark
>> > > > components
>> > > > > > > > (excelent choice to port from Flex with less time and no
>> focus
>> > on
>> > > > > > design)
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I don't know what the purpose of Express components set and
>> > HTML5
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Thank you,
>> > > > > > > > Hugo.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > --
>> > > > > > > Andrew Wetmore
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > > Carlos Rovira
>> > > > > > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
>> > > > > > *Apache Software Foundation*
>> > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Carlos Rovira
>> > > > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
>> > > > *Apache Software Foundation*
>> > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Carlos Rovira
>> > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
>> > *Apache Software Foundation*
>> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
>
>
--
Andrew Wetmore
http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
Re: Clarify the different component sets
Posted by Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>.
I think we should list the component sets that are not complete in a
separate list below the mention of Basic and Jewel...and MDL?
I can get to that later today.
Andrew
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 5:57 AM Hugo Ferreira <hf...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thank you again.
> It is all clear for me now :)
>
> Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> escreveu no dia quarta, 21/10/2020
> à(s) 09:54:
>
> > I think Express was a good idea some years ago, but was not developed, so
> > maybe the problem is that it didn't go so far, but maybe others want to
> > develop that one.
> > In the other hand we have other UI sets that was just experiments like
> > CreateJS or Flat, I think those could be removed or something (at least
> > from the SDK or from building) since don't think will go further
> >
> > El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 10:25, Hugo Ferreira (<
> hferreira.80@gmail.com
> > >)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > I may be wrong but:
> > > Express appears before Jewel ?
> > > Seems natural to me to pick up Express if I want to started and we
> would
> > > not have any other option but this is not the case today and with Jewel
> > > that evolved a lot, seems that Express end up alone.
> > > However if for some reason, someone want to create is own set perhaps
> > it's
> > > a good choice (at least and option).
> > >
> > > Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> escreveu no dia quarta,
> > 21/10/2020
> > > à(s) 09:19:
> > >
> > > > Hope Andrew can add the missing description with a better explanation
> > and
> > > > wording than me
> > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > > El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 10:05, Hugo Ferreira (<
> > > hferreira.80@gmail.com
> > > > >)
> > > > escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you Carlos.
> > > > > In fact in saw the referenced page and asked because was missing
> > this 2
> > > > > options as you said.
> > > > >
> > > > > Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> escreveu no dia quarta,
> > > > 21/10/2020
> > > > > à(s) 08:56:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi
> > > > > >
> > > > > > we need to update that page since it doesn't give info about the
> > sets
> > > > > Hugo
> > > > > > is asking for:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - HTML and HTML5: Are the components that use Basic underneath
> but
> > > > > provide
> > > > > > basic HTML(or HTML5) component tags. For example, if you want
> div,
> > > > > header,
> > > > > > section, button tags from HTML you must use this. This could be
> > mixed
> > > > > with
> > > > > > other sets like Basic or Jewel. In fact you can see TodoMVC is
> > using
> > > > HTML
> > > > > > components along Jewel components to mimic the interface in the
> > > > original
> > > > > > app.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Express: Is Basic with beads applied. While Basic is all about
> > PAYG
> > > > and
> > > > > > the foundation of other sets, Express uses to configure the most
> > > needed
> > > > > > beads so is not PAYG. For example if enabling/disable a component
> > is
> > > > > > something we think it could be very needed, the components in
> > Express
> > > > > have
> > > > > > the Disabled bead attached by default while in Basic you need to
> > add
> > > > it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 2:43, Andrew Wetmore (<
> > > cottage14@gmail.com
> > > > >)
> > > > > > escribió:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Brief descriptions of the component set are here:
> > > > > > > https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/component-sets
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Andrew
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:20 PM Hugo Ferreira <
> > > > hferreira.80@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For a while that I have a question to make about current
> > > components
> > > > > set
> > > > > > > :)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If search for TextInput.as, I found the following projects:
> > > > > > > > - HTML5
> > > > > > > > - Basic: I know that this is the smallest and 100% PAYG core
> > > > > components
> > > > > > > > from the framework
> > > > > > > > - Express
> > > > > > > > - Jewel: I know that this extends from Basic and it's focus
> of
> > > > design
> > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > TDJ samples (excelent choice for new project and Flex remake
> > > > > projects)
> > > > > > > > - MXRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for MX
> components
> > > > > > (excelent
> > > > > > > > choice to port from Flex with less time and no focus on
> design)
> > > > > > > > - SparkRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for Spark
> > > > components
> > > > > > > > (excelent choice to port from Flex with less time and no
> focus
> > on
> > > > > > design)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I don't know what the purpose of Express components set and
> > HTML5
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thank you,
> > > > > > > > Hugo.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Andrew Wetmore
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
> > > > > > *Apache Software Foundation*
> > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
> > > > *Apache Software Foundation*
> > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
> > *Apache Software Foundation*
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
--
Andrew Wetmore
http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
Re: Clarify the different component sets
Posted by Hugo Ferreira <hf...@gmail.com>.
