You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> on 2011/05/24 21:28:29 UTC
[VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4
Hi,
This is a vote for the forth milestone release on our way to a Shared
and LDAP API 1.0. Many fixes have been injected, and some major refactoring
have been done, including making the API OSGi compatible.
The SVN tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/tags/1.0.0-M4
The source and binary distribution packages:
http://people.apache.org/~elecharny/
The file names are prefixed with 'apache-ldap-api'. The bin packages
contain the shaded shared-all and all required dependencies to use the
LDAP API.
The staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedirectory-005/
The generated site:
http://directory.apache.org/api/gen-docs/1.0.0-M4/
The list of fixed issues :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+DIRSHARED+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%221.0.0-M4%22+ORDER+BY+updated+DESC%2C+priority+DESC%2C+created+ASC&mode=hide
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M4
[ ] 0 abstain
[ ] -1 Do not release Shared 1.0.0-M4
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
Nice work Emmanuel.
> [X] +1 Release Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
Regards,
Alex
Re: [VOTE] [Result] Release of Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
Thanks Emm !!!
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The vote was successful with 6 +1 ( Alex, Felix, Kiran, Pierre-Arnaud,
> Stefan and me). No -1.
>
> I'll release the binaries and update the site.
>
> Thanks !
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
>
[VOTE] [Result] Release of Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
The vote was successful with 6 +1 ( Alex, Felix, Kiran, Pierre-Arnaud,
Stefan and me). No -1.
I'll release the binaries and update the site.
Thanks !
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
On 6/23/11 11:13 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a vote for the first milestone of the 2.0 Apache Directory
> Server. While it's not considered as feature complete, it's a first
> step toward the 2.0 version. Many issues have been fixed since the
> last release (1.5.7) with more than 200 JIRA's issues closed.
>
> The SVN tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/tags/1.0.0-M4
reads :
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/apacheds/tags/2.0.0-M1/
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
Posted by Felix Knecht <fe...@apache.org>.
> [X] +1 Release Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
Regards
Felix
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
Posted by Stefan Zoerner <sz...@apache.org>.
+1
Am 23.06.2011 11:13, schrieb Emmanuel Lécharny:
> Hi,
>
> This is a vote for the first milestone of the 2.0 Apache Directory
> Server. While it's not considered as feature complete, it's a first
> step toward the 2.0 version. Many issues have been fixed since the
> last release (1.5.7) with more than 200 JIRA's issues closed.
>
> The SVN tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/tags/1.0.0-M4
>
> The source and binary distribution packages:
> http://people.apache.org/~elecharny/
>
> The staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedirectory-038/
>
> The generated site:
> http://directory.apache.org/apacheds/gen-docs/2.0.0-M1/
>
> The list of fixed issues :
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12315879
>
>
> Please cast your votes:
> [ ] +1 Release Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
> [ ] 0 abstain
> [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
--
Greetings from Hamburg,
Stefan
---8<---
Stefan Zoerner (szoerner@apache.org)
Apache Directory Project
Committer :: PMC Member
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
Posted by Kiran Ayyagari <ka...@apache.org>.
[X] +1 Release Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
just a note that there is a minor issue[1] when the server is run
with JVM version 1.5
But this is not a showstopper for this release, we can just release a note.
thanks Emmanuel for all the effort.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1629
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net> wrote:
> [X] +1 Release Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
>
> I tested the following installers successfully:
> - apacheds-2.0.0-M1-64bit.dmg
> - apacheds-2.0.0-M1-i386.deb
> - apacheds-2.0.0-M1.exe
> - apacheds-2.0.0-M1.zip
> - apacheds-2.0.0-M1-32bit.bin
>
> Regards,
> Pierre-Arnaud
>
> On 23 juin 2011, at 11:13, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a vote for the first milestone of the 2.0 Apache Directory
>> Server. While it's not considered as feature complete, it's a first
>> step toward the 2.0 version. Many issues have been fixed since the
>> last release (1.5.7) with more than 200 JIRA's issues closed.
