You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@stdcxx.apache.org by Martin Sebor <se...@roguewave.com> on 2008/01/28 19:03:15 UTC
Reply-To for issues@stdcxx.a.o
The Reply-To address for the issues list is set to issues@stdcxx.a.o.
I'm wondering if that's what we want. Shouldn't it be set to dev like
the commits list is?
Martin
RE: Reply-To for issues@stdcxx.a.o
Posted by Farid Zaripov <Fa...@epam.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 8:03 PM
> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> Subject: Reply-To for issues@stdcxx.a.o
>
> The Reply-To address for the issues list is set to issues@stdcxx.a.o.
> I'm wondering if that's what we want. Shouldn't it be set to
> dev like the commits list is?
Definitely, it's makes sense.
If someone wants to write to the issues list, lets post comment on the
issue :)
Farid.
RE: Reply-To for issues@stdcxx.a.o
Posted by Travis Vitek <Tr...@roguewave.com>.
That is what it used to do, right?
Seems that it should because not everyone is subscribed to issues@ or
they might have filters setup to ignore them. If this is the case then
they wouldn't have a chance to get involved with development related
discussions spawned from changes to a jira issue.
Travis
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com]
>Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 11:03 AM
>To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
>Subject: Reply-To for issues@stdcxx.a.o
>
>The Reply-To address for the issues list is set to issues@stdcxx.a.o.
>I'm wondering if that's what we want. Shouldn't it be set to dev like
>the commits list is?
>
>Martin
>
Re: Reply-To for issues@stdcxx.a.o
Posted by Mark Brown <ma...@gmail.com>.
Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> The Reply-To address for the issues list is set to issues@stdcxx.a.o.
> I'm wondering if that's what we want. Shouldn't it be set to dev like
> the commits list is?
>
> Martin
>
>
Makes sense.
By the way, thanks for adding the issues list! It makes my Inbox
a lot more manageable.
-- Mark
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Reply-To-for-issues%40stdcxx.a.o-tp15141361p15260125.html
Sent from the stdcxx-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.