Thank you again.
It is all clear for me now :)
Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> escreveu no dia quarta, 21/10/2020
à(s) 09:54:
> I think Express was a good idea some years ago, but was not developed, so
> maybe the problem is that it didn't go so far, but maybe others want to
> develop that one.
> In the other hand we have other UI sets that was just experiments like
> CreateJS or Flat, I think those could be removed or something (at least
> from the SDK or from building) since don't think will go further
>
> El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 10:25, Hugo Ferreira (<hferreira.80@gmail.com
> >)
> escribió:
>
> > I may be wrong but:
> > Express appears before Jewel ?
> > Seems natural to me to pick up Express if I want to started and we would
> > not have any other option but this is not the case today and with Jewel
> > that evolved a lot, seems that Express end up alone.
> > However if for some reason, someone want to create is own set perhaps
> it's
> > a good choice (at least and option).
> >
> > Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> escreveu no dia quarta,
> 21/10/2020
> > à(s) 09:19:
> >
> > > Hope Andrew can add the missing description with a better explanation
> and
> > > wording than me
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 10:05, Hugo Ferreira (<
> > hferreira.80@gmail.com
> > > >)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you Carlos.
> > > > In fact in saw the referenced page and asked because was missing
> this 2
> > > > options as you said.
> > > >
> > > > Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> escreveu no dia quarta,
> > > 21/10/2020
> > > > à(s) 08:56:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi
> > > > >
> > > > > we need to update that page since it doesn't give info about the
> sets
> > > > Hugo
> > > > > is asking for:
> > > > >
> > > > > - HTML and HTML5: Are the components that use Basic underneath but
> > > > provide
> > > > > basic HTML(or HTML5) component tags. For example, if you want div,
> > > > header,
> > > > > section, button tags from HTML you must use this. This could be
> mixed
> > > > with
> > > > > other sets like Basic or Jewel. In fact you can see TodoMVC is
> using
> > > HTML
> > > > > components along Jewel components to mimic the interface in the
> > > original
> > > > > app.
> > > > >
> > > > > - Express: Is Basic with beads applied. While Basic is all about
> PAYG
> > > and
> > > > > the foundation of other sets, Express uses to configure the most
> > needed
> > > > > beads so is not PAYG. For example if enabling/disable a component
> is
> > > > > something we think it could be very needed, the components in
> Express
> > > > have
> > > > > the Disabled bead attached by default while in Basic you need to
> add
> > > it.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 2:43, Andrew Wetmore (<
> > cottage14@gmail.com
> > > >)
> > > > > escribió:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Brief descriptions of the component set are here:
> > > > > > https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/component-sets
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Andrew
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:20 PM Hugo Ferreira <
> > > hferreira.80@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For a while that I have a question to make about current
> > components
> > > > set
> > > > > > :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If search for TextInput.as, I found the following projects:
> > > > > > > - HTML5
> > > > > > > - Basic: I know that this is the smallest and 100% PAYG core
> > > > components
> > > > > > > from the framework
> > > > > > > - Express
> > > > > > > - Jewel: I know that this extends from Basic and it's focus of
> > > design
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > TDJ samples (excelent choice for new project and Flex remake
> > > > projects)
> > > > > > > - MXRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for MX components
> > > > > (excelent
> > > > > > > choice to port from Flex with less time and no focus on design)
> > > > > > > - SparkRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for Spark
> > > components
> > > > > > > (excelent choice to port from Flex with less time and no focus
> on
> > > > > design)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I don't know what the purpose of Express components set and
> HTML5
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thank you,
> > > > > > > Hugo.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Andrew Wetmore
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
> > > > > *Apache Software Foundation*
> > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
> > > *Apache Software Foundation*
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
> *Apache Software Foundation*
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
Re: Clarify the different component sets
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
I think Express was a good idea some years ago, but was not developed, so
maybe the problem is that it didn't go so far, but maybe others want to
develop that one.
In the other hand we have other UI sets that was just experiments like
CreateJS or Flat, I think those could be removed or something (at least
from the SDK or from building) since don't think will go further
El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 10:25, Hugo Ferreira (<hf...@gmail.com>)
escribió:
> I may be wrong but:
> Express appears before Jewel ?
> Seems natural to me to pick up Express if I want to started and we would
> not have any other option but this is not the case today and with Jewel
> that evolved a lot, seems that Express end up alone.
> However if for some reason, someone want to create is own set perhaps it's
> a good choice (at least and option).
>
> Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> escreveu no dia quarta, 21/10/2020
> à(s) 09:19:
>
> > Hope Andrew can add the missing description with a better explanation and
> > wording than me
> > thanks
> >
> > El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 10:05, Hugo Ferreira (<
> hferreira.80@gmail.com
> > >)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Thank you Carlos.
> > > In fact in saw the referenced page and asked because was missing this 2
> > > options as you said.
> > >
> > > Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> escreveu no dia quarta,
> > 21/10/2020
> > > à(s) 08:56:
> > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > we need to update that page since it doesn't give info about the sets
> > > Hugo
> > > > is asking for:
> > > >
> > > > - HTML and HTML5: Are the components that use Basic underneath but
> > > provide
> > > > basic HTML(or HTML5) component tags. For example, if you want div,
> > > header,
> > > > section, button tags from HTML you must use this. This could be mixed
> > > with
> > > > other sets like Basic or Jewel. In fact you can see TodoMVC is using
> > HTML
> > > > components along Jewel components to mimic the interface in the
> > original
> > > > app.
> > > >
> > > > - Express: Is Basic with beads applied. While Basic is all about PAYG
> > and
> > > > the foundation of other sets, Express uses to configure the most
> needed
> > > > beads so is not PAYG. For example if enabling/disable a component is
> > > > something we think it could be very needed, the components in Express
> > > have
> > > > the Disabled bead attached by default while in Basic you need to add
> > it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 2:43, Andrew Wetmore (<
> cottage14@gmail.com
> > >)
> > > > escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi:
> > > > >
> > > > > Brief descriptions of the component set are here:
> > > > > https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/component-sets
> > > > >
> > > > > Andrew
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:20 PM Hugo Ferreira <
> > hferreira.80@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For a while that I have a question to make about current
> components
> > > set
> > > > > :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If search for TextInput.as, I found the following projects:
> > > > > > - HTML5
> > > > > > - Basic: I know that this is the smallest and 100% PAYG core
> > > components
> > > > > > from the framework
> > > > > > - Express
> > > > > > - Jewel: I know that this extends from Basic and it's focus of
> > design
> > > > > with
> > > > > > TDJ samples (excelent choice for new project and Flex remake
> > > projects)
> > > > > > - MXRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for MX components
> > > > (excelent
> > > > > > choice to port from Flex with less time and no focus on design)
> > > > > > - SparkRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for Spark
> > components
> > > > > > (excelent choice to port from Flex with less time and no focus on
> > > > design)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't know what the purpose of Express components set and HTML5
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you,
> > > > > > Hugo.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Andrew Wetmore
> > > > >
> > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
> > > > *Apache Software Foundation*
> > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
> > *Apache Software Foundation*
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
*Apache Software Foundation*
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: Clarify the different component sets
Posted by Hugo Ferreira <hf...@gmail.com>.
I may be wrong but:
Express appears before Jewel ?
Seems natural to me to pick up Express if I want to started and we would
not have any other option but this is not the case today and with Jewel
that evolved a lot, seems that Express end up alone.
However if for some reason, someone want to create is own set perhaps it's
a good choice (at least and option).
Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> escreveu no dia quarta, 21/10/2020
à(s) 09:19:
> Hope Andrew can add the missing description with a better explanation and
> wording than me
> thanks
>
> El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 10:05, Hugo Ferreira (<hferreira.80@gmail.com
> >)
> escribió:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thank you Carlos.
> > In fact in saw the referenced page and asked because was missing this 2
> > options as you said.