>>
>> The SVN tag:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/tags/1.0.0-M4
>>
>> The source and binary distribution packages:
>> http://people.apache.org/~elecharny/
>>
>> The staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedirectory-038/
>>
>> The generated site:
>> http://directory.apache.org/apacheds/gen-docs/2.0.0-M1/
>>
>> The list of fixed issues :
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12315879
>>
>> Please cast your votes:
>> [ ] +1 Release Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
>> [ ] 0 abstain
>> [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards,
>> Cordialement,
>> Emmanuel Lécharny
>> www.iktek.com
>
>
--
Kiran Ayyagari
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
Posted by Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>.
[X] +1 Release Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
I tested the following installers successfully:
- apacheds-2.0.0-M1-64bit.dmg
- apacheds-2.0.0-M1-i386.deb
- apacheds-2.0.0-M1.exe
- apacheds-2.0.0-M1.zip
- apacheds-2.0.0-M1-32bit.bin
Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud
On 23 juin 2011, at 11:13, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a vote for the first milestone of the 2.0 Apache Directory
> Server. While it's not considered as feature complete, it's a first
> step toward the 2.0 version. Many issues have been fixed since the
> last release (1.5.7) with more than 200 JIRA's issues closed.
>
> The SVN tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/tags/1.0.0-M4
>
> The source and binary distribution packages:
> http://people.apache.org/~elecharny/
>
> The staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedirectory-038/
>
> The generated site:
> http://directory.apache.org/apacheds/gen-docs/2.0.0-M1/
>
> The list of fixed issues :
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12315879
>
> Please cast your votes:
> [ ] +1 Release Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
> [ ] 0 abstain
> [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
[VOTE] Release of Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
Posted by Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@apache.org>.
Hi,
This is a vote for the first milestone of the 2.0 Apache Directory
Server. While it's not considered as feature complete, it's a first
step toward the 2.0 version. Many issues have been fixed since the
last release (1.5.7) with more than 200 JIRA's issues closed.
The SVN tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/tags/1.0.0-M4
The source and binary distribution packages:
http://people.apache.org/~elecharny/
The staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedirectory-038/
The generated site:
http://directory.apache.org/apacheds/gen-docs/2.0.0-M1/
The list of fixed issues :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12315879
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Release Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
[ ] 0 abstain
[ ] -1 Do not release Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
0+ - supportive but no time or muscle to help presently.
Hopefully I can lend a hand here in a couple weeks.
Regards and thanks to everyone doing a great job in this area.
Alex
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Kiran Ayyagari <ka...@apache.org>wrote:
> > [X] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M4
> thanks Emmanuel
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a vote for the forth milestone release on our way to a Shared
> > and LDAP API 1.0. Many fixes have been injected, and some major
> refactoring
> > have been done, including making the API OSGi compatible.
> >
> > The SVN tag:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/tags/1.0.0-M4
> >
> > The source and binary distribution packages:
> > http://people.apache.org/~elecharny/
> >
> > The file names are prefixed with 'apache-ldap-api'. The bin packages
> > contain the shaded shared-all and all required dependencies to use the
> > LDAP API.
> >
> > The staging repository:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedirectory-005/
> >
> > The generated site:
> > http://directory.apache.org/api/gen-docs/1.0.0-M4/
> >
> > The list of fixed issues :
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+DIRSHARED+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%221.0.0-M4%22+ORDER+BY+updated+DESC%2C+priority+DESC%2C+created+ASC&mode=hide
> >
> > Please cast your votes:
> > [ ] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M4
> > [ ] 0 abstain
> > [ ] -1 Do not release Shared 1.0.0-M4
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Regards,
> > Cordialement,
> > Emmanuel Lécharny
> > www.iktek.com
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Kiran Ayyagari
>
close : [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
i'm now closing the vote for shared-1.0.0-M4, we got 5 +1, one +0, no -1.
+1
Pierre-Arnaud,
Stefan,
Felix,
Kiran
Emmanuel
+0 :
Alex
I'll releasing the packages this morning, and announce it tomorrow.
Thanks guys !
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4
Posted by Kiran Ayyagari <ka...@apache.org>.
> [X] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M4
thanks Emmanuel
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a vote for the forth milestone release on our way to a Shared
> and LDAP API 1.0. Many fixes have been injected, and some major refactoring
> have been done, including making the API OSGi compatible.
>
> The SVN tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/tags/1.0.0-M4
>
> The source and binary distribution packages:
> http://people.apache.org/~elecharny/
>
> The file names are prefixed with 'apache-ldap-api'. The bin packages
> contain the shaded shared-all and all required dependencies to use the
> LDAP API.
