Re: [PROPOSAL] JSNodeTypes contribution :: IP clearance needed?

[Sandro Boehme <sa...@gmx.de>]

Hello again,

while I think the JSNodeTypes contribution is useful I would also like 
to have it in Sling to not need an OBR to install the Resource Editor.

Now that I'm a Committer in the meantime and I have written the 
JSNodeTypes library solely on my own the question is if the IP clearance 
process is still needed.

What do you think?

Best,

Sandro


Am 18.12.14 um 14:02 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
> Hi Sandro,
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Sandro Boehme <sa...@gmx.de> wrote:
>> ...Here you find a demo of the full API and all background information:
>> http://www.jcrbrowser.org/sling/libs/jsnodetypes/content/documentation.html
>
> I think it's interesting, I support accepting this donation as it is
> used in your editor. Thanks for this!
>
> Note that we'd need to go via the IP clearance process as we did for the editor.
>
> -Bertrand
>

Re: [PROPOSAL] JSNodeTypes contribution :: IP clearance needed?

[Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>]

Hi Sandro,

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Sandro Boehme <sa...@gmx.de> wrote:
> ...If there are no objections I would commit it with SLING-4364 in the folder
> "/contrib/commons/js/nodetypes"
> with the Sling parent pom,
> the ArtifactId "org.apache.sling.commons.js.nodetypes"
> and the version "1.0.SNAPSHOT"....

Works for me but maybe use 0.1.0-SNAPSHOT so that the first release can be 1.0.0

We use alternating odd/even versions so after 1.0.0 it's
1.0.1-SNAPSHOT and the next release is 1.0.2.

-Bertrand

Re: [PROPOSAL] JSNodeTypes contribution :: IP clearance needed?

[Sandro Boehme <sa...@gmx.de>]

Hi Bertrand,

thanks for your feedback, that sounds good!
If there are no objections I would commit it with SLING-4364 in the folder
"/contrib/commons/js/nodetypes"
with the Sling parent pom,
the ArtifactId "org.apache.sling.commons.js.nodetypes"
and the version "1.0.SNAPSHOT".
Does that fit in the general structure?

Best,

Sandro

Am 27.01.15 um 17:29 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
> Hi Sandro,
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Sandro Boehme <sa...@gmx.de> wrote:
>> ...Now that I'm a Committer in the meantime and I have written the JSNodeTypes
>> library solely on my own the question is if the IP clearance process is
>> still needed....
>
> IMO it's not needed in this case, committing code that you wrote
> yourself is covered by your iCLA.
>
> I suggest that you wait 24 hours for possible objections, and if
> there's none go ahead and commit.
>
> -Bertrand
>

Re: [PROPOSAL] JSNodeTypes contribution :: IP clearance needed?

[Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>]

Hi Sandro,

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Sandro Boehme <sa...@gmx.de> wrote:
> ...Now that I'm a Committer in the meantime and I have written the JSNodeTypes
> library solely on my own the question is if the IP clearance process is
> still needed....

IMO it's not needed in this case, committing code that you wrote
yourself is covered by your iCLA.

I suggest that you wait 24 hours for possible objections, and if
there's none go ahead and commit.

-Bertrand