You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> on 2019/12/02 07:26:13 UTC
[DISCUSS] Improve the Pyflink command line options (Adjustment to
FLIP-78)
Hi everyone,
I wanted to bring up the discussion of improving the Pyflink command line options.
A few command line options have been introduced in the FLIP-78 [1], i.e. "python-executable-path", "python-requirements","python-archive", etc. There are a few problems with these options, i.e. the naming style, variable argument options, etc.
We want to make some adjustment of FLIP-78 to improve the newly introduced command line options, here is the design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R8CaDa3908V1SnTxBkTBzeisWqBF40NAYYjfRl680eg/edit?usp=sharing <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R8CaDa3908V1SnTxBkTBzeisWqBF40NAYYjfRl680eg/edit?usp=sharing>
Looking forward to your feedback!
Best,
Wei
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-78%3A+Flink+Python+UDF+Environment+and+Dependency+Management <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-78:+Flink+Python+UDF+Environment+and+Dependency+Management>
Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the Pyflink command line options (Adjustment to
FLIP-78)
Posted by Dian Fu <di...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for bringing up this discussion Wei. +1 for this proposal!
As these options are proposed in 1.10, it will be great if we can improve them in 1.10. Then it will not cause compatible issues.
Thanks,
Dian
> 在 2019年12月5日，上午10:01，jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for the quick response Aljoscha & Wei !
>
> It seems unify the options is necessary, and 1.10 will be code frozen. I
> would be like to bring up the VOTE thread for this change ASAP, and more
> detail can continue discuss in the PR.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Best,
> Jincheng
>
> Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org> 于2019年12月4日周三 下午5:11写道：
>
>> Perfect, thanks for the background info! I also found this section now,
>> which mentions that it comes from Hadoop:
>> https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/running-on-yarn.html#important-notes.
>>
>> I think the proposed changes are good!
>>
>> Best,
>> Aljoscha
>>
>>> On 4. Dec 2019, at 04:34, Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Aljoscha,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your reply! Before bringing up this discussion I did some
>> research on commonly used separators for options that take multiple values.
>> I have considered ",", ":" and "#". Finally I chose "#" as the separator of
>> "--pyRequirements".
>>>
>>> For ",", it is the most widely used separator. Many projects use it as
>> the separator of the values in same level. e.g. "-Dexcludes" in Maven,
>> "--files" in Spark and "-pyFiles" in Flink. But the second parameter of
>> "--pyRequirements", the requirement cached directory, is not at the same
>> level as its first parameter (the requirements file). It is secondary and
>> is only needed when the packages in the requirements file can not be
>> downloaded from the package index server.
>>>
>>> For ":", it is used as a path separator in most cases. e.g. main
>> arguments of scp (secure copy), "--volume" in Docker and "-cp" in Java. But
>> as we support accept a URI as the file path, which contains ":" in most
>> cases, ":" can not be used as the separator of "--pyRequirements".
>>>
>>> For "#", it is really rarely used as a separator for multiple values. I
>> only find Spark using "#" as the separator for option "--files" and
>> "--archives" between file path and target file/directory name. After some
>> research I find that this usage comes from the URI fragment. We can append
>> a secondary resource as the fragment of the URI after a number sign ("#")
>> character. As we treat user file paths as URIs when parsing command line,
>> using "#" as the separator of "--pyRequirements" makes sense to me, which
>> means the second parameter is the fragment of the first parameter. The
>> definition of URI fragment can be found here [1].
>>>
>>> The reason of using "#" in "--pyArchives" as the separator of file path
>> and targer directory name is the same as above.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Wei
>>>
>>> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3.5
>>>
>>>> 在 2019年12月3日，22:02，Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org> 写道：
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I think it’s a good idea to make the options uniform. Using ‘#’ as
>> a separator for options that take two values seems a bit strange to me, did
>> you research if any other CLI tools have this convention?
>>>>
>>>> Side note: I don’t like that our options use camel-case, I think that’s
>> very non-standard. But that’s how it is now…
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Aljoscha
>>>>
>>>>> On 3. Dec 2019, at 10:14, jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for bringup this discussion Wei!
>>>>> I think this is very important for Flink User, we should contains this
>>>>> changes in Flink 1.10.
>>>>> +1 for the optimization from the perspective of user convenience and
>> the
>>>>> unified use of Flink command line parameters.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Jincheng
>>>>>
>>>>> Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月2日周一 下午3:26写道：
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wanted to bring up the discussion of improving the Pyflink command
>> line
>>>>>> options.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A few command line options have been introduced in the FLIP-78 [1],
>> i.e.
>>>>>> "python-executable-path", "python-requirements","python-archive", etc.
>>>>>> There are a few problems with these options, i.e. the naming style,
>>>>>> variable argument options, etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We want to make some adjustment of FLIP-78 to improve the newly
>> introduced
>>>>>> command line options, here is the design doc:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R8CaDa3908V1SnTxBkTBzeisWqBF40NAYYjfRl680eg/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>> <
>>>>>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R8CaDa3908V1SnTxBkTBzeisWqBF40NAYYjfRl680eg/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looking forward to your feedback!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Wei
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-78%3A+Flink+Python+UDF+Environment+and+Dependency+Management
>>>>>> <
>>>>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-78:+Flink+Python+UDF+Environment+and+Dependency+Management
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the Pyflink command line options (Adjustment to
FLIP-78)
Posted by Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
Thanks for all of your quick response! I will bring up the VOTE.
Best,
Wei
> 在 2019年12月5日，10:39，Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> Hi Wei,
>
> Thanks for bringing this discussion up, the changes look good to me.
> Looking forward to the vote. And you can prepare the pull request at the
> same time (in order to checkin in time).
>
> Best,
> Jark
>
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 at 10:27, Hequn Cheng <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for the discussion! Using "#" also makes sense to me.
>> And +1 to have these improvements in 1.10 as we don't want to
>> introduce compatibility problems later.
>>
>> Looking forward to the vote!
>>
>> Best, Hequn
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 10:02 AM jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the quick response Aljoscha & Wei !
>>>
>>> It seems unify the options is necessary, and 1.10 will be code frozen. I
>>> would be like to bring up the VOTE thread for this change ASAP, and more
>>> detail can continue discuss in the PR.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Jincheng
>>>
>>> Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org> 于2019年12月4日周三 下午5:11写道：
>>>
>>>> Perfect, thanks for the background info! I also found this section now,
>>>> which mentions that it comes from Hadoop:
>>>>
>>>
>> https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/running-on-yarn.html#important-notes.
>>>>
>>>> I think the proposed changes are good!
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Aljoscha
>>>>
>>>>> On 4. Dec 2019, at 04:34, Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Aljoscha,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your reply! Before bringing up this discussion I did some
>>>> research on commonly used separators for options that take multiple
>>> values.
>>>> I have considered ",", ":" and "#". Finally I chose "#" as the
>> separator
>>> of
>>>> "--pyRequirements".
>>>>>
>>>>> For ",", it is the most widely used separator. Many projects use it
>> as
>>>> the separator of the values in same level. e.g. "-Dexcludes" in Maven,
>>>> "--files" in Spark and "-pyFiles" in Flink. But the second parameter of
>>>> "--pyRequirements", the requirement cached directory, is not at the
>> same
>>>> level as its first parameter (the requirements file). It is secondary
>> and
>>>> is only needed when the packages in the requirements file can not be
>>>> downloaded from the package index server.
>>>>>
>>>>> For ":", it is used as a path separator in most cases. e.g. main
>>>> arguments of scp (secure copy), "--volume" in Docker and "-cp" in Java.
>>> But
>>>> as we support accept a URI as the file path, which contains ":" in most
>>>> cases, ":" can not be used as the separator of "--pyRequirements".
>>>>>
>>>>> For "#", it is really rarely used as a separator for multiple
>> values. I
>>>> only find Spark using "#" as the separator for option "--files" and
>>>> "--archives" between file path and target file/directory name. After
>> some
>>>> research I find that this usage comes from the URI fragment. We can
>>> append
>>>> a secondary resource as the fragment of the URI after a number sign
>> ("#")
>>>> character. As we treat user file paths as URIs when parsing command
>> line,
>>>> using "#" as the separator of "--pyRequirements" makes sense to me,
>> which
>>>> means the second parameter is the fragment of the first parameter. The
>>>> definition of URI fragment can be found here [1].
>>>>>
>>>>> The reason of using "#" in "--pyArchives" as the separator of file
>> path
>>>> and targer directory name is the same as above.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Wei
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3.5
>>>>>
>>>>>> 在 2019年12月3日，22:02，Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org> 写道：
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, I think it’s a good idea to make the options uniform. Using ‘#’
>>> as
>>>> a separator for options that take two values seems a bit strange to me,
>>> did
>>>> you research if any other CLI tools have this convention?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Side note: I don’t like that our options use camel-case, I think
>>> that’s
>>>> very non-standard. But that’s how it is now…
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Aljoscha
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3. Dec 2019, at 10:14, jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for bringup this discussion Wei!
>>>>>>> I think this is very important for Flink User, we should contains
>>> this
>>>>>>> changes in Flink 1.10.
>>>>>>> +1 for the optimization from the perspective of user convenience
>> and
>>>> the
>>>>>>> unified use of Flink command line parameters.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Jincheng
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月2日周一 下午3:26写道：
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I wanted to bring up the discussion of improving the Pyflink
>> command
>>>> line
>>>>>>>> options.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A few command line options have been introduced in the FLIP-78
>> [1],
>>>> i.e.
>>>>>>>> "python-executable-path", "python-requirements","python-archive",
>>> etc.
>>>>>>>> There are a few problems with these options, i.e. the naming
>> style,
>>>>>>>> variable argument options, etc.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We want to make some adjustment of FLIP-78 to improve the newly
>>>> introduced
>>>>>>>> command line options, here is the design doc:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R8CaDa3908V1SnTxBkTBzeisWqBF40NAYYjfRl680eg/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R8CaDa3908V1SnTxBkTBzeisWqBF40NAYYjfRl680eg/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Looking forward to your feedback!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Wei
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-78%3A+Flink+Python+UDF+Environment+and+Dependency+Management
>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-78:+Flink+Python+UDF+Environment+and+Dependency+Management
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the Pyflink command line options (Adjustment to FLIP-78)
Posted by Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com>.
Hi Wei,
Thanks for bringing this discussion up, the changes look good to me.
Looking forward to the vote. And you can prepare the pull request at the
same time (in order to checkin in time).
Best,
Jark
On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 at 10:27, Hequn Cheng <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks a lot for the discussion! Using "#" also makes sense to me.
> And +1 to have these improvements in 1.10 as we don't want to
> introduce compatibility problems later.
>
> Looking forward to the vote!
>
> Best, Hequn
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 10:02 AM jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Thanks for the quick response Aljoscha & Wei !
> >
> > It seems unify the options is necessary, and 1.10 will be code frozen. I
> > would be like to bring up the VOTE thread for this change ASAP, and more
> > detail can continue discuss in the PR.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Best,
> > Jincheng
> >
> > Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org> 于2019年12月4日周三 下午5:11写道：
> >
> > > Perfect, thanks for the background info! I also found this section now,
> > > which mentions that it comes from Hadoop:
> > >
> >
> https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/running-on-yarn.html#important-notes.
> > >
> > > I think the proposed changes are good!
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Aljoscha
> > >
> > > > On 4. Dec 2019, at 04:34, Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Aljoscha,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your reply! Before bringing up this discussion I did some
> > > research on commonly used separators for options that take multiple
> > values.
> > > I have considered ",", ":" and "#". Finally I chose "#" as the
> separator
> > of
> > > "--pyRequirements".
> > > >
> > > > For ",", it is the most widely used separator. Many projects use it
> as
> > > the separator of the values in same level. e.g. "-Dexcludes" in Maven,
> > > "--files" in Spark and "-pyFiles" in Flink. But the second parameter of
> > > "--pyRequirements", the requirement cached directory, is not at the
> same
> > > level as its first parameter (the requirements file). It is secondary
> and
> > > is only needed when the packages in the requirements file can not be
> > > downloaded from the package index server.
> > > >
> > > > For ":", it is used as a path separator in most cases. e.g. main
> > > arguments of scp (secure copy), "--volume" in Docker and "-cp" in Java.
> > But
> > > as we support accept a URI as the file path, which contains ":" in most
> > > cases, ":" can not be used as the separator of "--pyRequirements".
> > > >
> > > > For "#", it is really rarely used as a separator for multiple
> values. I
> > > only find Spark using "#" as the separator for option "--files" and
> > > "--archives" between file path and target file/directory name. After
> some
> > > research I find that this usage comes from the URI fragment. We can
> > append
> > > a secondary resource as the fragment of the URI after a number sign
> ("#")
> > > character. As we treat user file paths as URIs when parsing command
> line,
> > > using "#" as the separator of "--pyRequirements" makes sense to me,
> which
> > > means the second parameter is the fragment of the first parameter. The
> > > definition of URI fragment can be found here [1].
> > > >
> > > > The reason of using "#" in "--pyArchives" as the separator of file
> path
> > > and targer directory name is the same as above.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Wei
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3.5
> > > >
> > > >> 在 2019年12月3日，22:02，Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org> 写道：
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> Yes, I think it’s a good idea to make the options uniform. Using ‘#’
> > as
> > > a separator for options that take two values seems a bit strange to me,
> > did
> > > you research if any other CLI tools have this convention?
> > > >>
> > > >> Side note: I don’t like that our options use camel-case, I think
> > that’s
> > > very non-standard. But that’s how it is now…
> > > >>
> > > >> Best,
> > > >> Aljoscha
> > > >>
> > > >>> On 3. Dec 2019, at 10:14, jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks for bringup this discussion Wei!
> > > >>> I think this is very important for Flink User, we should contains
> > this
> > > >>> changes in Flink 1.10.
> > > >>> +1 for the optimization from the perspective of user convenience
> and
> > > the
> > > >>> unified use of Flink command line parameters.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Best,
> > > >>> Jincheng
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月2日周一 下午3:26写道：
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Hi everyone,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I wanted to bring up the discussion of improving the Pyflink
> command
> > > line
> > > >>>> options.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> A few command line options have been introduced in the FLIP-78
> [1],
> > > i.e.
> > > >>>> "python-executable-path", "python-requirements","python-archive",
> > etc.
> > > >>>> There are a few problems with these options, i.e. the naming
> style,
> > > >>>> variable argument options, etc.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> We want to make some adjustment of FLIP-78 to improve the newly
> > > introduced
> > > >>>> command line options, here is the design doc:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R8CaDa3908V1SnTxBkTBzeisWqBF40NAYYjfRl680eg/edit?usp=sharing
> > > >>>> <
> > > >>>>
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R8CaDa3908V1SnTxBkTBzeisWqBF40NAYYjfRl680eg/edit?usp=sharing
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>> Looking forward to your feedback!
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Best,
> > > >>>> Wei
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> [1]
> > > >>>>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-78%3A+Flink+Python+UDF+Environment+and+Dependency+Management
> > > >>>> <
> > > >>>>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-78:+Flink+Python+UDF+Environment+and+Dependency+Management
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the Pyflink command line options (Adjustment to FLIP-78)
Posted by Hequn Cheng <ch...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
Thanks a lot for the discussion! Using "#" also makes sense to me.
And +1 to have these improvements in 1.10 as we don't want to
introduce compatibility problems later.
Looking forward to the vote!
Best, Hequn
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 10:02 AM jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for the quick response Aljoscha & Wei !
>
> It seems unify the options is necessary, and 1.10 will be code frozen. I
> would be like to bring up the VOTE thread for this change ASAP, and more
> detail can continue discuss in the PR.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Best,
> Jincheng
>
> Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org> 于2019年12月4日周三 下午5:11写道：
>
> > Perfect, thanks for the background info! I also found this section now,
> > which mentions that it comes from Hadoop:
> >
> https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/running-on-yarn.html#important-notes.
> >
> > I think the proposed changes are good!
> >
> > Best,
> > Aljoscha
> >
> > > On 4. Dec 2019, at 04:34, Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Aljoscha,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your reply! Before bringing up this discussion I did some
> > research on commonly used separators for options that take multiple
> values.
> > I have considered ",", ":" and "#". Finally I chose "#" as the separator
> of
> > "--pyRequirements".
> > >
> > > For ",", it is the most widely used separator. Many projects use it as
> > the separator of the values in same level. e.g. "-Dexcludes" in Maven,
> > "--files" in Spark and "-pyFiles" in Flink. But the second parameter of
> > "--pyRequirements", the requirement cached directory, is not at the same
> > level as its first parameter (the requirements file). It is secondary and
> > is only needed when the packages in the requirements file can not be
> > downloaded from the package index server.