>
> The staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedirectory-005/
>
> The generated site:
> http://directory.apache.org/api/gen-docs/1.0.0-M4/
>
> The list of fixed issues :
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+DIRSHARED+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%221.0.0-M4%22+ORDER+BY+updated+DESC%2C+priority+DESC%2C+created+ASC&mode=hide
>
> Please cast your votes:
> [ ] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M4
> [ ] 0 abstain
> [ ] -1 Do not release Shared 1.0.0-M4
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
>
--
Kiran Ayyagari
Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4
Posted by Stefan Seelmann <se...@apache.org>.
+1
Nice job, guys!
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a vote for the forth milestone release on our way to a Shared
> and LDAP API 1.0. Many fixes have been injected, and some major refactoring
> have been done, including making the API OSGi compatible.
>
> The SVN tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/tags/1.0.0-M4
>
> The source and binary distribution packages:
> http://people.apache.org/~elecharny/
>
> The file names are prefixed with 'apache-ldap-api'. The bin packages
> contain the shaded shared-all and all required dependencies to use the
> LDAP API.
>
> The staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedirectory-005/
>
> The generated site:
> http://directory.apache.org/api/gen-docs/1.0.0-M4/
>
> The list of fixed issues :
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+DIRSHARED+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%221.0.0-M4%22+ORDER+BY+updated+DESC%2C+priority+DESC%2C+created+ASC&mode=hide
>
> Please cast your votes:
> [ ] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M4
> [ ] 0 abstain
> [ ] -1 Do not release Shared 1.0.0-M4
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@gmail.com>.
İ think we're doing ourselves a big disservice by sticking to J6.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 26, 2011, at 10:04 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 5/26/11 7:59 AM, Felix Knecht wrote:
>> I don't know if it matters, but parent pom indicates that Java 1.5
>> is needed [1] and the the artifacts to be released seem to be
>> compiled with Java 1.6 (at least the included MANIFEST.MF files are
>> indicating so).
>>
>> If it doesn't matters we should at least think about prerequisiting
>> Java 1.6 for all the Directory projects.
> I'd rather stuck to 1.5 atm. We can make sure that the next
> iteration (M5) is compiled with Java 5.
>
> Thanks for pointing this out !
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
On 5/26/11 7:59 AM, Felix Knecht wrote:
> I don't know if it matters, but parent pom indicates that Java 1.5 is
> needed [1] and the the artifacts to be released seem to be compiled
> with Java 1.6 (at least the included MANIFEST.MF files are indicating
> so).
>
> If it doesn't matters we should at least think about prerequisiting
> Java 1.6 for all the Directory projects.
I'd rather stuck to 1.5 atm. We can make sure that the next iteration
(M5) is compiled with Java 5.
Thanks for pointing this out !
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4
Posted by Felix Knecht <fe...@apache.org>.
Hi Pierre-Arnaud
It helps :-) Thanks for explanations. Didn't knew you can also look it
up in a compiled class.
Regards
Felix
On 05/26/2011 10:38 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
> Hi Felix,
>
> I think this is a bug in Maven's manifest generator which takes the value of the java version used to execute Maven ("Build-Jdk: ${java.version}") and not the version indicated to the Maven compiler plugin (as stated in the Directory's project pom). See links [1], [2] and [3].
>
> I've download the shared-all.jar file from the distribution and opened the LdapConnection.class file in an hexadecimal editor (Studio's hexadecimal editor for instance) and I can confirm that the target version is being respected by the Maven compiler plugin and that it is really 1.5.
> Take a look at that screenshot. [4]
> Byte 6 and 7, indicate "31" which corresponds to J2SE 5.0 according to this page. [5]
>
> Hope this helps,
> Pierre-Arnaud
>
> [1] — http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAR-62
> [2] — http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJAR-49
> [3] — http://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-archiver/examples/manifest.html
> [4] — http://cl.ly/74G4
> [5] — http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_class_file#General_layout
>
>
> On 26 mai 2011, at 07:59, Felix Knecht wrote:
>
>> I don't know if it matters, but parent pom indicates that Java 1.5 is needed [1] and the the artifacts to be released seem to be compiled with Java 1.6 (at least the included MANIFEST.MF files are indicating so).
