You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@roller.apache.org by Dave <sn...@gmail.com> on 2007/03/13 02:07:56 UTC
VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
I just uploaded 3.1 RC5 and I think it's ready for release.
Please take a look at the release files, do a sanity test or two if
you have time and VOTE!
Release files and updated docs are here:
http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/apache-roller-3.1/
List of isues fixed so far in RCs is here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROLLER/Testing+Roller+3.1
Thanks,
Dave
Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
Posted by Allen Gilliland <al...@sun.com>.
Matt Raible wrote:
> On 3/14/07, Allen Gilliland <al...@sun.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Matt Raible wrote:
>> > I downloaded and tried out rc6 - here's what I found.
>> >
>> > In WEB-INF/velocity/weblog.vm, there is the following entry in the
>> > showWeblogEntryComments macro.
>> >
>> > <a href="$url.comment($entry.anchor,
>> $comment.timestamp)"
>> > class="entrypermalink" title="$text.get(
>> > "macro.weblog.commentpermalink.title" )">#</a>
>> >
>> > However, there's no <a name="$comment.anchor"></a> to match this.
>> > That means # links are presented to the user, but nothing happens when
>> > you click on them.
>>
>> I thought I had fixed that in the trunk a while ago, but in any case I
>> don't know that little things like this are big enough to keep causing
>> us to delay the release. At some point we have to accept the fact that
>> we can't fix everything in one release and just move on.
>
> That's fine - but can you tell me how to fix it locally? I've used
> these links quite a bit to refer to comments on my blog in the past.
> Unfortunately, many of them are invalid since we changed from
> comment${number} to comment${timestamp}
Sure, it's very easy. The links are being generated fine, the only
problem is that what they are linking to is not in the page by default.
So to fix that you just need to add this in the
#showWeblogEntryComments() macro ...
<a name="comment-$comment.timestamp" id="comment-$comment.timestamp"></a>
that way those links are actually pointing to something =)
You can just put it above the <div class="comment...> line
>
> FWIW, this does seem to work on Jonathan's blog - don't know if he's
> running the latest.
>
> http://blogs.sun.com/jonathan/entry/moving_a_petabyte_of_data#comment-1173770951000
yep, that's because we are running newer versions of Roller than what's
been released. the release process has really slowed us down and 3.1
release is a ways behind what is in the trunk :(
-- Allen
>
>
> Matt
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Also, I noticed that rc3 had:
>> >
>> > create table roller_tasklock (
>> > id varchar(48) not null primary key,
>> > name varchar(255) not null,
>> > islocked tinyint(1) default 0,
>> > timeacquired datetime NULL,
>> > timeleased integer,
>> > lastrun datetime NULL
>> > );
>> > create index rtl_taskname_idx on roller_tasklock( name );
>> >
>> > Whereas rc6 has:
>> >
>> > create table roller_tasklock (
>> > id varchar(48) not null primary key,
>> > name varchar(255) not null,
>> > islocked tinyint(1) default 0,
>> > timeacquired datetime NULL,
>> > timeleased integer,
>> > lastrun datetime NULL
>> > );
>> > alter table roller_tasklock add constraint rtl_name_uq unique (
>> name(40) );
>> >
>> > In other words, the older version had "create index" and the latest
>> > has "alter table". Do I need to make this change to my database, or
>> > is the change from rc3 sufficient?
>>
>> no, those do totally different things and you need the constraint that
>> comes with the new table definition and can discard the old index.
>> Nothing to say about that really, that's just what happens when you are
>> using pre-final code :/
>>
>> it should be easy to fix though ...
>>
>> drop index rtl_taskname_idx from roller_tasklock;
>> alter table roller_tasklock add constraint rtl_name_uq unique (
>> name(40) );
>>
>> -- Allen
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Matt
>> >
>> > On 3/14/07, Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Jon Stevens downloaded RC5, tested and found a couple of bugs in the
>> >> new File Upload sub-folder feature, so I fixed that and couple of
>> >> footer links.
>> >>
>> >> Now we have RC6
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/apache-roller-3.1/
>> >>
>> >> And the updated change list here
>> >> https://roller.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=6962
>> >>
>> >> Download, test and please VOTE!
>> >>
>> >> - Dave
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
Posted by Elias Torres <el...@torrez.us>.
After enough self-wrestling, it works (bad week). +1
-Elias
Dave wrote:
> VOTES so far:
>
> Matt +1
>
> Anybody have a chance to take a look at the build?
>
> - Dave
>
>
>
> On 3/14/07, Matt Raible <ma...@raibledesigns.com> wrote:
>> I just noticed I have the following at the bottom of my page - where
>> my weblog form should be:
>>
>> #showWeblogEntryCommentForm(org.apache.roller.pojos.wrapper.WeblogEntryDataWrapper@f12760)
>>
>>
>> No worries though, this is probably something from my customized
>> theme, so here's my vote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> On 3/14/07, Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On 3/14/07, Matt Raible <ma...@raibledesigns.com> wrote:
>> > > On 3/14/07, Allen Gilliland <al...@sun.com> wrote:
>> > > > I thought I had fixed that in the trunk a while ago, but in any
>> case I
>> > > > don't know that little things like this are big enough to keep
>> causing
>> > > > us to delay the release. At some point we have to accept the
>> fact that
>> > > > we can't fix everything in one release and just move on.
>> >
>> > I totally agree with that sentiment. I thought the broken create
>> > directory feature was bad enough to warrant a fix. A moment of
>> > weakness perhaps ;-)
>> >
>> > Let's see some votes so we can get this thing out.
>> >
>> > - Dave
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://raibledesigns.com
>>
>
Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
Posted by Anil Gangolli <an...@busybuddha.org>.
I will have a chance tomorrow.
--a.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave" <sn...@gmail.com>
To: <ro...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 5:54 AM
Subject: Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
> VOTES so far:
>
> Matt +1
>
> Anybody have a chance to take a look at the build?
>
> - Dave
>
>
>
> On 3/14/07, Matt Raible <ma...@raibledesigns.com> wrote:
>> I just noticed I have the following at the bottom of my page - where
>> my weblog form should be:
>>
>> #showWeblogEntryCommentForm(org.apache.roller.pojos.wrapper.WeblogEntryDataWrapper@f12760)
>>
>> No worries though, this is probably something from my customized
>> theme, so here's my vote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> On 3/14/07, Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On 3/14/07, Matt Raible <ma...@raibledesigns.com> wrote:
>> > > On 3/14/07, Allen Gilliland <al...@sun.com> wrote:
>> > > > I thought I had fixed that in the trunk a while ago, but in any
>> > > > case I
>> > > > don't know that little things like this are big enough to keep
>> > > > causing
>> > > > us to delay the release. At some point we have to accept the fact
>> > > > that
>> > > > we can't fix everything in one release and just move on.
>> >
>> > I totally agree with that sentiment. I thought the broken create
>> > directory feature was bad enough to warrant a fix. A moment of
>> > weakness perhaps ;-)
>> >
>> > Let's see some votes so we can get this thing out.
>> >
>> > - Dave
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://raibledesigns.com
>>
>
Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
Posted by Dave <sn...@gmail.com>.
VOTES so far:
Matt +1
Anybody have a chance to take a look at the build?
- Dave
On 3/14/07, Matt Raible <ma...@raibledesigns.com> wrote:
> I just noticed I have the following at the bottom of my page - where
> my weblog form should be:
>
> #showWeblogEntryCommentForm(org.apache.roller.pojos.wrapper.WeblogEntryDataWrapper@f12760)
>
> No worries though, this is probably something from my customized
> theme, so here's my vote:
>
> +1
>
> Matt
>
> On 3/14/07, Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 3/14/07, Matt Raible <ma...@raibledesigns.com> wrote:
> > > On 3/14/07, Allen Gilliland <al...@sun.com> wrote:
> > > > I thought I had fixed that in the trunk a while ago, but in any case I
> > > > don't know that little things like this are big enough to keep causing
> > > > us to delay the release. At some point we have to accept the fact that
> > > > we can't fix everything in one release and just move on.
