You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com> on 2017/04/19 15:32:30 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Hi,
the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is ready for voting.
This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
Major changes in this release:
UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
* Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
* Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
* Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
UIMA Ruta Workbench:
* Fixed Query View
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1138/
SVN tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
Update site:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta/
Archive with all sources:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
... and here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
Please vote on release:
[ ] +1 OK to release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
Thanks.
Peter
Re: [VOTE][CANCEL] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
due to problems with IBM Java 7 found by Burn's testing.
Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
> Hi,
>
> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is ready for voting.
> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
>
> Major changes in this release:
>
> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
>
> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
> * Fixed Query View
>
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1138/
>
> SVN tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
>
> Update site:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta/
>
> Archive with all sources:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
>
> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>
> ... and here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Peter
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
signature on source-release -OK
build from source - OK
compare svntag with source-release: OK except maybe for .buildpath
install into neon 2, make ruta project: OK
Checked 3rd party jars for changes (in ruta.engine): no change except for uima
version upgrades.
License/notices checked - same as prev. version.
If Peter replies that the .buildpath difference is OK, then
[X] +1 OK to release
-Marshall Schor
On 4/19/2017 11:32 AM, Peter Kl�gl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is ready for voting.
> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
>
> Major changes in this release:
>
> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
>
> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
> * Fixed Query View
>
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1138/
>
> SVN tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
>
> Update site:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta/
>
> Archive with all sources:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
>
> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>
> ... and here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Peter
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
when comparing source-release vs the svn tag, there's one file,
example-projects/ruta-maven-example/.buildpath,
which is in the source-release and not in SVN. Is this OK?
-Marshall
On 4/19/2017 11:32 AM, Peter Kl�gl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is ready for voting.
> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
>
> Major changes in this release:
>
> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
>
> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
> * Fixed Query View
>
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1138/
>
> SVN tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
>
> Update site:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta/
>
> Archive with all sources:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
>
> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>
> ... and here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Peter
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com>.
Today I was able to download it with my browser so I started another
build. Now I get:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-invoker-plugin:2.0.0:run (integration-test)
on project ruta-maven-plugin: 1 build failed. See console output above for
details. -> [Help 1]
which pointed at an error
in ruta-maven-plugin/target/it/wordlists//build.log
test(org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest) Time elapsed: 1.828 sec
<<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
Will try again.
Burn
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 3:05 AM, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> no idea yet. I successfully downloaded the file outside of our network.
>
> Any ideas how we can *reasonably* hotfix the problem for the review? Can
> you download it from somewhere else and manually add it to the local m2
> folder?
>
>
> Best,
>
>
> Peter
>
>
> Am 03.05.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> > more info:
> >
> > That directory
> > (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/)
> has
> > .jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those. All of the files I can
> > download except the .jar.
> >
> > In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get about
> 105K bytes,
> > and then fail.
> >
> > Here's the output from curl:
> >
> > curl
> > http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/
> x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
> >> t.jar
> > % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time
> Current
> > Dload Upload Total Spent Left
> Speed
> > 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 216k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
> 0:00:12 269k
> > curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
> >
> > Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k:
> >
> > curl
> > http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/
> x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
> >> t.jar
> > % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time
> Current
> > Dload Upload Total Spent Left
> Speed
> > 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 212k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
> 0:00:12 263k
> > curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
> >
> > -Marshall
> >
> > On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our IT for
> >> advice...
> >>
> >>
> >> Peter
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I just went to
> >>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/
> x86_64/3.104.1/ in a
> >>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced a
> network error
> >>> (reported by my browser...)
> >>>
> >>> Would be good to get this fixed :-)
> >>>
> >>> -Marshall
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> >>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a
> >>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Peter
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis:
> >>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference to
> win32:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could not
> resolve
> >>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-parent:pom:2.6.1:
> Could
> >>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x86_64:jar:3.104.1
> >>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/): GET
> request
> >>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
> from
> >>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ~Burn
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <
> peter.kluegl@averbis.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> a gentle ping :-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is
> missing.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Peter
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
> >>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is ready for
> >>>>>> voting.
> >>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Major changes in this release:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
> >>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
> >>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
> >>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
> >>>>>>> * Fixed Query View
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Staging repository:
> >>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheuima-1138/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> SVN tag:
> >>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Update site:
> >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
> >>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
> >>>>>>> Archive with all sources:
> >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
> >>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
> >>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
> >>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ... and here:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
> >>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
> >>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> >>>>>>> Please vote on release:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
> >>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
> >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Peter
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
Hi,
I am a bit undecided on this.
The consequence of this bug/problem is that some dictionary lookup does
not work resulting in some missing annotations. This supposedly only
happens in IBM Java 7, which probably not too many ruta users use. The
fixes that would be shipped with this release are much more important.
And it would not be the only bug that's known but not fixed in this
release (41 open bug tickets on jira for ruta).
There were no complains, but most likely those users cannot use that
functionality at all since it is not reliable.
On the other hand, cancelling the rc and do a new one would allow me to
fix more bugs that have been reported by users since then. When will be
the next release? I would hope soon, but from experience I'd guess it
will take some time. So, you the users would have to wait for those.
Well, the other users would have to wait maybe three more weeks for the
fixes that are already included in the rc.
From a 'rc review' perspective, the build from source failed in an
environment that is supported (not explicitly excluded). It should be a
clear blocker.
If there are no other opinions, I will cancel the rc later this day.
Best,
Peter
Am 09.05.2017 um 23:46 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> Wow, good diagnosing!
>
> Suppose someone was using IBM Java 7 with Ruta, what kinds of problems would
> this cause?
> I presume they would be "undetected" - in that no exception, etc. would happen,
> but instead, just some wrong results?
>
> If it is detected, or the undetected wrong results you think would be of no
> significant consequence, then I could call this a non-blocker.
>
> Since we've had no complaints about this before (is this right?), I'm guessing
> this goes undetected (or no one is using a Java like IBM Java 7).
>
> If the wrong results are significant, I'd call it a blocker...
>
> -Marshall
>
> On 5/9/2017 12:06 PM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> Thanks Marshall.
>>
>>
>> I was able to reproduce the problem. It was caused by the (really really
>> old) code of the sax parser handler for reading the mtwl files. Some
>> sort of buffering caused two calls of characters() instead of one,
>> breaking up the string for the type mapping.
>>
>>
>> It's now fixed in the current trunk.
>>
>>
>> How should be proceed? Blocker or not?
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> Am 08.05.2017 um 16:32 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>> this might work:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/eclipse/index.html
>>>
>>> Scroll down to where it says:
>>>
>>> Download the IBM Development Package for Eclipse, Version 5.0, including IBM
>>> SDK, Java Technology Edition, Version 7 Release 1:
>>>
>>> * 32-bit Windows
>>> <https://www.ibm.com/services/forms/preLogin.do?source=idpe&S_TACT=105AGX05&S_CMP=JDK&lang=en_US&S_PKG=win32-5.3.1>
>>> * 64-bit Windows
>>> <https://www.ibm.com/services/forms/preLogin.do?source=idpe&S_TACT=105AGX05&S_CMP=JDK&lang=en_US&S_PKG=win64-5.3.1>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Marshall
>>>
>>> On 5/7/2017 10:49 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>> Looks like finding/downloading IBM Java 7 for windows is not trivial.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 05.05.2017 um 17:51 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>> These things sometimes are artifacts of hash table implementations.
>>>>>
>>>>> To reproduce, you might need to run with IBM Java.
>>>>>
>>>>> If possible, can Burn try with Oracle Java 7?
>>>>>
>>>>> (set JAVA_HOME to that).
>>>>>
>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/5/2017 2:03 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>> Ok that's strange. I know that I changed something in that project
>>>>>> because Marshall had problems building it with Java 8 when he tested the
>>>>>> v3 compatibility.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's my env
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apache Maven 3.2.5 (12a6b3acb947671f09b81f49094c53f426d8cea1;
>>>>>> 2014-12-14T18:29:23+01:00)
>>>>>> Maven home: C:\work\misc\apache-maven-3.2.5\bin\..
>>>>>> Java version: 1.7.0_75, vendor: Oracle Corporation
>>>>>> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_75\jre
>>>>>> Default locale: en_DE, platform encoding: Cp1252
>>>>>> OS name: "windows 8.1", version: "6.3", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll try to reproduce it, but I won't be able to do it today :-(
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 05.05.2017 um 00:02 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>>>>> Worked with IBM Java 1.8 ... fails reliably with IBM Java 1.7
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> that is correct - maven uses the value of JAVA_HOME
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/4/2017 10:45 AM, Burn Lewis wrote:
>>>>>>>>> man is apparently using $JAVA_HOME as this is not the java in my path
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> mvn -version
>>>>>>>>> Apache Maven 3.3.3 (7994120775791599e205a5524ec3e0dfe41d4a06;
>>>>>>>>> 2015-04-22T07:57:37-04:00)
>>>>>>>>> Maven home: /share/apache-maven-3.3.3
>>>>>>>>> Java version: 1.7.0, vendor: IBM Corporation
>>>>>>>>> Java home: /share/ibm-java-x86_64-70-SR9/jre
>>>>>>>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
>>>>>>>>> OS name: "linux", version: "2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64", arch: "amd64",
>>>>>>>>> family: "unix"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Should work just without any preconditions.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What build environement do you have? OS, Java version...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 04.05.2017 um 16:36 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>>>>>>>>> Failing assertion & stacktrace:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Type type4 = cas.getTypeSystem().getType("
>>>>>>>>>> my.package.one.One.Mtwl2");
>>>>>>>>>>> AnnotationIndex<AnnotationFS> ai4 = cas.getAnnotationIndex(type4);
>>>>>>>>>>>> assertEquals(1, ai4.size());
>>>>>>>>>>> assertEquals("2", ai4.iterator().next().getCoveredText());
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Running org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest
>>>>>>>>>>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.307
>>>>>>>> sec
>>>>>>>>>>> <<< FAILURE!
>>>>>>>>>>> test(org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest) Time elapsed: 2.259
>>>>>>>> sec
>>>>>>>>>>> <<< FAILURE!
>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
>>>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
>>>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:618)
>>>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126)
>>>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:443)
>>>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:427)
>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest.test(
>>>>>>>> OneEngineTest.java:78)
>>>>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>>>>>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>>>>>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(
>>>>>>>>>> FrameworkMethod.java:44)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(
>>>>>>>>>> ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(
>>>>>>>>>> FrameworkMethod.java:41)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.
