You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@htrace.apache.org by Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> on 2017/06/02 19:59:19 UTC
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] HTrace-4.3.0-incubating RC3
Vote passes with +3
* Masatake Iwasaki
* Elliott Clark
* Colin McCabe
Will submit to IPMC shortly.
Apologies for letting this slip for so long; other schedules got in the way
of being able to work on this.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> I wouldn't worry about it. Ship the thing.
>
> I had trouble making it pass all tests on mac. Will did in in time for next
> release.
>
> St.Ack
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I always thought that the deadline represented a minimum period, rather
> > than a maximum. In other words, the deadline was around to prevent
> > people from putting out a release in 6 hours or whatever that had some
> > undiscovered flaws because people didn't have a chance to examine it.
> >
> > I don't remember us ever re-doing a vote because the period had been
> > exceeded without enough votes coming in. But looking at
> > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html , it doesn't seem to
> > settle the issue one way or another. Does anyone know if there is a
> > formal rule for this?
> >
> > I guess to be on the safe side, you could start a new vote and have
> > people re-cast.
> >
> > cheers,
> > Colin
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 23, 2017, at 18:22, Mike Drob wrote:
> > > A question about protocol here... Two of the votes have come in past
> the
> > > deadline, but without them we wouldn't have had enough votes to get
> > > quorum
> > > on the release. Can we still accept them and move forward, or do we
> need
> > > to
> > > start over with a new vote? I'd really like to avoid the second option
> > > since getting enough votes here has been tenuous.
> > >
> > > I'm also making a note for myself for future votes that seven days is
> > > probably a better window than five.
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Verified checksums
> > > > Build from source using Maven 3.0.4 (with -Pnative)
> > > > Successfully ran unit tests
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 22, 2017, at 01:18, Elliott Clark wrote:
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > verified signatures.
> > > > > build from source.
> > > > > Checked that everything looked to be in the correct locations.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Masatake Iwasaki <
> > > > > iwasakims@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * verified signature and mds.
> > > > > > * built and installed from source tarball by maven-3.0.4.
> > > > > > * built hadoop trunk against htrace-4.3.0-incubating.
> > > > > > * verified that spans in HDFS works by HTracedSpanReceiver and
> > htraced.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Masatake Iwasaki
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 5/17/17 05:40, Mike Drob wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi Devs,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Please consider the following release candidate for Apache
> HTrace
> > > > > >> 4.3.0-incubating!
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> http://people.apache.org/~mdrob/htrace-4.3.0-incubating-rc3/
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The jars have been staged here:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > orgapachehtrace-1029
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> There's a few minor fixes in this release:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> ** Bug
> > > > > >> * [HTRACE-387] - htrace-c should have a test dependency on
> > htrace
> > > > > >> -htraced
> > > > > >> * [HTRACE-393] - Binary annotations are being shown as
> > base64 in
> > > > the
> > > > > >> zipkin frontend
> > > > > >> * [HTRACE-398] - Enforce requirement to build with Maven
> > 3.0.4
> > > > from
> > > > > >> HTRACE-236
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> ** Improvement
> > > > > >> * [HTRACE-386] - htrace-c: add functions for retrieving the
> > span
> > > > ID
> > > > > >> to
> > > > > >> the public API
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> RC History:
> > > > > >> RC0 - Discarded due to user error.
> > > > > >> RC1 - Missing some version string updates, vote failed.
> > > > > >> RC2 - Discarded due to missing HTRACE-398
> > > > > >> RC3 - Current
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> This vote will run for 5 days ( Sun May 21 21:30:00 UTC 2017 )
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > >> Mike
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] HTrace-4.3.0-incubating RC3
Posted by Raam Rosh-Hai <ra...@findhotel.net>.
Thank you everybody, really nice to see this progressing
On 3 June 2017 at 03:44, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
> No worries, Mike. Thanks for driving this!
>
> cheers,
> Colin
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017, at 12:59, Mike Drob wrote:
> > Vote passes with +3
> > * Masatake Iwasaki
> > * Elliott Clark
> > * Colin McCabe
> >
> > Will submit to IPMC shortly.
> >
> > Apologies for letting this slip for so long; other schedules got in the
> > way
> > of being able to work on this.
> >
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> > > I wouldn't worry about it. Ship the thing.
> > >
> > > I had trouble making it pass all tests on mac. Will did in in time for
> next
> > > release.
> > >
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I always thought that the deadline represented a minimum period,
> rather
> > > > than a maximum. In other words, the deadline was around to prevent
> > > > people from putting out a release in 6 hours or whatever that had
> some
> > > > undiscovered flaws because people didn't have a chance to examine it.
> > > >
> > > > I don't remember us ever re-doing a vote because the period had been
> > > > exceeded without enough votes coming in. But looking at
> > > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html , it doesn't seem to
> > > > settle the issue one way or another. Does anyone know if there is a
> > > > formal rule for this?
> > > >
> > > > I guess to be on the safe side, you could start a new vote and have
> > > > people re-cast.
> > > >
> > > > cheers,
> > > > Colin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 23, 2017, at 18:22, Mike Drob wrote:
> > > > > A question about protocol here... Two of the votes have come in
> past
> > > the
> > > > > deadline, but without them we wouldn't have had enough votes to get
> > > > > quorum
> > > > > on the release. Can we still accept them and move forward, or do we
> > > need
> > > > > to
> > > > > start over with a new vote? I'd really like to avoid the second
> option
> > > > > since getting enough votes here has been tenuous.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm also making a note for myself for future votes that seven days
> is
> > > > > probably a better window than five.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Verified checksums
> > > > > > Build from source using Maven 3.0.4 (with -Pnative)
> > > > > > Successfully ran unit tests
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, May 22, 2017, at 01:18, Elliott Clark wrote:
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > verified signatures.
