You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by "Alex Karasulu (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/06/14 02:40:30 UTC
[jira] Resolved: (DIRSERVER-644) Memory Leak in Persistent search ?
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-644?page=all ]
Alex Karasulu resolved DIRSERVER-644:
-------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix committed revision 414011:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=414011
> Memory Leak in Persistent search ?
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRSERVER-644
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-644
> Project: Directory ApacheDS
> Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Versions: 1.0-RC3
> Reporter: Emmanuel Lecharny
> Assignee: Alex Karasulu
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.0-RC4
> Attachments: SearchTest.java
>
> After having profiled memory, it seems we have a memory leak in SessionRegistry.
> A little test (attached) does a search N times for N threads, and for each search, a OutstandingRequest is attached to the session. After a few thousands of search we fall in OOM. I've put some trace in those methods :
> SessionRegistry.addOutstandingRequest
> and
> SessionRegistry.removeOutstandingRequest
> Session Released
> addOutstandingRequest 2
> addOutstandingRequest 3
> addOutstandingRequest 4
> ... ( 100 requests)
> addOutstandingRequest 99
> addOutstandingRequest 100
> addOutstandingRequest 101
> remove session
> The SessionRegistry.removeOutstandingRequest is never called, except if an exception is raised (NamingException).
> It may be on purpose ( persistent search), but we can't assume the server will be able to hold as many OutstandingRequest as we have search requests - or entries -.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira