You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@qpid.apache.org by Adel Boutros <ad...@live.com> on 2016/04/06 17:03:42 UTC
Re: Building qpid 0.34 on Solaris
Hello Raphael,
I am experiencing the same issue. I would like to know if you were able to
provide a workaround or a patch other than just commenting out the
"__thread"?
Regards,
Adel Boutros
www.murex.com
--
View this message in context: http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Building-qpid-0-34-on-Solaris-tp7628470p7641494.html
Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
Re: Building qpid 0.34 on Solaris
Posted by Andrew Stitcher <as...@redhat.com>.
On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 16:16 +0200, Adel Boutros wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
> We finally decided to stop trying to compile it on Solaris. We
> estimate it will take a lot of time to make it work on Solaris (To
> make the unit tests pass at least).
Adel,
That sounds very pragmatic.
In the past I have built qpidd with Solaris, if I get a little spare
time I may run up a Solaris descendant and try again.
I will very likely try with OmniOS (as that seems like the best
supported free Solaris currently) and the GNU tools. The (as was then)
Sun compilers were very much harder to get to compile qpid. This will
be x86 not sparc (I don't have access to any of those), so it may not
reflect your issues anyway.
I do have a Solaris 11 VM sitting around, but bit rot has set in (in my
memory!) and I can't remember how to start it!
Andrew
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
RE: Building qpid 0.34 on Solaris
Posted by Adel Boutros <ad...@live.com>.
Hello Andrew,
We finally decided to stop trying to compile it on Solaris. We estimate it will take a lot of time to make it work on Solaris (To make the unit tests pass at least).
Regards,Adel
> Subject: Re: Building qpid 0.34 on Solaris
> From: astitcher@redhat.com
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 08:51:23 -0400
>
> On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 14:06 +0200, Adel Boutros wrote:
> > Hello Raphael,
> > I had checked the stackoverflow link before and it seemed the only
> > way to fix it was to comment "__thread" but I don't find it as a good
> > solution as it might have side-effects. Were you able to find
> > something else that worked?
>
> commenting out the __thread will definitely cause problems unless you
> are running with a single worker thread as that variable *must* be
> thread local or bad things will happen!
>
> Andrew
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
>
Re: Building qpid 0.34 on Solaris
Posted by Andrew Stitcher <as...@redhat.com>.
On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 14:06 +0200, Adel Boutros wrote:
> Hello Raphael,
> I had checked the stackoverflow link before and it seemed the only
> way to fix it was to comment "__thread" but I don't find it as a good
> solution as it might have side-effects. Were you able to find
> something else that worked?
commenting out the __thread will definitely cause problems unless you
are running with a single worker thread as that variable *must* be
thread local or bad things will happen!
Andrew
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
RE: Building qpid 0.34 on Solaris
Posted by Adel Boutros <ad...@live.com>.
Hello Raphael,
I had checked the stackoverflow link before and it seemed the only way to fix it was to comment "__thread" but I don't find it as a good solution as it might have side-effects. Were you able to find something else that worked?
Regards,Adel
> From: raphael.fuchs1@gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:12:20 +0200
> Subject: Re: Building qpid 0.34 on Solaris
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
>
> Hi Adel,
>
> check here:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31543701/what-does-relocation-illegal-when-not-bound-to-object-being-created-mean
>
> this solved my problem.
>
> Cheers
> Raphael
>
>
> 2016-04-06 17:03 GMT+02:00 Adel Boutros <ad...@live.com>:
>
> > Hello Raphael,
> >
> > I am experiencing the same issue. I would like to know if you were able to
> > provide a workaround or a patch other than just commenting out the
> > "__thread"?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Adel Boutros
> > www.murex.com
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Building-qpid-0-34-on-Solaris-tp7628470p7641494.html
> > Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
> >
> >
Re: Building qpid 0.34 on Solaris
Posted by Raphael Fuchs <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hi Adel,
check here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31543701/what-does-relocation-illegal-when-not-bound-to-object-being-created-mean
this solved my problem.
Cheers
Raphael
2016-04-06 17:03 GMT+02:00 Adel Boutros <ad...@live.com>:
> Hello Raphael,
>
> I am experiencing the same issue. I would like to know if you were able to
> provide a workaround or a patch other than just commenting out the
> "__thread"?
>
> Regards,
> Adel Boutros
> www.murex.com
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Building-qpid-0-34-on-Solaris-tp7628470p7641494.html
> Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
>
>