You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to scout-dev@ws.apache.org by Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com> on 2007/07/11 19:59:14 UTC

Scout Release Plans

Hi there,

I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working towards our 
2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout as the JAXR 
1.0 implementation.  So far we are doing well with JAXR tck in geronimo 
by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much like to include 
scout in our 2.0 release.

To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout (1.0?) 
release plans are.  we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out around the 
end of July.

Input welcome :)

Lin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Re: Lin Sun as committer

Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me!

On 7/20/07, Anil Saldhana <an...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Please vote Lin Sun as committer for the Apache Scout project.
>
> +1 from me.
>
>
>  ________________________________
> Luggage? GPS? Comic books?
>  Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search.
>
>


-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Re: Lin Sun as committer

Posted by Kurt T Stam <ks...@apache.org>.
+1

Anil Saldhana wrote:
> Please vote Lin Sun as committer for the Apache Scout project.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Luggage? GPS? Comic books?
> Check out fitting gifts for grads
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48249/*http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=graduation+gifts&cs=bz>
> at Yahoo! Search. 

-- 
Kurt T Stam
kstam@apache.org

callto://kurtstam
c. +1 978.471.9213
f. +1 432.224.0461



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Lin Sun as committer

Posted by Anil Saldhana <an...@yahoo.com>.
Please vote Lin Sun as committer for the Apache Scout project.

+1 from me.

       
---------------------------------
Luggage? GPS? Comic books? 
Check out fitting  gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search.

Re: Scout Release Plans

Posted by Kurt T Stam <ks...@apache.org>.
Cool, yeah lets make a list and divi them up.

Thanks!

--Kurt

Lin Sun wrote:
> Hi Kurt, Got it.  If you haven't started anything, I can start working
> on the bug list.  I can start by supplying patches for these bugs with
> the trunk.    Let me know.
>
> Thanks, Lin
>
> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>> No apparently the code was branched for 0.7, and for a while the fixes
>> where only applied to the 0.7x branches, and never merged back
>> into the trunk. So it's a matter of identifying the jira's we need to
>> apply to the trunk and finding the corresponding txs in svn.
>>
>> I think most of the fixes where NPE which should be pretty easy to port
>> to the trunk. It may be the case that we have already fixed the issues
>> in the trunk with all the other work that we did though, so we should be
>> judicious.
>>
>> --Kurt
>>
>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>> Hi Kurt, I am sorry that I misunderstood you.  I had thought these
>>> fixes were already avail as all the JIRAs were marked as
>>> fixed/closed.   I had thought we just need to merge these fixes to
>>> trunk...  No?
>>>
>>> Lin
>>>
>>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>> Hi Lin,
>>>>
>>>> I think we want to try to get them fixed. I should have time
>>>> tomorrow to
>>>> take a look at it. Hopefully we can complete the vote by Friday and
>>>> get
>>>> rc1 out over the weekend.
>>>>
>>>> --Kurt
>>>>
>>>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>>>> Yes you are right - I was able to see the commit for some of the
>>>>> jiras, but not all of them.   I guess all looked minor except
>>>>> scout 11
>>>>> which doesn't contain any commit log/info.   I remember there is some
>>>>> issues related to classification fixed recently (like scout 23, 24,
>>>>> 30) so scout 11 may have been already fixed in trunk.
>>>>>
>>>>> If we decide we are going to merge this fixes into trunk, I am okay
>>>>> with that.  I'd like to get the rc1 build soon so that I can start
>>>>> test it in geronimo env. and fix any possible issues that might have
>>>>> been regressed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, Lin
>>>>>
>>>>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>>>> You should be able to see it in SVN. Like for SCOUT-15:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-15?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.ext.subversion:subversion-commits-tabpanel
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hope that helps.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Kurt
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Kurt,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I looked at them, I think most of them sounds minor fixes, and
>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>> not impact us.    However, I haven't been able to figure out how to
>>>>>>> tell which revision is associated with JIRA yet.   I'd like to do
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> if there is an easy way to.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think [SCOUT-15] is fixed in trunk.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Lin,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you have time maybe you can take a look at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-42
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --Kurt
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Kurt,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That sounds great for me.   1.0rc1 is good and we can test it in
>>>>>>>>> our
>>>>>>>>> env.   Let me know if there is anything I can do to help out.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lin
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Lin,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same
>>>>>>>>>> time-frame.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We currently have three issues in jira:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> SCOUT-38 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38>
>>>>>>>>>> Produce
>>>>>>>>>> website from the maven2 build
>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38>
>>>>>>>>>> Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost
>>>>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>>>> anyway
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> SCOUT-14 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14>
>>>>>>>>>> Binaries
>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>> download are empty
>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14>
>>>>>>>>>> Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is
>>>>>>>>>> done.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> SCOUT-12 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12>
>>>>>>>>>> Implement
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12>
>>>>>>>>>> Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :).
>>>>>>>>>> Should we
>>>>>>>>>> vote
>>>>>>>>>> on doing a 1.0rc1?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Input still welcome:).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --Kurt
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version
>>>>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>>>>> August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2
>>>>>>>>>> binding.
>>>>>>>>>> I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it
>>>>>>>>>> takes and
>>>>>>>>>> it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> work.
>>>>>>>>>> (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working
>>>>>>>>>>> towards
>>>>>>>>>>> our
>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout
>>>>>>>>>>> as the
>>>>>>>>>>> JAXR 1.0 implementation.  So far we are doing well with JAXR
>>>>>>>>>>> tck in
>>>>>>>>>>> geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much
>>>>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>>>> to include scout in our 2.0 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout
>>>>>>>>>>> (1.0?)
>>>>>>>>>>> release plans are.  we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out
>>>>>>>>>>> around
>>>>>>>>>>> the end of July.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Input welcome :)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Lin
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Re: Scout Release Plans

Posted by Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com>.
Hi Kurt, Got it.  If you haven't started anything, I can start working 
on the bug list.  I can start by supplying patches for these bugs with 
the trunk.    Let me know.

Thanks, Lin

Kurt T Stam wrote:
> No apparently the code was branched for 0.7, and for a while the fixes
> where only applied to the 0.7x branches, and never merged back
> into the trunk. So it's a matter of identifying the jira's we need to
> apply to the trunk and finding the corresponding txs in svn.
> 
> I think most of the fixes where NPE which should be pretty easy to port
> to the trunk. It may be the case that we have already fixed the issues
> in the trunk with all the other work that we did though, so we should be
> judicious.
> 
> --Kurt
> 
> Lin Sun wrote:
>> Hi Kurt, I am sorry that I misunderstood you.  I had thought these
>> fixes were already avail as all the JIRAs were marked as
>> fixed/closed.   I had thought we just need to merge these fixes to
>> trunk...  No?
>>
>> Lin
>>
>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>> Hi Lin,
>>>
>>> I think we want to try to get them fixed. I should have time tomorrow to
>>> take a look at it. Hopefully we can complete the vote by Friday and get
>>> rc1 out over the weekend.
>>>
>>> --Kurt
>>>
>>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>>> Yes you are right - I was able to see the commit for some of the
>>>> jiras, but not all of them.   I guess all looked minor except scout 11
>>>> which doesn't contain any commit log/info.   I remember there is some
>>>> issues related to classification fixed recently (like scout 23, 24,
>>>> 30) so scout 11 may have been already fixed in trunk.
>>>>
>>>> If we decide we are going to merge this fixes into trunk, I am okay
>>>> with that.  I'd like to get the rc1 build soon so that I can start
>>>> test it in geronimo env. and fix any possible issues that might have
>>>> been regressed.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Lin
>>>>
>>>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>>> You should be able to see it in SVN. Like for SCOUT-15:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-15?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.ext.subversion:subversion-commits-tabpanel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hope that helps.
>>>>>
>>>>> --Kurt
>>>>>
>>>>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Kurt,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I looked at them, I think most of them sounds minor fixes, and should
>>>>>> not impact us.    However, I haven't been able to figure out how to
>>>>>> tell which revision is associated with JIRA yet.   I'd like to do
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> if there is an easy way to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think [SCOUT-15] is fixed in trunk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Lin,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you have time maybe you can take a look at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-42
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --Kurt
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Kurt,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That sounds great for me.   1.0rc1 is good and we can test it in
>>>>>>>> our
>>>>>>>> env.   Let me know if there is anything I can do to help out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lin
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Lin,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same
>>>>>>>>> time-frame.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We currently have three issues in jira:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> SCOUT-38 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38> Produce
>>>>>>>>> website from the maven2 build
>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38>
>>>>>>>>> Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost
>>>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>>> anyway
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> SCOUT-14 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14> Binaries
>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>> download are empty
>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14>
>>>>>>>>> Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is
>>>>>>>>> done.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> SCOUT-12 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12>
>>>>>>>>> Implement
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12>
>>>>>>>>> Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should we
>>>>>>>>> vote
>>>>>>>>> on doing a 1.0rc1?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Input still welcome:).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --Kurt
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version
>>>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>>>> August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2
>>>>>>>>> binding.
>>>>>>>>> I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it
>>>>>>>>> takes and
>>>>>>>>> it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make that
>>>>>>>>> work.
>>>>>>>>> (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working
>>>>>>>>>> towards
>>>>>>>>>> our
>>>>>>>>>> 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout
>>>>>>>>>> as the
>>>>>>>>>> JAXR 1.0 implementation.  So far we are doing well with JAXR
>>>>>>>>>> tck in
>>>>>>>>>> geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much
>>>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>>> to include scout in our 2.0 release.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout
>>>>>>>>>> (1.0?)
>>>>>>>>>> release plans are.  we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out
>>>>>>>>>> around
>>>>>>>>>> the end of July.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Input welcome :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Lin
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Re: Scout Release Plans

Posted by Kurt T Stam <ks...@apache.org>.
No apparently the code was branched for 0.7, and for a while the fixes
where only applied to the 0.7x branches, and never merged back
into the trunk. So it's a matter of identifying the jira's we need to
apply to the trunk and finding the corresponding txs in svn.

I think most of the fixes where NPE which should be pretty easy to port
to the trunk. It may be the case that we have already fixed the issues
in the trunk with all the other work that we did though, so we should be
judicious.

--Kurt

Lin Sun wrote:
> Hi Kurt, I am sorry that I misunderstood you.  I had thought these
> fixes were already avail as all the JIRAs were marked as
> fixed/closed.   I had thought we just need to merge these fixes to
> trunk...  No?
>
> Lin
>
> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>> Hi Lin,
>>
>> I think we want to try to get them fixed. I should have time tomorrow to
>> take a look at it. Hopefully we can complete the vote by Friday and get
>> rc1 out over the weekend.
>>
>> --Kurt
>>
>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>> Yes you are right - I was able to see the commit for some of the
>>> jiras, but not all of them.   I guess all looked minor except scout 11
>>> which doesn't contain any commit log/info.   I remember there is some
>>> issues related to classification fixed recently (like scout 23, 24,
>>> 30) so scout 11 may have been already fixed in trunk.
>>>
>>> If we decide we are going to merge this fixes into trunk, I am okay
>>> with that.  I'd like to get the rc1 build soon so that I can start
>>> test it in geronimo env. and fix any possible issues that might have
>>> been regressed.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Lin
>>>
>>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>> You should be able to see it in SVN. Like for SCOUT-15:
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-15?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.ext.subversion:subversion-commits-tabpanel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hope that helps.
>>>>
>>>> --Kurt
>>>>
>>>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>>>> Hi Kurt,
>>>>>
>>>>> I looked at them, I think most of them sounds minor fixes, and should
>>>>> not impact us.    However, I haven't been able to figure out how to
>>>>> tell which revision is associated with JIRA yet.   I'd like to do
>>>>> that
>>>>> if there is an easy way to.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think [SCOUT-15] is fixed in trunk.
>>>>>
>>>>> Lin
>>>>>
>>>>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Lin,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you have time maybe you can take a look at
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-42
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Kurt
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Kurt,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That sounds great for me.   1.0rc1 is good and we can test it in
>>>>>>> our
>>>>>>> env.   Let me know if there is anything I can do to help out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Lin,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same
>>>>>>>> time-frame.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We currently have three issues in jira:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> SCOUT-38 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38> Produce
>>>>>>>> website from the maven2 build
>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38>
>>>>>>>> Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost
>>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>> anyway
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> SCOUT-14 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14> Binaries
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>> download are empty
>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14>
>>>>>>>> Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is
>>>>>>>> done.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> SCOUT-12 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12>
>>>>>>>> Implement
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12>
>>>>>>>> Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should we
>>>>>>>> vote
>>>>>>>> on doing a 1.0rc1?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Input still welcome:).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --Kurt
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version
>>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>>> August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2
>>>>>>>> binding.
>>>>>>>> I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it
>>>>>>>> takes and
>>>>>>>> it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make that
>>>>>>>> work.
>>>>>>>> (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working
>>>>>>>>> towards
>>>>>>>>> our
>>>>>>>>> 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout
>>>>>>>>> as the
>>>>>>>>> JAXR 1.0 implementation.  So far we are doing well with JAXR
>>>>>>>>> tck in
>>>>>>>>> geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much
>>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>> to include scout in our 2.0 release.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout
>>>>>>>>> (1.0?)
>>>>>>>>> release plans are.  we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out
>>>>>>>>> around
>>>>>>>>> the end of July.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Input welcome :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lin
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Re: Scout Release Plans

Posted by Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com>.
Hi Kurt, I am sorry that I misunderstood you.  I had thought these fixes 
were already avail as all the JIRAs were marked as fixed/closed.   I had 
thought we just need to merge these fixes to trunk...  No?

Lin

Kurt T Stam wrote:
> Hi Lin,
> 
> I think we want to try to get them fixed. I should have time tomorrow to
> take a look at it. Hopefully we can complete the vote by Friday and get
> rc1 out over the weekend.
> 
> --Kurt
> 
> Lin Sun wrote:
>> Yes you are right - I was able to see the commit for some of the
>> jiras, but not all of them.   I guess all looked minor except scout 11
>> which doesn't contain any commit log/info.   I remember there is some
>> issues related to classification fixed recently (like scout 23, 24,
>> 30) so scout 11 may have been already fixed in trunk.
>>
>> If we decide we are going to merge this fixes into trunk, I am okay
>> with that.  I'd like to get the rc1 build soon so that I can start
>> test it in geronimo env. and fix any possible issues that might have
>> been regressed.
>>
>> Thanks, Lin
>>
>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>> You should be able to see it in SVN. Like for SCOUT-15:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-15?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.ext.subversion:subversion-commits-tabpanel
>>>
>>>
>>> Hope that helps.
>>>
>>> --Kurt
>>>
>>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>>> Hi Kurt,
>>>>
>>>> I looked at them, I think most of them sounds minor fixes, and should
>>>> not impact us.    However, I haven't been able to figure out how to
>>>> tell which revision is associated with JIRA yet.   I'd like to do that
>>>> if there is an easy way to.
>>>>
>>>> I think [SCOUT-15] is fixed in trunk.
>>>>
>>>> Lin
>>>>
>>>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>>> Hi Lin,
>>>>>
>>>>> If you have time maybe you can take a look at
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-42
>>>>>
>>>>> --Kurt
>>>>>
>>>>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Kurt,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That sounds great for me.   1.0rc1 is good and we can test it in our
>>>>>> env.   Let me know if there is anything I can do to help out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Lin,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same
>>>>>>> time-frame.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We currently have three issues in jira:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SCOUT-38 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38> Produce
>>>>>>> website from the maven2 build
>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38>
>>>>>>> Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost done
>>>>>>> anyway
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SCOUT-14 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14> Binaries
>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>> download are empty <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14>
>>>>>>> Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is done.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SCOUT-12 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12> Implement
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12>
>>>>>>> Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should we
>>>>>>> vote
>>>>>>> on doing a 1.0rc1?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Input still welcome:).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --Kurt
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version
>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>> August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2
>>>>>>> binding.
>>>>>>> I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it
>>>>>>> takes and
>>>>>>> it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make that
>>>>>>> work.
>>>>>>> (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working towards
>>>>>>>> our
>>>>>>>> 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout as the
>>>>>>>> JAXR 1.0 implementation.  So far we are doing well with JAXR tck in
>>>>>>>> geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much
>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>> to include scout in our 2.0 release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout
>>>>>>>> (1.0?)
>>>>>>>> release plans are.  we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out around
>>>>>>>> the end of July.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Input welcome :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lin
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Re: Scout Release Plans

Posted by Kurt T Stam <ks...@apache.org>.
Hi Lin,

I think we want to try to get them fixed. I should have time tomorrow to
take a look at it. Hopefully we can complete the vote by Friday and get
rc1 out over the weekend.

--Kurt

Lin Sun wrote:
> Yes you are right - I was able to see the commit for some of the
> jiras, but not all of them.   I guess all looked minor except scout 11
> which doesn't contain any commit log/info.   I remember there is some
> issues related to classification fixed recently (like scout 23, 24,
> 30) so scout 11 may have been already fixed in trunk.
>
> If we decide we are going to merge this fixes into trunk, I am okay
> with that.  I'd like to get the rc1 build soon so that I can start
> test it in geronimo env. and fix any possible issues that might have
> been regressed.
>
> Thanks, Lin
>
> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>> You should be able to see it in SVN. Like for SCOUT-15:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-15?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.ext.subversion:subversion-commits-tabpanel
>>
>>
>> Hope that helps.
>>
>> --Kurt
>>
>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>> Hi Kurt,
>>>
>>> I looked at them, I think most of them sounds minor fixes, and should
>>> not impact us.    However, I haven't been able to figure out how to
>>> tell which revision is associated with JIRA yet.   I'd like to do that
>>> if there is an easy way to.
>>>
>>> I think [SCOUT-15] is fixed in trunk.
>>>
>>> Lin
>>>
>>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>> Hi Lin,
>>>>
>>>> If you have time maybe you can take a look at
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-42
>>>>
>>>> --Kurt
>>>>
>>>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>>>> Hi Kurt,
>>>>>
>>>>> That sounds great for me.   1.0rc1 is good and we can test it in our
>>>>> env.   Let me know if there is anything I can do to help out.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Lin
>>>>>
>>>>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Lin,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same
>>>>>> time-frame.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We currently have three issues in jira:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SCOUT-38 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38> Produce
>>>>>> website from the maven2 build
>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38>
>>>>>> Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost done
>>>>>> anyway
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SCOUT-14 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14> Binaries
>>>>>> from
>>>>>> download are empty <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14>
>>>>>> Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is done.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SCOUT-12 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12> Implement
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12>
>>>>>> Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should we
>>>>>> vote
>>>>>> on doing a 1.0rc1?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Input still welcome:).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Kurt
>>>>>>
>>>>>> p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version
>>>>>> in the
>>>>>> August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2
>>>>>> binding.
>>>>>> I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it
>>>>>> takes and
>>>>>> it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make that
>>>>>> work.
>>>>>> (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working towards
>>>>>>> our
>>>>>>> 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout as the
>>>>>>> JAXR 1.0 implementation.  So far we are doing well with JAXR tck in
>>>>>>> geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much
>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>> to include scout in our 2.0 release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout
>>>>>>> (1.0?)
>>>>>>> release plans are.  we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out around
>>>>>>> the end of July.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Input welcome :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Re: Scout Release Plans

Posted by Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com>.
Yes you are right - I was able to see the commit for some of the jiras, 
but not all of them.   I guess all looked minor except scout 11 which 
doesn't contain any commit log/info.   I remember there is some issues 
related to classification fixed recently (like scout 23, 24, 30) so 
scout 11 may have been already fixed in trunk.

If we decide we are going to merge this fixes into trunk, I am okay with 
that.  I'd like to get the rc1 build soon so that I can start test it in 
geronimo env. and fix any possible issues that might have been regressed.

Thanks, Lin

Kurt T Stam wrote:
> You should be able to see it in SVN. Like for SCOUT-15:
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-15?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.ext.subversion:subversion-commits-tabpanel
> 
> Hope that helps.
> 
> --Kurt
> 
> Lin Sun wrote:
>> Hi Kurt,
>>
>> I looked at them, I think most of them sounds minor fixes, and should
>> not impact us.    However, I haven't been able to figure out how to
>> tell which revision is associated with JIRA yet.   I'd like to do that
>> if there is an easy way to.
>>
>> I think [SCOUT-15] is fixed in trunk.
>>
>> Lin
>>
>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>> Hi Lin,
>>>
>>> If you have time maybe you can take a look at
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-42
>>>
>>> --Kurt
>>>
>>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>>> Hi Kurt,
>>>>
>>>> That sounds great for me.   1.0rc1 is good and we can test it in our
>>>> env.   Let me know if there is anything I can do to help out.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Lin
>>>>
>>>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>>> Hi Lin,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same
>>>>> time-frame.
>>>>>
>>>>> We currently have three issues in jira:
>>>>>
>>>>> SCOUT-38 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38> Produce
>>>>> website from the maven2 build
>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38>
>>>>> Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost done
>>>>> anyway
>>>>>
>>>>> SCOUT-14 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14> Binaries
>>>>> from
>>>>> download are empty <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14>
>>>>> Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is done.
>>>>>
>>>>> SCOUT-12 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12> Implement
>>>>> the
>>>>> Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12>
>>>>> Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should we vote
>>>>> on doing a 1.0rc1?
>>>>>
>>>>> Input still welcome:).
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> --Kurt
>>>>>
>>>>> p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version in the
>>>>> August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2
>>>>> binding.
>>>>> I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it takes and
>>>>> it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make that
>>>>> work.
>>>>> (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).
>>>>>
>>>>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working towards
>>>>>> our
>>>>>> 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout as the
>>>>>> JAXR 1.0 implementation.  So far we are doing well with JAXR tck in
>>>>>> geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much like
>>>>>> to include scout in our 2.0 release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout (1.0?)
>>>>>> release plans are.  we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out around
>>>>>> the end of July.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Input welcome :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Re: Scout Release Plans

Posted by Kurt T Stam <ks...@apache.org>.
You should be able to see it in SVN. Like for SCOUT-15:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-15?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.ext.subversion:subversion-commits-tabpanel

Hope that helps.

--Kurt

Lin Sun wrote:
> Hi Kurt,
>
> I looked at them, I think most of them sounds minor fixes, and should
> not impact us.    However, I haven't been able to figure out how to
> tell which revision is associated with JIRA yet.   I'd like to do that
> if there is an easy way to.
>
> I think [SCOUT-15] is fixed in trunk.
>
> Lin
>
> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>> Hi Lin,
>>
>> If you have time maybe you can take a look at
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-42
>>
>> --Kurt
>>
>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>> Hi Kurt,
>>>
>>> That sounds great for me.   1.0rc1 is good and we can test it in our
>>> env.   Let me know if there is anything I can do to help out.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Lin
>>>
>>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>> Hi Lin,
>>>>
>>>> I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same
>>>> time-frame.
>>>>
>>>> We currently have three issues in jira:
>>>>
>>>> SCOUT-38 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38> Produce
>>>> website from the maven2 build
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38>
>>>> Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost done
>>>> anyway
>>>>
>>>> SCOUT-14 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14> Binaries
>>>> from
>>>> download are empty <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14>
>>>> Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is done.
>>>>
>>>> SCOUT-12 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12> Implement
>>>> the
>>>> Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12>
>>>> Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.
>>>>
>>>> So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should we vote
>>>> on doing a 1.0rc1?
>>>>
>>>> Input still welcome:).
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> --Kurt
>>>>
>>>> p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version in the
>>>> August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2
>>>> binding.
>>>> I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it takes and
>>>> it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make that
>>>> work.
>>>> (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).
>>>>
>>>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>>
>>>>> I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working towards
>>>>> our
>>>>> 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout as the
>>>>> JAXR 1.0 implementation.  So far we are doing well with JAXR tck in
>>>>> geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much like
>>>>> to include scout in our 2.0 release.
>>>>>
>>>>> To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout (1.0?)
>>>>> release plans are.  we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out around
>>>>> the end of July.
>>>>>
>>>>> Input welcome :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Lin
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Re: Scout Release Plans

Posted by Anil Saldhana <an...@yahoo.com>.
Yes, Lin.  Those fixes were pretty minor. It is good to have them merged before we release 1.0. 

Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Kurt,

I looked at them, I think most of them sounds minor fixes, and should 
not impact us.    However, I haven't been able to figure out how to tell 
which revision is associated with JIRA yet.   I'd like to do that if 
there is an easy way to.

I think [SCOUT-15] is fixed in trunk.

Lin

Kurt T Stam wrote:
> Hi Lin,
> 
> If you have time maybe you can take a look at
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-42
> 
> --Kurt
> 
> Lin Sun wrote:
>> Hi Kurt,
>>
>> That sounds great for me.   1.0rc1 is good and we can test it in our
>> env.   Let me know if there is anything I can do to help out.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Lin
>>
>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>> Hi Lin,
>>>
>>> I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same time-frame.
>>>
>>> We currently have three issues in jira:
>>>
>>> SCOUT-38  Produce
>>> website from the maven2 build
>>> 
>>> Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost done
>>> anyway
>>>
>>> SCOUT-14  Binaries from
>>> download are empty 
>>> Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is done.
>>>
>>> SCOUT-12  Implement the
>>> Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
>>> 
>>> Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.
>>>
>>> So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should we vote
>>> on doing a 1.0rc1?
>>>
>>> Input still welcome:).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> --Kurt
>>>
>>> p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version in the
>>> August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2 binding.
>>> I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it takes and
>>> it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make that work.
>>> (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).
>>>
>>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>>> Hi there,
>>>>
>>>> I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working towards our
>>>> 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout as the
>>>> JAXR 1.0 implementation.  So far we are doing well with JAXR tck in
>>>> geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much like
>>>> to include scout in our 2.0 release.
>>>>
>>>> To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout (1.0?)
>>>> release plans are.  we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out around
>>>> the end of July.
>>>>
>>>> Input welcome :)
>>>>
>>>> Lin
>>>> 
       
---------------------------------
Get the Yahoo! toolbar and be alerted to new email wherever you're surfing. 

Re: Scout Release Plans

Posted by Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com>.
Hi Kurt,

I looked at them, I think most of them sounds minor fixes, and should 
not impact us.    However, I haven't been able to figure out how to tell 
which revision is associated with JIRA yet.   I'd like to do that if 
there is an easy way to.

I think [SCOUT-15] is fixed in trunk.

Lin

Kurt T Stam wrote:
> Hi Lin,
> 
> If you have time maybe you can take a look at
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-42
> 
> --Kurt
> 
> Lin Sun wrote:
>> Hi Kurt,
>>
>> That sounds great for me.   1.0rc1 is good and we can test it in our
>> env.   Let me know if there is anything I can do to help out.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Lin
>>
>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>> Hi Lin,
>>>
>>> I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same time-frame.
>>>
>>> We currently have three issues in jira:
>>>
>>> SCOUT-38 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38> Produce
>>> website from the maven2 build
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38>
>>> Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost done
>>> anyway
>>>
>>> SCOUT-14 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14> Binaries from
>>> download are empty <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14>
>>> Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is done.
>>>
>>> SCOUT-12 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12> Implement the
>>> Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12>
>>> Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.
>>>
>>> So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should we vote
>>> on doing a 1.0rc1?
>>>
>>> Input still welcome:).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> --Kurt
>>>
>>> p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version in the
>>> August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2 binding.
>>> I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it takes and
>>> it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make that work.
>>> (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).
>>>
>>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>>> Hi there,
>>>>
>>>> I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working towards our
>>>> 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout as the
>>>> JAXR 1.0 implementation.  So far we are doing well with JAXR tck in
>>>> geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much like
>>>> to include scout in our 2.0 release.
>>>>
>>>> To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout (1.0?)
>>>> release plans are.  we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out around
>>>> the end of July.
>>>>
>>>> Input welcome :)
>>>>
>>>> Lin
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Re: Scout Release Plans

Posted by Kurt T Stam <ks...@apache.org>.
Hi Lin,

If you have time maybe you can take a look at

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-42

--Kurt

Lin Sun wrote:
> Hi Kurt,
>
> That sounds great for me.   1.0rc1 is good and we can test it in our
> env.   Let me know if there is anything I can do to help out.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Lin
>
> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>> Hi Lin,
>>
>> I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same time-frame.
>>
>> We currently have three issues in jira:
>>
>> SCOUT-38 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38> Produce
>> website from the maven2 build
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38>
>> Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost done
>> anyway
>>
>> SCOUT-14 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14> Binaries from
>> download are empty <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14>
>> Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is done.
>>
>> SCOUT-12 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12> Implement the
>> Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12>
>> Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.
>>
>> So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should we vote
>> on doing a 1.0rc1?
>>
>> Input still welcome:).
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> --Kurt
>>
>> p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version in the
>> August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2 binding.
>> I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it takes and
>> it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make that work.
>> (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).
>>
>> Lin Sun wrote:
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working towards our
>>> 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout as the
>>> JAXR 1.0 implementation.  So far we are doing well with JAXR tck in
>>> geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much like
>>> to include scout in our 2.0 release.
>>>
>>> To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout (1.0?)
>>> release plans are.  we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out around
>>> the end of July.
>>>
>>> Input welcome :)
>>>
>>> Lin
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Re: Scout Release Plans

Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
yep!

On 7/12/07, Anil Saldhana <an...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Will bringing in the JAXB layer before 1.0 final release break things?
>
> Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  Hi Kurt,
>
> That sounds great for me. 1.0rc1 is good and we can test it in our
> env. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help out.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Lin
>
> Kurt T Stam wrote:
> > Hi Lin,
> >
> > I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same time-frame.
> >
> > We currently have three issues in jira:
> >
> > SCOUT-38 Produce
> > website from the maven2 build
> >
> > Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost done anyway
> >
> > SCOUT-14 Binaries from
> > download are empty
> > Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is done.
> >
> > SCOUT-12 Implement the
> > Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
> >
> > Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.
> >
> > So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should we vote
> > on doing a 1.0rc1?
> >
> > Input still welcome:).
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > --Kurt
> >
> > p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version in the
> > August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2 binding.
> > I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it takes and
> > it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make that work.
> > (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).
> >
> > Lin Sun wrote:
> >> Hi there,
> >>
> >> I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working towards our
> >> 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout as the
> >> JAXR 1.0 implementation. So far we are doing well with JAXR tck in
> >> geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much like
> >> to include scout in our 2.0 release.
> >>
> >> To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout (1.0?)
> >> release plans are. we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out around
> >> the end of July.
> >>
> >> Input welcome :)
> >>
> >> Lin
> >>
> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>  ________________________________
> Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail,
> news, photos & more.
>
>


-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Re: Scout Release Plans

Posted by Anil Saldhana <an...@yahoo.com>.
Will bringing in the JAXB layer before 1.0 final release break things?

Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Kurt,

That sounds great for me.   1.0rc1 is good and we can test it in our 
env.   Let me know if there is anything I can do to help out.

Thanks.

Lin

Kurt T Stam wrote:
> Hi Lin,
> 
> I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same time-frame.
> 
> We currently have three issues in jira:
> 
> SCOUT-38  Produce
> website from the maven2 build
> 
> Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost done anyway
> 
> SCOUT-14  Binaries from
> download are empty 
> Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is done.
> 
> SCOUT-12  Implement the
> Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
> 
> Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.
> 
> So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should we vote
> on doing a 1.0rc1?
> 
> Input still welcome:).
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> --Kurt
> 
> p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version in the
> August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2 binding.
> I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it takes and
> it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make that work.
> (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).
> 
> Lin Sun wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working towards our
>> 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout as the
>> JAXR 1.0 implementation.  So far we are doing well with JAXR tck in
>> geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much like
>> to include scout in our 2.0 release.
>>
>> To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout (1.0?)
>> release plans are.  we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out around
>> the end of July.
>>
>> Input welcome :)
>>
>> Lin
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org



       
---------------------------------
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more. 

Re: Scout Release Plans

Posted by Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com>.
Hi Kurt,

I think that will work for us.   So we'll use 1.0rc1 after it is out. 
When 1.0 is released and if it works with our schedule and testing, 
we'll switch to use that.

Thanks, Lin

Kurt T Stam wrote:
> Lin,
> 
> What I meant was that if you are ok with using rc1 for Geronimo, then I
> can add JAXB before 1.0 goes final. Maybe 1.0 may still make it
> in under your deadline, but the idea is I don't want to get in a
> situation where either one of us gets hung up.
> 
> --Kurt
> 
> Lin Sun wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I agree with Kurt that we don't need to hold up 1.0 rc1 for the JAXB
>> integration.   From geronimo's perspective, I think we are pretty much
>> done with scout inside of geronimo other than the final testing with
>> the rc1 and the final release.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Lin
>>
>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>> Yeah just want to second that it shouldn't break anything, since
>>> we'll be supporting both JAXB and XMLBeans. Just don't think this
>>> needs to
>>> hold things up now.
>>>
>>> Anil Saldhana wrote:
>>>> Lin,
>>>>   Kurt and I have been discussing off line that  we can maintain
>>>> status quo for Scout 1.0rc1 release but will get JAXB integrated
>>>> (that will still retain the xmlbeans stuff) for the 1.0 final release.
>>>>
>>>> This way we can get some additional time to resolve issues that you
>>>> may have with Geronimo integration.
>>>>
>>>> In my opinion, having JAXB integration is critical.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Anil
>>>>
>>>> */Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com>/* wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Hi Kurt,
>>>>
>>>>     That sounds great for me. 1.0rc1 is good and we can test it in our
>>>>     env. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help out.
>>>>
>>>>     Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>     Lin
>>>>
>>>>     Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>>     > Hi Lin,
>>>>     >
>>>>     > I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same
>>>>     time-frame.
>>>>     >
>>>>     > We currently have three issues in jira:
>>>>     >
>>>>     > SCOUT-38 Produce
>>>>     > website from the maven2 build
>>>>     >
>>>>     > Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost
>>>>     done anyway
>>>>     >
>>>>     > SCOUT-14 Binaries from
>>>>     > download are empty
>>>>     > Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is
>>>> done.
>>>>     >
>>>>     > SCOUT-12 Implement the
>>>>     > Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
>>>>     >
>>>>     > Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.
>>>>     >
>>>>     > So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should
>>>>     we vote
>>>>     > on doing a 1.0rc1?
>>>>     >
>>>>     > Input still welcome:).
>>>>     >
>>>>     > Cheers,
>>>>     >
>>>>     > --Kurt
>>>>     >
>>>>     > p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version
>>>>     in the
>>>>     > August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2
>>>>     binding.
>>>>     > I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it
>>>>     takes and
>>>>     > it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make
>>>>     that work.
>>>>     > (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).
>>>>     >
>>>>     > Lin Sun wrote:
>>>>     >> Hi there,
>>>>     >>
>>>>     >> I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working
>>>>     towards our
>>>>     >> 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout
>>>> as the
>>>>     >> JAXR 1.0 implementation. So far we are doing well with JAXR
>>>> tck in
>>>>     >> geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much
>>>>     like
>>>>     >> to include scout in our 2.0 release.
>>>>     >>
>>>>     >> To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout
>>>>     (1.0?)
>>>>     >> release plans are. we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out
>>>> around
>>>>     >> the end of July.
>>>>     >>
>>>>     >> Input welcome :)
>>>>     >>
>>>>     >> Lin
>>>>     >>
>>>>     >>
>>>>    
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>     >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>     >> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>     >>
>>>>     >
>>>>     >
>>>>     >
>>>>    
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>     > To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>     > For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>     >
>>>>     >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>     To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>     For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Looking for earth-friendly autos?
>>>> Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating"
>>>> <http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/;_ylc=X3oDMTE4MGw4Z2hlBF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2BHNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDZ3JlZW5jZW50ZXI->
>>>> at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center. 
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Re: Scout Release Plans

Posted by Kurt T Stam <ks...@apache.org>.
Lin,

What I meant was that if you are ok with using rc1 for Geronimo, then I
can add JAXB before 1.0 goes final. Maybe 1.0 may still make it
in under your deadline, but the idea is I don't want to get in a
situation where either one of us gets hung up.

--Kurt

Lin Sun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I agree with Kurt that we don't need to hold up 1.0 rc1 for the JAXB
> integration.   From geronimo's perspective, I think we are pretty much
> done with scout inside of geronimo other than the final testing with
> the rc1 and the final release.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Lin
>
> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>> Yeah just want to second that it shouldn't break anything, since
>> we'll be supporting both JAXB and XMLBeans. Just don't think this
>> needs to
>> hold things up now.
>>
>> Anil Saldhana wrote:
>>> Lin,
>>>   Kurt and I have been discussing off line that  we can maintain
>>> status quo for Scout 1.0rc1 release but will get JAXB integrated
>>> (that will still retain the xmlbeans stuff) for the 1.0 final release.
>>>
>>> This way we can get some additional time to resolve issues that you
>>> may have with Geronimo integration.
>>>
>>> In my opinion, having JAXB integration is critical.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Anil
>>>
>>> */Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com>/* wrote:
>>>
>>>     Hi Kurt,
>>>
>>>     That sounds great for me. 1.0rc1 is good and we can test it in our
>>>     env. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help out.
>>>
>>>     Thanks.
>>>
>>>     Lin
>>>
>>>     Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>     > Hi Lin,
>>>     >
>>>     > I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same
>>>     time-frame.
>>>     >
>>>     > We currently have three issues in jira:
>>>     >
>>>     > SCOUT-38 Produce
>>>     > website from the maven2 build
>>>     >
>>>     > Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost
>>>     done anyway
>>>     >
>>>     > SCOUT-14 Binaries from
>>>     > download are empty
>>>     > Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is
>>> done.
>>>     >
>>>     > SCOUT-12 Implement the
>>>     > Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
>>>     >
>>>     > Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.
>>>     >
>>>     > So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should
>>>     we vote
>>>     > on doing a 1.0rc1?
>>>     >
>>>     > Input still welcome:).
>>>     >
>>>     > Cheers,
>>>     >
>>>     > --Kurt
>>>     >
>>>     > p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version
>>>     in the
>>>     > August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2
>>>     binding.
>>>     > I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it
>>>     takes and
>>>     > it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make
>>>     that work.
>>>     > (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).
>>>     >
>>>     > Lin Sun wrote:
>>>     >> Hi there,
>>>     >>
>>>     >> I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working
>>>     towards our
>>>     >> 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout
>>> as the
>>>     >> JAXR 1.0 implementation. So far we are doing well with JAXR
>>> tck in
>>>     >> geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much
>>>     like
>>>     >> to include scout in our 2.0 release.
>>>     >>
>>>     >> To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout
>>>     (1.0?)
>>>     >> release plans are. we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out
>>> around
>>>     >> the end of July.
>>>     >>
>>>     >> Input welcome :)
>>>     >>
>>>     >> Lin
>>>     >>
>>>     >>
>>>    
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>     >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>     >> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>     >>
>>>     >
>>>     >
>>>     >
>>>    
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>     > To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>     > For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>     >
>>>     >
>>>
>>>
>>>    
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>     To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>     For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Looking for earth-friendly autos?
>>> Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating"
>>> <http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/;_ylc=X3oDMTE4MGw4Z2hlBF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2BHNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDZ3JlZW5jZW50ZXI->
>>> at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center. 
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Re: Scout Release Plans

Posted by Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com>.
Hi,

I agree with Kurt that we don't need to hold up 1.0 rc1 for the JAXB 
integration.   From geronimo's perspective, I think we are pretty much 
done with scout inside of geronimo other than the final testing with the 
rc1 and the final release.

Thanks.

Lin

Kurt T Stam wrote:
> Yeah just want to second that it shouldn't break anything, since we'll 
> be supporting both JAXB and XMLBeans. Just don't think this needs to
> hold things up now.
> 
> Anil Saldhana wrote:
>> Lin,
>>   Kurt and I have been discussing off line that  we can maintain 
>> status quo for Scout 1.0rc1 release but will get JAXB integrated (that 
>> will still retain the xmlbeans stuff) for the 1.0 final release.
>>
>> This way we can get some additional time to resolve issues that you 
>> may have with Geronimo integration.
>>
>> In my opinion, having JAXB integration is critical.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Anil
>>
>> */Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com>/* wrote:
>>
>>     Hi Kurt,
>>
>>     That sounds great for me. 1.0rc1 is good and we can test it in our
>>     env. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help out.
>>
>>     Thanks.
>>
>>     Lin
>>
>>     Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>     > Hi Lin,
>>     >
>>     > I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same
>>     time-frame.
>>     >
>>     > We currently have three issues in jira:
>>     >
>>     > SCOUT-38 Produce
>>     > website from the maven2 build
>>     >
>>     > Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost
>>     done anyway
>>     >
>>     > SCOUT-14 Binaries from
>>     > download are empty
>>     > Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is done.
>>     >
>>     > SCOUT-12 Implement the
>>     > Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
>>     >
>>     > Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.
>>     >
>>     > So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should
>>     we vote
>>     > on doing a 1.0rc1?
>>     >
>>     > Input still welcome:).
>>     >
>>     > Cheers,
>>     >
>>     > --Kurt
>>     >
>>     > p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version
>>     in the
>>     > August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2
>>     binding.
>>     > I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it
>>     takes and
>>     > it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make
>>     that work.
>>     > (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).
>>     >
>>     > Lin Sun wrote:
>>     >> Hi there,
>>     >>
>>     >> I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working
>>     towards our
>>     >> 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout as the
>>     >> JAXR 1.0 implementation. So far we are doing well with JAXR tck in
>>     >> geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much
>>     like
>>     >> to include scout in our 2.0 release.
>>     >>
>>     >> To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout
>>     (1.0?)
>>     >> release plans are. we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out around
>>     >> the end of July.
>>     >>
>>     >> Input welcome :)
>>     >>
>>     >> Lin
>>     >>
>>     >>
>>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>     >> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>     >>
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     > To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>     > For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>     >
>>     >
>>
>>
>>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>     For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Looking for earth-friendly autos?
>> Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" 
>> <http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/;_ylc=X3oDMTE4MGw4Z2hlBF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2BHNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDZ3JlZW5jZW50ZXI-> 
>> at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center. 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Re: Scout Release Plans

Posted by Kurt T Stam <ks...@apache.org>.
Yeah just want to second that it shouldn't break anything, since we'll
be supporting both JAXB and XMLBeans. Just don't think this needs to
hold things up now.

Anil Saldhana wrote:
> Lin,
>   Kurt and I have been discussing off line that  we can maintain
> status quo for Scout 1.0rc1 release but will get JAXB integrated (that
> will still retain the xmlbeans stuff) for the 1.0 final release.
>
> This way we can get some additional time to resolve issues that you
> may have with Geronimo integration.
>
> In my opinion, having JAXB integration is critical.
>
> Cheers,
> Anil
>
> */Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com>/* wrote:
>
>     Hi Kurt,
>
>     That sounds great for me. 1.0rc1 is good and we can test it in our
>     env. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help out.
>
>     Thanks.
>
>     Lin
>
>     Kurt T Stam wrote:
>     > Hi Lin,
>     >
>     > I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same
>     time-frame.
>     >
>     > We currently have three issues in jira:
>     >
>     > SCOUT-38 Produce
>     > website from the maven2 build
>     >
>     > Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost
>     done anyway
>     >
>     > SCOUT-14 Binaries from
>     > download are empty
>     > Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is done.
>     >
>     > SCOUT-12 Implement the
>     > Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
>     >
>     > Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.
>     >
>     > So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should
>     we vote
>     > on doing a 1.0rc1?
>     >
>     > Input still welcome:).
>     >
>     > Cheers,
>     >
>     > --Kurt
>     >
>     > p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version
>     in the
>     > August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2
>     binding.
>     > I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it
>     takes and
>     > it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make
>     that work.
>     > (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).
>     >
>     > Lin Sun wrote:
>     >> Hi there,
>     >>
>     >> I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working
>     towards our
>     >> 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout as the
>     >> JAXR 1.0 implementation. So far we are doing well with JAXR tck in
>     >> geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much
>     like
>     >> to include scout in our 2.0 release.
>     >>
>     >> To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout
>     (1.0?)
>     >> release plans are. we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out around
>     >> the end of July.
>     >>
>     >> Input welcome :)
>     >>
>     >> Lin
>     >>
>     >>
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>     >> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>     >>
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     > To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>     > For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>     >
>     >
>
>
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>     For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Looking for earth-friendly autos?
> Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating"
> <http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/;_ylc=X3oDMTE4MGw4Z2hlBF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2BHNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDZ3JlZW5jZW50ZXI->
> at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center. 

Re: Scout Release Plans

Posted by Anil Saldhana <an...@yahoo.com>.
Lin,
  Kurt and I have been discussing off line that  we can maintain status quo for Scout 1.0rc1 release but will get JAXB integrated (that will still retain the xmlbeans stuff) for the 1.0 final release.

This way we can get some additional time to resolve issues that you may have with Geronimo integration.

In my opinion, having JAXB integration is critical.

Cheers,
Anil

Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Kurt,

That sounds great for me.   1.0rc1 is good and we can test it in our 
env.   Let me know if there is anything I can do to help out.

Thanks.

Lin

Kurt T Stam wrote:
> Hi Lin,
> 
> I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same time-frame.
> 
> We currently have three issues in jira:
> 
> SCOUT-38  Produce
> website from the maven2 build
> 
> Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost done anyway
> 
> SCOUT-14  Binaries from
> download are empty 
> Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is done.
> 
> SCOUT-12  Implement the
> Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
> 
> Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.
> 
> So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should we vote
> on doing a 1.0rc1?
> 
> Input still welcome:).
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> --Kurt
> 
> p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version in the
> August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2 binding.
> I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it takes and
> it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make that work.
> (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).
> 
> Lin Sun wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working towards our
>> 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout as the
>> JAXR 1.0 implementation.  So far we are doing well with JAXR tck in
>> geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much like
>> to include scout in our 2.0 release.
>>
>> To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout (1.0?)
>> release plans are.  we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out around
>> the end of July.
>>
>> Input welcome :)
>>
>> Lin
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org



  
---------------------------------
Looking for earth-friendly autos? 
 Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.  

Re: Scout Release Plans

Posted by Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com>.
Hi Kurt,

That sounds great for me.   1.0rc1 is good and we can test it in our 
env.   Let me know if there is anything I can do to help out.

Thanks.

Lin

Kurt T Stam wrote:
> Hi Lin,
> 
> I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same time-frame.
> 
> We currently have three issues in jira:
> 
> SCOUT-38 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38> Produce
> website from the maven2 build
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38>
> Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost done anyway
> 
> SCOUT-14 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14> Binaries from
> download are empty <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14>
> Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is done.
> 
> SCOUT-12 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12> Implement the
> Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12>
> Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.
> 
> So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should we vote
> on doing a 1.0rc1?
> 
> Input still welcome:).
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> --Kurt
> 
> p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version in the
> August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2 binding.
> I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it takes and
> it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make that work.
> (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).
> 
> Lin Sun wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working towards our
>> 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout as the
>> JAXR 1.0 implementation.  So far we are doing well with JAXR tck in
>> geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much like
>> to include scout in our 2.0 release.
>>
>> To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout (1.0?)
>> release plans are.  we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out around
>> the end of July.
>>
>> Input welcome :)
>>
>> Lin
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Re: Scout Release Plans

Posted by Kurt T Stam <ks...@apache.org>.
Sure, as long as you can hold my hand the first time around.:). I'll
start the vote.

--Kurt

Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Yes, please assuming you would like to be the release manager? :)
>
> -- dims
>
> On 7/11/07, Kurt T Stam <ks...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi Lin,
>>
>> I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same time-frame.
>>
>> We currently have three issues in jira:
>>
>> SCOUT-38 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38> Produce
>> website from the maven2 build
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38>
>> Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost done
>> anyway
>>
>> SCOUT-14 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14> Binaries from
>> download are empty <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14>
>> Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is done.
>>
>> SCOUT-12 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12> Implement the
>> Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12>
>> Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.
>>
>> So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should we vote
>> on doing a 1.0rc1?
>>
>> Input still welcome:).
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> --Kurt
>>
>> p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version in the
>> August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2 binding.
>> I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it takes and
>> it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make that work.
>> (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).
>>
>> Lin Sun wrote:
>> > Hi there,
>> >
>> > I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working towards our
>> > 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout as the
>> > JAXR 1.0 implementation.  So far we are doing well with JAXR tck in
>> > geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much like
>> > to include scout in our 2.0 release.
>> >
>> > To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout (1.0?)
>> > release plans are.  we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out around
>> > the end of July.
>> >
>> > Input welcome :)
>> >
>> > Lin
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org


VOTE Release Scout 1.0 rc1

Posted by Kurt T Stam <ks...@apache.org>.
+1 for me.

--Kurt

Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Yes, please assuming you would like to be the release manager? :)
>
> -- dims
>
> On 7/11/07, Kurt T Stam <ks...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi Lin,
>>
>> I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same time-frame.
>>
>> We currently have three issues in jira:
>>
>> SCOUT-38 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38> Produce
>> website from the maven2 build
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38>
>> Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost done
>> anyway
>>
>> SCOUT-14 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14> Binaries from
>> download are empty <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14>
>> Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is done.
>>
>> SCOUT-12 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12> Implement the
>> Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12>
>> Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.
>>
>> So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should we vote
>> on doing a 1.0rc1?
>>
>> Input still welcome:).
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> --Kurt
>>
>> p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version in the
>> August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2 binding.
>> I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it takes and
>> it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make that work.
>> (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).
>>
>> Lin Sun wrote:
>> > Hi there,
>> >
>> > I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working towards our
>> > 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout as the
>> > JAXR 1.0 implementation.  So far we are doing well with JAXR tck in
>> > geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much like
>> > to include scout in our 2.0 release.
>> >
>> > To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout (1.0?)
>> > release plans are.  we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out around
>> > the end of July.
>> >
>> > Input welcome :)
>> >
>> > Lin
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Re: Scout Release Plans

Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
Yes, please assuming you would like to be the release manager? :)

-- dims

On 7/11/07, Kurt T Stam <ks...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Lin,
>
> I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same time-frame.
>
> We currently have three issues in jira:
>
> SCOUT-38 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38> Produce
> website from the maven2 build
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38>
> Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost done anyway
>
> SCOUT-14 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14> Binaries from
> download are empty <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14>
> Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is done.
>
> SCOUT-12 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12> Implement the
> Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12>
> Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.
>
> So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should we vote
> on doing a 1.0rc1?
>
> Input still welcome:).
>
> Cheers,
>
> --Kurt
>
> p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version in the
> August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2 binding.
> I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it takes and
> it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make that work.
> (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).
>
> Lin Sun wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working towards our
> > 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout as the
> > JAXR 1.0 implementation.  So far we are doing well with JAXR tck in
> > geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much like
> > to include scout in our 2.0 release.
> >
> > To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout (1.0?)
> > release plans are.  we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out around
> > the end of July.
> >
> > Input welcome :)
> >
> > Lin
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Re: Scout Release Plans

Posted by Kurt T Stam <ks...@apache.org>.
Hi Lin,

I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same time-frame.

We currently have three issues in jira:

SCOUT-38 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38> Produce
website from the maven2 build
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38>
Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost done anyway

SCOUT-14 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14> Binaries from
download are empty <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14>
Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is done.

SCOUT-12 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12> Implement the
Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12>
Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.

So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should we vote
on doing a 1.0rc1?

Input still welcome:).

Cheers,

--Kurt

p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version in the
August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2 binding.
I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it takes and
it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make that work.
(I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).

Lin Sun wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working towards our
> 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout as the
> JAXR 1.0 implementation.  So far we are doing well with JAXR tck in
> geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much like
> to include scout in our 2.0 release.
>
> To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout (1.0?)
> release plans are.  we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out around
> the end of July.
>
> Input welcome :)
>
> Lin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org