You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Varun Thacker (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/08/08 10:17:11 UTC

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-6342) Solr should mention CHANGES from Lucene which have side effects in Solr

Varun Thacker created SOLR-6342:
-----------------------------------

             Summary: Solr should mention CHANGES from Lucene which have side effects in Solr
                 Key: SOLR-6342
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6342
             Project: Solr
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Varun Thacker


This is the problem that I faced - A user upgraded Solr from 4.0 to 4.9 and the queries being formed were behaving differently.

I tracked it down to LUCENE-5180 ( which I believe is the correct thing to do ) . The problem is since Solr does't ship with the Lucene CHANGES.txt file and we didn't record this under the the Solr CHANGES.txt file also, a user is not aware of such changes when upgrading.

I can think of two options - 
1. Duplicate the changes which have side effects in Solr under Solr's CHANGES.txt file also ( not sure if we do this already and that we missed this one ).
2. Be conservative and ship Solr binaries with the Lucene CHANGES.txt file also

We should address this problem





--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org