You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to infrastructure-issues@apache.org by "Gavin (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/02/03 16:32:11 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (INFRA-7039) keys-fetch.py does not handle V3
key fingerprints
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13889556#comment-13889556 ]
Gavin commented on INFRA-7039:
------------------------------
I've had a look around, there are servers that support v3 - like sks and its pool, however the percentage of users on v3 as opposed to v4 is like 4%. How about we just dont support v3 and ask folks to migrate to v4+ ?
> keys-fetch.py does not handle V3 key fingerprints
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: INFRA-7039
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7039
> Project: Infrastructure
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: LDAP
> Environment: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site/trunk/people/keys-fetch.py
> Reporter: Sebb
> Priority: Minor
>
> If an LDAP key entry uses V3 fingerprint, the key fetch process does not work.
> This is because the server that is used - keys.gnupg.net - does not support v3 fingerprints.
> As a temporary work-round, I have added a command-line option to load keys by id; this means finding the id which corresponds to the v3 fingerprint.
> It is not possible to derive the id directly from a v3 fingerprint, so this requires a manual search, followed by manually adding the id.
> It would be useful if V3 fingerprints were directly supported.
> For example, maybe there is a GPG server that supports search by V3 fingerprint?
> Alternatively, perhaps the manual search could be automated?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)