> > >
> > > For ":", it is used as a path separator in most cases. e.g. main
> > arguments of scp (secure copy), "--volume" in Docker and "-cp" in Java.
> But
> > as we support accept a URI as the file path, which contains ":" in most
> > cases, ":" can not be used as the separator of "--pyRequirements".
> > >
> > > For "#", it is really rarely used as a separator for multiple values. I
> > only find Spark using "#" as the separator for option "--files" and
> > "--archives" between file path and target file/directory name. After some
> > research I find that this usage comes from the URI fragment. We can
> append
> > a secondary resource as the fragment of the URI after a number sign ("#")
> > character. As we treat user file paths as URIs when parsing command line,
> > using "#" as the separator of "--pyRequirements" makes sense to me, which
> > means the second parameter is the fragment of the first parameter. The
> > definition of URI fragment can be found here [1].
> > >
> > > The reason of using "#" in "--pyArchives" as the separator of file path
> > and targer directory name is the same as above.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Wei
> > >
> > > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3.5
> > >
> > >> 在 2019年12月3日，22:02，Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org> 写道：
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Yes, I think it’s a good idea to make the options uniform. Using ‘#’
> as
> > a separator for options that take two values seems a bit strange to me,
> did
> > you research if any other CLI tools have this convention?
> > >>
> > >> Side note: I don’t like that our options use camel-case, I think
> that’s
> > very non-standard. But that’s how it is now…
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Aljoscha
> > >>
> > >>> On 3. Dec 2019, at 10:14, jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks for bringup this discussion Wei!
> > >>> I think this is very important for Flink User, we should contains
> this
> > >>> changes in Flink 1.10.
> > >>> +1 for the optimization from the perspective of user convenience and
> > the
> > >>> unified use of Flink command line parameters.
> > >>>
> > >>> Best,
> > >>> Jincheng
> > >>>
> > >>> Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月2日周一 下午3:26写道：
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi everyone,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I wanted to bring up the discussion of improving the Pyflink command
> > line
> > >>>> options.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> A few command line options have been introduced in the FLIP-78 [1],
> > i.e.
> > >>>> "python-executable-path", "python-requirements","python-archive",
> etc.
> > >>>> There are a few problems with these options, i.e. the naming style,
> > >>>> variable argument options, etc.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> We want to make some adjustment of FLIP-78 to improve the newly
> > introduced
> > >>>> command line options, here is the design doc:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R8CaDa3908V1SnTxBkTBzeisWqBF40NAYYjfRl680eg/edit?usp=sharing
> > >>>> <
> > >>>>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R8CaDa3908V1SnTxBkTBzeisWqBF40NAYYjfRl680eg/edit?usp=sharing
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> Looking forward to your feedback!
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best,
> > >>>> Wei
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [1]
> > >>>>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-78%3A+Flink+Python+UDF+Environment+and+Dependency+Management
> > >>>> <
> > >>>>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-78:+Flink+Python+UDF+Environment+and+Dependency+Management
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the Pyflink command line options (Adjustment to FLIP-78)
Posted by jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
Thanks for the quick response Aljoscha & Wei !
It seems unify the options is necessary, and 1.10 will be code frozen. I
would be like to bring up the VOTE thread for this change ASAP, and more
detail can continue discuss in the PR.
What do you think?
Best,
Jincheng
Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org> 于2019年12月4日周三 下午5:11写道：
> Perfect, thanks for the background info! I also found this section now,
> which mentions that it comes from Hadoop:
> https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/running-on-yarn.html#important-notes.
>
> I think the proposed changes are good!
>
> Best,
> Aljoscha
>
> > On 4. Dec 2019, at 04:34, Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Aljoscha,
> >
> > Thanks for your reply! Before bringing up this discussion I did some
> research on commonly used separators for options that take multiple values.
> I have considered ",", ":" and "#". Finally I chose "#" as the separator of
> "--pyRequirements".
> >
> > For ",", it is the most widely used separator. Many projects use it as
> the separator of the values in same level. e.g. "-Dexcludes" in Maven,
> "--files" in Spark and "-pyFiles" in Flink. But the second parameter of
> "--pyRequirements", the requirement cached directory, is not at the same
> level as its first parameter (the requirements file). It is secondary and
> is only needed when the packages in the requirements file can not be
> downloaded from the package index server.
> >
> > For ":", it is used as a path separator in most cases. e.g. main
> arguments of scp (secure copy), "--volume" in Docker and "-cp" in Java. But
> as we support accept a URI as the file path, which contains ":" in most
> cases, ":" can not be used as the separator of "--pyRequirements".
> >
> > For "#", it is really rarely used as a separator for multiple values. I
> only find Spark using "#" as the separator for option "--files" and
> "--archives" between file path and target file/directory name. After some
> research I find that this usage comes from the URI fragment. We can append
> a secondary resource as the fragment of the URI after a number sign ("#")
> character. As we treat user file paths as URIs when parsing command line,
> using "#" as the separator of "--pyRequirements" makes sense to me, which
> means the second parameter is the fragment of the first parameter. The
> definition of URI fragment can be found here [1].
> >
> > The reason of using "#" in "--pyArchives" as the separator of file path
> and targer directory name is the same as above.
> >
> > Best,
> > Wei
> >
> > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3.5
> >
> >> 在 2019年12月3日，22:02，Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org> 写道：
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Yes, I think it’s a good idea to make the options uniform. Using ‘#’ as
> a separator for options that take two values seems a bit strange to me, did
> you research if any other CLI tools have this convention?
> >>
> >> Side note: I don’t like that our options use camel-case, I think that’s
> very non-standard. But that’s how it is now…
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Aljoscha
> >>
> >>> On 3. Dec 2019, at 10:14, jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for bringup this discussion Wei!
> >>> I think this is very important for Flink User, we should contains this
> >>> changes in Flink 1.10.
> >>> +1 for the optimization from the perspective of user convenience and
> the
> >>> unified use of Flink command line parameters.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Jincheng
> >>>
> >>> Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月2日周一 下午3:26写道：
> >>>
> >>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>
> >>>> I wanted to bring up the discussion of improving the Pyflink command
> line
> >>>> options.
> >>>>
> >>>> A few command line options have been introduced in the FLIP-78 [1],
> i.e.
> >>>> "python-executable-path", "python-requirements","python-archive", etc.
> >>>> There are a few problems with these options, i.e. the naming style,
> >>>> variable argument options, etc.
> >>>>
> >>>> We want to make some adjustment of FLIP-78 to improve the newly
> introduced
> >>>> command line options, here is the design doc:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R8CaDa3908V1SnTxBkTBzeisWqBF40NAYYjfRl680eg/edit?usp=sharing
> >>>> <
> >>>>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R8CaDa3908V1SnTxBkTBzeisWqBF40NAYYjfRl680eg/edit?usp=sharing
> >>>>>
> >>>> Looking forward to your feedback!
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> Wei
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]
> >>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-78%3A+Flink+Python+UDF+Environment+and+Dependency+Management
> >>>> <
> >>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-78:+Flink+Python+UDF+Environment+and+Dependency+Management
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the Pyflink command line options (Adjustment to
FLIP-78)
Posted by Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>.
Perfect, thanks for the background info! I also found this section now, which mentions that it comes from Hadoop: https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/running-on-yarn.html#important-notes.
I think the proposed changes are good!
Best,
Aljoscha
> On 4. Dec 2019, at 04:34, Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Aljoscha,
>
> Thanks for your reply! Before bringing up this discussion I did some research on commonly used separators for options that take multiple values. I have considered ",", ":" and "#". Finally I chose "#" as the separator of "--pyRequirements".
>
> For ",", it is the most widely used separator. Many projects use it as the separator of the values in same level. e.g. "-Dexcludes" in Maven, "--files" in Spark and "-pyFiles" in Flink. But the second parameter of "--pyRequirements", the requirement cached directory, is not at the same level as its first parameter (the requirements file). It is secondary and is only needed when the packages in the requirements file can not be downloaded from the package index server.
>
> For ":", it is used as a path separator in most cases. e.g. main arguments of scp (secure copy), "--volume" in Docker and "-cp" in Java. But as we support accept a URI as the file path, which contains ":" in most cases, ":" can not be used as the separator of "--pyRequirements".
>
> For "#", it is really rarely used as a separator for multiple values. I only find Spark using "#" as the separator for option "--files" and "--archives" between file path and target file/directory name. After some research I find that this usage comes from the URI fragment. We can append a secondary resource as the fragment of the URI after a number sign ("#") character. As we treat user file paths as URIs when parsing command line, using "#" as the separator of "--pyRequirements" makes sense to me, which means the second parameter is the fragment of the first parameter. The definition of URI fragment can be found here [1].
>
> The reason of using "#" in "--pyArchives" as the separator of file path and targer directory name is the same as above.
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3.5
>
>> 在 2019年12月3日，22:02，Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org> 写道：
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yes, I think it’s a good idea to make the options uniform. Using ‘#’ as a separator for options that take two values seems a bit strange to me, did you research if any other CLI tools have this convention?
>>
>> Side note: I don’t like that our options use camel-case, I think that’s very non-standard. But that’s how it is now…
>>
>> Best,
>> Aljoscha
>>
>>> On 3. Dec 2019, at 10:14, jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for bringup this discussion Wei!
>>> I think this is very important for Flink User, we should contains this
>>> changes in Flink 1.10.
>>> +1 for the optimization from the perspective of user convenience and the
>>> unified use of Flink command line parameters.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Jincheng
>>>
>>> Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月2日周一 下午3:26写道：
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I wanted to bring up the discussion of improving the Pyflink command line
>>>> options.
>>>>
>>>> A few command line options have been introduced in the FLIP-78 [1], i.e.
>>>> "python-executable-path", "python-requirements","python-archive", etc.
>>>> There are a few problems with these options, i.e. the naming style,
>>>> variable argument options, etc.
>>>>
>>>> We want to make some adjustment of FLIP-78 to improve the newly introduced
>>>> command line options, here is the design doc:
>>>>
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R8CaDa3908V1SnTxBkTBzeisWqBF40NAYYjfRl680eg/edit?usp=sharing
>>>> <
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R8CaDa3908V1SnTxBkTBzeisWqBF40NAYYjfRl680eg/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>
>>>> Looking forward to your feedback!
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Wei
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-78%3A+Flink+Python+UDF+Environment+and+Dependency+Management
>>>> <
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-78:+Flink+Python+UDF+Environment+and+Dependency+Management
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the Pyflink command line options (Adjustment to
FLIP-78)
Posted by Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com>.
Hi Aljoscha,
Thanks for your reply! Before bringing up this discussion I did some research on commonly used separators for options that take multiple values. I have considered ",", ":" and "#". Finally I chose "#" as the separator of "--pyRequirements".
For ",", it is the most widely used separator. Many projects use it as the separator of the values in same level. e.g. "-Dexcludes" in Maven, "--files" in Spark and "-pyFiles" in Flink. But the second parameter of "--pyRequirements", the requirement cached directory, is not at the same level as its first parameter (the requirements file). It is secondary and is only needed when the packages in the requirements file can not be downloaded from the package index server.
For ":", it is used as a path separator in most cases. e.g. main arguments of scp (secure copy), "--volume" in Docker and "-cp" in Java. But as we support accept a URI as the file path, which contains ":" in most cases, ":" can not be used as the separator of "--pyRequirements".
For "#", it is really rarely used as a separator for multiple values. I only find Spark using "#" as the separator for option "--files" and "--archives" between file path and target file/directory name. After some research I find that this usage comes from the URI fragment. We can append a secondary resource as the fragment of the URI after a number sign ("#") character. As we treat user file paths as URIs when parsing command line, using "#" as the separator of "--pyRequirements" makes sense to me, which means the second parameter is the fragment of the first parameter. The definition of URI fragment can be found here [1].
The reason of using "#" in "--pyArchives" as the separator of file path and targer directory name is the same as above.
Best,
Wei
[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3.5
> 在 2019年12月3日，22:02，Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org> 写道：
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I think it’s a good idea to make the options uniform. Using ‘#’ as a separator for options that take two values seems a bit strange to me, did you research if any other CLI tools have this convention?
>
> Side note: I don’t like that our options use camel-case, I think that’s very non-standard. But that’s how it is now…
>
> Best,
> Aljoscha
>
>> On 3. Dec 2019, at 10:14, jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for bringup this discussion Wei!
>> I think this is very important for Flink User, we should contains this
>> changes in Flink 1.10.
>> +1 for the optimization from the perspective of user convenience and the
>> unified use of Flink command line parameters.
>>
>> Best,
>> Jincheng
>>
>> Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月2日周一 下午3:26写道：
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I wanted to bring up the discussion of improving the Pyflink command line
>>> options.
>>>
>>> A few command line options have been introduced in the FLIP-78 [1], i.e.
>>> "python-executable-path", "python-requirements","python-archive", etc.
>>> There are a few problems with these options, i.e. the naming style,
>>> variable argument options, etc.
>>>
>>> We want to make some adjustment of FLIP-78 to improve the newly introduced
>>> command line options, here is the design doc:
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R8CaDa3908V1SnTxBkTBzeisWqBF40NAYYjfRl680eg/edit?usp=sharing
>>> <
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R8CaDa3908V1SnTxBkTBzeisWqBF40NAYYjfRl680eg/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>
>>> Looking forward to your feedback!
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Wei
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-78%3A+Flink+Python+UDF+Environment+and+Dependency+Management
>>> <
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-78:+Flink+Python+UDF+Environment+and+Dependency+Management
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the Pyflink command line options (Adjustment to
FLIP-78)
Posted by Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>.
Hi,
Yes, I think it’s a good idea to make the options uniform. Using ‘#’ as a separator for options that take two values seems a bit strange to me, did you research if any other CLI tools have this convention?
Side note: I don’t like that our options use camel-case, I think that’s very non-standard. But that’s how it is now…
Best,
Aljoscha
> On 3. Dec 2019, at 10:14, jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for bringup this discussion Wei!
> I think this is very important for Flink User, we should contains this
> changes in Flink 1.10.
> +1 for the optimization from the perspective of user convenience and the
> unified use of Flink command line parameters.
>
> Best,
> Jincheng
>
> Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月2日周一 下午3:26写道：
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I wanted to bring up the discussion of improving the Pyflink command line
>> options.
>>
>> A few command line options have been introduced in the FLIP-78 [1], i.e.
>> "python-executable-path", "python-requirements","python-archive", etc.
>> There are a few problems with these options, i.e. the naming style,
>> variable argument options, etc.
>>
>> We want to make some adjustment of FLIP-78 to improve the newly introduced
>> command line options, here is the design doc:
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R8CaDa3908V1SnTxBkTBzeisWqBF40NAYYjfRl680eg/edit?usp=sharing
>> <
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R8CaDa3908V1SnTxBkTBzeisWqBF40NAYYjfRl680eg/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>> Looking forward to your feedback!
>>
>> Best,
>> Wei
>>
>> [1]
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-78%3A+Flink+Python+UDF+Environment+and+Dependency+Management
>> <
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-78:+Flink+Python+UDF+Environment+and+Dependency+Management
>>>
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the Pyflink command line options (Adjustment to FLIP-78)
Posted by jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for bringup this discussion Wei!
I think this is very important for Flink User, we should contains this
changes in Flink 1.10.
+1 for the optimization from the perspective of user convenience and the
unified use of Flink command line parameters.
Best,
Jincheng
Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月2日周一 下午3:26写道：
> Hi everyone,
>
> I wanted to bring up the discussion of improving the Pyflink command line
> options.
>
> A few command line options have been introduced in the FLIP-78 [1], i.e.
> "python-executable-path", "python-requirements","python-archive", etc.
> There are a few problems with these options, i.e. the naming style,
> variable argument options, etc.
>
> We want to make some adjustment of FLIP-78 to improve the newly introduced
> command line options, here is the design doc:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R8CaDa3908V1SnTxBkTBzeisWqBF40NAYYjfRl680eg/edit?usp=sharing
> <
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R8CaDa3908V1SnTxBkTBzeisWqBF40NAYYjfRl680eg/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> Looking forward to your feedback!
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
> [1]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-78%3A+Flink+Python+UDF+Environment+and+Dependency+Management
> <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-78:+Flink+Python+UDF+Environment+and+Dependency+Management
> >
>
>