> >
> > Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> escreveu no dia quarta,
> 21/10/2020
> > à(s) 08:56:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > we need to update that page since it doesn't give info about the sets
> > Hugo
> > > is asking for:
> > >
> > > - HTML and HTML5: Are the components that use Basic underneath but
> > provide
> > > basic HTML(or HTML5) component tags. For example, if you want div,
> > header,
> > > section, button tags from HTML you must use this. This could be mixed
> > with
> > > other sets like Basic or Jewel. In fact you can see TodoMVC is using
> HTML
> > > components along Jewel components to mimic the interface in the
> original
> > > app.
> > >
> > > - Express: Is Basic with beads applied. While Basic is all about PAYG
> and
> > > the foundation of other sets, Express uses to configure the most needed
> > > beads so is not PAYG. For example if enabling/disable a component is
> > > something we think it could be very needed, the components in Express
> > have
> > > the Disabled bead attached by default while in Basic you need to add
> it.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 2:43, Andrew Wetmore (<cottage14@gmail.com
> >)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > > > Hi:
> > > >
> > > > Brief descriptions of the component set are here:
> > > > https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/component-sets
> > > >
> > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:20 PM Hugo Ferreira <
> hferreira.80@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > For a while that I have a question to make about current components
> > set
> > > > :)
> > > > >
> > > > > If search for TextInput.as, I found the following projects:
> > > > > - HTML5
> > > > > - Basic: I know that this is the smallest and 100% PAYG core
> > components
> > > > > from the framework
> > > > > - Express
> > > > > - Jewel: I know that this extends from Basic and it's focus of
> design
> > > > with
> > > > > TDJ samples (excelent choice for new project and Flex remake
> > projects)
> > > > > - MXRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for MX components
> > > (excelent
> > > > > choice to port from Flex with less time and no focus on design)
> > > > > - SparkRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for Spark
> components
> > > > > (excelent choice to port from Flex with less time and no focus on
> > > design)
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't know what the purpose of Express components set and HTML5
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you,
> > > > > Hugo.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Andrew Wetmore
> > > >
> > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
> > > *Apache Software Foundation*
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
> *Apache Software Foundation*
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
Re: Clarify the different component sets
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hope Andrew can add the missing description with a better explanation and
wording than me
thanks
El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 10:05, Hugo Ferreira (<hf...@gmail.com>)
escribió:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you Carlos.
> In fact in saw the referenced page and asked because was missing this 2
> options as you said.
>
> Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> escreveu no dia quarta, 21/10/2020
> à(s) 08:56:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > we need to update that page since it doesn't give info about the sets
> Hugo
> > is asking for:
> >
> > - HTML and HTML5: Are the components that use Basic underneath but
> provide
> > basic HTML(or HTML5) component tags. For example, if you want div,
> header,
> > section, button tags from HTML you must use this. This could be mixed
> with
> > other sets like Basic or Jewel. In fact you can see TodoMVC is using HTML
> > components along Jewel components to mimic the interface in the original
> > app.
> >
> > - Express: Is Basic with beads applied. While Basic is all about PAYG and
> > the foundation of other sets, Express uses to configure the most needed
> > beads so is not PAYG. For example if enabling/disable a component is
> > something we think it could be very needed, the components in Express
> have
> > the Disabled bead attached by default while in Basic you need to add it.
> >
> >
> >
> > El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 2:43, Andrew Wetmore (<co...@gmail.com>)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Hi:
> > >
> > > Brief descriptions of the component set are here:
> > > https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/component-sets
> > >
> > > Andrew
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:20 PM Hugo Ferreira <hf...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > For a while that I have a question to make about current components
> set
> > > :)
> > > >
> > > > If search for TextInput.as, I found the following projects:
> > > > - HTML5
> > > > - Basic: I know that this is the smallest and 100% PAYG core
> components
> > > > from the framework
> > > > - Express
> > > > - Jewel: I know that this extends from Basic and it's focus of design
> > > with
> > > > TDJ samples (excelent choice for new project and Flex remake
> projects)
> > > > - MXRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for MX components
> > (excelent
> > > > choice to port from Flex with less time and no focus on design)
> > > > - SparkRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for Spark components
> > > > (excelent choice to port from Flex with less time and no focus on
> > design)
> > > >
> > > > I don't know what the purpose of Express components set and HTML5
> > > >
> > > > Thank you,
> > > > Hugo.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrew Wetmore
> > >
> > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
> > *Apache Software Foundation*
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
*Apache Software Foundation*
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: Clarify the different component sets
Posted by Hugo Ferreira <hf...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Thank you Carlos.