> >
> > I totally agree with that sentiment. I thought the broken create
> > directory feature was bad enough to warrant a fix. A moment of
> > weakness perhaps ;-)
> >
> > Let's see some votes so we can get this thing out.
> >
> > - Dave
> >
>
>
> --
> http://raibledesigns.com
>
Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
Posted by Matt Raible <ma...@raibledesigns.com>.
I just noticed I have the following at the bottom of my page - where
my weblog form should be:
#showWeblogEntryCommentForm(org.apache.roller.pojos.wrapper.WeblogEntryDataWrapper@f12760)
No worries though, this is probably something from my customized
theme, so here's my vote:
+1
Matt
On 3/14/07, Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/14/07, Matt Raible <ma...@raibledesigns.com> wrote:
> > On 3/14/07, Allen Gilliland <al...@sun.com> wrote:
> > > I thought I had fixed that in the trunk a while ago, but in any case I
> > > don't know that little things like this are big enough to keep causing
> > > us to delay the release. At some point we have to accept the fact that
> > > we can't fix everything in one release and just move on.
>
> I totally agree with that sentiment. I thought the broken create
> directory feature was bad enough to warrant a fix. A moment of
> weakness perhaps ;-)
>
> Let's see some votes so we can get this thing out.
>
> - Dave
>
--
http://raibledesigns.com
Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
Posted by Dave <sn...@gmail.com>.
On 3/14/07, Matt Raible <ma...@raibledesigns.com> wrote:
> On 3/14/07, Allen Gilliland <al...@sun.com> wrote:
> > I thought I had fixed that in the trunk a while ago, but in any case I
> > don't know that little things like this are big enough to keep causing
> > us to delay the release. At some point we have to accept the fact that
> > we can't fix everything in one release and just move on.
I totally agree with that sentiment. I thought the broken create
directory feature was bad enough to warrant a fix. A moment of
weakness perhaps ;-)
Let's see some votes so we can get this thing out.
- Dave
Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
Posted by Matt Raible <ma...@raibledesigns.com>.
On 3/14/07, Allen Gilliland <al...@sun.com> wrote:
>
>
> Matt Raible wrote:
> > I downloaded and tried out rc6 - here's what I found.
> >
> > In WEB-INF/velocity/weblog.vm, there is the following entry in the
> > showWeblogEntryComments macro.
> >
> > <a href="$url.comment($entry.anchor, $comment.timestamp)"
> > class="entrypermalink" title="$text.get(
> > "macro.weblog.commentpermalink.title" )">#</a>
> >
> > However, there's no <a name="$comment.anchor"></a> to match this.
> > That means # links are presented to the user, but nothing happens when
> > you click on them.
>
> I thought I had fixed that in the trunk a while ago, but in any case I
> don't know that little things like this are big enough to keep causing
> us to delay the release. At some point we have to accept the fact that
> we can't fix everything in one release and just move on.
That's fine - but can you tell me how to fix it locally? I've used
these links quite a bit to refer to comments on my blog in the past.
Unfortunately, many of them are invalid since we changed from
comment${number} to comment${timestamp}
FWIW, this does seem to work on Jonathan's blog - don't know if he's
running the latest.
http://blogs.sun.com/jonathan/entry/moving_a_petabyte_of_data#comment-1173770951000
Matt
>
>
> >
> > Also, I noticed that rc3 had:
> >
> > create table roller_tasklock (
> > id varchar(48) not null primary key,
> > name varchar(255) not null,
> > islocked tinyint(1) default 0,
> > timeacquired datetime NULL,
> > timeleased integer,
> > lastrun datetime NULL
> > );
> > create index rtl_taskname_idx on roller_tasklock( name );
> >
> > Whereas rc6 has:
> >
> > create table roller_tasklock (
> > id varchar(48) not null primary key,
> > name varchar(255) not null,
> > islocked tinyint(1) default 0,
> > timeacquired datetime NULL,
> > timeleased integer,
> > lastrun datetime NULL
> > );
> > alter table roller_tasklock add constraint rtl_name_uq unique ( name(40) );
> >
> > In other words, the older version had "create index" and the latest
> > has "alter table". Do I need to make this change to my database, or
> > is the change from rc3 sufficient?