> > > > > > > build from source.
> > > > > > > Checked that everything looked to be in the correct locations.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Masatake Iwasaki <
> > > > > > > iwasakims@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > * verified signature and mds.
> > > > > > > > * built and installed from source tarball by maven-3.0.4.
> > > > > > > > * built hadoop trunk against htrace-4.3.0-incubating.
> > > > > > > > * verified that spans in HDFS works by HTracedSpanReceiver
> and
> > > > htraced.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Masatake Iwasaki
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 5/17/17 05:40, Mike Drob wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Hi Devs,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Please consider the following release candidate for Apache
> > > HTrace
> > > > > > > >> 4.3.0-incubating!
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> http://people.apache.org/~mdrob/htrace-4.3.0-incubating-
> rc3/
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> The jars have been staged here:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > > > orgapachehtrace-1029
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> There's a few minor fixes in this release:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> ** Bug
> > > > > > > >> * [HTRACE-387] - htrace-c should have a test
> dependency on
> > > > htrace
> > > > > > > >> -htraced
> > > > > > > >> * [HTRACE-393] - Binary annotations are being shown as
> > > > base64 in
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > >> zipkin frontend
> > > > > > > >> * [HTRACE-398] - Enforce requirement to build with
> Maven
> > > > 3.0.4
> > > > > > from
> > > > > > > >> HTRACE-236
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> ** Improvement
> > > > > > > >> * [HTRACE-386] - htrace-c: add functions for
> retrieving the
> > > > span
> > > > > > ID
> > > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > > >> the public API
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> RC History:
> > > > > > > >> RC0 - Discarded due to user error.
> > > > > > > >> RC1 - Missing some version string updates, vote failed.
> > > > > > > >> RC2 - Discarded due to missing HTRACE-398
> > > > > > > >> RC3 - Current
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> This vote will run for 5 days ( Sun May 21 21:30:00 UTC
> 2017 )
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > > >> Mike
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] HTrace-4.3.0-incubating RC3
Posted by Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>.
No worries, Mike. Thanks for driving this!
cheers,
Colin
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017, at 12:59, Mike Drob wrote:
> Vote passes with +3
> * Masatake Iwasaki
> * Elliott Clark
> * Colin McCabe
>
> Will submit to IPMC shortly.
>
> Apologies for letting this slip for so long; other schedules got in the
> way
> of being able to work on this.
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > I wouldn't worry about it. Ship the thing.
> >
> > I had trouble making it pass all tests on mac. Will did in in time for next
> > release.
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I always thought that the deadline represented a minimum period, rather
> > > than a maximum. In other words, the deadline was around to prevent
> > > people from putting out a release in 6 hours or whatever that had some
> > > undiscovered flaws because people didn't have a chance to examine it.
> > >
> > > I don't remember us ever re-doing a vote because the period had been
> > > exceeded without enough votes coming in. But looking at
> > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html , it doesn't seem to
> > > settle the issue one way or another. Does anyone know if there is a
> > > formal rule for this?
> > >
> > > I guess to be on the safe side, you could start a new vote and have
> > > people re-cast.
> > >
> > > cheers,
> > > Colin
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 23, 2017, at 18:22, Mike Drob wrote:
> > > > A question about protocol here... Two of the votes have come in past
> > the
> > > > deadline, but without them we wouldn't have had enough votes to get
> > > > quorum
> > > > on the release. Can we still accept them and move forward, or do we
> > need
> > > > to
> > > > start over with a new vote? I'd really like to avoid the second option
> > > > since getting enough votes here has been tenuous.
> > > >
> > > > I'm also making a note for myself for future votes that seven days is
> > > > probably a better window than five.
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Verified checksums
> > > > > Build from source using Maven 3.0.4 (with -Pnative)
> > > > > Successfully ran unit tests
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, May 22, 2017, at 01:18, Elliott Clark wrote:
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > verified signatures.
> > > > > > build from source.
> > > > > > Checked that everything looked to be in the correct locations.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Masatake Iwasaki <
> > > > > > iwasakims@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > * verified signature and mds.
> > > > > > > * built and installed from source tarball by maven-3.0.4.
> > > > > > > * built hadoop trunk against htrace-4.3.0-incubating.
> > > > > > > * verified that spans in HDFS works by HTracedSpanReceiver and
> > > htraced.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Masatake Iwasaki
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 5/17/17 05:40, Mike Drob wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi Devs,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Please consider the following release candidate for Apache
> > HTrace
> > > > > > >> 4.3.0-incubating!
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> http://people.apache.org/~mdrob/htrace-4.3.0-incubating-rc3/
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> The jars have been staged here:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > > orgapachehtrace-1029
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> There's a few minor fixes in this release:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> ** Bug
> > > > > > >> * [HTRACE-387] - htrace-c should have a test dependency on
> > > htrace
> > > > > > >> -htraced
> > > > > > >> * [HTRACE-393] - Binary annotations are being shown as
> > > base64 in
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >> zipkin frontend
> > > > > > >> * [HTRACE-398] - Enforce requirement to build with Maven
> > > 3.0.4
> > > > > from
> > > > > > >> HTRACE-236
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> ** Improvement
> > > > > > >> * [HTRACE-386] - htrace-c: add functions for retrieving the
> > > span
> > > > > ID
> > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > >> the public API
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> RC History:
> > > > > > >> RC0 - Discarded due to user error.
> > > > > > >> RC1 - Missing some version string updates, vote failed.
> > > > > > >> RC2 - Discarded due to missing HTRACE-398
> > > > > > >> RC3 - Current
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> This vote will run for 5 days ( Sun May 21 21:30:00 UTC 2017 )
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > >> Mike
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >