Yan:: Re: Release 1.1.0

[Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>]

Hello David
i will look at owb-493 you mentioned. i assume that this is the single failed test for 1.0.2-final tck in geronimo, isnt it?

Thanks

Çar, 05 Oca 2011 19:52 EET tarihinde David Jencks şöyle yazdı:

>
>On Jan 5, 2011, at 6:55 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
>> Hello folks,
>> 
>> - WDYT about 1.1.0 release? 
>
>Since you applied my patch that adds significant capabilities to WebBeansContext, I'd like to spend a little time modifying OWB to use it wherever it's easy to do so.  If we don't completely eliminate the service loader we need to be sure it doesn't conflict with the new code.
>
>Also, OWB-493 needs to be fixed or we need to talk Pete into excluding the relevant tests.  I don't think I have the knowledge of OWB internals needed to fix it.
>
>> - Please look at your JIRA  tasks and close them if no need to stay as open.
>
>I don't seem to be able to close issues, just resolve them.
>
>thanks
>david jencks
>
>
>> - Please look at Unscheduled tasks and put them in 1.0.1 or 1.1.0
>> 
>> Thanks;
>> 
>> --Gurkan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>

Re: Yan:: Re: Release 1.1.0

[David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>]

The tck version is up to 1.0.4-SNAPSHOT, but this is the remaining problem in geronimo.  I think you'll need to get the http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/weld/cdi-tck/branches/1.0 and build it yourself to see the most recent test revisions.  I'm not convinced the changes Pete has made to the meaning of the events and the tests are appropriate for a 1.0.x tck.  I'm curious what you think.

thanks
david jencks
 
On Jan 5, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:

> Hello David
> i will look at owb-493 you mentioned. i assume that this is the single failed test for 1.0.2-final tck in geronimo, isnt it?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Çar, 05 Oca 2011 19:52 EET tarihinde David Jencks şöyle yazdı:
> 
>> 
>> On Jan 5, 2011, at 6:55 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello folks,
>>> 
>>> - WDYT about 1.1.0 release? 
>> 
>> Since you applied my patch that adds significant capabilities to WebBeansContext, I'd like to spend a little time modifying OWB to use it wherever it's easy to do so.  If we don't completely eliminate the service loader we need to be sure it doesn't conflict with the new code.
>> 
>> Also, OWB-493 needs to be fixed or we need to talk Pete into excluding the relevant tests.  I don't think I have the knowledge of OWB internals needed to fix it.
>> 
>>> - Please look at your JIRA  tasks and close them if no need to stay as open.
>> 
>> I don't seem to be able to close issues, just resolve them.
>> 
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>> 
>> 
>>> - Please look at Unscheduled tasks and put them in 1.0.1 or 1.1.0
>>> 
>>> Thanks;
>>> 
>>> --Gurkan
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
>