>
> no, those do totally different things and you need the constraint that
> comes with the new table definition and can discard the old index.
> Nothing to say about that really, that's just what happens when you are
> using pre-final code :/
>
> it should be easy to fix though ...
>
> drop index rtl_taskname_idx from roller_tasklock;
> alter table roller_tasklock add constraint rtl_name_uq unique ( name(40) );
>
> -- Allen
>
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > On 3/14/07, Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Jon Stevens downloaded RC5, tested and found a couple of bugs in the
> >> new File Upload sub-folder feature, so I fixed that and couple of
> >> footer links.
> >>
> >> Now we have RC6
> >> http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/apache-roller-3.1/
> >>
> >> And the updated change list here
> >> https://roller.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=6962
> >>
> >> Download, test and please VOTE!
> >>
> >> - Dave
> >>
> >
> >
>
--
http://raibledesigns.com
Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
Posted by Allen Gilliland <al...@sun.com>.
Matt Raible wrote:
> I downloaded and tried out rc6 - here's what I found.
>
> In WEB-INF/velocity/weblog.vm, there is the following entry in the
> showWeblogEntryComments macro.
>
> <a href="$url.comment($entry.anchor, $comment.timestamp)"
> class="entrypermalink" title="$text.get(
> "macro.weblog.commentpermalink.title" )">#</a>
>
> However, there's no <a name="$comment.anchor"></a> to match this.
> That means # links are presented to the user, but nothing happens when
> you click on them.
I thought I had fixed that in the trunk a while ago, but in any case I
don't know that little things like this are big enough to keep causing
us to delay the release. At some point we have to accept the fact that
we can't fix everything in one release and just move on.
>
> Also, I noticed that rc3 had:
>
> create table roller_tasklock (
> id varchar(48) not null primary key,
> name varchar(255) not null,
> islocked tinyint(1) default 0,
> timeacquired datetime NULL,
> timeleased integer,
> lastrun datetime NULL
> );
> create index rtl_taskname_idx on roller_tasklock( name );
>
> Whereas rc6 has:
>
> create table roller_tasklock (
> id varchar(48) not null primary key,
> name varchar(255) not null,
> islocked tinyint(1) default 0,
> timeacquired datetime NULL,
> timeleased integer,
> lastrun datetime NULL
> );
> alter table roller_tasklock add constraint rtl_name_uq unique ( name(40) );
>
> In other words, the older version had "create index" and the latest
> has "alter table". Do I need to make this change to my database, or
> is the change from rc3 sufficient?
no, those do totally different things and you need the constraint that
comes with the new table definition and can discard the old index.
Nothing to say about that really, that's just what happens when you are
using pre-final code :/
it should be easy to fix though ...
drop index rtl_taskname_idx from roller_tasklock;
alter table roller_tasklock add constraint rtl_name_uq unique ( name(40) );
-- Allen
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
> On 3/14/07, Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Jon Stevens downloaded RC5, tested and found a couple of bugs in the
>> new File Upload sub-folder feature, so I fixed that and couple of
>> footer links.
>>
>> Now we have RC6
>> http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/apache-roller-3.1/
>>
>> And the updated change list here
>> https://roller.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=6962
>>
>> Download, test and please VOTE!
>>
>> - Dave
>>
>
>
Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
Posted by Matt Raible <ma...@raibledesigns.com>.
I downloaded and tried out rc6 - here's what I found.
In WEB-INF/velocity/weblog.vm, there is the following entry in the
showWeblogEntryComments macro.
