DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44412] Missing border-after when break-after set on a block

[bu...@apache.org]

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44412


Jeremias Maerki <je...@apache.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




--- Comment #3 from Jeremias Maerki <je...@apache.org>  2008-03-14 04:18:00 PST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> On the following:
>     <fo:block>Before the block</fo:block>
>     <fo:block border="4pt solid black" break-before="page" break-after="page">A
> block with
>       borders and break-before and break-after.</fo:block>
>     <fo:block>After the block</fo:block>
> 
> The border-after on the second block is missing, although the block is finished.
> It looks like its conditionality is (wrongly) taken into account, as setting
> border-after-width.conditionality="retain" make it re-appear. The problem also
> doesn't show up if break-after is removed from the second block and break-before
> added on the third block instead.

This part should be fixed now:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=637057&view=rev

The "pending marks" have not been removed from the layout context which caused
the border-after to be considered twice in space resolution, on time in a
conditional context which reset the border to 0.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.