You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by cafe <rm...@estudiantes.uci.cu> on 2007/01/29 04:08:05 UTC
Is so good ActiveMQ’s InputStream?
Is so good ActiveMQ’s InputStream?
My question is, if is better for transfer files between 300 MB and 500 MB
using activeMQ’s InputStream or to do that manually the programmer?
Is more reliable let do the transfer to activeMQ?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-so-good-ActiveMQ%E2%80%99s-InputStream--tf3133811.html#a8683500
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Is so good ActiveMQ’s InputStream?
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 1/29/07, cafe <rm...@estudiantes.uci.cu> wrote:
> Actually those questions are opposite to my point. Let mi tell you:
> My app need to send files (over 300mg) to different clients (over 100
> clients in different PC) so I need only a strategy for sending and receiving
> these files. Now my questions are:
> 1-What happen if a connection is lost when the files are being sending or
> receiving?
> 2-What about the performance of activeMQ when it most manages these
> transfers simultaneously?
You could use some out-of-band mechanism if you prefer. e.g. use some
central file system / web server / FTP mechanism for the actual
transfer, then use ActiveMQ to send around messages containing URLs to
the actual file to be processed.
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Is so good ActiveMQ's InputStream?
Posted by "Christopher G. Stach II" <cg...@ldsys.net>.
Sanjiv Jivan wrote:
> Christopher,
> Do you really need to be arrogant in all your emails?
>
> I don't post here regularly but follow this list and its responses like
> yours which makes such mailing lists unfriendly and drives people away.
>
> Please learn how to be a little more patient / friendly in instead of
> talking down to people in all your responses.
>
> Sanjiv
>
>
> On 1/29/07, Christopher G. Stach II <cg...@ldsys.net> wrote:
>>
>> cafe wrote:
>> > Actually those questions are opposite to my point. Let mi tell you:
>> > My app need to send files (over 300mg) to different clients (over 100
>> > clients in different PC) so I need only a strategy for sending and
>> receiving
>> > these files. Now my questions are:
>> > 1-What happen if a connection is lost when the files are being sending
>> or
>> > receiving?
>> > 2-What about the performance of activeMQ when it most manages these
>> > transfers simultaneously?
>> >
>> >
>> > Christopher G. Stach II wrote:
>> >> cafe wrote:
>> >>> sorry, the question is about Stream
>> >>>
>> >>> cafe wrote:
>> >>>> Is so good ActiveMQ's InputStream?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> My question is, if is better for transfer files between 300 MB and
>> 500
>> >>>> MB
>> >>>> using activeMQ's InputStream or to do that manually the programmer?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Is more reliable let do the transfer to activeMQ?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >> What else would it be about?
>> >>
>> >> I haven't seen any objective performance comparisons, so that just
>> >> brings up more questions.
>> >>
>> >> 1. How much will it cost to design and implement your own strategy vs.
>>
>> >> using JMS/AMQ?
>> >> 2. How well will AMQ perform compared to a generic file transfer
>> >> implementation?
>> >> 3. How much will the infrastructure for your implementation cost vs.
>> >> AMQ's?
>> >> 4. Will either serve your application's needs?
>> >> etc. etc. etc.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Christopher G. Stach II
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> 1. The message would be lost. What else would happen? Use transactions
>> and resend.
>> 2. See my original email.
>>
>> --
>> Christopher G. Stach II
Sorry. I didn't know Martha Stewart was watching.
--
Christopher G. Stach II
Re: Is so good ActiveMQ’s InputStream?
Posted by Sanjiv Jivan <sa...@gmail.com>.
Christopher,
Do you really need to be arrogant in all your emails?
I don't post here regularly but follow this list and its responses like
yours which makes such mailing lists unfriendly and drives people away.
Please learn how to be a little more patient / friendly in instead of
talking down to people in all your responses.
Sanjiv
On 1/29/07, Christopher G. Stach II <cg...@ldsys.net> wrote:
>
> cafe wrote:
> > Actually those questions are opposite to my point. Let mi tell you:
> > My app need to send files (over 300mg) to different clients (over 100
> > clients in different PC) so I need only a strategy for sending and
> receiving
> > these files. Now my questions are:
> > 1-What happen if a connection is lost when the files are being sending
> or
> > receiving?
> > 2-What about the performance of activeMQ when it most manages these
> > transfers simultaneously?
> >
> >
> > Christopher G. Stach II wrote:
> >> cafe wrote:
> >>> sorry, the question is about Stream
> >>>
> >>> cafe wrote:
> >>>> Is so good ActiveMQ's InputStream?
> >>>>
> >>>> My question is, if is better for transfer files between 300 MB and
> 500
> >>>> MB
> >>>> using activeMQ's InputStream or to do that manually the programmer?
> >>>>
> >>>> Is more reliable let do the transfer to activeMQ?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >> What else would it be about?
> >>
> >> I haven't seen any objective performance comparisons, so that just
> >> brings up more questions.
> >>
> >> 1. How much will it cost to design and implement your own strategy vs.
