You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to soap-user@ws.apache.org by ch...@airfrance.fr on 2003/02/11 10:00:03 UTC

Should I use a nightly build in production

Hi,

I'm quite confused about the fact that no new release are expected.
I do need compression over HTTP 1.1, which is currently available in CVS.
Moving to AXIS would not resolve my problem, because Axis does not provide
this feature.

 Should I use a nightly build version in production? Is it stable enough?
Any advice is welcome,

 Christophe




 
----------------
L'acces immediat aux meilleurs tarifs Air France et au billet electronique sur http://www.airfrance.com
 
For immediate access to the best Air France fares and to electronic tickets, visit our website http://www.airfrance.com
 
----------------
Les donnees et renseignements contenus dans ce message sont personnels, confidentiels et secrets. Ce message est adresse a l'individu ou l'entite dont les coordonnees figurent ci-dessus. Si vous n'etes pas le bon destinataire, nous vous demandons de ne pas lire, copier, utiliser ou divulguer cette communication. Nous vous prions de notifier cette erreur a l'expediteur et d'effacer immediatement cette communication de votre systeme.
The information contained in this message is privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. This message is intended for the individual or entity adressed herein. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.


Re: Should I use a nightly build in production

Posted by "Jesus M. Salvo Jr." <je...@migasia.com>.
I mean ... after all .... HTTPUtils.post() already sends out the Header 
field ... which is one of the major requirements in HTTP 1.1.
So doesn't this simply mean changing the value of HttpUtils.HTTP_VERSION 
from "1.0" to "1.1"?


Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote:

> Why does Apache SOAP use HTTP/1.0 and not HTTP/1.1?
>
> Although SOAP 1.1 did not indicate directly that HTTP/1.1 must be 
> supported, it sort of indirectly did by the examples and the HTTP 
> specification in the reference:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP/#_Toc478383526
> http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP/#_Toc478383536
>
>
>
> Scott Nichol wrote:
>
>> The Apache SOAP client always uses HTTP 1.0, never HTTP 1.1.  If you 
>> need HTTP 1.1 support, you would either need to write your own 
>> transport or move to another implementation like Axis.
>>
>>  
>>
>
>
>


-- 
Jesus M. Salvo Jr.
Mobile Internet Group Pty Ltd
(formerly Softgame International Pty Ltd)
M: +61 409 126699
T: +61 2 94604777
F: +61 2 94603677

PGP Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0BA5348



Re: Should I use a nightly build in production

Posted by "Jesus M. Salvo Jr." <je...@migasia.com>.
Why does Apache SOAP use HTTP/1.0 and not HTTP/1.1?

Although SOAP 1.1 did not indicate directly that HTTP/1.1 must be 
supported, it sort of indirectly did by the examples and the HTTP 
specification in the reference:

http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP/#_Toc478383526
http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP/#_Toc478383536



Scott Nichol wrote:

>The Apache SOAP client always uses HTTP 1.0, never HTTP 1.1.  If you 
>need HTTP 1.1 support, you would either need to write your own 
>transport or move to another implementation like Axis.
>
>  
>



Re: Should I use a nightly build in production

Posted by Scott Nichol <sn...@scottnichol.com>.
The Apache SOAP client always uses HTTP 1.0, never HTTP 1.1.  If you 
need HTTP 1.1 support, you would either need to write your own 
transport or move to another implementation like Axis.

Axis is nearing its 1.1 release.  I believe someone has submitted an 
Axis filter that does gzip, although it is being discussed on that 
mailing list how that filter will be packaged, e.g. will it be in the 
binary distribution, which jar will contain it.

As for the Apache SOAP nightly build, there were at least 3 bugs in 
it that I found working with Malte Kampfe.  Prior to that, I know of 
no outstanding bugs.

On 11 Feb 2003 at 10:00, chalexandre@airfrance.fr wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I'm quite confused about the fact that no new release are expected.
> I do need compression over HTTP 1.1, which is currently available in CVS.
> Moving to AXIS would not resolve my problem, because Axis does not provide
> this feature.
> 
>  Should I use a nightly build version in production? Is it stable enough?
> Any advice is welcome,
> 
>  Christophe
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> ----------------
> L'acces immediat aux meilleurs tarifs Air France et au billet electronique sur http://www.airfrance.com
>  
> For immediate access to the best Air France fares and to electronic tickets, visit our website http://www.airfrance.com
>  
> ----------------
> Les donnees et renseignements contenus dans ce message sont personnels, confidentiels et secrets. Ce message est adresse a l'individu ou l'entite dont les coordonnees figurent ci-dessus. Si vous n'etes pas le bon destinataire, nous vous demandons de ne pas lire, copier, utiliser ou divulguer 
cette communication. Nous vous prions de notifier cette erreur a l'expediteur et d'effacer immediatement cette communication de votre systeme.
> The information contained in this message is privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. This message is intended for the individual or entity adressed herein. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please 
notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
> 
> 


Scott Nichol

Do not reply directly to this e-mail address, as it is filtered to
only receive e-mail from specific mailing lists.