[GitHub] [lucene] xtonik commented on issue #11996: Replace custom String constructor from codepoints with constructor within java.lang.String class.

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

xtonik commented on issue #11996:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11996#issuecomment-1336413434

   It's obvious you are completely out of reality. Do you think I spend my free time to do such things? If you are so clever, explain what is wrong with original implementation, I have not found any details about mentioned bugs - this should be clearly described in commit message or elsewhere - based on this information it is possible to write test, not so without. And last but not least there is written remark about necessity of verification of my suggestion.
   About my comments about incorrectness of custom implementation - it is evident, that I have right on first look to source code.
   I went through early whole Lucene project to find something worthy to contribute I really don't realize that I get so much disgusting response, I have prepared some other proposals, but I don't want communicate with other developers in such way so I will not continue to cooperate in this project anymore.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@lucene.apache.org