>
> >> using JMS/AMQ?
> >> 2. How well will AMQ perform compared to a generic file transfer
> >> implementation?
> >> 3. How much will the infrastructure for your implementation cost vs.
> >> AMQ's?
> >> 4. Will either serve your application's needs?
> >> etc. etc. etc.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Christopher G. Stach II
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> 1. The message would be lost. What else would happen? Use transactions
> and resend.
> 2. See my original email.
>
> --
> Christopher G. Stach II
>
>
Re: Is so good ActiveMQ’s InputStream?
Posted by "Christopher G. Stach II" <cg...@ldsys.net>.
cafe wrote:
> Actually those questions are opposite to my point. Let mi tell you:
> My app need to send files (over 300mg) to different clients (over 100
> clients in different PC) so I need only a strategy for sending and receiving
> these files. Now my questions are:
> 1-What happen if a connection is lost when the files are being sending or
> receiving?
> 2-What about the performance of activeMQ when it most manages these
> transfers simultaneously?
>
>
> Christopher G. Stach II wrote:
>> cafe wrote:
>>> sorry, the question is about Stream
>>>
>>> cafe wrote:
>>>> Is so good ActiveMQ’s InputStream?
>>>>
>>>> My question is, if is better for transfer files between 300 MB and 500
>>>> MB
>>>> using activeMQ’s InputStream or to do that manually the programmer?
>>>>
>>>> Is more reliable let do the transfer to activeMQ?
>>>>
>>>>
>> What else would it be about?
>>
>> I haven't seen any objective performance comparisons, so that just
>> brings up more questions.
>>
>> 1. How much will it cost to design and implement your own strategy vs.
>> using JMS/AMQ?
>> 2. How well will AMQ perform compared to a generic file transfer
>> implementation?
>> 3. How much will the infrastructure for your implementation cost vs.
>> AMQ's?
>> 4. Will either serve your application's needs?
>> etc. etc. etc.
>>
>> --
>> Christopher G. Stach II
>>
>>
>>
>
1. The message would be lost. What else would happen? Use transactions
and resend.
2. See my original email.
--
Christopher G. Stach II
Re: Is so good ActiveMQ’s InputStream?
Posted by cafe <rm...@estudiantes.uci.cu>.
Actually those questions are opposite to my point. Let mi tell you:
My app need to send files (over 300mg) to different clients (over 100
clients in different PC) so I need only a strategy for sending and receiving
these files. Now my questions are:
1-What happen if a connection is lost when the files are being sending or
receiving?
2-What about the performance of activeMQ when it most manages these
transfers simultaneously?
Christopher G. Stach II wrote:
>
> cafe wrote:
>> sorry, the question is about Stream
>>
>> cafe wrote:
>>> Is so good ActiveMQ’s InputStream?
>>>
>>> My question is, if is better for transfer files between 300 MB and 500
>>> MB
>>> using activeMQ’s InputStream or to do that manually the programmer?
>>>
>>> Is more reliable let do the transfer to activeMQ?
>>>
>>>
>
> What else would it be about?
>
> I haven't seen any objective performance comparisons, so that just
> brings up more questions.
>
> 1. How much will it cost to design and implement your own strategy vs.
> using JMS/AMQ?
> 2. How well will AMQ perform compared to a generic file transfer
> implementation?
> 3. How much will the infrastructure for your implementation cost vs.
> AMQ's?
> 4. Will either serve your application's needs?
> etc. etc. etc.
>
> --
> Christopher G. Stach II
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-so-good-ActiveMQ%E2%80%99s-InputStream--tf3133811.html#a8684994
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Is so good ActiveMQ’s InputStream?
Posted by "Christopher G. Stach II" <cg...@ldsys.net>.
cafe wrote:
> sorry, the question is about Stream
>
> cafe wrote:
>> Is so good ActiveMQ’s InputStream?
>>
>> My question is, if is better for transfer files between 300 MB and 500 MB
>> using activeMQ’s InputStream or to do that manually the programmer?
>>
>> Is more reliable let do the transfer to activeMQ?
>>
>>
What else would it be about?
I haven't seen any objective performance comparisons, so that just
brings up more questions.
1. How much will it cost to design and implement your own strategy vs.
using JMS/AMQ?
2. How well will AMQ perform compared to a generic file transfer
implementation?
3. How much will the infrastructure for your implementation cost vs. AMQ's?
4. Will either serve your application's needs?
etc. etc. etc.
--
Christopher G. Stach II
Re: Is so good ActiveMQ’s InputStream?
Posted by cafe <rm...@estudiantes.uci.cu>.
sorry, the question is about Stream
cafe wrote:
>
> Is so good ActiveMQ’s InputStream?
>
> My question is, if is better for transfer files between 300 MB and 500 MB
> using activeMQ’s InputStream or to do that manually the programmer?
>
> Is more reliable let do the transfer to activeMQ?
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-so-good-ActiveMQ%E2%80%99s-InputStream--tf3133811.html#a8683717
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.