<a href="$url.comment($entry.anchor, $comment.timestamp)"
class="entrypermalink" title="$text.get(
"macro.weblog.commentpermalink.title" )">#</a>
However, there's no <a name="$comment.anchor"></a> to match this.
That means # links are presented to the user, but nothing happens when
you click on them.
Also, I noticed that rc3 had:
create table roller_tasklock (
id varchar(48) not null primary key,
name varchar(255) not null,
islocked tinyint(1) default 0,
timeacquired datetime NULL,
timeleased integer,
lastrun datetime NULL
);
create index rtl_taskname_idx on roller_tasklock( name );
Whereas rc6 has:
create table roller_tasklock (
id varchar(48) not null primary key,
name varchar(255) not null,
islocked tinyint(1) default 0,
timeacquired datetime NULL,
timeleased integer,
lastrun datetime NULL
);
alter table roller_tasklock add constraint rtl_name_uq unique ( name(40) );
In other words, the older version had "create index" and the latest
has "alter table". Do I need to make this change to my database, or
is the change from rc3 sufficient?
Thanks,
Matt
On 3/14/07, Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jon Stevens downloaded RC5, tested and found a couple of bugs in the
> new File Upload sub-folder feature, so I fixed that and couple of
> footer links.
>
> Now we have RC6
> http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/apache-roller-3.1/
>
> And the updated change list here
> https://roller.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=6962
>
> Download, test and please VOTE!
>
> - Dave
>
--
http://raibledesigns.com
Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Dave,
Verified signatures on .tar.gz and .zip.
+1
Craig
On Mar 14, 2007, at 9:24 AM, Dave wrote:
> Jon Stevens downloaded RC5, tested and found a couple of bugs in the
> new File Upload sub-folder feature, so I fixed that and couple of
> footer links.
>
> Now we have RC6
> http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/apache-roller-3.1/
>
> And the updated change list here
> https://roller.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=6962
>
> Download, test and please VOTE!
>
> - Dave
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
Posted by Anil Gangolli <an...@busybuddha.org>.
I've fixed ROL-1374 in the trunk.
There was a slight difference in the way the path was being formed for the
termination cookie, so it wasn't matching the original.
Since it only affects the logout-redirect.jsp, sites that want the fix can
pick up the logout-redirect.jsp from the fix revision and just drop it in.
Dave, if for any reason we do spin another 3.1 RC, you should incorporate
the fix.
I'm +1 on the release of RC6.
--a.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anil Gangolli" <an...@busybuddha.org>
To: <ro...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 1:14 PM
Subject: Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
>
>
> I did a cursory test of a fresh installation of RC6. It looks fine to me.
>
> I noticed it has the permanent Remember Me bug which I've filed as
> http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/roller/browse/ROL-1374.
> The workaround is to drop the cookie manually from the browser.
>
> I will look at the bug in more detail later today. I don't know if we
> consider this serious enough an issue to hold release.
> It is a potential security issue if the user thinks they have logged out
> and leaves a browser.
>
> This bug doesn't affect Roller 2.3.1 which I am currently running (and am
> about to try upgrading).
>
> I'm hoping to hear other opinions on this bug before I cast my vote.
>
> --a.
>
>
>
> Some notes on my installation.
>
> Downloaded and verified signatures on all four zip/tar.gz binary/source
> distributions. All OK.
>
> For installation I used only the tar.gz binary distribution. I did not
> examine or try building from the source distribution.
>
> I downloaded required-jars-roller-3.1.tar.gz runtime jar bundle from
> roller.dev.java.net site
>
> I used mail and activation jars I had previously downloaded.
>
>
> Runtime Platform:
> - Apache Tomcat 5.5.17 (from Apache distribution)
> - Sun JDK 1.5.0_11 for Linux
> - MySQL 5.0.27 (from mysql-5.0.27-1.fc6 rpm)
> - I use InnoDB as the default storage engine and UTF-8 as the default
> char set
> - Linux (Fedora Core 6)
>
>
> The only custom properties I set were uploads.dir and search.index.dir to
> installation-specific values, and log4j.properties to use a specific log
> filename.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave" <sn...@gmail.com>
> To: <ro...@incubator.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 9:24 AM
> Subject: Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
>
>
>> Jon Stevens downloaded RC5, tested and found a couple of bugs in the
>> new File Upload sub-folder feature, so I fixed that and couple of
>> footer links.
>>
>> Now we have RC6
>> http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/apache-roller-3.1/
>>
>> And the updated change list here
>> https://roller.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=6962
>>
>> Download, test and please VOTE!
>>
>> - Dave
>>
>
Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
Posted by Anil Gangolli <an...@busybuddha.org>.
I did a cursory test of a fresh installation of RC6. It looks fine to me.
I noticed it has the permanent Remember Me bug which I've filed as
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/roller/browse/ROL-1374.
The workaround is to drop the cookie manually from the browser.
I will look at the bug in more detail later today. I don't know if we
consider this serious enough an issue to hold release.
It is a potential security issue if the user thinks they have logged out and
leaves a browser.
This bug doesn't affect Roller 2.3.1 which I am currently running (and am
about to try upgrading).
I'm hoping to hear other opinions on this bug before I cast my vote.
--a.
Some notes on my installation.
Downloaded and verified signatures on all four zip/tar.gz binary/source
distributions. All OK.
For installation I used only the tar.gz binary distribution. I did not
examine or try building from the source distribution.
I downloaded required-jars-roller-3.1.tar.gz runtime jar bundle from
roller.dev.java.net site
I used mail and activation jars I had previously downloaded.
Runtime Platform:
- Apache Tomcat 5.5.17 (from Apache distribution)
- Sun JDK 1.5.0_11 for Linux
- MySQL 5.0.27 (from mysql-5.0.27-1.fc6 rpm)
- I use InnoDB as the default storage engine and UTF-8 as the default
char set
- Linux (Fedora Core 6)
The only custom properties I set were uploads.dir and search.index.dir to
installation-specific values, and log4j.properties to use a specific log
filename.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave" <sn...@gmail.com>
To: <ro...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
> Jon Stevens downloaded RC5, tested and found a couple of bugs in the
> new File Upload sub-folder feature, so I fixed that and couple of
> footer links.
>
> Now we have RC6
> http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/apache-roller-3.1/
>
> And the updated change list here
> https://roller.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=6962
>
> Download, test and please VOTE!
>
> - Dave
>
Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
Posted by Dave <sn...@gmail.com>.
Jon Stevens downloaded RC5, tested and found a couple of bugs in the
new File Upload sub-folder feature, so I fixed that and couple of
footer links.
Now we have RC6
http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/apache-roller-3.1/
And the updated change list here
https://roller.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=6962
Download, test and please VOTE!
- Dave
Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
So, RAT is the Release Audit Tool that Robert wrote. Let's see what
we can do without Robert's help first.
Take a look at
http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=apache
+RAT&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
http://code.google.com/p/arat/downloads/list
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/fileupload/rat-report.html
I've downloaded it and I'll take a look at how easy it is to use in
the next 5 minutes.
Craig
On Mar 12, 2007, at 7:57 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> I haven't run RAT myself. Perhaps Robert could give us a pointer.
>
> Craig
>
> On Mar 12, 2007, at 6:39 PM, Dave wrote:
>
>> On 3/12/07, Craig L Russell <Cr...@sun.com> wrote:
>>> I downloaded and verified signatures for the .tar.gz and .zip files.
>>> Look good.
>>>
>>> Just one comment on the LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt. You have several
>>> attributions of code but you don't include the licensing terms for
>>> them, except for JDOM, Blojsom and Pebble.
>>>
>>> So I didn't see what license terms apply to ROME, Acegi Security,
>>> and
>>> icons by Mark James.
>>
>> Thanks Craig.
>>
>>
>>> Did you run RAT on the release?
>>
>> What's RAT?
>>
>>
>> - Dave
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
I haven't run RAT myself. Perhaps Robert could give us a pointer.
Craig
On Mar 12, 2007, at 6:39 PM, Dave wrote:
> On 3/12/07, Craig L Russell <Cr...@sun.com> wrote:
>> I downloaded and verified signatures for the .tar.gz and .zip files.
>> Look good.
>>
>> Just one comment on the LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt. You have several
>> attributions of code but you don't include the licensing terms for
>> them, except for JDOM, Blojsom and Pebble.
>>
>> So I didn't see what license terms apply to ROME, Acegi Security, and
>> icons by Mark James.
>
> Thanks Craig.
>
>
>> Did you run RAT on the release?
>
> What's RAT?
>
>
> - Dave
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
Posted by Dave <sn...@gmail.com>.
On 3/12/07, Craig L Russell <Cr...@sun.com> wrote:
> I downloaded and verified signatures for the .tar.gz and .zip files.
> Look good.
>
> Just one comment on the LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt. You have several
> attributions of code but you don't include the licensing terms for
> them, except for JDOM, Blojsom and Pebble.
>
> So I didn't see what license terms apply to ROME, Acegi Security, and
> icons by Mark James.
Thanks Craig.
> Did you run RAT on the release?
What's RAT?
- Dave
Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Dave,
I downloaded and verified signatures for the .tar.gz and .zip files.
Look good.
Just one comment on the LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt. You have several
attributions of code but you don't include the licensing terms for
them, except for JDOM, Blojsom and Pebble.
So I didn't see what license terms apply to ROME, Acegi Security, and
icons by Mark James.
Did you run RAT on the release?
Craig
On Mar 12, 2007, at 6:07 PM, Dave wrote:
> I just uploaded 3.1 RC5 and I think it's ready for release.
>
> Please take a look at the release files, do a sanity test or two if
> you have time and VOTE!
>
>
> Release files and updated docs are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/apache-roller-3.1/
>
> List of isues fixed so far in RCs is here:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROLLER/Testing+Roller+3.1
>
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: Release Apache Roller 3.1
Posted by Dave <sn...@gmail.com>.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anil Gangolli" <an...@busybuddha.org>
> Subject: Re: Release Apache Roller 3.1
> >
> > Hmm. I'm still finding only RC4 up there. What am I doing wrong?
>
On 3/13/07, Anil Gangolli <an...@busybuddha.org> wrote:
> Dave, I found it sitting in the wrong directory (apache-roller-2.3.1).
Doh!
Everything should be in the right place now.
- Dave
Re: Release Apache Roller 3.1
Posted by Anil Gangolli <an...@busybuddha.org>.
Dave, I found it sitting in the wrong directory (apache-roller-2.3.1).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anil Gangolli" <an...@busybuddha.org>
To: <ro...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 6:59 AM
Subject: Re: Release Apache Roller 3.1
>
> Hmm. I'm still finding only RC4 up there. What am I doing wrong?
>
> --a.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave" <sn...@gmail.com>
> To: <ro...@incubator.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 6:07 PM
> Subject: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
>
>
>>I just uploaded 3.1 RC5 and I think it's ready for release.
>>
>> Please take a look at the release files, do a sanity test or two if
>> you have time and VOTE!
>>
>>
>> Release files and updated docs are here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/apache-roller-3.1/
>>
>> List of isues fixed so far in RCs is here:
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROLLER/Testing+Roller+3.1
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dave
>>
>
Re: Release Apache Roller 3.1
Posted by Anil Gangolli <an...@busybuddha.org>.
Hmm. I'm still finding only RC4 up there. What am I doing wrong?
--a.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave" <sn...@gmail.com>
To: <ro...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 6:07 PM
Subject: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1
>I just uploaded 3.1 RC5 and I think it's ready for release.
>
> Please take a look at the release files, do a sanity test or two if
> you have time and VOTE!
>
>
> Release files and updated docs are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/apache-roller-3.1/
>
> List of isues fixed so far in RCs is here:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROLLER/Testing+Roller+3.1
>
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
>