>>
>> If it doesn't matters we should at least think about prerequisiting Java 1.6 for all the Directory projects.
>>
>> If it's not a blocker
>> [X] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M4
>>
>> Good job, go ahead!
>>
>> Regards
>> Felix
>>
>> [1] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/directory/project/project/21/project-21.pom
>>
>>
>> On 05/24/2011 09:28 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This is a vote for the forth milestone release on our way to a Shared
>>> and LDAP API 1.0. Many fixes have been injected, and some major refactoring
>>> have been done, including making the API OSGi compatible.
>>>
>>> The SVN tag:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/tags/1.0.0-M4
>>>
>>> The source and binary distribution packages:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~elecharny/
>>>
>>> The file names are prefixed with 'apache-ldap-api'. The bin packages
>>> contain the shaded shared-all and all required dependencies to use the
>>> LDAP API.
>>>
>>> The staging repository:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedirectory-005/
>>>
>>> The generated site:
>>> http://directory.apache.org/api/gen-docs/1.0.0-M4/
>>>
>>> The list of fixed issues :
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+DIRSHARED+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%221.0.0-M4%22+ORDER+BY+updated+DESC%2C+priority+DESC%2C+created+ASC&mode=hide
>>>
>>>
>>> Please cast your votes:
>>> [ ] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M4
>>> [ ] 0 abstain
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release Shared 1.0.0-M4
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4
Posted by Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>.
Hi Felix,
I think this is a bug in Maven's manifest generator which takes the value of the java version used to execute Maven ("Build-Jdk: ${java.version}") and not the version indicated to the Maven compiler plugin (as stated in the Directory's project pom). See links [1], [2] and [3].
I've download the shared-all.jar file from the distribution and opened the LdapConnection.class file in an hexadecimal editor (Studio's hexadecimal editor for instance) and I can confirm that the target version is being respected by the Maven compiler plugin and that it is really 1.5.
Take a look at that screenshot. [4]
Byte 6 and 7, indicate "31" which corresponds to J2SE 5.0 according to this page. [5]
Hope this helps,
Pierre-Arnaud
[1] — http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAR-62
[2] — http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJAR-49
[3] — http://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-archiver/examples/manifest.html
[4] — http://cl.ly/74G4
[5] — http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_class_file#General_layout
On 26 mai 2011, at 07:59, Felix Knecht wrote:
> I don't know if it matters, but parent pom indicates that Java 1.5 is needed [1] and the the artifacts to be released seem to be compiled with Java 1.6 (at least the included MANIFEST.MF files are indicating so).
>
> If it doesn't matters we should at least think about prerequisiting Java 1.6 for all the Directory projects.
>
> If it's not a blocker
> [X] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M4
>
> Good job, go ahead!
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> [1] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/directory/project/project/21/project-21.pom
>
>
> On 05/24/2011 09:28 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a vote for the forth milestone release on our way to a Shared
>> and LDAP API 1.0. Many fixes have been injected, and some major refactoring
>> have been done, including making the API OSGi compatible.
>>
>> The SVN tag:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/tags/1.0.0-M4
>>
>> The source and binary distribution packages:
>> http://people.apache.org/~elecharny/
>>
>> The file names are prefixed with 'apache-ldap-api'. The bin packages
>> contain the shaded shared-all and all required dependencies to use the
>> LDAP API.
>>
>> The staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedirectory-005/
>>
>> The generated site:
>> http://directory.apache.org/api/gen-docs/1.0.0-M4/
>>
>> The list of fixed issues :
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+DIRSHARED+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%221.0.0-M4%22+ORDER+BY+updated+DESC%2C+priority+DESC%2C+created+ASC&mode=hide
>>
>>
>> Please cast your votes:
>> [ ] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M4
>> [ ] 0 abstain
>> [ ] -1 Do not release Shared 1.0.0-M4
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@gmail.com>.
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On May 26, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Felix Knecht <fe...@apache.org> wrote:
> I don't know if it matters, but parent pom indicates that Java 1.5
> is needed [1] and the the artifacts to be released seem to be
> compiled with Java 1.6 (at least the included MANIFEST.MF files are
> indicating so).
>
> If it doesn't matters we should at least think about prerequisiting
> Java 1.6 for all the Directory projects.
>
> If it's not a blocker
> [X] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M4
>
> Good job, go ahead!
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> [1] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/directory/project/project/21/project-21.pom
>
>
> On 05/24/2011 09:28 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a vote for the forth milestone release on our way to a Shared
>> and LDAP API 1.0. Many fixes have been injected, and some major
>> refactoring
>> have been done, including making the API OSGi compatible.
>>
>> The SVN tag:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/tags/1.0.0-M4
>>
>> The source and binary distribution packages:
>> http://people.apache.org/~elecharny/
>>
>> The file names are prefixed with 'apache-ldap-api'. The bin packages
>> contain the shaded shared-all and all required dependencies to use
>> the
>> LDAP API.
>>
>> The staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedirectory-005/
>>
>> The generated site:
>> http://directory.apache.org/api/gen-docs/1.0.0-M4/
>>
>> The list of fixed issues :
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+DIRSHARED+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%221.0.0-M4%22+ORDER+BY+updated+DESC%2C+priority+DESC%2C+created+ASC&mode=hide
>>
>>
>> Please cast your votes:
>> [ ] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M4
>> [ ] 0 abstain
>> [ ] -1 Do not release Shared 1.0.0-M4
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4
Posted by Felix Knecht <fe...@apache.org>.
I don't know if it matters, but parent pom indicates that Java 1.5 is
needed [1] and the the artifacts to be released seem to be compiled with
Java 1.6 (at least the included MANIFEST.MF files are indicating so).
If it doesn't matters we should at least think about prerequisiting Java
1.6 for all the Directory projects.
If it's not a blocker
[X] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M4
Good job, go ahead!
Regards
Felix
[1]
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/directory/project/project/21/project-21.pom
On 05/24/2011 09:28 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a vote for the forth milestone release on our way to a Shared
> and LDAP API 1.0. Many fixes have been injected, and some major refactoring
> have been done, including making the API OSGi compatible.
>
> The SVN tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/tags/1.0.0-M4
>
> The source and binary distribution packages:
> http://people.apache.org/~elecharny/
>
> The file names are prefixed with 'apache-ldap-api'. The bin packages
> contain the shaded shared-all and all required dependencies to use the
> LDAP API.
>
> The staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedirectory-005/
>
> The generated site:
> http://directory.apache.org/api/gen-docs/1.0.0-M4/
>
> The list of fixed issues :
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+DIRSHARED+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%221.0.0-M4%22+ORDER+BY+updated+DESC%2C+priority+DESC%2C+created+ASC&mode=hide
>
>
> Please cast your votes:
> [ ] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M4
> [ ] 0 abstain
> [ ] -1 Do not release Shared 1.0.0-M4
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4
Posted by Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>.
On 25 mai 2011, at 15:13, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On 5/25/11 3:10 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
>> On 25 mai 2011, at 14:52, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/25/11 2:48 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
>>>> Hi Emmanuel,
>>>>
>>>> On 24 mai 2011, at 21:28, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a vote for the forth milestone release on our way to a Shared
>>>>> and LDAP API 1.0. Many fixes have been injected, and some major refactoring
>>>>> have been done, including making the API OSGi compatible.
>>>> Hum, I thought the API was already OSGI compatible in previous milestones.
>>>> One major difference since 1.0.0-M3 I think is, the removal of the embedded Apache Felix OSGI container.
>>> Hmm, you may be right. Or I expressed what I had in mind incorrectly : the API is now OSGi compatible assuming your application has a OSGi container, but we don't provide one. This is what I had in mind.
>>>
>>>>> The SVN tag:
>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/tags/1.0.0-M4
>>>>>
>>>>> The source and binary distribution packages:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~elecharny/
>>>> I thing these files are not necessary for the release and should not be copied to the distribution server:
>>>> - apache-ldap-api-1.0.0-M4.pom
>>>> - apache-ldap-api-1.0.0-M4.pom.asc
>>>> - apache-ldap-api-1.0.0-M4.pom.asc.asc
>>> Sure. They have been generated automatically, I don't know why.
>>>> I'm not sure the key you used to sign the release has been added to the KEYS file at the root of the Directory project distributions directory (However it seems to be present in Mina's KEYS file).