In fact in saw the referenced page and asked because was missing this 2
options as you said.
Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> escreveu no dia quarta, 21/10/2020
à(s) 08:56:
> Hi
>
> we need to update that page since it doesn't give info about the sets Hugo
> is asking for:
>
> - HTML and HTML5: Are the components that use Basic underneath but provide
> basic HTML(or HTML5) component tags. For example, if you want div, header,
> section, button tags from HTML you must use this. This could be mixed with
> other sets like Basic or Jewel. In fact you can see TodoMVC is using HTML
> components along Jewel components to mimic the interface in the original
> app.
>
> - Express: Is Basic with beads applied. While Basic is all about PAYG and
> the foundation of other sets, Express uses to configure the most needed
> beads so is not PAYG. For example if enabling/disable a component is
> something we think it could be very needed, the components in Express have
> the Disabled bead attached by default while in Basic you need to add it.
>
>
>
> El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 2:43, Andrew Wetmore (<co...@gmail.com>)
> escribió:
>
> > Hi:
> >
> > Brief descriptions of the component set are here:
> > https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/component-sets
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:20 PM Hugo Ferreira <hf...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > For a while that I have a question to make about current components set
> > :)
> > >
> > > If search for TextInput.as, I found the following projects:
> > > - HTML5
> > > - Basic: I know that this is the smallest and 100% PAYG core components
> > > from the framework
> > > - Express
> > > - Jewel: I know that this extends from Basic and it's focus of design
> > with
> > > TDJ samples (excelent choice for new project and Flex remake projects)
> > > - MXRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for MX components
> (excelent
> > > choice to port from Flex with less time and no focus on design)
> > > - SparkRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for Spark components
> > > (excelent choice to port from Flex with less time and no focus on
> design)
> > >
> > > I don't know what the purpose of Express components set and HTML5
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > Hugo.
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
> *Apache Software Foundation*
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
Re: Clarify the different component sets
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi
we need to update that page since it doesn't give info about the sets Hugo
is asking for:
- HTML and HTML5: Are the components that use Basic underneath but provide
basic HTML(or HTML5) component tags. For example, if you want div, header,
section, button tags from HTML you must use this. This could be mixed with
other sets like Basic or Jewel. In fact you can see TodoMVC is using HTML
components along Jewel components to mimic the interface in the original
app.
- Express: Is Basic with beads applied. While Basic is all about PAYG and
the foundation of other sets, Express uses to configure the most needed
beads so is not PAYG. For example if enabling/disable a component is
something we think it could be very needed, the components in Express have
the Disabled bead attached by default while in Basic you need to add it.
El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 2:43, Andrew Wetmore (<co...@gmail.com>)
escribió:
> Hi:
>
> Brief descriptions of the component set are here:
> https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/component-sets
>
> Andrew
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:20 PM Hugo Ferreira <hf...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > For a while that I have a question to make about current components set
> :)
> >
> > If search for TextInput.as, I found the following projects:
> > - HTML5
> > - Basic: I know that this is the smallest and 100% PAYG core components
> > from the framework
> > - Express
> > - Jewel: I know that this extends from Basic and it's focus of design
> with
> > TDJ samples (excelent choice for new project and Flex remake projects)
> > - MXRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for MX components (excelent
> > choice to port from Flex with less time and no focus on design)
> > - SparkRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for Spark components
> > (excelent choice to port from Flex with less time and no focus on design)
> >
> > I don't know what the purpose of Express components set and HTML5
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Hugo.
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
*Apache Software Foundation*
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: Clarify the different component sets
Posted by Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>.
Hi:
Brief descriptions of the component set are here:
https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/component-sets
Andrew
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:20 PM Hugo Ferreira <hf...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For a while that I have a question to make about current components set :)
>
> If search for TextInput.as, I found the following projects:
> - HTML5
> - Basic: I know that this is the smallest and 100% PAYG core components
> from the framework
> - Express
> - Jewel: I know that this extends from Basic and it's focus of design with
> TDJ samples (excelent choice for new project and Flex remake projects)
> - MXRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for MX components (excelent
> choice to port from Flex with less time and no focus on design)
> - SparkRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for Spark components
> (excelent choice to port from Flex with less time and no focus on design)
>
> I don't know what the purpose of Express components set and HTML5
>
> Thank you,
> Hugo.
>
--
Andrew Wetmore
http://cottage14.blogspot.com/