>>>>>>>>>> evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
>>>>>>>>>> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
>>>>>>>>>> RunAfters.java:31)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
>>>>>>>>>> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
>>>>>>>>>> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46)
>>>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180)
>>>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41)
>>>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
>>>>>>>>>> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
>>>>>>>>>> RunAfters.java:31)
>>>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(
>>>>>>>>>> JUnit4Provider.java:252)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
>>>>>>>>>> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(
>>>>>>>>>> JUnit4Provider.java:112)
>>>>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>>>>>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>>>>>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(
>>>>>>>>>> ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(
>>>>>>>>>> ProviderFactory.java:165)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(
>>>>>>>>>> ProviderFactory.java:85)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(
>>>>>>>>>> ForkedBooter.java:115)
>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(
>>>>>>>>>> ForkedBooter.java:75)
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Keep getting the same test failure ... do I have to install UIMA &
>>>>>>>>>> UIMAFit
>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ~Burn
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The problem seems (somewhat) intermittent. Yesterday, solid failure.
>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>> morning, first time - it failed, 2nd time it worked (for me). Burn
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reports he
>>>>>>>>>>>>> got past this, this morning, as well...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/4/2017 3:05 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no idea yet. I successfully downloaded the file outside of our
>>>>>>>>>> network.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any ideas how we can *reasonably* hotfix the problem for the review?
>>>>>>>>>> Can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you download it from somewhere else and manually add it to the local
>>>>>>>>>> m2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folder?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more info:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That directory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _64/3.104.1/) has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those. All of the
>>>>>>>> files I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> download except the .jar.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get
>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 105K bytes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and then fail.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's the output from curl:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> t.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Time Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Left Speed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 216k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0:00:12 269k
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> t.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Time Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Left Speed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 212k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0:00:12 263k
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our
>>>>>>>> IT
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> advice...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just went to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/ in a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> network error
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (reported by my browser...)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would be good to get this fixed :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> win32:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not resolve
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-
>>>>>>>>>> parent:pom:2.6.1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x8
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6_64:jar:3.104.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/):
>>>>>>>>>> GET
>>>>>>>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.
>>>>>>>>>> jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~Burn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> peter.kluegl@averbis.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a gentle ping :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> missing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is
>>>>>>>> ready
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Major changes in this release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed Query View
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repository:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>> uima-1138/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SVN tag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Update site:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Archive with all sources:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Wow, good diagnosing!
Suppose someone was using IBM Java 7 with Ruta, what kinds of problems would
this cause?
I presume they would be "undetected" - in that no exception, etc. would happen,
but instead, just some wrong results?
If it is detected, or the undetected wrong results you think would be of no
significant consequence, then I could call this a non-blocker.
Since we've had no complaints about this before (is this right?), I'm guessing
this goes undetected (or no one is using a Java like IBM Java 7).
If the wrong results are significant, I'd call it a blocker...
-Marshall
On 5/9/2017 12:06 PM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Thanks Marshall.
>
>
> I was able to reproduce the problem. It was caused by the (really really
> old) code of the sax parser handler for reading the mtwl files. Some
> sort of buffering caused two calls of characters() instead of one,
> breaking up the string for the type mapping.
>
>
> It's now fixed in the current trunk.
>
>
> How should be proceed? Blocker or not?
>
>
> Best,
>
>
> Peter
>
>
> Am 08.05.2017 um 16:32 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>> this might work:
>>
>>
>> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/eclipse/index.html
>>
>> Scroll down to where it says:
>>
>> Download the IBM Development Package for Eclipse, Version 5.0, including IBM
>> SDK, Java Technology Edition, Version 7 Release 1:
>>
>> * 32-bit Windows
>> <https://www.ibm.com/services/forms/preLogin.do?source=idpe&S_TACT=105AGX05&S_CMP=JDK&lang=en_US&S_PKG=win32-5.3.1>
>> * 64-bit Windows
>> <https://www.ibm.com/services/forms/preLogin.do?source=idpe&S_TACT=105AGX05&S_CMP=JDK&lang=en_US&S_PKG=win64-5.3.1>
>>
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>> On 5/7/2017 10:49 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>> Looks like finding/downloading IBM Java 7 for windows is not trivial.
>>>
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 05.05.2017 um 17:51 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>> These things sometimes are artifacts of hash table implementations.
>>>>
>>>> To reproduce, you might need to run with IBM Java.
>>>>
>>>> If possible, can Burn try with Oracle Java 7?
>>>>
>>>> (set JAVA_HOME to that).
>>>>
>>>> -Marshall
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5/5/2017 2:03 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>> Ok that's strange. I know that I changed something in that project
>>>>> because Marshall had problems building it with Java 8 when he tested the
>>>>> v3 compatibility.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's my env
>>>>>
>>>>> Apache Maven 3.2.5 (12a6b3acb947671f09b81f49094c53f426d8cea1;
>>>>> 2014-12-14T18:29:23+01:00)
>>>>> Maven home: C:\work\misc\apache-maven-3.2.5\bin\..
>>>>> Java version: 1.7.0_75, vendor: Oracle Corporation
>>>>> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_75\jre
>>>>> Default locale: en_DE, platform encoding: Cp1252
>>>>> OS name: "windows 8.1", version: "6.3", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll try to reproduce it, but I won't be able to do it today :-(
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 05.05.2017 um 00:02 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>>>> Worked with IBM Java 1.8 ... fails reliably with IBM Java 1.7
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that is correct - maven uses the value of JAVA_HOME
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/4/2017 10:45 AM, Burn Lewis wrote:
>>>>>>>> man is apparently using $JAVA_HOME as this is not the java in my path
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> mvn -version
>>>>>>>> Apache Maven 3.3.3 (7994120775791599e205a5524ec3e0dfe41d4a06;
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-22T07:57:37-04:00)
>>>>>>>> Maven home: /share/apache-maven-3.3.3
>>>>>>>> Java version: 1.7.0, vendor: IBM Corporation
>>>>>>>> Java home: /share/ibm-java-x86_64-70-SR9/jre
>>>>>>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
>>>>>>>> OS name: "linux", version: "2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64", arch: "amd64",
>>>>>>>> family: "unix"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Should work just without any preconditions.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What build environement do you have? OS, Java version...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 04.05.2017 um 16:36 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>>>>>>>> Failing assertion & stacktrace:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Type type4 = cas.getTypeSystem().getType("
>>>>>>>>> my.package.one.One.Mtwl2");
>>>>>>>>>> AnnotationIndex<AnnotationFS> ai4 = cas.getAnnotationIndex(type4);
>>>>>>>>>>> assertEquals(1, ai4.size());
>>>>>>>>>> assertEquals("2", ai4.iterator().next().getCoveredText());
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Running org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest
>>>>>>>>>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.307
>>>>>>> sec
>>>>>>>>>> <<< FAILURE!
>>>>>>>>>> test(org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest) Time elapsed: 2.259
>>>>>>> sec
>>>>>>>>>> <<< FAILURE!
>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
>>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
>>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:618)
>>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126)
>>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:443)
>>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:427)
>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest.test(
>>>>>>> OneEngineTest.java:78)
>>>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>>>>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>>>>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(
>>>>>>>>> FrameworkMethod.java:44)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(
>>>>>>>>> ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(
>>>>>>>>> FrameworkMethod.java:41)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.
>>>>>>>>> evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
>>>>>>>>> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
>>>>>>>>> RunAfters.java:31)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
>>>>>>>>> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
>>>>>>>>> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46)
>>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180)
>>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41)
>>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
>>>>>>>>> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
>>>>>>>>> RunAfters.java:31)
>>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(
>>>>>>>>> JUnit4Provider.java:252)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
>>>>>>>>> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(
>>>>>>>>> JUnit4Provider.java:112)
>>>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>>>>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>>>>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(
>>>>>>>>> ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(
>>>>>>>>> ProviderFactory.java:165)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(
>>>>>>>>> ProviderFactory.java:85)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(
>>>>>>>>> ForkedBooter.java:115)
>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(
>>>>>>>>> ForkedBooter.java:75)
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Keep getting the same test failure ... do I have to install UIMA &
>>>>>>>>> UIMAFit
>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ~Burn
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The problem seems (somewhat) intermittent. Yesterday, solid failure.
>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>> morning, first time - it failed, 2nd time it worked (for me). Burn
>>>>>>>>>>>> reports he
>>>>>>>>>>>> got past this, this morning, as well...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/4/2017 3:05 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> no idea yet. I successfully downloaded the file outside of our
>>>>>>>>> network.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any ideas how we can *reasonably* hotfix the problem for the review?
>>>>>>>>> Can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you download it from somewhere else and manually add it to the local
>>>>>>>>> m2
>>>>>>>>>>>>> folder?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more info:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That directory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86
>>>>>>>>>>>> _64/3.104.1/) has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those. All of the
>>>>>>> files I
>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> download except the .jar.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get
>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>> 105K bytes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and then fail.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's the output from curl:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>>>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> t.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
>>>>>>>>>>>> Time Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
>>>>>>>>>>>> Left Speed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 216k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
>>>>>>>>>>>> 0:00:12 269k
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>>>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> t.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
>>>>>>>>>>>> Time Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
>>>>>>>>>>>> Left Speed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 212k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
>>>>>>>>>>>> 0:00:12 263k
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our
>>>>>>> IT
>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> advice...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just went to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>>>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/ in a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>> network error
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (reported by my browser...)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would be good to get this fixed :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> win32:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could
>>>>>>>>>>>> not resolve
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-
>>>>>>>>> parent:pom:2.6.1:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x8
>>>>>>>>>>>> 6_64:jar:3.104.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/):
>>>>>>>>> GET
>>>>>>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.
>>>>>>>>> jar
>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~Burn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <
>>>>>>>>>>>> peter.kluegl@averbis.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a gentle ping :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is
>>>>>>>>>>>> missing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is
>>>>>>> ready
>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Major changes in this release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed Query View
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repository:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>> uima-1138/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SVN tag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Update site:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Archive with all sources:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
Thanks Marshall.
I was able to reproduce the problem. It was caused by the (really really
old) code of the sax parser handler for reading the mtwl files. Some
sort of buffering caused two calls of characters() instead of one,
breaking up the string for the type mapping.
It's now fixed in the current trunk.
How should be proceed? Blocker or not?
Best,
Peter
Am 08.05.2017 um 16:32 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> this might work:
>
>
> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/eclipse/index.html
>
> Scroll down to where it says:
>
> Download the IBM Development Package for Eclipse, Version 5.0, including IBM
> SDK, Java Technology Edition, Version 7 Release 1:
>
> * 32-bit Windows
> <https://www.ibm.com/services/forms/preLogin.do?source=idpe&S_TACT=105AGX05&S_CMP=JDK&lang=en_US&S_PKG=win32-5.3.1>
> * 64-bit Windows
> <https://www.ibm.com/services/forms/preLogin.do?source=idpe&S_TACT=105AGX05&S_CMP=JDK&lang=en_US&S_PKG=win64-5.3.1>
>
>
> -Marshall
>
> On 5/7/2017 10:49 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> Looks like finding/downloading IBM Java 7 for windows is not trivial.
>>
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> Am 05.05.2017 um 17:51 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>> These things sometimes are artifacts of hash table implementations.
>>>
>>> To reproduce, you might need to run with IBM Java.
>>>
>>> If possible, can Burn try with Oracle Java 7?
>>>
>>> (set JAVA_HOME to that).
>>>
>>> -Marshall
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/5/2017 2:03 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>> Ok that's strange. I know that I changed something in that project
>>>> because Marshall had problems building it with Java 8 when he tested the
>>>> v3 compatibility.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here's my env
>>>>
>>>> Apache Maven 3.2.5 (12a6b3acb947671f09b81f49094c53f426d8cea1;
>>>> 2014-12-14T18:29:23+01:00)
>>>> Maven home: C:\work\misc\apache-maven-3.2.5\bin\..
>>>> Java version: 1.7.0_75, vendor: Oracle Corporation
>>>> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_75\jre
>>>> Default locale: en_DE, platform encoding: Cp1252
>>>> OS name: "windows 8.1", version: "6.3", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'll try to reproduce it, but I won't be able to do it today :-(
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 05.05.2017 um 00:02 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>>> Worked with IBM Java 1.8 ... fails reliably with IBM Java 1.7
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> that is correct - maven uses the value of JAVA_HOME
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/4/2017 10:45 AM, Burn Lewis wrote:
>>>>>>> man is apparently using $JAVA_HOME as this is not the java in my path
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> mvn -version
>>>>>>> Apache Maven 3.3.3 (7994120775791599e205a5524ec3e0dfe41d4a06;
>>>>>>> 2015-04-22T07:57:37-04:00)
>>>>>>> Maven home: /share/apache-maven-3.3.3
>>>>>>> Java version: 1.7.0, vendor: IBM Corporation
>>>>>>> Java home: /share/ibm-java-x86_64-70-SR9/jre
>>>>>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
>>>>>>> OS name: "linux", version: "2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64", arch: "amd64",
>>>>>>> family: "unix"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Should work just without any preconditions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What build environement do you have? OS, Java version...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 04.05.2017 um 16:36 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>>>>>>> Failing assertion & stacktrace:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Type type4 = cas.getTypeSystem().getType("
>>>>>>>> my.package.one.One.Mtwl2");
>>>>>>>>> AnnotationIndex<AnnotationFS> ai4 = cas.getAnnotationIndex(type4);
>>>>>>>>>> assertEquals(1, ai4.size());
>>>>>>>>> assertEquals("2", ai4.iterator().next().getCoveredText());
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Running org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest
>>>>>>>>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.307
>>>>>> sec
>>>>>>>>> <<< FAILURE!
>>>>>>>>> test(org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest) Time elapsed: 2.259
>>>>>> sec
>>>>>>>>> <<< FAILURE!
>>>>>>>>> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:618)
>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126)
>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:443)
>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:427)
>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest.test(
>>>>>> OneEngineTest.java:78)
>>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>>>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>>>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(
>>>>>>>> FrameworkMethod.java:44)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(
>>>>>>>> ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(
>>>>>>>> FrameworkMethod.java:41)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.
>>>>>>>> evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
>>>>>>>> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
>>>>>>>> RunAfters.java:31)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
>>>>>>>> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
>>>>>>>> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46)
>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180)
>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41)
>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
>>>>>>>> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
>>>>>>>> RunAfters.java:31)
>>>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(
>>>>>>>> JUnit4Provider.java:252)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
>>>>>>>> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(
>>>>>>>> JUnit4Provider.java:112)
>>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>>>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>>>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(
>>>>>>>> ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(
>>>>>>>> ProviderFactory.java:165)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(
>>>>>>>> ProviderFactory.java:85)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(
>>>>>>>> ForkedBooter.java:115)
>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(
>>>>>>>> ForkedBooter.java:75)
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Keep getting the same test failure ... do I have to install UIMA &
>>>>>>>> UIMAFit
>>>>>>>>>> somewhere?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ~Burn
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The problem seems (somewhat) intermittent. Yesterday, solid failure.
>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>> morning, first time - it failed, 2nd time it worked (for me). Burn
>>>>>>>>>>> reports he
>>>>>>>>>>> got past this, this morning, as well...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/4/2017 3:05 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> no idea yet. I successfully downloaded the file outside of our
>>>>>>>> network.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Any ideas how we can *reasonably* hotfix the problem for the review?
>>>>>>>> Can
>>>>>>>>>>>> you download it from somewhere else and manually add it to the local
>>>>>>>> m2
>>>>>>>>>>>> folder?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> more info:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That directory
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86
>>>>>>>>>>> _64/3.104.1/) has
>>>>>>>>>>>>> .jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those. All of the
>>>>>> files I
>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> download except the .jar.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get
>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>> 105K bytes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and then fail.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's the output from curl:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> curl
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> t.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
>>>>>>>>>>> Time Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
>>>>>>>>>>> Left Speed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 216k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
>>>>>>>>>>> 0:00:12 269k
>>>>>>>>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> curl
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> t.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
>>>>>>>>>>> Time Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
>>>>>>>>>>> Left Speed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 212k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
>>>>>>>>>>> 0:00:12 263k
>>>>>>>>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our
>>>>>> IT
>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> advice...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just went to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/ in a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced
>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>> network error
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (reported by my browser...)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would be good to get this fixed :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> win32:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could
>>>>>>>>>>> not resolve
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-
>>>>>>>> parent:pom:2.6.1:
>>>>>>>>>>> Could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x8
>>>>>>>>>>> 6_64:jar:3.104.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/):
>>>>>>>> GET
>>>>>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.
>>>>>>>> jar
>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~Burn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <
>>>>>>>>>>> peter.kluegl@averbis.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a gentle ping :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is
>>>>>>>>>>> missing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is
>>>>>> ready
>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Major changes in this release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed Query View
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repository:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>> uima-1138/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SVN tag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Update site:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Archive with all sources:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
this might work:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/eclipse/index.html
Scroll down to where it says:
Download the IBM Development Package for Eclipse, Version 5.0, including IBM
SDK, Java Technology Edition, Version 7 Release 1:
* 32-bit Windows
<https://www.ibm.com/services/forms/preLogin.do?source=idpe&S_TACT=105AGX05&S_CMP=JDK&lang=en_US&S_PKG=win32-5.3.1>
* 64-bit Windows
<https://www.ibm.com/services/forms/preLogin.do?source=idpe&S_TACT=105AGX05&S_CMP=JDK&lang=en_US&S_PKG=win64-5.3.1>
-Marshall
On 5/7/2017 10:49 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Looks like finding/downloading IBM Java 7 for windows is not trivial.
>
>
> Peter
>
>
> Am 05.05.2017 um 17:51 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>> These things sometimes are artifacts of hash table implementations.
>>
>> To reproduce, you might need to run with IBM Java.
>>
>> If possible, can Burn try with Oracle Java 7?
>>
>> (set JAVA_HOME to that).
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>>
>> On 5/5/2017 2:03 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>> Ok that's strange. I know that I changed something in that project
>>> because Marshall had problems building it with Java 8 when he tested the
>>> v3 compatibility.
>>>
>>>
>>> Here's my env
>>>
>>> Apache Maven 3.2.5 (12a6b3acb947671f09b81f49094c53f426d8cea1;
>>> 2014-12-14T18:29:23+01:00)
>>> Maven home: C:\work\misc\apache-maven-3.2.5\bin\..
>>> Java version: 1.7.0_75, vendor: Oracle Corporation
>>> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_75\jre
>>> Default locale: en_DE, platform encoding: Cp1252
>>> OS name: "windows 8.1", version: "6.3", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>>>
>>>
>>> I'll try to reproduce it, but I won't be able to do it today :-(
>>>
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 05.05.2017 um 00:02 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>> Worked with IBM Java 1.8 ... fails reliably with IBM Java 1.7
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> that is correct - maven uses the value of JAVA_HOME
>>>>>
>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/4/2017 10:45 AM, Burn Lewis wrote:
>>>>>> man is apparently using $JAVA_HOME as this is not the java in my path
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> mvn -version
>>>>>> Apache Maven 3.3.3 (7994120775791599e205a5524ec3e0dfe41d4a06;
>>>>>> 2015-04-22T07:57:37-04:00)
>>>>>> Maven home: /share/apache-maven-3.3.3
>>>>>> Java version: 1.7.0, vendor: IBM Corporation
>>>>>> Java home: /share/ibm-java-x86_64-70-SR9/jre
>>>>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
>>>>>> OS name: "linux", version: "2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64", arch: "amd64",
>>>>>> family: "unix"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Should work just without any preconditions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What build environement do you have? OS, Java version...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 04.05.2017 um 16:36 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>>>>>> Failing assertion & stacktrace:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Type type4 = cas.getTypeSystem().getType("
>>>>>>> my.package.one.One.Mtwl2");
>>>>>>>> AnnotationIndex<AnnotationFS> ai4 = cas.getAnnotationIndex(type4);
>>>>>>>>> assertEquals(1, ai4.size());
>>>>>>>> assertEquals("2", ai4.iterator().next().getCoveredText());
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Running org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest
>>>>>>>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.307
>>>>> sec
>>>>>>>> <<< FAILURE!
>>>>>>>> test(org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest) Time elapsed: 2.259
>>>>> sec
>>>>>>>> <<< FAILURE!
>>>>>>>> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
>>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
>>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:618)
>>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126)
>>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:443)
>>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:427)
>>>>>>>> at org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest.test(
>>>>> OneEngineTest.java:78)
>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(
>>>>>>> FrameworkMethod.java:44)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(
>>>>>>> ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(
>>>>>>> FrameworkMethod.java:41)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.
>>>>>>> evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
>>>>>>> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
>>>>>>> RunAfters.java:31)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
>>>>>>> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
>>>>>>> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46)
>>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180)
>>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41)
>>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
>>>>>>> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
>>>>>>> RunAfters.java:31)
>>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(
>>>>>>> JUnit4Provider.java:252)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
>>>>>>> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(
>>>>>>> JUnit4Provider.java:112)
>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(
>>>>>>> ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(
>>>>>>> ProviderFactory.java:165)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(
>>>>>>> ProviderFactory.java:85)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(
>>>>>>> ForkedBooter.java:115)
>>>>>>>> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(
>>>>>>> ForkedBooter.java:75)
>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Keep getting the same test failure ... do I have to install UIMA &
>>>>>>> UIMAFit
>>>>>>>>> somewhere?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ~Burn
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The problem seems (somewhat) intermittent. Yesterday, solid failure.
>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>> morning, first time - it failed, 2nd time it worked (for me). Burn
>>>>>>>>>> reports he
>>>>>>>>>> got past this, this morning, as well...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 5/4/2017 3:05 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> no idea yet. I successfully downloaded the file outside of our
>>>>>>> network.
>>>>>>>>>>> Any ideas how we can *reasonably* hotfix the problem for the review?
>>>>>>> Can
>>>>>>>>>>> you download it from somewhere else and manually add it to the local
>>>>>>> m2
>>>>>>>>>>> folder?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>>>>>>>> more info:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That directory
>>>>>>>>>>>> (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86
>>>>>>>>>> _64/3.104.1/) has
>>>>>>>>>>>> .jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those. All of the
>>>>> files I
>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>> download except the .jar.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get
>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>> 105K bytes,
>>>>>>>>>>>> and then fail.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's the output from curl:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> curl
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>> t.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
>>>>>>>>>> Time Current
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
>>>>>>>>>> Left Speed
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 216k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
>>>>>>>>>> 0:00:12 269k
>>>>>>>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> curl
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>> t.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
>>>>>>>>>> Time Current
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
>>>>>>>>>> Left Speed
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 212k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
>>>>>>>>>> 0:00:12 263k
>>>>>>>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our
>>>>> IT
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> advice...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just went to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/ in a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced
>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> network error
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (reported by my browser...)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would be good to get this fixed :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> win32:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could
>>>>>>>>>> not resolve
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-
>>>>>>> parent:pom:2.6.1:
>>>>>>>>>> Could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x8
>>>>>>>>>> 6_64:jar:3.104.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/):
>>>>>>> GET
>>>>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.
>>>>>>> jar
>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~Burn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <
>>>>>>>>>> peter.kluegl@averbis.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a gentle ping :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is
>>>>>>>>>> missing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is
>>>>> ready
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Major changes in this release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed Query View
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repository:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>> uima-1138/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SVN tag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Update site:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Archive with all sources:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
Looks like finding/downloading IBM Java 7 for windows is not trivial.
Peter
Am 05.05.2017 um 17:51 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> These things sometimes are artifacts of hash table implementations.
>
> To reproduce, you might need to run with IBM Java.
>
> If possible, can Burn try with Oracle Java 7?
>
> (set JAVA_HOME to that).
>
> -Marshall
>
>
> On 5/5/2017 2:03 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> Ok that's strange. I know that I changed something in that project
>> because Marshall had problems building it with Java 8 when he tested the
>> v3 compatibility.
>>
>>
>> Here's my env
>>
>> Apache Maven 3.2.5 (12a6b3acb947671f09b81f49094c53f426d8cea1;
>> 2014-12-14T18:29:23+01:00)
>> Maven home: C:\work\misc\apache-maven-3.2.5\bin\..
>> Java version: 1.7.0_75, vendor: Oracle Corporation
>> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_75\jre
>> Default locale: en_DE, platform encoding: Cp1252
>> OS name: "windows 8.1", version: "6.3", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>>
>>
>> I'll try to reproduce it, but I won't be able to do it today :-(
>>
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 05.05.2017 um 00:02 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>> Worked with IBM Java 1.8 ... fails reliably with IBM Java 1.7
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> that is correct - maven uses the value of JAVA_HOME
>>>>
>>>> -Marshall
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5/4/2017 10:45 AM, Burn Lewis wrote:
>>>>> man is apparently using $JAVA_HOME as this is not the java in my path
>>>>>
>>>>>> mvn -version
>>>>> Apache Maven 3.3.3 (7994120775791599e205a5524ec3e0dfe41d4a06;
>>>>> 2015-04-22T07:57:37-04:00)
>>>>> Maven home: /share/apache-maven-3.3.3
>>>>> Java version: 1.7.0, vendor: IBM Corporation
>>>>> Java home: /share/ibm-java-x86_64-70-SR9/jre
>>>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
>>>>> OS name: "linux", version: "2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64", arch: "amd64",
>>>>> family: "unix"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Should work just without any preconditions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What build environement do you have? OS, Java version...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 04.05.2017 um 16:36 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>>>>> Failing assertion & stacktrace:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Type type4 = cas.getTypeSystem().getType("
>>>>>> my.package.one.One.Mtwl2");
>>>>>>> AnnotationIndex<AnnotationFS> ai4 = cas.getAnnotationIndex(type4);
>>>>>>>> assertEquals(1, ai4.size());
>>>>>>> assertEquals("2", ai4.iterator().next().getCoveredText());
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Running org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest
>>>>>>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.307
>>>> sec
>>>>>>> <<< FAILURE!
>>>>>>> test(org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest) Time elapsed: 2.259
>>>> sec
>>>>>>> <<< FAILURE!
>>>>>>> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:618)
>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126)
>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:443)
>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:427)
>>>>>>> at org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest.test(
>>>> OneEngineTest.java:78)
>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(
>>>>>> FrameworkMethod.java:44)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(
>>>>>> ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(
>>>>>> FrameworkMethod.java:41)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.
>>>>>> evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
>>>>>> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
>>>>>> RunAfters.java:31)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
>>>>>> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
>>>>>> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46)
>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180)
>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41)
>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
>>>>>> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
>>>>>> RunAfters.java:31)
>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(
>>>>>> JUnit4Provider.java:252)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
>>>>>> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(
>>>>>> JUnit4Provider.java:112)
>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(
>>>>>> ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(
>>>>>> ProviderFactory.java:165)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(
>>>>>> ProviderFactory.java:85)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(
>>>>>> ForkedBooter.java:115)
>>>>>>> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(
>>>>>> ForkedBooter.java:75)
>>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Keep getting the same test failure ... do I have to install UIMA &
>>>>>> UIMAFit
>>>>>>>> somewhere?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ~Burn
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The problem seems (somewhat) intermittent. Yesterday, solid failure.
>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>> morning, first time - it failed, 2nd time it worked (for me). Burn
>>>>>>>>> reports he
>>>>>>>>> got past this, this morning, as well...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 5/4/2017 3:05 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> no idea yet. I successfully downloaded the file outside of our
>>>>>> network.
>>>>>>>>>> Any ideas how we can *reasonably* hotfix the problem for the review?
>>>>>> Can
>>>>>>>>>> you download it from somewhere else and manually add it to the local
>>>>>> m2
>>>>>>>>>> folder?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>>>>>>> more info:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That directory
>>>>>>>>>>> (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86
>>>>>>>>> _64/3.104.1/) has
>>>>>>>>>>> .jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those. All of the
>>>> files I
>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>> download except the .jar.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get
>>>> about
>>>>>>>>> 105K bytes,
>>>>>>>>>>> and then fail.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Here's the output from curl:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> curl
>>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>> t.jar
>>>>>>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
>>>>>>>>> Time Current
>>>>>>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
>>>>>>>>> Left Speed
>>>>>>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 216k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
>>>>>>>>> 0:00:12 269k
>>>>>>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> curl
>>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>> t.jar
>>>>>>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
>>>>>>>>> Time Current
>>>>>>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
>>>>>>>>> Left Speed
>>>>>>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 212k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
>>>>>>>>> 0:00:12 263k
>>>>>>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our
>>>> IT
>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>> advice...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just went to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/ in a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced
>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> network error
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (reported by my browser...)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would be good to get this fixed :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference
>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> win32:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could
>>>>>>>>> not resolve
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-
>>>>>> parent:pom:2.6.1:
>>>>>>>>> Could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x8
>>>>>>>>> 6_64:jar:3.104.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/):
>>>>>> GET
>>>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.
>>>>>> jar
>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~Burn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <
>>>>>>>>> peter.kluegl@averbis.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a gentle ping :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is
>>>>>>>>> missing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is
>>>> ready
>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Major changes in this release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed Query View
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repository:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>> uima-1138/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SVN tag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Update site:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Archive with all sources:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
These things sometimes are artifacts of hash table implementations.
To reproduce, you might need to run with IBM Java.
If possible, can Burn try with Oracle Java 7?
(set JAVA_HOME to that).
-Marshall
On 5/5/2017 2:03 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Ok that's strange. I know that I changed something in that project
> because Marshall had problems building it with Java 8 when he tested the
> v3 compatibility.
>
>
> Here's my env
>
> Apache Maven 3.2.5 (12a6b3acb947671f09b81f49094c53f426d8cea1;
> 2014-12-14T18:29:23+01:00)
> Maven home: C:\work\misc\apache-maven-3.2.5\bin\..
> Java version: 1.7.0_75, vendor: Oracle Corporation
> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_75\jre
> Default locale: en_DE, platform encoding: Cp1252
> OS name: "windows 8.1", version: "6.3", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>
>
> I'll try to reproduce it, but I won't be able to do it today :-(
>
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> Am 05.05.2017 um 00:02 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>> Worked with IBM Java 1.8 ... fails reliably with IBM Java 1.7
>>
>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>
>>> that is correct - maven uses the value of JAVA_HOME
>>>
>>> -Marshall
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/4/2017 10:45 AM, Burn Lewis wrote:
>>>> man is apparently using $JAVA_HOME as this is not the java in my path
>>>>
>>>>> mvn -version
>>>> Apache Maven 3.3.3 (7994120775791599e205a5524ec3e0dfe41d4a06;
>>>> 2015-04-22T07:57:37-04:00)
>>>> Maven home: /share/apache-maven-3.3.3
>>>> Java version: 1.7.0, vendor: IBM Corporation
>>>> Java home: /share/ibm-java-x86_64-70-SR9/jre
>>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
>>>> OS name: "linux", version: "2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64", arch: "amd64",
>>>> family: "unix"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Should work just without any preconditions.
>>>>>
>>>>> What build environement do you have? OS, Java version...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 04.05.2017 um 16:36 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>>>> Failing assertion & stacktrace:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Type type4 = cas.getTypeSystem().getType("
>>>>> my.package.one.One.Mtwl2");
>>>>>> AnnotationIndex<AnnotationFS> ai4 = cas.getAnnotationIndex(type4);
>>>>>>> assertEquals(1, ai4.size());
>>>>>> assertEquals("2", ai4.iterator().next().getCoveredText());
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Running org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest
>>>>>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.307
>>> sec
>>>>>> <<< FAILURE!
>>>>>> test(org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest) Time elapsed: 2.259
>>> sec
>>>>>> <<< FAILURE!
>>>>>> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:618)
>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126)
>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:443)
>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:427)
>>>>>> at org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest.test(
>>> OneEngineTest.java:78)
>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(
>>>>> FrameworkMethod.java:44)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(
>>>>> ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(
>>>>> FrameworkMethod.java:41)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.
>>>>> evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
>>>>> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
>>>>> RunAfters.java:31)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
>>>>> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
>>>>> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46)
>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180)
>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41)
>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
>>>>> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
>>>>> RunAfters.java:31)
>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(
>>>>> JUnit4Provider.java:252)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
>>>>> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(
>>>>> JUnit4Provider.java:112)
>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(
>>>>> ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(
>>>>> ProviderFactory.java:165)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(
>>>>> ProviderFactory.java:85)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(
>>>>> ForkedBooter.java:115)
>>>>>> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(
>>>>> ForkedBooter.java:75)
>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Keep getting the same test failure ... do I have to install UIMA &
>>>>> UIMAFit
>>>>>>> somewhere?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ~Burn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The problem seems (somewhat) intermittent. Yesterday, solid failure.
>>>>> This
>>>>>>>> morning, first time - it failed, 2nd time it worked (for me). Burn
>>>>>>>> reports he
>>>>>>>> got past this, this morning, as well...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/4/2017 3:05 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> no idea yet. I successfully downloaded the file outside of our
>>>>> network.
>>>>>>>>> Any ideas how we can *reasonably* hotfix the problem for the review?
>>>>> Can
>>>>>>>>> you download it from somewhere else and manually add it to the local
>>>>> m2
>>>>>>>>> folder?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>>>>>> more info:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That directory
>>>>>>>>>> (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86
>>>>>>>> _64/3.104.1/) has
>>>>>>>>>> .jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those. All of the
>>> files I
>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>> download except the .jar.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get
>>> about
>>>>>>>> 105K bytes,
>>>>>>>>>> and then fail.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Here's the output from curl:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> curl
>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>> t.jar
>>>>>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
>>>>>>>> Time Current
>>>>>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
>>>>>>>> Left Speed
>>>>>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 216k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
>>>>>>>> 0:00:12 269k
>>>>>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> curl
>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>> t.jar
>>>>>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
>>>>>>>> Time Current
>>>>>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
>>>>>>>> Left Speed
>>>>>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 212k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
>>>>>>>> 0:00:12 263k
>>>>>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our
>>> IT
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>> advice...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I just went to
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/ in a
>>>>>>>>>>>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced
>>> a
>>>>>>>> network error
>>>>>>>>>>>> (reported by my browser...)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Would be good to get this fixed :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference
>>> to
>>>>>>>> win32:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could
>>>>>>>> not resolve
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-
>>>>> parent:pom:2.6.1:
>>>>>>>> Could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x8
>>>>>>>> 6_64:jar:3.104.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/):
>>>>> GET
>>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.
>>>>> jar
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~Burn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <
>>>>>>>> peter.kluegl@averbis.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a gentle ping :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is
>>>>>>>> missing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is
>>> ready
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Major changes in this release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed Query View
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repository:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>> uima-1138/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SVN tag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Update site:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Archive with all sources:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
Ok that's strange. I know that I changed something in that project
because Marshall had problems building it with Java 8 when he tested the
v3 compatibility.
Here's my env
Apache Maven 3.2.5 (12a6b3acb947671f09b81f49094c53f426d8cea1;
2014-12-14T18:29:23+01:00)
Maven home: C:\work\misc\apache-maven-3.2.5\bin\..
Java version: 1.7.0_75, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_75\jre
Default locale: en_DE, platform encoding: Cp1252
OS name: "windows 8.1", version: "6.3", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
I'll try to reproduce it, but I won't be able to do it today :-(
Peter
Am 05.05.2017 um 00:02 schrieb Burn Lewis:
> Worked with IBM Java 1.8 ... fails reliably with IBM Java 1.7
>
> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
>> that is correct - maven uses the value of JAVA_HOME
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>>
>> On 5/4/2017 10:45 AM, Burn Lewis wrote:
>>> man is apparently using $JAVA_HOME as this is not the java in my path
>>>
>>>> mvn -version
>>> Apache Maven 3.3.3 (7994120775791599e205a5524ec3e0dfe41d4a06;
>>> 2015-04-22T07:57:37-04:00)
>>> Maven home: /share/apache-maven-3.3.3
>>> Java version: 1.7.0, vendor: IBM Corporation
>>> Java home: /share/ibm-java-x86_64-70-SR9/jre
>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
>>> OS name: "linux", version: "2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64", arch: "amd64",
>>> family: "unix"
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Should work just without any preconditions.
>>>>
>>>> What build environement do you have? OS, Java version...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 04.05.2017 um 16:36 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>>> Failing assertion & stacktrace:
>>>>>
>>>>> Type type4 = cas.getTypeSystem().getType("
>>>> my.package.one.One.Mtwl2");
>>>>> AnnotationIndex<AnnotationFS> ai4 = cas.getAnnotationIndex(type4);
>>>>>> assertEquals(1, ai4.size());
>>>>> assertEquals("2", ai4.iterator().next().getCoveredText());
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Running org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest
>>>>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.307
>> sec
>>>>> <<< FAILURE!
>>>>> test(org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest) Time elapsed: 2.259
>> sec
>>>>> <<< FAILURE!
>>>>> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:618)
>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126)
>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:443)
>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:427)
>>>>> at org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest.test(
>> OneEngineTest.java:78)
>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>> at
>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
>>>>> at
>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(
>>>> FrameworkMethod.java:44)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(
>>>> ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(
>>>> FrameworkMethod.java:41)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.
>>>> evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
>>>> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
>>>> RunAfters.java:31)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
>>>> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
>>>> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46)
>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180)
>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41)
>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
>>>> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
>>>> RunAfters.java:31)
>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(
>>>> JUnit4Provider.java:252)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
>>>> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(
>>>> JUnit4Provider.java:112)
>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>> at
>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
>>>>> at
>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(
>>>> ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(
>>>> ProviderFactory.java:165)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(
>>>> ProviderFactory.java:85)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(
>>>> ForkedBooter.java:115)
>>>>> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(
>>>> ForkedBooter.java:75)
>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>> Keep getting the same test failure ... do I have to install UIMA &
>>>> UIMAFit
>>>>>> somewhere?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~Burn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The problem seems (somewhat) intermittent. Yesterday, solid failure.
>>>> This
>>>>>>> morning, first time - it failed, 2nd time it worked (for me). Burn
>>>>>>> reports he
>>>>>>> got past this, this morning, as well...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/4/2017 3:05 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> no idea yet. I successfully downloaded the file outside of our
>>>> network.
>>>>>>>> Any ideas how we can *reasonably* hotfix the problem for the review?
>>>> Can
>>>>>>>> you download it from somewhere else and manually add it to the local
>>>> m2
>>>>>>>> folder?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>>>>> more info:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That directory
>>>>>>>>> (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86
>>>>>>> _64/3.104.1/) has
>>>>>>>>> .jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those. All of the
>> files I
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>> download except the .jar.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get
>> about
>>>>>>> 105K bytes,
>>>>>>>>> and then fail.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here's the output from curl:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> curl
>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>> t.jar
>>>>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
>>>>>>> Time Current
>>>>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
>>>>>>> Left Speed
>>>>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 216k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
>>>>>>> 0:00:12 269k
>>>>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> curl
>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>> t.jar
>>>>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
>>>>>>> Time Current
>>>>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
>>>>>>> Left Speed
>>>>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 212k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
>>>>>>> 0:00:12 263k
>>>>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our
>> IT
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> advice...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I just went to
>>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/ in a
>>>>>>>>>>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced
>> a
>>>>>>> network error
>>>>>>>>>>> (reported by my browser...)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Would be good to get this fixed :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a
>>>>>>>>>>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference
>> to
>>>>>>> win32:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could
>>>>>>> not resolve
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-
>>>> parent:pom:2.6.1:
>>>>>>> Could
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x8
>>>>>>> 6_64:jar:3.104.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/):
>>>> GET
>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.
>>>> jar
>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~Burn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <
>>>>>>> peter.kluegl@averbis.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a gentle ping :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is
>>>>>>> missing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is
>> ready
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Major changes in this release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed Query View
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repository:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>> uima-1138/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SVN tag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Update site:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Archive with all sources:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com>.
Worked with IBM Java 1.8 ... fails reliably with IBM Java 1.7
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> that is correct - maven uses the value of JAVA_HOME
>
> -Marshall
>
>
> On 5/4/2017 10:45 AM, Burn Lewis wrote:
> > man is apparently using $JAVA_HOME as this is not the java in my path
> >
> >> mvn -version
> > Apache Maven 3.3.3 (7994120775791599e205a5524ec3e0dfe41d4a06;
> > 2015-04-22T07:57:37-04:00)
> > Maven home: /share/apache-maven-3.3.3
> > Java version: 1.7.0, vendor: IBM Corporation
> > Java home: /share/ibm-java-x86_64-70-SR9/jre
> > Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
> > OS name: "linux", version: "2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64", arch: "amd64",
> > family: "unix"
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Should work just without any preconditions.
> >>
> >> What build environement do you have? OS, Java version...
> >>
> >>
> >> Peter
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 04.05.2017 um 16:36 schrieb Burn Lewis:
> >>> Failing assertion & stacktrace:
> >>>
> >>> Type type4 = cas.getTypeSystem().getType("
> >> my.package.one.One.Mtwl2");
> >>> AnnotationIndex<AnnotationFS> ai4 = cas.getAnnotationIndex(type4);
> >>>> assertEquals(1, ai4.size());
> >>> assertEquals("2", ai4.iterator().next().getCoveredText());
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Running org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest
> >>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.307
> sec
> >>> <<< FAILURE!
> >>> test(org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest) Time elapsed: 2.259
> sec
> >>> <<< FAILURE!
> >>> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
> >>> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
> >>> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:618)
> >>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126)
> >>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:443)
> >>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:427)
> >>> at org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest.test(
> OneEngineTest.java:78)
> >>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >>> at
> >>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> >> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
> >>> at
> >>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> >> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
> >>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(
> >> FrameworkMethod.java:44)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(
> >> ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(
> >> FrameworkMethod.java:41)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.
> >> evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
> >> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
> >> RunAfters.java:31)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
> >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
> >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46)
> >>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180)
> >>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41)
> >>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
> >> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
> >> RunAfters.java:31)
> >>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(
> >> JUnit4Provider.java:252)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
> >> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(
> >> JUnit4Provider.java:112)
> >>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >>> at
> >>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> >> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
> >>> at
> >>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> >> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
> >>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(
> >> ReflectionUtils.java:189)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(
> >> ProviderFactory.java:165)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(
> >> ProviderFactory.java:85)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(
> >> ForkedBooter.java:115)
> >>> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(
> >> ForkedBooter.java:75)
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Keep getting the same test failure ... do I have to install UIMA &
> >> UIMAFit
> >>>> somewhere?
> >>>>
> >>>> ~Burn
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> The problem seems (somewhat) intermittent. Yesterday, solid failure.
> >> This
> >>>>> morning, first time - it failed, 2nd time it worked (for me). Burn
> >>>>> reports he
> >>>>> got past this, this morning, as well...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Marshall
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 5/4/2017 3:05 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> no idea yet. I successfully downloaded the file outside of our
> >> network.
> >>>>>> Any ideas how we can *reasonably* hotfix the problem for the review?
> >> Can
> >>>>>> you download it from somewhere else and manually add it to the local
> >> m2
> >>>>>> folder?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Peter
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> >>>>>>> more info:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> That directory
> >>>>>>> (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86
> >>>>> _64/3.104.1/) has
> >>>>>>> .jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those. All of the
> files I
> >>>>> can
> >>>>>>> download except the .jar.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get
> about
> >>>>> 105K bytes,
> >>>>>>> and then fail.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Here's the output from curl:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> curl
> >>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
> >>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
> >>>>>>>> t.jar
> >>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
> >>>>> Time Current
> >>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
> >>>>> Left Speed
> >>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 216k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
> >>>>> 0:00:12 269k
> >>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> curl
> >>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
> >>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
> >>>>>>>> t.jar
> >>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
> >>>>> Time Current
> >>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
> >>>>> Left Speed
> >>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 212k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
> >>>>> 0:00:12 263k
> >>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Marshall
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our
> IT
> >>>>> for
> >>>>>>>> advice...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Peter
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I just went to
> >>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
> >>>>> 64/3.104.1/ in a
> >>>>>>>>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced
> a
> >>>>> network error
> >>>>>>>>> (reported by my browser...)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Would be good to get this fixed :-)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> -Marshall
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a
> >>>>>>>>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Peter
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis:
> >>>>>>>>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference
> to
> >>>>> win32:
> >>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could
> >>>>> not resolve
> >>>>>>>>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-
> >> parent:pom:2.6.1:
> >>>>> Could
> >>>>>>>>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x8
> >>>>> 6_64:jar:3.104.1
> >>>>>>>>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/):
> >> GET
> >>>>> request
> >>>>>>>>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.
> >> jar
> >>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ~Burn
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <
> >>>>> peter.kluegl@averbis.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> a gentle ping :-)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is
> >>>>> missing.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is
> ready
> >>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>> voting.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Major changes in this release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed Query View
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repository:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
> >>>>> uima-1138/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> SVN tag:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Update site:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
> >>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Archive with all sources:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and here:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
that is correct - maven uses the value of JAVA_HOME
-Marshall
On 5/4/2017 10:45 AM, Burn Lewis wrote:
> man is apparently using $JAVA_HOME as this is not the java in my path
>
>> mvn -version
> Apache Maven 3.3.3 (7994120775791599e205a5524ec3e0dfe41d4a06;
> 2015-04-22T07:57:37-04:00)
> Maven home: /share/apache-maven-3.3.3
> Java version: 1.7.0, vendor: IBM Corporation
> Java home: /share/ibm-java-x86_64-70-SR9/jre
> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
> OS name: "linux", version: "2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64", arch: "amd64",
> family: "unix"
>
>
> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Should work just without any preconditions.
>>
>> What build environement do you have? OS, Java version...
>>
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 04.05.2017 um 16:36 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>> Failing assertion & stacktrace:
>>>
>>> Type type4 = cas.getTypeSystem().getType("
>> my.package.one.One.Mtwl2");
>>> AnnotationIndex<AnnotationFS> ai4 = cas.getAnnotationIndex(type4);
>>>> assertEquals(1, ai4.size());
>>> assertEquals("2", ai4.iterator().next().getCoveredText());
>>>
>>>
>>> Running org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest
>>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.307 sec
>>> <<< FAILURE!
>>> test(org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest) Time elapsed: 2.259 sec
>>> <<< FAILURE!
>>> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
>>> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
>>> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:618)
>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126)
>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:443)
>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:427)
>>> at org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest.test(OneEngineTest.java:78)
>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>> at
>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
>>> at
>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
>>> at
>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(
>> FrameworkMethod.java:44)
>>> at
>>> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(
>> ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
>>> at
>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(
>> FrameworkMethod.java:41)
>>> at
>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.
>> evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
>>> at
>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
>> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>>> at
>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
>> RunAfters.java:31)
>>> at
>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
>> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73)
>>> at
>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
>> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46)
>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180)
>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41)
>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173)
>>> at
>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
>> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>>> at
>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
>> RunAfters.java:31)
>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(
>> JUnit4Provider.java:252)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
>> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(
>> JUnit4Provider.java:112)
>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>> at
>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
>>> at
>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(
>> ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(
>> ProviderFactory.java:165)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(
>> ProviderFactory.java:85)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(
>> ForkedBooter.java:115)
>>> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(
>> ForkedBooter.java:75)
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Keep getting the same test failure ... do I have to install UIMA &
>> UIMAFit
>>>> somewhere?
>>>>
>>>> ~Burn
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The problem seems (somewhat) intermittent. Yesterday, solid failure.
>> This
>>>>> morning, first time - it failed, 2nd time it worked (for me). Burn
>>>>> reports he
>>>>> got past this, this morning, as well...
>>>>>
>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/4/2017 3:05 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> no idea yet. I successfully downloaded the file outside of our
>> network.
>>>>>> Any ideas how we can *reasonably* hotfix the problem for the review?
>> Can
>>>>>> you download it from somewhere else and manually add it to the local
>> m2
>>>>>> folder?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>>> more info:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That directory
>>>>>>> (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86
>>>>> _64/3.104.1/) has
>>>>>>> .jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those. All of the files I
>>>>> can
>>>>>>> download except the .jar.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get about
>>>>> 105K bytes,
>>>>>>> and then fail.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's the output from curl:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> curl
>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>>>>>>> t.jar
>>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
>>>>> Time Current
>>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
>>>>> Left Speed
>>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 216k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
>>>>> 0:00:12 269k
>>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> curl
>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>>>>>>> t.jar
>>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
>>>>> Time Current
>>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
>>>>> Left Speed
>>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 212k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
>>>>> 0:00:12 263k
>>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our IT
>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> advice...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I just went to
>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>>>> 64/3.104.1/ in a
>>>>>>>>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced a
>>>>> network error
>>>>>>>>> (reported by my browser...)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Would be good to get this fixed :-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a
>>>>>>>>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>>>>>>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference to
>>>>> win32:
>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could
>>>>> not resolve
>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-
>> parent:pom:2.6.1:
>>>>> Could
>>>>>>>>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x8
>>>>> 6_64:jar:3.104.1
>>>>>>>>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/):
>> GET
>>>>> request
>>>>>>>>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.
>> jar
>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ~Burn
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <
>>>>> peter.kluegl@averbis.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> a gentle ping :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is
>>>>> missing.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is ready
>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>> voting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Major changes in this release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed Query View
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repository:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>> uima-1138/
>>>>>>>>>>>>> SVN tag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Update site:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Archive with all sources:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
>>>>>>>>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
>>>>>>>>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com>.
man is apparently using $JAVA_HOME as this is not the java in my path
> mvn -version
Apache Maven 3.3.3 (7994120775791599e205a5524ec3e0dfe41d4a06;
2015-04-22T07:57:37-04:00)
Maven home: /share/apache-maven-3.3.3
Java version: 1.7.0, vendor: IBM Corporation
Java home: /share/ibm-java-x86_64-70-SR9/jre
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "linux", version: "2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64", arch: "amd64",
family: "unix"
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>
wrote:
> Should work just without any preconditions.
>
> What build environement do you have? OS, Java version...
>
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> Am 04.05.2017 um 16:36 schrieb Burn Lewis:
> > Failing assertion & stacktrace:
> >
> > Type type4 = cas.getTypeSystem().getType("
> my.package.one.One.Mtwl2");
> > AnnotationIndex<AnnotationFS> ai4 = cas.getAnnotationIndex(type4);
> >> assertEquals(1, ai4.size());
> > assertEquals("2", ai4.iterator().next().getCoveredText());
> >
> >
> > Running org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest
> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.307 sec
> > <<< FAILURE!
> > test(org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest) Time elapsed: 2.259 sec
> > <<< FAILURE!
> > java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
> > at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
> > at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:618)
> > at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126)
> > at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:443)
> > at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:427)
> > at org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest.test(OneEngineTest.java:78)
> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > at
> > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
> > at
> > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
> > at
> > org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(
> FrameworkMethod.java:44)
> > at
> > org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(
> ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
> > at
> > org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(
> FrameworkMethod.java:41)
> > at
> > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.
> evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
> > at
> > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
> > at
> > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
> RunAfters.java:31)
> > at
> > org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73)
> > at
> > org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46)
> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180)
> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41)
> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173)
> > at
> > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
> > at
> > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
> RunAfters.java:31)
> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220)
> > at
> > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(
> JUnit4Provider.java:252)
> > at
> > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141)
> > at
> > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(
> JUnit4Provider.java:112)
> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > at
> > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
> > at
> > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
> > at
> > org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(
> ReflectionUtils.java:189)
> > at
> > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(
> ProviderFactory.java:165)
> > at
> > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(
> ProviderFactory.java:85)
> > at
> > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(
> ForkedBooter.java:115)
> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(
> ForkedBooter.java:75)
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Keep getting the same test failure ... do I have to install UIMA &
> UIMAFit
> >> somewhere?
> >>
> >> ~Burn
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The problem seems (somewhat) intermittent. Yesterday, solid failure.
> This
> >>> morning, first time - it failed, 2nd time it worked (for me). Burn
> >>> reports he
> >>> got past this, this morning, as well...
> >>>
> >>> -Marshall
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 5/4/2017 3:05 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> no idea yet. I successfully downloaded the file outside of our
> network.
> >>>>
> >>>> Any ideas how we can *reasonably* hotfix the problem for the review?
> Can
> >>>> you download it from somewhere else and manually add it to the local
> m2
> >>>> folder?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Peter
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> >>>>> more info:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That directory
> >>>>> (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86
> >>> _64/3.104.1/) has
> >>>>> .jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those. All of the files I
> >>> can
> >>>>> download except the .jar.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get about
> >>> 105K bytes,
> >>>>> and then fail.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here's the output from curl:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> curl
> >>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
> >>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
> >>>>>> t.jar
> >>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
> >>> Time Current
> >>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
> >>> Left Speed
> >>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 216k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
> >>> 0:00:12 269k
> >>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> curl
> >>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
> >>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
> >>>>>> t.jar
> >>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
> >>> Time Current
> >>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
> >>> Left Speed
> >>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 212k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
> >>> 0:00:12 263k
> >>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Marshall
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our IT
> >>> for
> >>>>>> advice...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Peter
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> >>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I just went to
> >>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
> >>> 64/3.104.1/ in a
> >>>>>>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced a
> >>> network error
> >>>>>>> (reported by my browser...)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Would be good to get this fixed :-)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Marshall
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a
> >>>>>>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Peter
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis:
> >>>>>>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference to
> >>> win32:
> >>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could
> >>> not resolve
> >>>>>>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-
> parent:pom:2.6.1:
> >>> Could
> >>>>>>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x8
> >>> 6_64:jar:3.104.1
> >>>>>>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/):
> GET
> >>> request
> >>>>>>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.
> jar
> >>> from
> >>>>>>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ~Burn
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <
> >>> peter.kluegl@averbis.com>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> a gentle ping :-)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is
> >>> missing.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Peter
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is ready
> >>> for
> >>>>>>>>>> voting.
> >>>>>>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Major changes in this release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
> >>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
> >>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
> >>>>>>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
> >>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed Query View
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Staging repository:
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
> >>> uima-1138/
> >>>>>>>>>>> SVN tag:
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Update site:
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
> >>>>>>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
> >>>>>>>>>>> Archive with all sources:
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
> >>>>>>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
> >>>>>>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
> >>>>>>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ... and here:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
> >>>>>>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
> >>>>>>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> >>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Peter
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
Should work just without any preconditions.
What build environement do you have? OS, Java version...
Peter
Am 04.05.2017 um 16:36 schrieb Burn Lewis:
> Failing assertion & stacktrace:
>
> Type type4 = cas.getTypeSystem().getType("my.package.one.One.Mtwl2");
> AnnotationIndex<AnnotationFS> ai4 = cas.getAnnotationIndex(type4);
>> assertEquals(1, ai4.size());
> assertEquals("2", ai4.iterator().next().getCoveredText());
>
>
> Running org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.307 sec
> <<< FAILURE!
> test(org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest) Time elapsed: 2.259 sec
> <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:618)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:443)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:427)
> at org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest.test(OneEngineTest.java:78)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:252)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:112)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:115)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:75)
>
>
> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Keep getting the same test failure ... do I have to install UIMA & UIMAFit
>> somewhere?
>>
>> ~Burn
>>
>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The problem seems (somewhat) intermittent. Yesterday, solid failure. This
>>> morning, first time - it failed, 2nd time it worked (for me). Burn
>>> reports he
>>> got past this, this morning, as well...
>>>
>>> -Marshall
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/4/2017 3:05 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> no idea yet. I successfully downloaded the file outside of our network.
>>>>
>>>> Any ideas how we can *reasonably* hotfix the problem for the review? Can
>>>> you download it from somewhere else and manually add it to the local m2
>>>> folder?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>> more info:
>>>>>
>>>>> That directory
>>>>> (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86
>>> _64/3.104.1/) has
>>>>> .jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those. All of the files I
>>> can
>>>>> download except the .jar.
>>>>>
>>>>> In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get about
>>> 105K bytes,
>>>>> and then fail.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's the output from curl:
>>>>>
>>>>> curl
>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>>>>> t.jar
>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
>>> Time Current
>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
>>> Left Speed
>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 216k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
>>> 0:00:12 269k
>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>>>>>
>>>>> Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k:
>>>>>
>>>>> curl
>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>>>>> t.jar
>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
>>> Time Current
>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
>>> Left Speed
>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 212k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
>>> 0:00:12 263k
>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>>>>>
>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our IT
>>> for
>>>>>> advice...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just went to
>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>> 64/3.104.1/ in a
>>>>>>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced a
>>> network error
>>>>>>> (reported by my browser...)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would be good to get this fixed :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a
>>>>>>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>>>>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference to
>>> win32:
>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could
>>> not resolve
>>>>>>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-parent:pom:2.6.1:
>>> Could
>>>>>>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x8
>>> 6_64:jar:3.104.1
>>>>>>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/): GET
>>> request
>>>>>>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>> from
>>>>>>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ~Burn
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <
>>> peter.kluegl@averbis.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> a gentle ping :-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is
>>> missing.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is ready
>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> voting.
>>>>>>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Major changes in this release:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
>>>>>>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed Query View
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repository:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>> uima-1138/
>>>>>>>>>>> SVN tag:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Update site:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
>>>>>>>>>>> Archive with all sources:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
>>>>>>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ... and here:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
>>>>>>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
>>>>>>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com>.
Failing assertion & stacktrace:
Type type4 = cas.getTypeSystem().getType("my.package.one.One.Mtwl2");
AnnotationIndex<AnnotationFS> ai4 = cas.getAnnotationIndex(type4);
> assertEquals(1, ai4.size());
assertEquals("2", ai4.iterator().next().getCoveredText());
Running org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.307 sec
<<< FAILURE!
test(org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest) Time elapsed: 2.259 sec
<<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:618)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:443)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:427)
at org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest.test(OneEngineTest.java:78)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
at
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
at
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)
at
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73)
at
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:252)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:112)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:115)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:75)
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Keep getting the same test failure ... do I have to install UIMA & UIMAFit
> somewhere?
>
> ~Burn
>
> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
>> The problem seems (somewhat) intermittent. Yesterday, solid failure. This
>> morning, first time - it failed, 2nd time it worked (for me). Burn
>> reports he
>> got past this, this morning, as well...
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>>
>> On 5/4/2017 3:05 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >
>> > no idea yet. I successfully downloaded the file outside of our network.
>> >
>> > Any ideas how we can *reasonably* hotfix the problem for the review? Can
>> > you download it from somewhere else and manually add it to the local m2
>> > folder?
>> >
>> >
>> > Best,
>> >
>> >
>> > Peter
>> >
>> >
>> > Am 03.05.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>> >> more info:
>> >>
>> >> That directory
>> >> (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86
>> _64/3.104.1/) has
>> >> .jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those. All of the files I
>> can
>> >> download except the .jar.
>> >>
>> >> In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get about
>> 105K bytes,
>> >> and then fail.
>> >>
>> >> Here's the output from curl:
>> >>
>> >> curl
>> >> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>> >>> t.jar
>> >> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
>> Time Current
>> >> Dload Upload Total Spent
>> Left Speed
>> >> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 216k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
>> 0:00:12 269k
>> >> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>> >>
>> >> Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k:
>> >>
>> >> curl
>> >> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>> >>> t.jar
>> >> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
>> Time Current
>> >> Dload Upload Total Spent
>> Left Speed
>> >> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 212k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
>> 0:00:12 263k
>> >> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>> >>
>> >> -Marshall
>> >>
>> >> On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our IT
>> for
>> >>> advice...
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Peter
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>> >>>> Hi,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I just went to
>> >>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>> 64/3.104.1/ in a
>> >>>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced a
>> network error
>> >>>> (reported by my browser...)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Would be good to get this fixed :-)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -Marshall
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> >>>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a
>> >>>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Peter
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>> >>>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference to
>> win32:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could
>> not resolve
>> >>>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-parent:pom:2.6.1:
>> Could
>> >>>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x8
>> 6_64:jar:3.104.1
>> >>>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/): GET
>> request
>> >>>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>> from
>> >>>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> ~Burn
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <
>> peter.kluegl@averbis.com>
>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> a gentle ping :-)
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is
>> missing.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Peter
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>> >>>>>>>> Hi,
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is ready
>> for
>> >>>>>>> voting.
>> >>>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Major changes in this release:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
>> >>>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
>> >>>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
>> >>>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
>> >>>>>>>> * Fixed Query View
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Staging repository:
>> >>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>> uima-1138/
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> SVN tag:
>> >>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Update site:
>> >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>> >>>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
>> >>>>>>>> Archive with all sources:
>> >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>> >>>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
>> >>>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
>> >>>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> ... and here:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
>> >>>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
>> >>>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>> >>>>>>>> Please vote on release:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>> >>>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Thanks.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Peter
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com>.
Keep getting the same test failure ... do I have to install UIMA & UIMAFit
somewhere?
~Burn
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> The problem seems (somewhat) intermittent. Yesterday, solid failure. This
> morning, first time - it failed, 2nd time it worked (for me). Burn
> reports he
> got past this, this morning, as well...
>
> -Marshall
>
>
> On 5/4/2017 3:05 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > no idea yet. I successfully downloaded the file outside of our network.
> >
> > Any ideas how we can *reasonably* hotfix the problem for the review? Can
> > you download it from somewhere else and manually add it to the local m2
> > folder?
> >
> >
> > Best,
> >
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
> > Am 03.05.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> >> more info:
> >>
> >> That directory
> >> (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/
> x86_64/3.104.1/) has
> >> .jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those. All of the files I
> can
> >> download except the .jar.
> >>
> >> In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get about
> 105K bytes,
> >> and then fail.
> >>
> >> Here's the output from curl:
> >>
> >> curl
> >> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/
> x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
> >>> t.jar
> >> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time
> Current
> >> Dload Upload Total Spent Left
> Speed
> >> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 216k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
> 0:00:12 269k
> >> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
> >>
> >> Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k:
> >>
> >> curl
> >> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/
> x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
> >>> t.jar
> >> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time
> Current
> >> Dload Upload Total Spent Left
> Speed
> >> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 212k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
> 0:00:12 263k
> >> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
> >>
> >> -Marshall
> >>
> >> On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our IT
> for
> >>> advice...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Peter
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I just went to
> >>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/
> x86_64/3.104.1/ in a
> >>>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced a
> network error
> >>>> (reported by my browser...)
> >>>>
> >>>> Would be good to get this fixed :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> -Marshall
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> >>>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a
> >>>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Peter
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis:
> >>>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference to
> win32:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could not
> resolve
> >>>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-parent:pom:2.6.1:
> Could
> >>>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:
> x86_64:jar:3.104.1
> >>>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/): GET
> request
> >>>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
> from
> >>>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ~Burn
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <
> peter.kluegl@averbis.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> a gentle ping :-)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is
> missing.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Peter
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
> >>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is ready
> for
> >>>>>>> voting.
> >>>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Major changes in this release:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
> >>>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
> >>>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
> >>>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
> >>>>>>>> * Fixed Query View
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Staging repository:
> >>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheuima-1138/
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> SVN tag:
> >>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Update site:
> >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
> >>>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
> >>>>>>>> Archive with all sources:
> >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
> >>>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
> >>>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
> >>>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ... and here:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
> >>>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
> >>>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> >>>>>>>> Please vote on release:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
> >>>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
> >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Peter
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
The problem seems (somewhat) intermittent. Yesterday, solid failure. This
morning, first time - it failed, 2nd time it worked (for me). Burn reports he
got past this, this morning, as well...
-Marshall
On 5/4/2017 3:05 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> no idea yet. I successfully downloaded the file outside of our network.
>
> Any ideas how we can *reasonably* hotfix the problem for the review? Can
> you download it from somewhere else and manually add it to the local m2
> folder?
>
>
> Best,
>
>
> Peter
>
>
> Am 03.05.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>> more info:
>>
>> That directory
>> (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/) has
>> .jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those. All of the files I can
>> download except the .jar.
>>
>> In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get about 105K bytes,
>> and then fail.
>>
>> Here's the output from curl:
>>
>> curl
>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>> t.jar
>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
>> Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 216k 0 0:00:12 --:--:-- 0:00:12 269k
>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>>
>> Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k:
>>
>> curl
>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>> t.jar
>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
>> Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 212k 0 0:00:12 --:--:-- 0:00:12 263k
>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>> On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our IT for
>>> advice...
>>>
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I just went to
>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/ in a
>>>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced a network error
>>>> (reported by my browser...)
>>>>
>>>> Would be good to get this fixed :-)
>>>>
>>>> -Marshall
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a
>>>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference to win32:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could not resolve
>>>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-parent:pom:2.6.1: Could
>>>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x86_64:jar:3.104.1
>>>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/): GET request
>>>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar from
>>>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~Burn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> a gentle ping :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is missing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is ready for
>>>>>>> voting.
>>>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Major changes in this release:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
>>>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
>>>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
>>>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
>>>>>>>> * Fixed Query View
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Staging repository:
>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1138/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> SVN tag:
>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Update site:
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
>>>>>>>> Archive with all sources:
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
>>>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ... and here:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
>>>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
>>>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>>>>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
Hi,
no idea yet. I successfully downloaded the file outside of our network.
Any ideas how we can *reasonably* hotfix the problem for the review? Can
you download it from somewhere else and manually add it to the local m2
folder?
Best,
Peter
Am 03.05.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> more info:
>
> That directory
> (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/) has
> .jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those. All of the files I can
> download except the .jar.
>
> In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get about 105K bytes,
> and then fail.
>
> Here's the output from curl:
>
> curl
> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>> t.jar
> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
> Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 216k 0 0:00:12 --:--:-- 0:00:12 269k
> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>
> Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k:
>
> curl
> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>> t.jar
> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
> Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 212k 0 0:00:12 --:--:-- 0:00:12 263k
> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>
> -Marshall
>
> On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our IT for
>> advice...
>>
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I just went to
>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/ in a
>>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced a network error
>>> (reported by my browser...)
>>>
>>> Would be good to get this fixed :-)
>>>
>>> -Marshall
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a
>>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference to win32:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could not resolve
>>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-parent:pom:2.6.1: Could
>>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x86_64:jar:3.104.1
>>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/): GET request
>>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar from
>>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
>>>>>
>>>>> ~Burn
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> a gentle ping :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is missing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is ready for
>>>>>> voting.
>>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Major changes in this release:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
>>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
>>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
>>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
>>>>>>> * Fixed Query View
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Staging repository:
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1138/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SVN tag:
>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Update site:
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
>>>>>>> Archive with all sources:
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
>>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
>>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ... and here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
>>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
>>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>>>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
more info:
That directory
(http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/) has
.jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those. All of the files I can
download except the .jar.
In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get about 105K bytes,
and then fail.
Here's the output from curl:
curl
http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
> t.jar
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 216k 0 0:00:12 --:--:-- 0:00:12 269k
curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k:
curl
http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
> t.jar
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 212k 0 0:00:12 --:--:-- 0:00:12 263k
curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
-Marshall
On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our IT for
> advice...
>
>
> Peter
>
>
> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just went to
>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/ in a
>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced a network error
>> (reported by my browser...)
>>
>> Would be good to get this fixed :-)
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>>
>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a
>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow.
>>>
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference to win32:
>>>>
>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could not resolve
>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-parent:pom:2.6.1: Could
>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x86_64:jar:3.104.1
>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/): GET request
>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar from
>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
>>>>
>>>> ~Burn
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> a gentle ping :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is missing.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is ready for
>>>>> voting.
>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Major changes in this release:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
>>>>>> * Fixed Query View
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Staging repository:
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1138/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SVN tag:
>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Update site:
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
>>>>>> Archive with all sources:
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ... and here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
Hi,
I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our IT for
advice...
Peter
Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> Hi,
>
> I just went to
> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/ in a
> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced a network error
> (reported by my browser...)
>
> Would be good to get this fixed :-)
>
> -Marshall
>
>
> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a
>> timeout. The server is terribly slow.
>>
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference to win32:
>>>
>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could not resolve
>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-parent:pom:2.6.1: Could
>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x86_64:jar:3.104.1
>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/): GET request
>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar from
>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
>>>
>>> ~Burn
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> a gentle ping :-)
>>>>
>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is missing.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is ready for
>>>> voting.
>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Major changes in this release:
>>>>>
>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
>>>>>
>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
>>>>> * Fixed Query View
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Staging repository:
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1138/
>>>>>
>>>>> SVN tag:
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
>>>>>
>>>>> Update site:
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
>>>>> Archive with all sources:
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>>>>>
>>>>> ... and here:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter
>>>>>
>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Hi,
I just went to
http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/ in a
browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced a network error
(reported by my browser...)
Would be good to get this fixed :-)
-Marshall
On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a
> timeout. The server is terribly slow.
>
>
> Peter
>
>
> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference to win32:
>>
>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could not resolve
>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-parent:pom:2.6.1: Could
>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x86_64:jar:3.104.1
>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/): GET request
>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar from
>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
>>
>> ~Burn
>>
>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> a gentle ping :-)
>>>
>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is missing.
>>>
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is ready for
>>> voting.
>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
>>>>
>>>> Major changes in this release:
>>>>
>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
>>>>
>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
>>>> * Fixed Query View
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Staging repository:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1138/
>>>>
>>>> SVN tag:
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
>>>>
>>>> Update site:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
>>>> Archive with all sources:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>>>>
>>>> ... and here:
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a
timeout. The server is terribly slow.
Peter
Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis:
> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference to win32:
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could not resolve
> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-parent:pom:2.6.1: Could
> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x86_64:jar:3.104.1
> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/): GET request
> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar from
> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
>
> ~Burn
>
> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>
> wrote:
>
>> a gentle ping :-)
>>
>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is missing.
>>
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is ready for
>> voting.
>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
>>>
>>> Major changes in this release:
>>>
>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
>>>
>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
>>> * Fixed Query View
>>>
>>>
>>> Staging repository:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1138/
>>>
>>> SVN tag:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
>>>
>>> Update site:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
>>> Archive with all sources:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>>>
>>> ... and here:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>> Please vote on release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com>.
My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference to win32:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could not resolve
dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-parent:pom:2.6.1: Could
not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x86_64:jar:3.104.1
from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/): GET request
of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar from
averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
~Burn
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>
wrote:
> a gentle ping :-)
>
> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is missing.
>
>
> Peter
>
>
> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is ready for
> voting.
> > This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
> >
> > Major changes in this release:
> >
> > UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
> > * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
> > * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
> > * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
> >
> > UIMA Ruta Workbench:
> > * Fixed Query View
> >
> >
> > Staging repository:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1138/
> >
> > SVN tag:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
> >
> > Update site:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
> >
> > Archive with all sources:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
> >
> > Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
> > They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
> >
> > ... and here:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> >
> > Please vote on release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 OK to release
> > [ ] 0 Don't care
> > [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
a gentle ping :-)
The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is missing.
Peter
Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Kl�gl:
> Hi,
>
> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is ready for voting.
> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
>
> Major changes in this release:
>
> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
>
> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
> * Fixed Query View
>
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1138/
>
> SVN tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
>
> Update site:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta/
>
> Archive with all sources:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
>
> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>
> ... and here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Peter
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
compared svn-tag to source-release - OK
mvn clean install svn-tag - OK
mvn clean install source-release - OK
spot checked issues/license/notice/release-notes - OK
spot checked signatures - OK
installed UIMA Ruta Workbench in Eclipse Neon 3 with UIMA 2.10.0 - OK
created simple project, created script, debugged script - OK
tested query view - OK
tested some ruta component repositories with staged artifacts - OK
[X] +1 OK to release
Peter
Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Kl�gl:
> Hi,
>
> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is ready for voting.
> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
>
> Major changes in this release:
>
> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
>
> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
> * Fixed Query View
>
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1138/
>
> SVN tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
>
> Update site:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta/
>
> Archive with all sources:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
>
> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>
> ... and here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Peter
>
>