>>>> I was unable to verify the *.asc signed files.
>>> ahha... May be the KEYS we have in directory is not up to date. Let me fix that.
>>>> Is it normal that we still bundle the "org.apache.felix.framework-3.2.0.jar" module in the lib directory ?
>>> Hmmm, no. We have to remove the dependency, I guess. Some cleanup we can do in M5
>> Yeah, definitely...
>> I guess a dependency towards OSGI is still necessary since we have kept the bundle activators to allow the use of the API in an OSGI environment.
>> Something less _expensive_ than the "Apache Felix Framework" could be used, like the org.osgi:org.osgi.core module.
>
> The best, atm, would be to fill a JIRA.
>
> I'd like to get the 1.0.0-M4 out asap, if there is nothing wrong in the release, in order to get back to documentation, using the modified API. This is mostly the reason I wanted this release out, all in all...
Yeah, IMO, this isn't something blocker for the release.
Just a minor cleaning that we need to take care before the next milestone.
This aside, the release seems good to me.
[X] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M4
Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud
Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
On 5/25/11 3:10 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
> On 25 mai 2011, at 14:52, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>
>> On 5/25/11 2:48 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
>>> Hi Emmanuel,
>>>
>>> On 24 mai 2011, at 21:28, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> This is a vote for the forth milestone release on our way to a Shared
>>>> and LDAP API 1.0. Many fixes have been injected, and some major refactoring
>>>> have been done, including making the API OSGi compatible.
>>> Hum, I thought the API was already OSGI compatible in previous milestones.
>>> One major difference since 1.0.0-M3 I think is, the removal of the embedded Apache Felix OSGI container.
>> Hmm, you may be right. Or I expressed what I had in mind incorrectly : the API is now OSGi compatible assuming your application has a OSGi container, but we don't provide one. This is what I had in mind.
>>
>>>> The SVN tag:
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/tags/1.0.0-M4
>>>>
>>>> The source and binary distribution packages:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~elecharny/
>>> I thing these files are not necessary for the release and should not be copied to the distribution server:
>>> - apache-ldap-api-1.0.0-M4.pom
>>> - apache-ldap-api-1.0.0-M4.pom.asc
>>> - apache-ldap-api-1.0.0-M4.pom.asc.asc
>> Sure. They have been generated automatically, I don't know why.
>>> I'm not sure the key you used to sign the release has been added to the KEYS file at the root of the Directory project distributions directory (However it seems to be present in Mina's KEYS file).
>>> I was unable to verify the *.asc signed files.
>> ahha... May be the KEYS we have in directory is not up to date. Let me fix that.
>>> Is it normal that we still bundle the "org.apache.felix.framework-3.2.0.jar" module in the lib directory ?
>> Hmmm, no. We have to remove the dependency, I guess. Some cleanup we can do in M5
> Yeah, definitely...
> I guess a dependency towards OSGI is still necessary since we have kept the bundle activators to allow the use of the API in an OSGI environment.
> Something less _expensive_ than the "Apache Felix Framework" could be used, like the org.osgi:org.osgi.core module.
The best, atm, would be to fill a JIRA.
I'd like to get the 1.0.0-M4 out asap, if there is nothing wrong in the
release, in order to get back to documentation, using the modified API.
This is mostly the reason I wanted this release out, all in all...
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4
Posted by Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>.
On 25 mai 2011, at 14:52, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On 5/25/11 2:48 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
>> Hi Emmanuel,
>>
>> On 24 mai 2011, at 21:28, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This is a vote for the forth milestone release on our way to a Shared
>>> and LDAP API 1.0. Many fixes have been injected, and some major refactoring
>>> have been done, including making the API OSGi compatible.
>> Hum, I thought the API was already OSGI compatible in previous milestones.
>> One major difference since 1.0.0-M3 I think is, the removal of the embedded Apache Felix OSGI container.
> Hmm, you may be right. Or I expressed what I had in mind incorrectly : the API is now OSGi compatible assuming your application has a OSGi container, but we don't provide one. This is what I had in mind.
>
>>> The SVN tag:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/tags/1.0.0-M4
>>>
>>> The source and binary distribution packages:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~elecharny/
>> I thing these files are not necessary for the release and should not be copied to the distribution server:
>> - apache-ldap-api-1.0.0-M4.pom
>> - apache-ldap-api-1.0.0-M4.pom.asc
>> - apache-ldap-api-1.0.0-M4.pom.asc.asc
> Sure. They have been generated automatically, I don't know why.
