You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@struts.apache.org by Kirti <ki...@gmail.com> on 2008/05/23 13:37:25 UTC

struts + freemarker version

we are currently using struts 2.0.9 with freemarker 2.3.8. 
We are planning to upgrade to struts 2.0.11 and freemarker 2.3.13. But we
have few doubts on thier compatibility. Apparently struts 2.0.11 also uses
freemarker 2.3.8.
We see that there are major performance improvements in 2.3.13.
Can we upgrade ourselves to use struts 2.0.11 with freemarker 2.3.13? Do
anyone see any issues with this upgradation? 
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/struts-%2B-freemarker-version-tp17423821p17423821.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org


Re: struts + freemarker version

Posted by Al Sutton <al...@alsutton.com>.
I've used S2.0.11 and Freemarker 2.3.13 without any problems.

The only reason it's not in the latest builds is that it was released 
after the latest S2 builds and FM2.3.13 hasn't been put into the 
neccessary place to support an automated build.

Al.

Kirti wrote:
> we are currently using struts 2.0.9 with freemarker 2.3.8. 
> We are planning to upgrade to struts 2.0.11 and freemarker 2.3.13. But we
> have few doubts on thier compatibility. Apparently struts 2.0.11 also uses
> freemarker 2.3.8.
> We see that there are major performance improvements in 2.3.13.
> Can we upgrade ourselves to use struts 2.0.11 with freemarker 2.3.13? Do
> anyone see any issues with this upgradation? 
>   


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org