You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Michal Karm <mi...@gmail.com> on 2018/07/19 15:36:25 UTC
Regression with CMake Windows builds, 2.4.29 is the last one passing
Hi guys,
I would like to ask whether there are any plans on
accepting [1] patch to 2.4.x as it keeps failing the CMake Windows build.
Furthermore, there is a regression [2] in 2.4.34 CMake Windows build that did not
exist in 2.4.29.
If anyone has a hit or an idea handy to get me unstuck I try to come up with a
patch.
Thank you for your time
K.
[1] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62190
[2] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62557
Michal Karm Babacek
--
Sent from my Hosaka Ono-Sendai Cyberspace 7
[RESOLVED] Re: Regression with CMake Windows builds, 2.4.29 is the
last one passing
Posted by Michal Karm <mi...@gmail.com>.
On 07/19/2018 08:18 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Hi Michal, thanks for your report.
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Michal Karm <michal.babacek@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I would like to ask whether there are any plans on
> accepting [1] patch to 2.4.x as it keeps failing the CMake Windows build.
>
> Furthermore, there is a regression [2] in 2.4.34 CMake Windows build that
> did not
> exist in 2.4.29.
>
> If anyone has a hit or an idea handy to get me unstuck I try to come up with a
> patch.
>
> Thank you for your time
> K.
>
> [1] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62190
> <https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62190>
>
>
> Suggestion adopted, as should have happened in the original backport. The
> changes are now merged complete from trunk.
>
>
> [2] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62557
> <https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62557>
>
>
> Proposed a solution for you. If this builds clean for you, I'll commit to
> trunk and 2.4.
Thank you for the hint. Updated patches are on the Bugzilla, including links to
passing builds.
Michal Karm Babacek
--
Sent from my Hosaka Ono-Sendai Cyberspace 7
Re: Regression with CMake Windows builds, 2.4.29 is the last one passing
Posted by William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
FWIW, the correct fix seems to be to fix the regression in
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1832609&view=rev rather than the windows
build.
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018, 13:18 William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Hi Michal, thanks for your report.
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Michal Karm <mi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I would like to ask whether there are any plans on
>> accepting [1] patch to 2.4.x as it keeps failing the CMake Windows build.
>>
>> Furthermore, there is a regression [2] in 2.4.34 CMake Windows build that
>> did not
>> exist in 2.4.29.
>>
>> If anyone has a hit or an idea handy to get me unstuck I try to come up
>> with a
>> patch.
>>
>> Thank you for your time
>> K.
>>
>> [1] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62190
>
>
> Suggestion adopted, as should have happened in the original backport. The
> changes are now merged complete from trunk.
>
>
>> [2] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62557
>
>
> Proposed a solution for you. If this builds clean for you, I'll commit to
> trunk and 2.4.
>
Re: Regression with CMake Windows builds, 2.4.29 is the last one passing
Posted by William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Hi Michal, thanks for your report.
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Michal Karm <mi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I would like to ask whether there are any plans on
> accepting [1] patch to 2.4.x as it keeps failing the CMake Windows build.
>
> Furthermore, there is a regression [2] in 2.4.34 CMake Windows build that
> did not
> exist in 2.4.29.
>
> If anyone has a hit or an idea handy to get me unstuck I try to come up
> with a
> patch.
>
> Thank you for your time
> K.
>
> [1] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62190
Suggestion adopted, as should have happened in the original backport. The
changes are now merged complete from trunk.
> [2] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62557
Proposed a solution for you. If this builds clean for you, I'll commit to
trunk and 2.4.