>> I'm not sure the key you used to sign the release has been added to the KEYS file at the root of the Directory project distributions directory (However it seems to be present in Mina's KEYS file).
>> I was unable to verify the *.asc signed files.
> ahha... May be the KEYS we have in directory is not up to date. Let me fix that.
>> Is it normal that we still bundle the "org.apache.felix.framework-3.2.0.jar" module in the lib directory ?
> Hmmm, no. We have to remove the dependency, I guess. Some cleanup we can do in M5
Yeah, definitely...
I guess a dependency towards OSGI is still necessary since we have kept the bundle activators to allow the use of the API in an OSGI environment.
Something less _expensive_ than the "Apache Felix Framework" could be used, like the org.osgi:org.osgi.core module.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
On 5/25/11 2:48 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> On 24 mai 2011, at 21:28, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a vote for the forth milestone release on our way to a Shared
>> and LDAP API 1.0. Many fixes have been injected, and some major refactoring
>> have been done, including making the API OSGi compatible.
> Hum, I thought the API was already OSGI compatible in previous milestones.
> One major difference since 1.0.0-M3 I think is, the removal of the embedded Apache Felix OSGI container.
Hmm, you may be right. Or I expressed what I had in mind incorrectly :
the API is now OSGi compatible assuming your application has a OSGi
container, but we don't provide one. This is what I had in mind.
>> The SVN tag:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/tags/1.0.0-M4
>>
>> The source and binary distribution packages:
>> http://people.apache.org/~elecharny/
> I thing these files are not necessary for the release and should not be copied to the distribution server:
> - apache-ldap-api-1.0.0-M4.pom
> - apache-ldap-api-1.0.0-M4.pom.asc
> - apache-ldap-api-1.0.0-M4.pom.asc.asc
Sure. They have been generated automatically, I don't know why.
> I'm not sure the key you used to sign the release has been added to the KEYS file at the root of the Directory project distributions directory (However it seems to be present in Mina's KEYS file).
> I was unable to verify the *.asc signed files.
ahha... May be the KEYS we have in directory is not up to date. Let me
fix that.
> Is it normal that we still bundle the "org.apache.felix.framework-3.2.0.jar" module in the lib directory ?
Hmmm, no. We have to remove the dependency, I guess. Some cleanup we can
do in M5
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4
Posted by Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>.
Hi Emmanuel,
On 24 mai 2011, at 21:28, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a vote for the forth milestone release on our way to a Shared
> and LDAP API 1.0. Many fixes have been injected, and some major refactoring
> have been done, including making the API OSGi compatible.
Hum, I thought the API was already OSGI compatible in previous milestones.
One major difference since 1.0.0-M3 I think is, the removal of the embedded Apache Felix OSGI container.
> The SVN tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/tags/1.0.0-M4
>
> The source and binary distribution packages:
> http://people.apache.org/~elecharny/
I thing these files are not necessary for the release and should not be copied to the distribution server:
- apache-ldap-api-1.0.0-M4.pom
- apache-ldap-api-1.0.0-M4.pom.asc
- apache-ldap-api-1.0.0-M4.pom.asc.asc
I'm not sure the key you used to sign the release has been added to the KEYS file at the root of the Directory project distributions directory (However it seems to be present in Mina's KEYS file).
I was unable to verify the *.asc signed files.
Is it normal that we still bundle the "org.apache.felix.framework-3.2.0.jar" module in the lib directory ?
> The file names are prefixed with 'apache-ldap-api'. The bin packages
> contain the shaded shared-all and all required dependencies to use the
> LDAP API.
>
> The staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedirectory-005/
>
> The generated site:
> http://directory.apache.org/api/gen-docs/1.0.0-M4/
>
> The list of fixed issues :
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+DIRSHARED+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%221.0.0-M4%22+ORDER+BY+updated+DESC%2C+priority+DESC%2C+created+ASC&mode=hide
>
> Please cast your votes:
> [ ] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M4
> [ ] 0 abstain
> [ ] -1 Do not release Shared 1.0.0-M4
Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud