Re: Discussion: Feedback needed on the Documentation Review process

[Laura Stewart <sc...@gmail.com>]

On 10/17/06, Laura Stewart <sc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/17/06, Rajesh Kartha <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Comments inline.
> >
> > Regards,
> > -Rajesh
> >
>
> > > Was the wiki a good way to conduct the reviews?
> > >
> > Maybe it is the MoinMoin - Derby wiki that does not allow an easier way
> > to edit tables, but I found
> > adding/editing the pages not that friendly. Updating a JIRA issue seemed
> > easier.
> > So if we have to continue using the current wiki, maybe a JIRA issue for
> > each manual could be easier, where
> > reviewers can add the comments to. This issue can be closed if the
> > majority of the comments are addressed and
> > a new JIRA issue can be created, if needed, for any unaddressed ones.
>
> Having a single issue per manual worked okay for me to submit patches,
> but I think that it would be harder to track individual comments and
> their status.
> Is there a way to create a sub issue or linked issue for individual comments?
>
> --
> Laura Stewart
>

Does anyone else have comments that you want to share on the
Documentation Review process?

-- 
Laura Stewart

Re: Discussion: Feedback needed on the Documentation Review process

[Yip Ng <yi...@gmail.com>]

On 11/3/06, Laura Stewart <sc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Does anyone else have comments that you want to share on the
> Documentation Review process?



In my opinion, I think the documentation review should be done using jira.
Most code reviews are done in jira and I found it to be quite effective.


Regards,
Yip Ng